Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment

Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the dentoskeletal changes of patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with either the Jasper jumper appliance or the activator-headgear combination, both associated with fixed appliances. Methods The sample comprised 72 subjects with Cl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2013-05, Vol.143 (5), p.684-694
Hauptverfasser: Lima, Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de, Henriques, José Fernando Castanha, Janson, Guilherme, Pereira, Suelen Cristina da Costa, Neves, Leniana Santos, Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 694
container_issue 5
container_start_page 684
container_title American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics
container_volume 143
creator Lima, Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
Janson, Guilherme
Pereira, Suelen Cristina da Costa
Neves, Leniana Santos
Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont
description Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the dentoskeletal changes of patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with either the Jasper jumper appliance or the activator-headgear combination, both associated with fixed appliances. Methods The sample comprised 72 subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion divided into 3 groups: group 1 included 25 subjects treated with fixed appliances and the force modules of the Jasper jumper at an initial mean age of 12.72 years, group 2 included 25 subjects treated with the activator-headgear combination followed by fixed appliances at an initial mean age of 11.07 years, and group 3 included 22 untreated subjects at an initial mean age of 12.67 years. Initial cephalometric characteristics and dentoskeletal changes were compared with analysis of variance. Results Both experimental groups had similar dentoskeletal changes: restrictive effect on the maxilla, clockwise mandibular rotation and a slight increase in anterior face height, retrusion of the maxillary incisors, distalization of the maxillary molars, protrusion of the mandibular incisors, extrusion of the mandibular molars, and significant improvements of the maxillomandibular relationship, overjet, overbite, and the molar relationship. Conclusions The effects of the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination followed by fixed orthodontic appliances were similar in Class II malocclusion treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347786978</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0889540613001170</els_id><sourcerecordid>1347786978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a457d26fdbba30326768954047ea50c10b6ef5ec8567946873ef02a90ddc80913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsuO1DAQjBCIHRa-AAnlyCWhnYedHEBCy1srcQDOVsfu7Dib2IPtLMw_8NE4OwsHLpzasqqqq6s7y54yKBkw_mIqcXLalRWwugRWAvT3sh2DXhRctNX9bAdd1xdtA_wsexTCBAnRVPAwO6tqXrNewC779YZsdOGaZoo452qP9opCbqxeFel8OOZxT_knDAfy-bQuW0Grb39RRXOD0fliT6ivCH2u3DIYi9E4m-PhMBu0KsmNbp7dj5PeaH6mh_Nxn8zbaFQePWFcko_H2YMR50BP7up59u3d268XH4rLz-8_Xry-LFTDmlhg0wpd8VEPA9ZQV1zwrk9jNoKwBcVg4DS2pLqWi77hnahphAp70Fp10LP6PHt-0j14932lEOVigqJ5RktuDZLVjRAd70WXoPUJqrwLwdMoD94s6I-SgdzWICd5uwa5rUECkynkxHp212AdFtJ_OX9yT4CXJwClMW8MeRmUoZSVNp5UlNqZ_zR49Q9fzcYahfM1HSlMbvU2JSiZDJUE-WW7hO0QWA3AWDLwG0qzsXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1347786978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lima, Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de ; Henriques, José Fernando Castanha ; Janson, Guilherme ; Pereira, Suelen Cristina da Costa ; Neves, Leniana Santos ; Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont</creator><creatorcontrib>Lima, Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de ; Henriques, José Fernando Castanha ; Janson, Guilherme ; Pereira, Suelen Cristina da Costa ; Neves, Leniana Santos ; Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the dentoskeletal changes of patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with either the Jasper jumper appliance or the activator-headgear combination, both associated with fixed appliances. Methods The sample comprised 72 subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion divided into 3 groups: group 1 included 25 subjects treated with fixed appliances and the force modules of the Jasper jumper at an initial mean age of 12.72 years, group 2 included 25 subjects treated with the activator-headgear combination followed by fixed appliances at an initial mean age of 11.07 years, and group 3 included 22 untreated subjects at an initial mean age of 12.67 years. Initial cephalometric characteristics and dentoskeletal changes were compared with analysis of variance. Results Both experimental groups had similar dentoskeletal changes: restrictive effect on the maxilla, clockwise mandibular rotation and a slight increase in anterior face height, retrusion of the maxillary incisors, distalization of the maxillary molars, protrusion of the mandibular incisors, extrusion of the mandibular molars, and significant improvements of the maxillomandibular relationship, overjet, overbite, and the molar relationship. Conclusions The effects of the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination followed by fixed orthodontic appliances were similar in Class II malocclusion treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23631970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Activator Appliances ; Adolescent ; Case-Control Studies ; Cephalometry ; Child ; Dentistry ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Female ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy ; Mandible - growth &amp; development ; Maxilla - growth &amp; development ; Maxillofacial Development ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation ; Orthodontics, Corrective - methods ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2013-05, Vol.143 (5), p.684-694</ispartof><rights>American Association of Orthodontists</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a457d26fdbba30326768954047ea50c10b6ef5ec8567946873ef02a90ddc80913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a457d26fdbba30326768954047ea50c10b6ef5ec8567946873ef02a90ddc80913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540613001170$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23631970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lima, Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, José Fernando Castanha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janson, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Suelen Cristina da Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Leniana Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont</creatorcontrib><title>Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the dentoskeletal changes of patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with either the Jasper jumper appliance or the activator-headgear combination, both associated with fixed appliances. Methods The sample comprised 72 subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion divided into 3 