Evaluating direct energy savings and market transformation effects: A decade of technical design assistance in the northwestern USA

This paper documents the direct energy savings and energy efficiency market transformation impacts of a multi-state design assistance program in the northwestern US. The paper addresses four specific aims. (1) It provides a conservative and justified estimate of the direct energy savings associated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2013-01, Vol.52, p.342-353
Hauptverfasser: Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin, Brown, G.Z., Burpee, Heather, Djunaedy, Ery, Gladics, Gunnar, Kline, Jeff, Loveland, Joel, Meek, Christopher, Thimmanna, Harshana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 353
container_issue
container_start_page 342
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 52
creator Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin
Brown, G.Z.
Burpee, Heather
Djunaedy, Ery
Gladics, Gunnar
Kline, Jeff
Loveland, Joel
Meek, Christopher
Thimmanna, Harshana
description This paper documents the direct energy savings and energy efficiency market transformation impacts of a multi-state design assistance program in the northwestern US. The paper addresses four specific aims. (1) It provides a conservative and justified estimate of the direct energy savings associated with design assistance activities of a market transformation program from 2001 to 2010. (2) It provides a rigorous methodology to evaluate direct energy savings associated with design assistance market transformation programs. (3) It provides a low-cost replicable method to predict energy savings in new buildings by evaluating the integrated design process. (4) It provides quantitative indicators useful for estimating indirect energy savings from market transformation. Applying the recommended analysis method and assuming a 12-year measure life, the direct energy savings of the population (626 buildings; 51,262,000ft2) is estimated as 45.3aMW (average megawatts) (electric), and 265,738.089therms (non-electric). If the entire program budget were divided into the electric savings only, the Lab Network cost per kWh saved ranged from $0.0016 to $0.003 using the recommended method and $0.0092/kWh using the most conservative method. These figures do not isolate contextual influences or represent total resource cost. Statistically significant correlations (r2=0.1−0.3) between integrated design scores and energy savings are reported. ► Estimated direct energy savings of a market transformation program are presented. ► A methodology to evaluate energy savings from multiple baselines is documented. ► Level of integrated design can be used to estimate energy savings in new buildings. ► Quantitative evaluation indicators of efficiency market transformation are provided. ► Electric energy saved from design assistance costs between $0.0016 and $0.0092/kWh.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347802505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421512008129</els_id><sourcerecordid>1272729979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-1d77132f93d52320bfeec2f313dbf7881e2e2b1cf9085a2bd343a4d818448eed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQQBtRcFz9BR4MiOCl23x0d7oFD8OyuwoLHtY5h0xSmcnYk4xJZmTP_nFr7MWDB5UcAsWrSlVeVdVLRhtGWf9u10A4xKnhlPGGjg0V8lG1YIMUdS-lfFwtqKCsbjnrnlbPct5RStthbBfVj6uTno66-LAh1icwhUCAtLknWZ8wmIkOlux1-gqFlKRDdjHtkY-BgHPI5_dkSSwYbYFERwqYbfBGTxjLfhOIztnnooMB4gMpWyAhprL9DrlACmR1t3xePXF6yvDi4b6oVtdXXy4_1refbz5dLm9r0zFZamalZIK7UdiOC07XDsBwJ5iwayeHgQEHvmbGjXToNF9b0Qrd2oENbTsAWHFRvZ3rHlL8dsT31d5nA9OkA8RjVky0cqC8o92_US7xjKMc_wulcuxbiejrP9BdPKaAMyPFuRh60TGkxEyZFHNO4NQheTRwrxhVZ91qp37pVmfdio4KdWPWm4faOuPvO1RlfP6dyntseOTnyV7NnNNR6U1CZnWHhXpcCcnb_lzpw0wAujh5SCobD-hv3g9lo_9rJz8BLk3K2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1222386351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating direct energy savings and market transformation effects: A decade of technical design assistance in the northwestern USA</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin ; Brown, G.Z. ; Burpee, Heather ; Djunaedy, Ery ; Gladics, Gunnar ; Kline, Jeff ; Loveland, Joel ; Meek, Christopher ; Thimmanna, Harshana</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin ; Brown, G.Z. ; Burpee, Heather ; Djunaedy, Ery ; Gladics, Gunnar ; Kline, Jeff ; Loveland, Joel ; Meek, Christopher ; Thimmanna, Harshana</creatorcontrib><description>This paper documents the direct energy savings and energy efficiency market transformation impacts of a multi-state design assistance program in the northwestern US. The paper addresses four specific aims. (1) It provides a conservative and justified estimate of the direct energy savings associated with design assistance activities of a market transformation program from 2001 to 2010. (2) It provides a rigorous methodology to evaluate direct energy savings associated with design assistance market transformation programs. (3) It provides a low-cost replicable method to predict energy savings in new buildings by evaluating the integrated design process. (4) It provides quantitative indicators useful for estimating indirect energy savings from market transformation. Applying the recommended analysis method and assuming a 12-year measure life, the direct energy savings of the population (626 buildings; 51,262,000ft2) is estimated as 45.3aMW (average megawatts) (electric), and 265,738.089therms (non-electric). If the entire program budget were divided into the electric savings only, the Lab Network cost per kWh saved ranged from $0.0016 to $0.003 using the recommended method and $0.0092/kWh using the most conservative method. These figures do not isolate contextual influences or represent total resource cost. Statistically significant correlations (r2=0.1−0.3) between integrated design scores and energy savings are reported. ► Estimated direct energy savings of a market transformation program are presented. ► A methodology to evaluate energy savings from multiple baselines is documented. ► Level of integrated design can be used to estimate energy savings in new buildings. ► Quantitative evaluation indicators of efficiency market transformation are provided. ► Electric energy saved from design assistance costs between $0.0016 and $0.0092/kWh.