Relating R&D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has the potential to play a major role in the stabilization of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. To develop the capture technology from its current demonstration phase towards commercial maturity, significant funding is directed to CCS, such as the EU’s €4.5bn NER300 f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2013-01, Vol.52, p.439-452 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 452 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 439 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Lohwasser, Richard Madlener, Reinhard |
description | Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has the potential to play a major role in the stabilization of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. To develop the capture technology from its current demonstration phase towards commercial maturity, significant funding is directed to CCS, such as the EU’s €4.5bn NER300 fund. However, we know little about how this funding relates to market diffusion of CCS. This paper addresses that question. We initially review past learning effects from both capacity installations and R&D efforts for a similar technology using the concept of two-factor learning. We apply the obtained learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching rates to CCS in the electricity market model Hector, which simulates 19 European countries hourly until 2040, to understand the impact of learning and associated policies on CCS market diffusion. We evaluate the effectiveness of policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching by relating the policy budget to the realized CCS capacity and find that, at lower policy cost, both methods are about equally effective. At higher spending levels, policies promoting learning-by-doing are more effective. Overall, policy effectiveness increases in low CO2 price scenarios, but the CO2 price still remains the key prerequisite for the economic competitiveness, even with major policy support.
► Identified two-factor learning rates for CCS through empirical data from flue gas desulphurization. ► Evaluated effectiveness of CCS stimulation policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-researching. ► Both policy types are about equally effective with small policy budgets. ► Policies addressing learning-by-doing, e.g., subsidies to CCS projects, are more effective with large policy budgets. ► Analysis deployed Hector power market model that simulates 19 European countries on hourly granularity until 2040. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.061 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347802256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421512008439</els_id><sourcerecordid>2833409111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e02e17362ca0a2b3f4e380065791dfcbc3634987dd75cd3aa7ad0425c8ee25613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcGKFDEQhoMoOK4-gQcDouyl20rS3UkfPMjoqrAg7LrgLWTTldmMPcmYpFd8ezM7iwcP4qkuX338VT8hzxm0DNjwZtti2Me55cB4C2MLA3tAVkxJ0QxSyodkBQJY03HWPyZPct4CQKfGbkW-XeBsig8bevH6PTVhoj7cYi47DIVWpbceMy2RrteXdGfSdyx08s4t2cdAy02Ky-aGlp-xccaWmOiMJoXqe0oeOTNnfHY_T8jV2Yev60_N-ZePn9fvzhvbC1UaBI5MioFbA4ZfC9ehUABDL0c2OXttxSC6Uclpkr2dhDHSTNDx3ipE3g9MnJDTo3ef4o-lJtc7ny3OswkYl6yZ6KQCXtn_QFmllJR9RV_-hW7jkkI9RDPOuVD9KEWlxJGyKeac0Ol98vVJvzQDfShGb_VdMfpQjIZRw13iV_duk62ZXTLB-vxnlQ-Sy1Ec7C-OnDNRm02qzNVlFQ21PMk7eTjo7ZHA-uBbj0nnWlewOPmEtugp-n8m-Q3RFaxO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1222385973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relating R&D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lohwasser, Richard ; Madlener, Reinhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Lohwasser, Richard ; Madlener, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><description>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has the potential to play a major role in the stabilization of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. To develop the capture technology from its current demonstration phase towards commercial maturity, significant funding is directed to CCS, such as the EU’s €4.5bn NER300 fund. However, we know little about how this funding relates to market diffusion of CCS. This paper addresses that question. We initially review past learning effects from both capacity installations and R&D efforts for a similar technology using the concept of two-factor learning. We apply the obtained learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching rates to CCS in the electricity market model Hector, which simulates 19 European countries hourly until 2040, to understand the impact of learning and associated policies on CCS market diffusion. We evaluate the effectiveness of policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching by relating the policy budget to the realized CCS capacity and find that, at lower policy cost, both methods are about equally effective. At higher spending levels, policies promoting learning-by-doing are more effective. Overall, policy effectiveness increases in low CO2 price scenarios, but the CO2 price still remains the key prerequisite for the economic competitiveness, even with major policy support.
► Identified two-factor learning rates for CCS through empirical data from flue gas desulphurization. ► Evaluated effectiveness of CCS stimulation policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-researching. ► Both policy types are about equally effective with small policy budgets. ► Policies addressing learning-by-doing, e.g., subsidies to CCS projects, are more effective with large policy budgets. ► Analysis deployed Hector power market model that simulates 19 European countries on hourly granularity until 2040.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.061</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries ; Applied sciences ; carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; CCS ; Cost ; Economic data ; Effectiveness studies ; Electric energy ; Electric power ; electricity ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; European Union ; Exact sciences and technology ; Federal funding ; funding ; Gases ; General, economic and professional studies ; General. Regulations. Norms. Economy ; greenhouse gases ; Investments ; issues and policy ; Learning ; Markets ; Metering. Control ; Methodology. Modelling ; Policy effectiveness ; Prices ; R&D ; Research & development ; Storage ; Technology ; Two-factor-learning</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2013-01, Vol.52, p.439-452</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e02e17362ca0a2b3f4e380065791dfcbc3634987dd75cd3aa7ad0425c8ee25613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e02e17362ca0a2b3f4e380065791dfcbc3634987dd75cd3aa7ad0425c8ee25613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27865,27866,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26727933$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lohwasser, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madlener, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><title>Relating R&D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has the potential to play a major role in the stabilization of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. To develop the capture technology from its current demonstration phase towards commercial maturity, significant funding is directed to CCS, such as the EU’s €4.5bn NER300 fund. However, we know little about how this funding relates to market diffusion of CCS. This paper addresses that question. We initially review past learning effects from both capacity installations and R&D efforts for a similar technology using the concept of two-factor learning. We apply the obtained learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching rates to CCS in the electricity market model Hector, which simulates 19 European countries hourly until 2040, to understand the impact of learning and associated policies on CCS market diffusion. We evaluate the effectiveness of policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching by relating the policy budget to the realized CCS capacity and find that, at lower policy cost, both methods are about equally effective. At higher spending levels, policies promoting learning-by-doing are more effective. Overall, policy effectiveness increases in low CO2 price scenarios, but the CO2 price still remains the key prerequisite for the economic competitiveness, even with major policy support.
