Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?
Failings in patient care and quality in NHS Trusts have become a recurring theme over the past few years. In this paper, we examine the Care Quality Commission’s Guidance about Compliance : Essential Standards of Quality and Safety and ask how NHS Trusts might be better supported in fulfilling the r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | HEC forum 2012-06, Vol.24 (2), p.139-147 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 147 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | HEC forum |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | McClimans, Leah Slowther, Anne-Marie Parker, Michael |
description | Failings in patient care and quality in NHS Trusts have become a recurring theme over the past few years. In this paper, we examine the Care Quality Commission’s
Guidance about Compliance
:
Essential Standards of Quality and Safety
and ask how NHS Trusts might be better supported in fulfilling the regulations specified therein. We argue that clinical ethics committees (CECs) have a role to play in this regard. We make this argument by attending to the many ethical elements that are highlighted in the Commission’s Regulations and by providing practical examples of how CECs can (and in some case already do) provide ethics support to health professionals and trusts. Although CECs have been traditionally associated with case consultation, i.e., discrete problems caused by individual circumstances, in the previous 10 years the literature suggests that clinical ethics services have become more integrated into the life of the health care organization and are increasing construed as proactive agents of
systematic
change. We provide evidence from a recent survey of UK clinical ethics services that this trend is present in the UK. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347802124</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1347802124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-664432075ee260294208dd07d94bab07cb4c8601524761a6e24467bf18d45f693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLw0AUhQdRbH38ADcy4MZN9M5kHhk3IqFqsSCCXQ-TZKIpedRMIrS_3qmpIoK4uov7nXMfB6ETAhcEQF46AjKEAAgNFJE8WO-gMeGSBhFT0S4ag-IioDKUI3Tg3AIAGAe2j0aUhhykEmN0FZsazx9wXBZ1kZoST7rXInU4bqqq6DprHZ5Wy7Z5t_ipN2XRrXCT49i09voI7eWmdPZ4Ww_R_HbyHN8Hs8e7aXwzC1IGvAuEYCykILm1VABVjEKUZSAzxRKTgEwTlkYCCKdMCmKEpYwJmeQkyhjPhQoP0fng69d4663rdFW41JalqW3TO01CJiOghLL_USBKkM0TPHr2C100fVv7Qz4piGTIqafIQKVt41xrc71si8q0Kw_pTQZ6yED7DPQmA732mtOtc59UNvtWfD3dA3QAnG_VL7b9Ofov1w96z41L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019087352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>McClimans, Leah ; Slowther, Anne-Marie ; Parker, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>McClimans, Leah ; Slowther, Anne-Marie ; Parker, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Failings in patient care and quality in NHS Trusts have become a recurring theme over the past few years. In this paper, we examine the Care Quality Commission’s
Guidance about Compliance
:
Essential Standards of Quality and Safety
and ask how NHS Trusts might be better supported in fulfilling the regulations specified therein. We argue that clinical ethics committees (CECs) have a role to play in this regard. We make this argument by attending to the many ethical elements that are highlighted in the Commission’s Regulations and by providing practical examples of how CECs can (and in some case already do) provide ethics support to health professionals and trusts. Although CECs have been traditionally associated with case consultation, i.e., discrete problems caused by individual circumstances, in the previous 10 years the literature suggests that clinical ethics services have become more integrated into the life of the health care organization and are increasing construed as proactive agents of
systematic
change. We provide evidence from a recent survey of UK clinical ethics services that this trend is present in the UK.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22350796</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HEFOE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Clinical governance ; Clinical outcomes ; Committees ; Consent ; Education ; Ethics ; Ethics Committees, Clinical ; Families & family life ; Guideline Adherence ; Health administration ; Hospitals, Public ; Medical ethics ; Medical Law ; Medical personnel ; Medical service ; Patients ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Medicine ; Professional ethics ; Quality Improvement ; Quality of care ; Quality of Health Care ; Regulation ; State Medicine ; Studies ; Surveys ; Theory of Medicine/Bioethics ; Trusts ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>HEC forum, 2012-06, Vol.24 (2), p.139-147</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-664432075ee260294208dd07d94bab07cb4c8601524761a6e24467bf18d45f693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-664432075ee260294208dd07d94bab07cb4c8601524761a6e24467bf18d45f693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27864,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22350796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McClimans, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slowther, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?</title><title>HEC forum</title><addtitle>HEC Forum</addtitle><addtitle>HEC Forum</addtitle><description>Failings in patient care and quality in NHS Trusts have become a recurring theme over the past few years. In this paper, we examine the Care Quality Commission’s
Guidance about Compliance
:
Essential Standards of Quality and Safety
