Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?

Failings in patient care and quality in NHS Trusts have become a recurring theme over the past few years. In this paper, we examine the Care Quality Commission’s Guidance about Compliance : Essential Standards of Quality and Safety and ask how NHS Trusts might be better supported in fulfilling the r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HEC forum 2012-06, Vol.24 (2), p.139-147
Hauptverfasser: McClimans, Leah, Slowther, Anne-Marie, Parker, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147
container_issue 2
container_start_page 139
container_title HEC forum
container_volume 24
creator McClimans, Leah
Slowther, Anne-Marie
Parker, Michael
description Failings in patient care and quality in NHS Trusts have become a recurring theme over the past few years. In this paper, we examine the Care Quality Commission’s Guidance about Compliance : Essential Standards of Quality and Safety and ask how NHS Trusts might be better supported in fulfilling the regulations specified therein. We argue that clinical ethics committees (CECs) have a role to play in this regard. We make this argument by attending to the many ethical elements that are highlighted in the Commission’s Regulations and by providing practical examples of how CECs can (and in some case already do) provide ethics support to health professionals and trusts. Although CECs have been traditionally associated with case consultation, i.e., discrete problems caused by individual circumstances, in the previous 10 years the literature suggests that clinical ethics services have become more integrated into the life of the health care organization and are increasing construed as proactive agents of systematic change. We provide evidence from a recent survey of UK clinical ethics services that this trend is present in the UK.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347802124</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1347802124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-664432075ee260294208dd07d94bab07cb4c8601524761a6e24467bf18d45f693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLw0AUhQdRbH38ADcy4MZN9M5kHhk3IqFqsSCCXQ-TZKIpedRMIrS_3qmpIoK4uov7nXMfB6ETAhcEQF46AjKEAAgNFJE8WO-gMeGSBhFT0S4ag-IioDKUI3Tg3AIAGAe2j0aUhhykEmN0FZsazx9wXBZ1kZoST7rXInU4bqqq6DprHZ5Wy7Z5t_ipN2XRrXCT49i09voI7eWmdPZ4Ww_R_HbyHN8Hs8e7aXwzC1IGvAuEYCykILm1VABVjEKUZSAzxRKTgEwTlkYCCKdMCmKEpYwJmeQkyhjPhQoP0fng69d4663rdFW41JalqW3TO01CJiOghLL_USBKkM0TPHr2C100fVv7Qz4piGTIqafIQKVt41xrc71si8q0Kw_pTQZ6yED7DPQmA732mtOtc59UNvtWfD3dA3QAnG_VL7b9Ofov1w96z41L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019087352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>McClimans, Leah ; Slowther, Anne-Marie ; Parker, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>McClimans, Leah ; Slowther, Anne-Marie ; Parker, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Failings in patient care and quality in NHS Trusts have become a recurring theme over the past few years. In this paper, we examine the Care Quality Commission’s Guidance about Compliance : Essential Standards of Quality and Safety and ask how NHS Trusts might be better supported in fulfilling the regulations specified therein. We argue that clinical ethics committees (CECs) have a role to play in this regard. We make this argument by attending to the many ethical elements that are highlighted in the Commission’s Regulations and by providing practical examples of how CECs can (and in some case already do) provide ethics support to health professionals and trusts. Although CECs have been traditionally associated with case consultation, i.e., discrete problems caused by individual circumstances, in the previous 10 years the literature suggests that clinical ethics services have become more integrated into the life of the health care organization and are increasing construed as proactive agents of systematic change. We provide evidence from a recent survey of UK clinical ethics services that this trend is present in the UK.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22350796</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HEFOE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Clinical governance ; Clinical outcomes ; Committees ; Consent ; Education ; Ethics ; Ethics Committees, Clinical ; Families &amp; family life ; Guideline Adherence ; Health administration ; Hospitals, Public ; Medical ethics ; Medical Law ; Medical personnel ; Medical service ; Patients ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Medicine ; Professional ethics ; Quality Improvement ; Quality of care ; Quality of Health Care ; Regulation ; State Medicine ; Studies ; Surveys ; Theory of Medicine/Bioethics ; Trusts ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>HEC forum, 2012-06, Vol.24 (2), p.139-147</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-664432075ee260294208dd07d94bab07cb4c8601524761a6e24467bf18d45f693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-664432075ee260294208dd07d94bab07cb4c8601524761a6e24467bf18d45f693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27864,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22350796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McClimans, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slowther, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?