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.037</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Building technical equipments ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; Cost ; Cost control ; Cost estimates ; Economic data ; Energy ; Energy conservation ; Energy economics ; Energy efficiency ; Energy management and energy conservation in building ; Energy market ; Energy policy ; Environmental engineering ; Evaluation ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Green buildings ; Market transformation ; Markets ; Methodology. Modelling ; Population ; process design ; Saving ; Studies ; Technical cooperation ; U.S.A ; United States</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2013-01, Vol.52, p.342-353</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-1d77132f93d52320bfeec2f313dbf7881e2e2b1cf9085a2bd343a4d818448eed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-1d77132f93d52320bfeec2f313dbf7881e2e2b1cf9085a2bd343a4d818448eed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421512008129$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27842,27843,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26727925$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, G.Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burpee, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djunaedy, Ery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gladics, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loveland, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meek, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thimmanna, Harshana</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating direct energy savings and market transformation effects: A decade of technical design assistance in the northwestern USA</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>This paper documents the direct energy savings and energy efficiency market transformation impacts of a multi-state design assistance program in the northwestern US. The paper addresses four specific aims. (1) It provides a conservative and justified estimate of the direct energy savings associated with design assistance activities of a market transformation program from 2001 to 2010. (2) It provides a rigorous methodology to evaluate direct energy savings associated with design assistance market transformation programs. (3) It provides a low-cost replicable method to predict energy savings in new buildings by evaluating the integrated design process. (4) It provides quantitative indicators useful for estimating indirect energy savings from market transformation. Applying the recommended analysis method and assuming a 12-year measure life, the direct energy savings of the population (626 buildings; 51,262,000ft2) is estimated as 45.3aMW (average megawatts) (electric), and 265,738.089therms (non-electric). If the entire program budget were divided into the electric savings only, the Lab Network cost per kWh saved ranged from $0.0016 to $0.003 using the recommended method and $0.0092/kWh using the most conservative method. These figures do not isolate contextual influences or represent total resource cost. Statistically significant correlations (r2=0.1−0.3) between integrated design scores and energy savings are reported. ► Estimated direct energy savings of a market transformation program are presented. ► A methodology to evaluate energy savings from multiple baselines is documented. ► Level of integrated design can be used to estimate energy savings in new buildings. ► Quantitative evaluation indicators of efficiency market transformation are provided. ► Electric energy saved from design assistance costs between $0.0016 and $0.0092/kWh.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building technical equipments</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy management and energy conservation in building</subject><subject>Energy market</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Market transformation</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Methodology. Modelling</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>process design</subject><subject>Saving</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technical cooperation</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQQBtRcFz9BR4MiOCl23x0d7oFD8OyuwoLHtY5h0xSmcnYk4xJZmTP_nFr7MWDB5UcAsWrSlVeVdVLRhtGWf9u10A4xKnhlPGGjg0V8lG1YIMUdS-lfFwtqKCsbjnrnlbPct5RStthbBfVj6uTno66-LAh1icwhUCAtLknWZ8wmIkOlux1-gqFlKRDdjHtkY-BgHPI5_dkSSwYbYFERwqYbfBGTxjLfhOIztnnooMB4gMpWyAhprL9DrlACmR1t3xePXF6yvDi4b6oVtdXXy4_1refbz5dLm9r0zFZamalZIK7UdiOC07XDsBwJ5iwayeHgQEHvmbGjXToNF9b0Qrd2oENbTsAWHFRvZ3rHlL8dsT31d5nA9OkA8RjVky0cqC8o92_US7xjKMc_wulcuxbiejrP9BdPKaAMyPFuRh60TGkxEyZFHNO4NQheTRwrxhVZ91qp37pVmfdio4KdWPWm4faOuPvO1RlfP6dyntseOTnyV7NnNNR6U1CZnWHhXpcCcnb_lzpw0wAujh5SCobD-hv3g9lo_9rJz8BLk3K2A</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin</creator><creator>Brown, G.Z.