groups: group 1 included 25 subjects treated with fixed appliances and the force modules of the Jasper jumper at an initial mean age of 12.72 years, group 2 included 25 subjects treated with the activator-headgear combination followed by fixed appliances at an initial mean age of 11.07 years, and group 3 included 22 untreated subjects at an initial mean age of 12.67 years. Initial cephalometric characteristics and dentoskeletal changes were compared with analysis of variance. Results Both experimental groups had similar dentoskeletal changes: restrictive effect on the maxilla, clockwise mandibular rotation and a slight increase in anterior face height, retrusion of the maxillary incisors, distalization of the maxillary molars, protrusion of the mandibular incisors, extrusion of the mandibular molars, and significant improvements of the maxillomandibular relationship, overjet, overbite, and the molar relationship. Conclusions The effects of the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination followed by fixed orthodontic appliances were similar in Class II malocclusion treatment.</description><subject>Activator Appliances</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Extraoral Traction Appliances</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy</subject><subject>Mandible - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Maxilla - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Maxillofacial Development</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design</subject><subject>Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation</subject><subject>Orthodontics, Corrective - methods</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsuO1DAQjBCIHRa-AAnlyCWhnYedHEBCy1srcQDOVsfu7Dib2IPtLMw_8NE4OwsHLpzasqqqq6s7y54yKBkw_mIqcXLalRWwugRWAvT3sh2DXhRctNX9bAdd1xdtA_wsexTCBAnRVPAwO6tqXrNewC779YZsdOGaZoo452qP9opCbqxeFel8OOZxT_knDAfy-bQuW0Grb39RRXOD0fliT6ivCH2u3DIYi9E4m-PhMBu0KsmNbp7dj5PeaH6mh_Nxn8zbaFQePWFcko_H2YMR50BP7up59u3d268XH4rLz-8_Xry-LFTDmlhg0wpd8VEPA9ZQV1zwrk9jNoKwBcVg4DS2pLqWi77hnahphAp70Fp10LP6PHt-0j14932lEOVigqJ5RktuDZLVjRAd70WXoPUJqrwLwdMoD94s6I-SgdzWICd5uwa5rUECkynkxHp212AdFtJ_OX9yT4CXJwClMW8MeRmUoZSVNp5UlNqZ_zR49Q9fzcYahfM1HSlMbvU2JSiZDJUE-WW7hO0QWA3AWDLwG0qzsXg</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Lima, Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de</creator><creator>Henriques, José Fernando Castanha</creator><creator>Janson, Guilherme</creator><creator>Pereira, Suelen Cristina da Costa</creator><creator>Neves, Leniana Santos</creator><creator>Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment</title><author>Lima, Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de ; Henriques, José Fernando Castanha ; Janson, Guilherme ; Pereira, Suelen Cristina da Costa ; Neves, Leniana Santos ; Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-a457d26fdbba30326768954047ea50c10b6ef5ec8567946873ef02a90ddc80913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Activator Appliances</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Extraoral Traction Appliances</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy</topic><topic>Mandible - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Maxilla - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Maxillofacial Development</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design</topic><topic>Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation</topic><topic>Orthodontics, Corrective - methods</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lima, Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, José Fernando Castanha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janson, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Suelen Cristina da Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Leniana Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lima, Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de</au><au>Henriques, José Fernando Castanha</au><au>Janson, Guilherme</au><au>Pereira, Suelen Cristina da Costa</au><au>Neves, Leniana Santos</au><au>Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>684</spage><epage>694</epage><pages>684-694</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the dentoskeletal changes of patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with either the Jasper jumper appliance or the activator-headgear combination, both associated with fixed appliances. Methods The sample comprised 72 subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion divided into 3 groups: group 1 included 25 subjects treated with fixed appliances and the force modules of the Jasper jumper at an initial mean age of 12.72 years, group 2 included 25 subjects treated with the activator-headgear combination followed by fixed appliances at an initial mean age of 11.07 years, and group 3 included 22 untreated subjects at an initial mean age of 12.67 years. Initial cephalometric characteristics and dentoskeletal changes were compared with analysis of variance. Results Both experimental groups had similar dentoskeletal changes: restrictive effect on the maxilla, clockwise mandibular rotation and a slight increase in anterior face height, retrusion of the maxillary incisors, distalization of the maxillary molars, protrusion of the mandibular incisors, extrusion of the mandibular molars, and significant improvements of the maxillomandibular relationship, overjet, overbite, and the molar relationship. Conclusions The effects of the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination followed by fixed orthodontic appliances were similar in Class II malocclusion treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>23631970</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.009</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-5406
ispartof American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2013-05, Vol.143 (5), p.684-694
issn 0889-5406
1097-6752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347786978
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Activator Appliances
Adolescent
Case-Control Studies
Cephalometry
Child
Dentistry
Extraoral Traction Appliances
Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy
Mandible - growth & development
Maxilla - growth & development
Maxillofacial Development
Orthodontic Appliance Design
Orthodontics, Corrective - instrumentation
Orthodontics, Corrective - methods
Statistics, Nonparametric
Treatment Outcome
title Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T02%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dentoskeletal%20changes%20induced%20by%20the%20Jasper%20jumper%20and%20the%20activator-headgear%20combination%20appliances%20followed%20by%20fixed%20orthodontic%20treatment&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Lima,%20Karina%20Jer%C3%B4nimo%20Rodrigues%20Santiago%20de&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=684&rft.epage=694&rft.pages=684-694&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1347786978%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1347786978&rft_id=info:pmid/23631970&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0889540613001170&rfr_iscdi=true