</title><title>HEC forum</title><addtitle>HEC Forum</addtitle><addtitle>HEC Forum</addtitle><description>Failings in patient care and quality in NHS Trusts have become a recurring theme over the past few years. In this paper, we examine the Care Quality Commission’s Guidance about Compliance : Essential Standards of Quality and Safety and ask how NHS Trusts might be better supported in fulfilling the regulations specified therein. We argue that clinical ethics committees (CECs) have a role to play in this regard. We make this argument by attending to the many ethical elements that are highlighted in the Commission’s Regulations and by providing practical examples of how CECs can (and in some case already do) provide ethics support to health professionals and trusts. Although CECs have been traditionally associated with case consultation, i.e., discrete problems caused by individual circumstances, in the previous 10 years the literature suggests that clinical ethics services have become more integrated into the life of the health care organization and are increasing construed as proactive agents of systematic change. We provide evidence from a recent survey of UK clinical ethics services that this trend is present in the UK.</description><subject>Clinical governance</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics Committees, Clinical</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Hospitals, Public</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Medical Law</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical service</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Medicine</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</subject><subject>Trusts</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0956-2737</issn><issn>1572-8498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLw0AUhQdRbH38ADcy4MZN9M5kHhk3IqFqsSCCXQ-TZKIpedRMIrS_3qmpIoK4uov7nXMfB6ETAhcEQF46AjKEAAgNFJE8WO-gMeGSBhFT0S4ag-IioDKUI3Tg3AIAGAe2j0aUhhykEmN0FZsazx9wXBZ1kZoST7rXInU4bqqq6DprHZ5Wy7Z5t_ipN2XRrXCT49i09voI7eWmdPZ4Ww_R_HbyHN8Hs8e7aXwzC1IGvAuEYCykILm1VABVjEKUZSAzxRKTgEwTlkYCCKdMCmKEpYwJmeQkyhjPhQoP0fng69d4663rdFW41JalqW3TO01CJiOghLL_USBKkM0TPHr2C100fVv7Qz4piGTIqafIQKVt41xrc71si8q0Kw_pTQZ6yED7DPQmA732mtOtc59UNvtWfD3dA3QAnG_VL7b9Ofov1w96z41L</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>McClimans, Leah</creator><creator>Slowther, Anne-Marie</creator><creator>Parker, Michael</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?</title><author>McClimans, Leah ; Slowther, Anne-Marie ; Parker, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-664432075ee260294208dd07d94bab07cb4c8601524761a6e24467bf18d45f693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Clinical governance</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics Committees, Clinical</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Hospitals, Public</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Medical Law</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical service</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Medicine</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</topic><topic>Trusts</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McClimans, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slowther, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>HEC forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McClimans, Leah</au><au>Slowther, Anne-Marie</au><au>Parker, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?</atitle><jtitle>HEC forum</jtitle><stitle>HEC Forum</stitle><addtitle>HEC Forum</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>139-147</pages><issn>0956-2737</issn><eissn>1572-8498</eissn><coden>HEFOE8</coden><abstract>Failings in patient care and quality in NHS Trusts have become a recurring theme over the past few years. In this paper, we examine the Care Quality Commission’s Guidance about Compliance : Essential Standards of Quality and Safety and ask how NHS Trusts might be better supported in fulfilling the regulations specified therein. We argue that clinical ethics committees (CECs) have a role to play in this regard. We make this argument by attending to the many ethical elements that are highlighted in the Commission’s Regulations and by providing practical examples of how CECs can (and in some case already do) provide ethics support to health professionals and trusts. Although CECs have been traditionally associated with case consultation, i.e., discrete problems caused by individual circumstances, in the previous 10 years the literature suggests that clinical ethics services have become more integrated into the life of the health care organization and are increasing construed as proactive agents of systematic change. We provide evidence from a recent survey of UK clinical ethics services that this trend is present in the UK.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>22350796</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-2737
ispartof HEC forum, 2012-06, Vol.24 (2), p.139-147
issn 0956-2737
1572-8498
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347802124
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SpringerNature Complete Journals
subjects Clinical governance
Clinical outcomes
Committees
Consent
Education
Ethics
Ethics Committees, Clinical
Families & family life
Guideline Adherence
Health administration
Hospitals, Public
Medical ethics
Medical Law
Medical personnel
Medical service
Patients
Philosophy
Philosophy of Medicine
Professional ethics
Quality Improvement
Quality of care
Quality of Health Care
Regulation
State Medicine
Studies
Surveys
Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
Trusts
United Kingdom
title Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A01%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20UK%20Clinical%20Ethics%20Committees%20Improve%20Quality%20of%20Care?&rft.jtitle=HEC%20forum&rft.au=McClimans,%20Leah&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=139-147&rft.issn=0956-2737&rft.eissn=1572-8498&rft.coden=HEFOE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10730-012-9175-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1347802124%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019087352&rft_id=info:pmid/22350796&rfr_iscdi=true