Modification of water application uniformity among closed circuit trickle irrigation systems

The aim of this research was determine the maximum application uniformity of closed circuit trickle irrigation systems designs. Laboratory tests carried out for Two types of closed circuits: a) One manifold for lateral lines or Closed circuits with One Manifold of Trikle Irrigation System (COMTIS);...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural sciences 2010-05, Vol.1 (1), p.1-9
Hauptverfasser: Mansour, Hani A.-G., Tayel, Mohamed Yousif, Abd El-Hady, Mohamed A., Lightfoot, David A., El-Gindy, Abdel-Ghany Mohamed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Agricultural sciences
container_volume 1
creator Mansour, Hani A.-G.
Tayel, Mohamed Yousif
Abd El-Hady, Mohamed A.
Lightfoot, David A.
El-Gindy, Abdel-Ghany Mohamed
description The aim of this research was determine the maximum application uniformity of closed circuit trickle irrigation systems designs. Laboratory tests carried out for Two types of closed circuits: a) One manifold for lateral lines or Closed circuits with One Manifold of Trikle Irrigation System (COMTIS); b) Closed circuits with Two Manifolds of Trikle Irrigation System (CTMTIS), and c) Traditional Trikle Irrigation System (TTIS) as a control. Three lengths of lateral lines were used, 40, 60, and 80 meters. PE tubes lateral lines: 16 mm diameter; 30 cm emitters distance, and GR built-in emitters 4 lph when operating pressure 1 bar. Experiments were conducted at the Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., ARC, MALR, Egypt. With COMTIS the emitter flow rate was 4.07, 3.51, and 3.59 lph compared to 4.18, 3.72, and 3.71 lph with CTMTIS and 3.21, 2.6, and 2.16 lph with TTIS (lateral lengths 40, 60, and 80 meters respectively). Uniformity varied widely within individual lateral lengths and between circuit types. Under CTMTIS uniformity values were 97.74, 95.14, and 92.03 %; with COMTIS they were 95.73, 89.45, and 83.25 %; and with TTIS they were 88.27, 84.73, and 80.53 % (for lateral lengths 40, 60, 80 meters respectively). The greatest uniformity was observed under CTMTIS and COMTIS when using the shortest lateral length 40 meters, then lateral length 60 meters, while the lowest value was observed when using lateral length 80 meters this result depends on the physical and hydraulic characteristics of the emitter and lateral line. CTMTIS was more uniform than either COMTIS or TTIS. Friction losses were decreased with CTMTIS in the emitter laterals at lengths 40 meters compared to TTIS and COMTIS. Therefore, differences may be related to increased friction losses when using TDIS and COMDIS.
doi_str_mv 10.4236/as.2010.11001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1348481608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1348481608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1101-7b718519bae3dad69eea4e5ef6020b9df336802d71148f3f285d448b46dd625e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1PwzAMxSMEEtPYkXuOXDriJs2yI5r4koa4wA0pShNnCrRNSVqh_fd0DPDl2dbzk_Uj5BLYUpRcXpu8LNk0ADAGJ2RWQiULVUk4_e8rfk4WOb-zqSTjAtSMvD1FF3ywZgixo9HTLzNgoqbvm7_l2AUfUxuGPTVt7HbUNjGjozYkO4aBDinYjwZpSCnsjid5nwds8wU586bJuPjVOXm9u33ZPBTb5_vHzc22sNO3UKzqFagK1rVB7oyTa0QjsEIvWcnqtfOcS8VKtwIQynNfqsoJoWohnZNlhXxOro65fYqfI-ZBtyFbbBrTYRyzBi6UUCCZmqzF0WpTzDmh130KrUl7DUwfQGqT9QGk_gHJvwEjf2dE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1348481608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modification of water application uniformity among closed circuit trickle irrigation systems</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Mansour, Hani A.-G. ; Tayel, Mohamed Yousif ; Abd El-Hady, Mohamed A. ; Lightfoot, David A. ; El-Gindy, Abdel-Ghany Mohamed</creator><creatorcontrib>Mansour, Hani A.