Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective study on 14 cases

Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow is a relatively common pathology and would involve 1-3% of the overall population. Lack of consensus on surgical techniques reflects the difficulty of understanding and treating this disease. Our prospective study reports the results of its arthroscopic treatment o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chirurgie de la main 2013-04, Vol.32 (2), p.80-84
Hauptverfasser: Sauvage, A, Nedellec, G, Brulard, C, Gaumet, G, Mesnil, P, Fontaine, C, Wavreille, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:fre
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 2
container_start_page 80
container_title Chirurgie de la main
container_volume 32
creator Sauvage, A
Nedellec, G
Brulard, C
Gaumet, G
Mesnil, P
Fontaine, C
Wavreille, G
description Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow is a relatively common pathology and would involve 1-3% of the overall population. Lack of consensus on surgical techniques reflects the difficulty of understanding and treating this disease. Our prospective study reports the results of its arthroscopic treatment on 14 patients operated on between 2009 and 2012. The mean follow-up was 7.15 months. All patients underwent a well conducted medical treatment for an average of 32.5 months. The operation was carried out under regional anesthesia in an outpatient. The technique included a time of joint exploration, joint capsulotomy and a transverse division of the pathological tendon of extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC). The value on the visual analogic scale (VAS) at rest and during exercise increased from 2.85 to 0.43 and from 7.71 to 2.43, respectively, then remained stable over time. Professional activity was resumed on average at 9.1 weeks. Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications were found. No laxity was observed. The Mayo Clinic and DASH scores were significantly improved from 52.14 to 92.5 and from 54.11 to 9.7, respectively. Overall, we observed 11 very good and three good results. Although our prospective series has a few patients and limited follow-up, our results are better or similar than those reported in the literature on pain relief and functional recovery. In contrast, the average recovery of professional activity was longer. Elbow arthroscopy, less invasive than open procedures, and allowing further joint exploration, seems an excellent alternative technique in this indication.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.main.2013.02.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347464608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1347464608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-5ad1cd3cf202d5afa0994196f1b66c63d1376ec0960c349f067902ae610992b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LAzEYhIMgtlb_gAfJ0cuu75uk2cZbKX5BQQ-9L9nkXUzZLzdZof_eBetc5jAPwzCM3SHkCKgfj3lrQ5cLQJmDyAHVBVtioU2mZy3YdYxHAJCgxRVbCLneCLGBJfvcjulr7KPrh-B4GsmmlrrE-5o3NtFoG05z0nf-1IQU4hO3fJj5gVwKP8RjmvyJ9x1HxZ2NFG_YZW2bSLdnX7HDy_Nh95btP17fd9t9NqDClK2tR-elqwUIv7a1BWMUGl1jpbXT0qMsNDkwGpxUpgZdGBCWNM6gqOSKPfzVzmO-J4qpbEN01DS2o36KJUpVKK00bGb0_oxOVUu-HMbQ2vFU_p8gfwHDRV1f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1347464608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective study on 14 cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sauvage, A ; Nedellec, G ; Brulard, C ; Gaumet, G ; Mesnil, P ; Fontaine, C ; Wavreille, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Sauvage, A ; Nedellec, G ; Brulard, C ; Gaumet, G ; Mesnil, P ; Fontaine, C ; Wavreille, G</creatorcontrib><description>Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow is a relatively common pathology and would involve 1-3% of the overall population. Lack of consensus on surgical techniques reflects the difficulty of understanding and treating this disease. Our prospective study reports the results of its arthroscopic treatment on 14 patients operated on between 2009 and 2012. The mean follow-up was 7.15 months. All patients underwent a well conducted medical treatment for an average of 32.5 months. The operation was carried out under regional anesthesia in an outpatient. The technique included a time of joint exploration, joint capsulotomy and a transverse division of the pathological tendon of extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC). The value on the visual analogic scale (VAS) at rest and during exercise increased from 2.85 to 0.43 and from 7.71 to 2.43, respectively, then remained stable over time. Professional activity was resumed on average at 9.1 weeks. Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications were found. No laxity was observed. The Mayo Clinic and DASH scores were significantly improved from 52.14 to 92.5 and from 54.11 to 9.7, respectively. Overall, we observed 11 very good and three good results. Although our prospective series has a few patients and limited follow-up, our results are better or similar than those reported in the literature on pain relief and functional recovery. In contrast, the average recovery of professional activity was longer. Elbow arthroscopy, less invasive than open procedures, and allowing further joint exploration, seems an excellent alternative technique in this indication.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1769-6666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2013.02.