Relating R&D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has the potential to play a major role in the stabilization of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. To develop the capture technology from its current demonstration phase towards commercial maturity, significant funding is directed to CCS, such as the EU’s €4.5bn NER300 f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2013-01, Vol.52, p.439-452
Hauptverfasser: Lohwasser, Richard, Madlener, Reinhard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 452
container_issue
container_start_page 439
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 52
creator Lohwasser, Richard
Madlener, Reinhard
description Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has the potential to play a major role in the stabilization of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. To develop the capture technology from its current demonstration phase towards commercial maturity, significant funding is directed to CCS, such as the EU’s €4.5bn NER300 fund. However, we know little about how this funding relates to market diffusion of CCS. This paper addresses that question. We initially review past learning effects from both capacity installations and R&D efforts for a similar technology using the concept of two-factor learning. We apply the obtained learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching rates to CCS in the electricity market model Hector, which simulates 19 European countries hourly until 2040, to understand the impact of learning and associated policies on CCS market diffusion. We evaluate the effectiveness of policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching by relating the policy budget to the realized CCS capacity and find that, at lower policy cost, both methods are about equally effective. At higher spending levels, policies promoting learning-by-doing are more effective. Overall, policy effectiveness increases in low CO2 price scenarios, but the CO2 price still remains the key prerequisite for the economic competitiveness, even with major policy support. ► Identified two-factor learning rates for CCS through empirical data from flue gas desulphurization. ► Evaluated effectiveness of CCS stimulation policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-researching. ► Both policy types are about equally effective with small policy budgets. ► Policies addressing learning-by-doing, e.g., subsidies to CCS projects, are more effective with large policy budgets. ► Analysis deployed Hector power market model that simulates 19 European countries on hourly granularity until 2040.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347802256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421512008439</els_id><sourcerecordid>2833409111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e02e17362ca0a2b3f4e380065791dfcbc3634987dd75cd3aa7ad0425c8ee25613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcGKFDEQhoMoOK4-gQcDouyl20rS3UkfPMjoqrAg7LrgLWTTldmMPcmYpFd8ezM7iwcP4qkuX338VT8hzxm0DNjwZtti2Me55cB4C2MLA3tAVkxJ0QxSyodkBQJY03HWPyZPct4CQKfGbkW-XeBsig8bevH6PTVhoj7cYi47DIVWpbceMy2RrteXdGfSdyx08s4t2cdAy02Ky-aGlp-xccaWmOiMJoXqe0oeOTNnfHY_T8jV2Yev60_N-ZePn9fvzhvbC1UaBI5MioFbA4ZfC9ehUABDL0c2OXttxSC6Uclpkr2dhDHSTNDx3ipE3g9MnJDTo3ef4o-lJtc7ny3OswkYl6yZ6KQCXtn_QFmllJR9RV_-hW7jkkI9RDPOuVD9KEWlxJGyKeac0Ol98vVJvzQDfShGb_VdMfpQjIZRw13iV_duk62ZXTLB-vxnlQ-Sy1Ec7C-OnDNRm02qzNVlFQ21PMk7eTjo7ZHA-uBbj0nnWlewOPmEtugp-n8m-Q3RFaxO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1222385973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relating R&amp;D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lohwasser, Richard ; Madlener, Reinhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Lohwasser, Richard ; Madlener, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><description>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has the potential to play a major role in the stabilization of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. To develop the capture technology from its current demonstration phase towards commercial maturity, significant funding is directed to CCS, such as the EU’s €4.5bn NER300 fund. However, we know little about how this funding relates to market diffusion of CCS. This paper addresses that question. We initially review past learning effects from both capacity installations and R&amp;D efforts for a similar technology using the concept of two-factor learning. We apply the obtained learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching rates to CCS in the electricity market model Hector, which simulates 19 European countries hourly until 2040, to understand the impact of learning and associated policies on CCS market diffusion. We evaluate the effectiveness of policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching by relating the policy budget to the realized CCS capacity and find that, at lower policy cost, both methods are about equally effective. At higher spending levels, policies promoting learning-by-doing are more effective. Overall, policy effectiveness increases in low CO2 price scenarios, but the CO2 price still remains the key prerequisite for the economic competitiveness, even with major policy support. ► Identified two-factor learning rates for CCS through empirical data from flue gas desulphurization. ► Evaluated effectiveness of CCS stimulation policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-researching. ► Both policy types are about equally effective with small policy budgets. ► Policies addressing learning-by-doing, e.g., subsidies to CCS projects, are more effective with large policy budgets. ► Analysis deployed Hector power market model that simulates 19 European countries on hourly granularity until 2040.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.061</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries ; Applied sciences ; carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; CCS ; Cost ; Economic data ; Effectiveness studies ; Electric energy ; Electric power ; electricity ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; European Union ; Exact sciences and technology ; Federal funding ; funding ; Gases ; General, economic and professional studies ; General. Regulations. Norms. Economy ; greenhouse gases ; Investments ; issues and policy ; Learning ; Markets ; Metering. Control ; Methodology. Modelling ; Policy effectiveness ; Prices ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Storage ; Technology ; Two-factor-learning</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2013-01, Vol.52, p.439-452</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e02e17362ca0a2b3f4e380065791dfcbc3634987dd75cd3aa7ad0425c8ee25613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e02e17362ca0a2b3f4e380065791dfcbc3634987dd75cd3aa7ad0425c8ee25613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27865,27866,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26727933$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lohwasser, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madlener, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><title>Relating R&amp;D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has the potential to play a major role in the stabilization of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. To develop the capture technology from its current demonstration phase towards commercial maturity, significant funding is directed to