-G. ; Tayel, Mohamed Yousif ; Abd El-Hady, Mohamed A. ; Lightfoot, David A. ; El-Gindy, Abdel-Ghany Mohamed</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this research was determine the maximum application uniformity of closed circuit trickle irrigation systems designs. Laboratory tests carried out for Two types of closed circuits: a) One manifold for lateral lines or Closed circuits with One Manifold of Trikle Irrigation System (COMTIS); b) Closed circuits with Two Manifolds of Trikle Irrigation System (CTMTIS), and c) Traditional Trikle Irrigation System (TTIS) as a control. Three lengths of lateral lines were used, 40, 60, and 80 meters. PE tubes lateral lines: 16 mm diameter; 30 cm emitters distance, and GR built-in emitters 4 lph when operating pressure 1 bar. Experiments were conducted at the Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., ARC, MALR, Egypt. With COMTIS the emitter flow rate was 4.07, 3.51, and 3.59 lph compared to 4.18, 3.72, and 3.71 lph with CTMTIS and 3.21, 2.6, and 2.16 lph with TTIS (lateral lengths 40, 60, and 80 meters respectively). Uniformity varied widely within individual lateral lengths and between circuit types. Under CTMTIS uniformity values were 97.74, 95.14, and 92.03 %; with COMTIS they were 95.73, 89.45, and 83.25 %; and with TTIS they were 88.27, 84.73, and 80.53 % (for lateral lengths 40, 60, 80 meters respectively). The greatest uniformity was observed under CTMTIS and COMTIS when using the shortest lateral length 40 meters, then lateral length 60 meters, while the lowest value was observed when using lateral length 80 meters this result depends on the physical and hydraulic characteristics of the emitter and lateral line. CTMTIS was more uniform than either COMTIS or TTIS. Friction losses were decreased with CTMTIS in the emitter laterals at lengths 40 meters compared to TTIS and COMTIS. Therefore, differences may be related to increased friction losses when using TDIS and COMDIS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-8553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-8561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4236/as.2010.11001</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Agricultural sciences, 2010-05, Vol.1 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1101-7b718519bae3dad69eea4e5ef6020b9df336802d71148f3f285d448b46dd625e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mansour, Hani A.-G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tayel, Mohamed Yousif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abd El-Hady, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lightfoot, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Gindy, Abdel-Ghany Mohamed</creatorcontrib><title>Modification of water application uniformity among closed circuit trickle irrigation systems</title><title>Agricultural sciences</title><description>The aim of this research was determine the maximum application uniformity of closed circuit trickle irrigation systems designs. Laboratory tests carried out for Two types of closed circuits: a) One manifold for lateral lines or Closed circuits with One Manifold of Trikle Irrigation System (COMTIS); b) Closed circuits with Two Manifolds of Trikle Irrigation System (CTMTIS), and c) Traditional Trikle Irrigation System (TTIS) as a control. Three lengths of lateral lines were used, 40, 60, and 80 meters. PE tubes lateral lines: 16 mm diameter; 30 cm emitters distance, and GR built-in emitters 4 lph when operating pressure 1 bar. Experiments were conducted at the Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., ARC, MALR, Egypt. With COMTIS the emitter flow rate was 4.07, 3.51, and 3.59 lph compared to 4.18, 3.72, and 3.71 lph with CTMTIS and 3.21, 2.6, and 2.16 lph with TTIS (lateral lengths 40, 60, and 80 meters respectively). Uniformity varied widely within individual lateral lengths and between circuit types. Under CTMTIS uniformity values were 97.74, 95.14, and 92.03 %; with COMTIS they were 95.73, 89.45, and 83.25 %; and with TTIS they were 88.27, 84.73, and 80.53 % (for lateral lengths 40, 60, 80 meters respectively). The greatest uniformity was observed under CTMTIS and COMTIS when using the shortest lateral length 40 meters, then lateral length 60 meters, while the lowest value was observed when using lateral length 80 meters this result depends on the physical and hydraulic characteristics of the emitter and lateral line. CTMTIS was more uniform than either COMTIS or TTIS. Friction losses were decreased with CTMTIS in the emitter laterals at lengths 40 meters compared to TTIS and COMTIS. Therefore, differences may be related to increased friction losses when using TDIS and COMDIS.</description><issn>2156-8553</issn><issn>2156-8561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1PwzAMxSMEEtPYkXuOXDriJs2yI5r4koa4wA0pShNnCrRNSVqh_fd0DPDl2dbzk_Uj5BLYUpRcXpu8LNk0ADAGJ2RWQiULVUk4_e8rfk4WOb-zqSTjAtSMvD1FF3ywZgixo9HTLzNgoqbvm7_l2AUfUxuGPTVt7HbUNjGjozYkO4aBDinYjwZpSCnsjid5nwds8wU586bJuPjVOXm9u33ZPBTb5_vHzc22sNO3UKzqFagK1rVB7oyTa0QjsEIvWcnqtfOcS8VKtwIQynNfqsoJoWohnZNlhXxOro65fYqfI-ZBtyFbbBrTYRyzBi6UUCCZmqzF0WpTzDmh130KrUl7DUwfQGqT9QGk_gHJvwEjf2dE</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Mansour, Hani A.