</creator><creator>Burpee, Heather</creator><creator>Djunaedy, Ery</creator><creator>Gladics, Gunnar</creator><creator>Kline, Jeff</creator><creator>Loveland, Joel</creator><creator>Meek, Christopher</creator><creator>Thimmanna, Harshana</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Evaluating direct energy savings and market transformation effects: A decade of technical design assistance in the northwestern USA</title><author>Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin ; Brown, G.Z. ; Burpee, Heather ; Djunaedy, Ery ; Gladics, Gunnar ; Kline, Jeff ; Loveland, Joel ; Meek, Christopher ; Thimmanna, Harshana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-1d77132f93d52320bfeec2f313dbf7881e2e2b1cf9085a2bd343a4d818448eed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building technical equipments</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy management and energy conservation in building</topic><topic>Energy market</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Market transformation</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Methodology. Modelling</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>process design</topic><topic>Saving</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technical cooperation</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, G.Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burpee, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djunaedy, Ery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gladics, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loveland, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meek, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thimmanna, Harshana</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin</au><au>Brown, G.Z.</au><au>Burpee, Heather</au><au>Djunaedy, Ery</au><au>Gladics, Gunnar</au><au>Kline, Jeff</au><au>Loveland, Joel</au><au>Meek, Christopher</au><au>Thimmanna, Harshana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating direct energy savings and market transformation effects: A decade of technical design assistance in the northwestern USA</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>342</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>342-353</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>This paper documents the direct energy savings and energy efficiency market transformation impacts of a multi-state design assistance program in the northwestern US. The paper addresses four specific aims. (1) It provides a conservative and justified estimate of the direct energy savings associated with design assistance activities of a market transformation program from 2001 to 2010. (2) It provides a rigorous methodology to evaluate direct energy savings associated with design assistance market transformation programs. (3) It provides a low-cost replicable method to predict energy savings in new buildings by evaluating the integrated design process. (4) It provides quantitative indicators useful for estimating indirect energy savings from market transformation. Applying the recommended analysis method and assuming a 12-year measure life, the direct energy savings of the population (626 buildings; 51,262,000ft2) is estimated as 45.3aMW (average megawatts) (electric), and 265,738.089therms (non-electric). If the entire program budget were divided into the electric savings only, the Lab Network cost per kWh saved ranged from $0.0016 to $0.003 using the recommended method and $0.0092/kWh using the most conservative method. These figures do not isolate contextual influences or represent total resource cost. Statistically significant correlations (r2=0.1−0.3) between integrated design scores and energy savings are reported. ► Estimated direct energy savings of a market transformation program are presented. ► A methodology to evaluate energy savings from multiple baselines is documented. ► Level of integrated design can be used to estimate energy savings in new buildings. ► Quantitative evaluation indicators of efficiency market transformation are provided. ► Electric energy saved from design assistance costs between $0.0016 and $0.0092/kWh.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.037</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2013-01, Vol.52, p.342-353
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347802505
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Building technical equipments
Buildings
Buildings. Public works
Correlation
Correlation analysis
Cost
Cost control
Cost estimates
Economic data
Energy
Energy conservation
Energy economics
Energy efficiency
Energy management and energy conservation in building
Energy market
Energy policy
Environmental engineering
Evaluation
Exact sciences and technology
General, economic and professional studies
Green buildings
Market transformation
Markets
Methodology. Modelling
Population
process design
Saving
Studies
Technical cooperation
U.S.A
United States
title Evaluating direct energy savings and market transformation effects: A decade of technical design assistance in the northwestern USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A32%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20direct%20energy%20savings%20and%20market%20transformation%20effects:%20A%20decade%20of%20technical%20design%20assistance%20in%20the%20northwestern%20USA&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Van%20Den%20Wymelenberg,%20Kevin&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=342-353&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1272729979%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1222386351&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421512008129&rfr_iscdi=true