► Identified two-factor learning rates for CCS through empirical data from flue gas desulphurization. ► Evaluated effectiveness of CCS stimulation policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-researching. ► Both policy types are about equally effective with small policy budgets. ► Policies addressing learning-by-doing, e.g., subsidies to CCS projects, are more effective with large policy budgets. ► Analysis deployed Hector power market model that simulates 19 European countries on hourly granularity until 2040.</description><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>CCS</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>electricity</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Federal funding</subject><subject>funding</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>General. Regulations. Norms. Economy</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Metering. Control</subject><subject>Methodology. Modelling</subject><subject>Policy effectiveness</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Two-factor-learning</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcGKFDEQhoMoOK4-gQcDouyl20rS3UkfPMjoqrAg7LrgLWTTldmMPcmYpFd8ezM7iwcP4qkuX338VT8hzxm0DNjwZtti2Me55cB4C2MLA3tAVkxJ0QxSyodkBQJY03HWPyZPct4CQKfGbkW-XeBsig8bevH6PTVhoj7cYi47DIVWpbceMy2RrteXdGfSdyx08s4t2cdAy02Ky-aGlp-xccaWmOiMJoXqe0oeOTNnfHY_T8jV2Yev60_N-ZePn9fvzhvbC1UaBI5MioFbA4ZfC9ehUABDL0c2OXttxSC6Uclpkr2dhDHSTNDx3ipE3g9MnJDTo3ef4o-lJtc7ny3OswkYl6yZ6KQCXtn_QFmllJR9RV_-hW7jkkI9RDPOuVD9KEWlxJGyKeac0Ol98vVJvzQDfShGb_VdMfpQjIZRw13iV_duk62ZXTLB-vxnlQ-Sy1Ec7C-OnDNRm02qzNVlFQ21PMk7eTjo7ZHA-uBbj0nnWlewOPmEtugp-n8m-Q3RFaxO</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Lohwasser, Richard</creator><creator>Madlener, Reinhard</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Relating R&D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning</title><author>Lohwasser, Richard ; Madlener, Reinhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e02e17362ca0a2b3f4e380065791dfcbc3634987dd75cd3aa7ad0425c8ee25613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>CCS</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>electricity</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Federal funding</topic><topic>funding</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>General. Regulations. Norms. Economy</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Metering. Control</topic><topic>Methodology. Modelling</topic><topic>Policy effectiveness</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Two-factor-learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lohwasser, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madlener, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lohwasser, Richard</au><au>Madlener, Reinhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relating R&D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>439</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>439-452</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has the potential to play a major role in the stabilization of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. To develop the capture technology from its current demonstration phase towards commercial maturity, significant funding is directed to CCS, such as the EU’s €4.5bn NER300 fund. However, we know little about how this funding relates to market diffusion of CCS. This paper addresses that question. We initially review past learning effects from both capacity installations and R&D efforts for a similar technology using the concept of two-factor learning. We apply the obtained learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching rates to CCS in the electricity market model Hector, which simulates 19 European countries hourly until 2040, to understand the impact of learning and associated policies on CCS market diffusion. We evaluate the effectiveness of policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching by relating the policy budget to the realized CCS capacity and find that, at lower policy cost, both methods are about equally effective. At higher spending levels, policies promoting learning-by-doing are more effective. Overall, policy effectiveness increases in low CO2 price scenarios, but the CO2 price still remains the key prerequisite for the economic competitiveness, even with major policy support.
► Identified two-factor learning rates for CCS through empirical data from flue gas desulphurization. ► Evaluated effectiveness of CCS stimulation policies addressing learning-by-doing and learning-by-researching. ► Both policy types are about equally effective with small policy budgets. ► Policies addressing learning-by-doing, e.g., subsidies to CCS projects, are more effective with large policy budgets. ► Analysis deployed Hector power market model that simulates 19 European countries on hourly granularity until 2040.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.061</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2013-01, Vol.52, p.439-452 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347802256 |
source | PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Air pollution caused by fuel industries Applied sciences carbon dioxide Carbon sequestration CCS Cost Economic data Effectiveness studies Electric energy Electric power electricity Energy Energy economics Energy policy Energy. Thermal use of fuels European Union Exact sciences and technology Federal funding funding Gases General, economic and professional studies General. Regulations. Norms. Economy greenhouse gases Investments issues and policy Learning Markets Metering. Control Methodology. Modelling Policy effectiveness Prices R&D Research & development Storage Technology Two-factor-learning |
title | Relating R&D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A38%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relating%20R&D%20and%20investment%20policies%20to%20CCS%20market%20diffusion%20through%20two-factor%20learning&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Lohwasser,%20Richard&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=439-452&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2833409111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1222385973&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421512008439&rfr_iscdi=true |