-G.</creator><creator>Tayel, Mohamed Yousif</creator><creator>Abd El-Hady, Mohamed A.</creator><creator>Lightfoot, David A.</creator><creator>El-Gindy, Abdel-Ghany Mohamed</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Modification of water application uniformity among closed circuit trickle irrigation systems</title><author>Mansour, Hani A.-G. ; Tayel, Mohamed Yousif ; Abd El-Hady, Mohamed A. ; Lightfoot, David A. ; El-Gindy, Abdel-Ghany Mohamed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1101-7b718519bae3dad69eea4e5ef6020b9df336802d71148f3f285d448b46dd625e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mansour, Hani A.-G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tayel, Mohamed Yousif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abd El-Hady, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lightfoot, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Gindy, Abdel-Ghany Mohamed</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Agricultural sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mansour, Hani A.-G.</au><au>Tayel, Mohamed Yousif</au><au>Abd El-Hady, Mohamed A.</au><au>Lightfoot, David A.</au><au>El-Gindy, Abdel-Ghany Mohamed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modification of water application uniformity among closed circuit trickle irrigation systems</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural sciences</jtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>2156-8553</issn><eissn>2156-8561</eissn><abstract>The aim of this research was determine the maximum application uniformity of closed circuit trickle irrigation systems designs. Laboratory tests carried out for Two types of closed circuits: a) One manifold for lateral lines or Closed circuits with One Manifold of Trikle Irrigation System (COMTIS); b) Closed circuits with Two Manifolds of Trikle Irrigation System (CTMTIS), and c) Traditional Trikle Irrigation System (TTIS) as a control. Three lengths of lateral lines were used, 40, 60, and 80 meters. PE tubes lateral lines: 16 mm diameter; 30 cm emitters distance, and GR built-in emitters 4 lph when operating pressure 1 bar. Experiments were conducted at the Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., ARC, MALR, Egypt. With COMTIS the emitter flow rate was 4.07, 3.51, and 3.59 lph compared to 4.18, 3.72, and 3.71 lph with CTMTIS and 3.21, 2.6, and 2.16 lph with TTIS (lateral lengths 40, 60, and 80 meters respectively). Uniformity varied widely within individual lateral lengths and between circuit types. Under CTMTIS uniformity values were 97.74, 95.14, and 92.03 %; with COMTIS they were 95.73, 89.45, and 83.25 %; and with TTIS they were 88.27, 84.73, and 80.53 % (for lateral lengths 40, 60, 80 meters respectively). The greatest uniformity was observed under CTMTIS and COMTIS when using the shortest lateral length 40 meters, then lateral length 60 meters, while the lowest value was observed when using lateral length 80 meters this result depends on the physical and hydraulic characteristics of the emitter and lateral line. CTMTIS was more uniform than either COMTIS or TTIS. Friction losses were decreased with CTMTIS in the emitter laterals at lengths 40 meters compared to TTIS and COMTIS. Therefore, differences may be related to increased friction losses when using TDIS and COMDIS.</abstract><doi>10.4236/as.2010.11001</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2156-8553
ispartof Agricultural sciences, 2010-05, Vol.1 (1), p.1-9
issn 2156-8553
2156-8561
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1348481608
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Modification of water application uniformity among closed circuit trickle irrigation systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A17%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modification%20of%20water%20application%20uniformity%20among%20closed%20circuit%20trickle%20irrigation%20systems&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20sciences&rft.au=Mansour,%20Hani%20A.-G.&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=2156-8553&rft.eissn=2156-8561&rft_id=info:doi/10.4236/as.2010.11001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1348481608%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1348481608&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true