and ask how NHS Trusts might be better supported in fulfilling the regulations specified therein. We argue that clinical ethics committees (CECs) have a role to play in this regard. We make this argument by attending to the many ethical elements that are highlighted in the Commission’s Regulations and by providing practical examples of how CECs can (and in some case already do) provide ethics support to health professionals and trusts. Although CECs have been traditionally associated with case consultation, i.e., discrete problems caused by individual circumstances, in the previous 10 years the literature suggests that clinical ethics services have become more integrated into the life of the health care organization and are increasing construed as proactive agents of
systematic
change. We provide evidence from a recent survey of UK clinical ethics services that this trend is present in the UK.</description><subject>Clinical governance</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics Committees, Clinical</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Hospitals, Public</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Medical Law</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical service</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Medicine</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</subject><subject>Trusts</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0956-2737</issn><issn>1572-8498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLw0AUhQdRbH38ADcy4MZN9M5kHhk3IqFqsSCCXQ-TZKIpedRMIrS_3qmpIoK4uov7nXMfB6ETAhcEQF46AjKEAAgNFJE8WO-gMeGSBhFT0S4ag-IioDKUI3Tg3AIAGAe2j0aUhhykEmN0FZsazx9wXBZ1kZoST7rXInU4bqqq6DprHZ5Wy7Z5t_ipN2XRrXCT49i09voI7eWmdPZ4Ww_R_HbyHN8Hs8e7aXwzC1IGvAuEYCykILm1VABVjEKUZSAzxRKTgEwTlkYCCKdMCmKEpYwJmeQkyhjPhQoP0fng69d4663rdFW41JalqW3TO01CJiOghLL_USBKkM0TPHr2C100fVv7Qz4piGTIqafIQKVt41xrc71si8q0Kw_pTQZ6yED7DPQmA732mtOtc59UNvtWfD3dA3QAnG_VL7b9Ofov1w96z41L</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>McClimans, Leah</creator><creator>Slowther, Anne-Marie</creator><creator>Parker, Michael</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?</title><author>McClimans, Leah ; Slowther, Anne-Marie ; Parker, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-664432075ee260294208dd07d94bab07cb4c8601524761a6e24467bf18d45f693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Clinical governance</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics Committees, Clinical</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Hospitals, Public</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Medical Law</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical service</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Medicine</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</topic><topic>Trusts</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McClimans, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slowther, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>HEC forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McClimans, Leah</au><au>Slowther, Anne-Marie</au><au>Parker, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?</atitle><jtitle>HEC forum</jtitle><stitle>HEC Forum</stitle><addtitle>HEC Forum</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>139-147</pages><issn>0956-2737</issn><eissn>1572-8498</eissn><coden>HEFOE8</coden><abstract>Failings in patient care and quality in NHS Trusts have become a recurring theme over the past few years. In this paper, we examine the Care Quality Commission’s
Guidance about Compliance
:
Essential Standards of Quality and Safety
and ask how NHS Trusts might be better supported in fulfilling the regulations specified therein. We argue that clinical ethics committees (CECs) have a role to play in this regard. We make this argument by attending to the many ethical elements that are highlighted in the Commission’s Regulations and by providing practical examples of how CECs can (and in some case already do) provide ethics support to health professionals and trusts. Although CECs have been traditionally associated with case consultation, i.e., discrete problems caused by individual circumstances, in the previous 10 years the literature suggests that clinical ethics services have become more integrated into the life of the health care organization and are increasing construed as proactive agents of
systematic
change. We provide evidence from a recent survey of UK clinical ethics services that this trend is present in the UK.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>22350796</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-2737 |
ispartof | HEC forum, 2012-06, Vol.24 (2), p.139-147 |
issn | 0956-2737 1572-8498 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347802124 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SpringerNature Complete Journals |
subjects | Clinical governance Clinical outcomes Committees Consent Education Ethics Ethics Committees, Clinical Families & family life Guideline Adherence Health administration Hospitals, Public Medical ethics Medical Law Medical personnel Medical service Patients Philosophy Philosophy of Medicine Professional ethics Quality Improvement Quality of care Quality of Health Care Regulation State Medicine Studies Surveys Theory of Medicine/Bioethics Trusts United Kingdom |
title | Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A01%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20UK%20Clinical%20Ethics%20Committees%20Improve%20Quality%20of%20Care?&rft.jtitle=HEC%20forum&rft.au=McClimans,%20Leah&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=139-147&rft.issn=0956-2737&rft.eissn=1572-8498&rft.coden=HEFOE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1347802124%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019087352&rft_id=info:pmid/22350796&rfr_iscdi=true |