CCS, such as the EU’s €4.5bn NER300 fund. However, we know little about how this funding relates to market diffusion of CCS. This paper addresses that question. We initially review past learning effects from both capacity installations and R&amp;D efforts for a similar technology using the concept of two-factor learning. We apply the obtained learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching rates to CCS in the electricity market model Hector, which simulates 19 European countries hourly until 2040, to understand the impact of learning and associated policies on CCS market diffusion. We evaluate the effectiveness of policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching by relating the policy budget to the realized CCS capacity and find that, at lower policy cost, both methods are about equally effective. At higher spending levels, policies promoting learning-by-doing are more effective. Overall, policy effectiveness increases in low CO2 price scenarios, but the CO2 price still remains the key prerequisite for the economic competitiveness, even with major policy support. ► Identified two-factor learning rates for CCS through empirical data from flue gas desulphurization. ► Evaluated effectiveness of CCS stimulation policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-researching. ► Both policy types are about equally effective with small policy budgets. ► Policies addressing learning-by-doing, e.g., subsidies to CCS projects, are more effective with large policy budgets. ► Analysis deployed Hector power market model that simulates 19 European countries on hourly granularity until 2040.</description><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>CCS</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>electricity</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Federal funding</subject><subject>funding</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>General. Regulations. Norms. Economy</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Metering. Control</subject><subject>Methodology. Modelling</subject><subject>Policy effectiveness</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Two-factor-learning</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcGKFDEQhoMoOK4-gQcDouyl20rS3UkfPMjoqrAg7LrgLWTTldmMPcmYpFd8ezM7iwcP4qkuX338VT8hzxm0DNjwZtti2Me55cB4C2MLA3tAVkxJ0QxSyodkBQJY03HWPyZPct4CQKfGbkW-XeBsig8bevH6PTVhoj7cYi47DIVWpbceMy2RrteXdGfSdyx08s4t2cdAy02Ky-aGlp-xccaWmOiMJoXqe0oeOTNnfHY_T8jV2Yev60_N-ZePn9fvzhvbC1UaBI5MioFbA4ZfC9ehUABDL0c2OXttxSC6Uclpkr2dhDHSTNDx3ipE3g9MnJDTo3ef4o-lJtc7ny3OswkYl6yZ6KQCXtn_QFmllJR9RV_-hW7jkkI9RDPOuVD9KEWlxJGyKeac0Ol98vVJvzQDfShGb_VdMfpQjIZRw13iV_duk62ZXTLB-vxnlQ-Sy1Ec7C-OnDNRm02qzNVlFQ21PMk7eTjo7ZHA-uBbj0nnWlewOPmEtugp-n8m-Q3RFaxO</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Lohwasser, Richard</creator><creator>Madlener, Reinhard</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Relating R&amp;D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning</title><author>Lohwasser, Richard ; Madlener, Reinhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e02e17362ca0a2b3f4e380065791dfcbc3634987dd75cd3aa7ad0425c8ee25613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>CCS</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>electricity</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Federal funding</topic><topic>funding</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>General. Regulations. Norms. Economy</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Metering. Control</topic><topic>Methodology. Modelling</topic><topic>Policy effectiveness</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Two-factor-learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lohwasser, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madlener, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lohwasser, Richard</au><au>Madlener, Reinhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relating R&amp;D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>439</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>439-452</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has the potential to play a major role in the stabilization of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. To develop the capture technology from its current demonstration phase towards commercial maturity, significant funding is directed to CCS, such as the EU’s €4.5bn NER300 fund. However, we know little about how this funding relates to market diffusion of CCS. This paper addresses that question. We initially review past learning effects from both capacity installations and R&amp;D efforts for a similar technology using the concept of two-factor learning. We apply the obtained learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching rates to CCS in the electricity market model Hector, which simulates 19 European countries hourly until 2040, to understand the impact of learning and associated policies on CCS market diffusion. We evaluate the effectiveness of policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching by relating the policy budget to the realized CCS capacity and find that, at lower policy cost, both methods are about equally effective. At higher spending levels, policies promoting learning-by-doing are more effective. Overall, policy effectiveness increases in low CO2 price scenarios, but the CO2 price still remains the key prerequisite for the economic competitiveness, even with major policy support. ► Identified two-factor learning rates for CCS through empirical data from flue gas desulphurization. ► Evaluated effectiveness of CCS stimulation policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-researching. ► Both policy types are about equally effective with small policy budgets. ► Policies addressing learning-by-doing, e.g., subsidies to CCS projects, are more effective with large policy budgets. ► Analysis deployed Hector power market model that simulates 19 European countries on hourly granularity until 2040.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.061</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2013-01, Vol.52, p.439-452
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347802256
source PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Air pollution caused by fuel industries
Applied sciences
carbon dioxide
Carbon sequestration
CCS
Cost
Economic data
Effectiveness studies
Electric energy
Electric power
electricity
Energy
Energy economics
Energy policy
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
European Union
Exact sciences and technology
Federal funding
funding
Gases
General, economic and professional studies
General. Regulations. Norms. Economy
greenhouse gases
Investments
issues and policy
Learning
Markets
Metering. Control
Methodology. Modelling
Policy effectiveness
Prices
R&D
Research & development
Storage
Technology
Two-factor-learning
title Relating R&D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A38%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relating%20R&D%20and%20investment%20policies%20to%20CCS%20market%20diffusion%20through%20two-factor%20learning&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Lohwasser,%20Richard&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=439-452&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2833409111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1222385973&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421512008439&rfr_iscdi=true