Characteristics of inspiratory and expiratory reactance in interstitial lung disease

Summary Background Forced oscillometry is a non-invasive method to measure respiratory resistance and reactance. In this study, we investigated the characteristics of measurements obtained with an impulse oscillation system (IOS) for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Method IOS and spir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2013-06, Vol.107 (6), p.875-882
Hauptverfasser: Sugiyama, A, Hattori, N, Haruta, Y, Nakamura, I, Nakagawa, M, Miyamoto, S, Onari, Y, Iwamoto, H, Ishikawa, N, Fujitaka, K, Murai, H, Kohno, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background Forced oscillometry is a non-invasive method to measure respiratory resistance and reactance. In this study, we investigated the characteristics of measurements obtained with an impulse oscillation system (IOS) for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Method IOS and spirometry were performed in 64 ILD patients, 54 asthma patients, 49 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, and 29 controls. Respiratory resistance and reactance were assessed as measurements averaged over several tidal breaths (whole-breath analysis) and as measurements separately averaged during inspiration and expiration (inspiratory–expiratory analysis). Results Whole-breath IOS analyses for ILD patients showed increased resistance at 5 Hz and decreased reactance at 5 Hz (X5) compared with controls, although these features were also found in asthma and COPD patients. Inspiratory–expiratory analysis demonstrated that the changes in X5 and reactance area (AX) between inspiration and expiration (ΔX5 and ΔAX, respectively) were significantly different from those in asthma patients, COPD patients, and controls. However, multiple linear regression analysis showed that the presence of ILD was independently associated with ΔX5, but not with ΔAX. Furthermore, ΔX5 was inversely correlated with vital capacity and diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide in ILD patients. Conclusions Our results suggest that ΔX5 is a characteristic feature of IOS measurements in ILD patients, which is clearly different from those in asthma and COPD patients. This within-breath X5 change in ILD might be associated with its severity and physiological abnormality, although further studies are needed to investigate its cause.
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.005