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23582280</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arthroscopy ; Debridement ; Elbow Joint - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Joint Capsule - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Tendons - surgery ; Tennis Elbow - surgery ; Visual Analog Scale</subject><ispartof>Chirurgie de la main, 2013-04, Vol.32 (2), p.80-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier SAS.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23582280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sauvage, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedellec, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brulard, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaumet, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesnil, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wavreille, G</creatorcontrib><title>Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective study on 14 cases</title><title>Chirurgie de la main</title><addtitle>Chir Main</addtitle><description>Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow is a relatively common pathology and would involve 1-3% of the overall population. Lack of consensus on surgical techniques reflects the difficulty of understanding and treating this disease. Our prospective study reports the results of its arthroscopic treatment on 14 patients operated on between 2009 and 2012. The mean follow-up was 7.15 months. All patients underwent a well conducted medical treatment for an average of 32.5 months. The operation was carried out under regional anesthesia in an outpatient. The technique included a time of joint exploration, joint capsulotomy and a transverse division of the pathological tendon of extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC). The value on the visual analogic scale (VAS) at rest and during exercise increased from 2.85 to 0.43 and from 7.71 to 2.43, respectively, then remained stable over time. Professional activity was resumed on average at 9.1 weeks. Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications were found. No laxity was observed. The Mayo Clinic and DASH scores were significantly improved from 52.14 to 92.5 and from 54.11 to 9.7, respectively. Overall, we observed 11 very good and three good results. Although our prospective series has a few patients and limited follow-up, our results are better or similar than those reported in the literature on pain relief and functional recovery. In contrast, the average recovery of professional activity was longer. Elbow arthroscopy, less invasive than open procedures, and allowing further joint exploration, seems an excellent alternative technique in this indication.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arthroscopy</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Elbow Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Capsule - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Tendons - surgery</subject><subject>Tennis Elbow - surgery</subject><subject>Visual Analog Scale</subject><issn>1769-6666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE1LAzEYhIMgtlb_gAfJ0cuu75uk2cZbKX5BQQ-9L9nkXUzZLzdZof_eBetc5jAPwzCM3SHkCKgfj3lrQ5cLQJmDyAHVBVtioU2mZy3YdYxHAJCgxRVbCLneCLGBJfvcjulr7KPrh-B4GsmmlrrE-5o3NtFoG05z0nf-1IQU4hO3fJj5gVwKP8RjmvyJ9x1HxZ2NFG_YZW2bSLdnX7HDy_Nh95btP17fd9t9NqDClK2tR-elqwUIv7a1BWMUGl1jpbXT0qMsNDkwGpxUpgZdGBCWNM6gqOSKPfzVzmO-J4qpbEN01DS2o36KJUpVKK00bGb0_oxOVUu-HMbQ2vFU_p8gfwHDRV1f</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Sauvage, A</creator><creator>Nedellec, G</creator><creator>Brulard, C</creator><creator>Gaumet, G</creator><creator>Mesnil, P</creator><creator>Fontaine, C</creator><creator>Wavreille, G</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective study on 14 cases</title><author>Sauvage, A ; Nedellec, G ; Brulard, C ; Gaumet, G ; Mesnil, P ; Fontaine, C ; Wavreille, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-5ad1cd3cf202d5afa0994196f1b66c63d1376ec0960c349f067902ae610992b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arthroscopy</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Elbow Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Capsule - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Tendons - surgery</topic><topic>Tennis Elbow - surgery</topic><topic>Visual Analog Scale</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sauvage, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedellec, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brulard, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaumet, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesnil, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wavreille, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chirurgie de la main</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sauvage, A</au><au>Nedellec, G</au><au>Brulard, C</au><au>Gaumet, G</au><au>Mesnil, P</au><au>Fontaine, C</au><au>Wavreille, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective study on 14 cases</atitle><jtitle>Chirurgie de la main</jtitle><addtitle>Chir Main</addtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>80-84</pages><eissn>1769-6666</eissn><abstract>Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow is a relatively common pathology and would involve 1-3% of the overall population. Lack of consensus on surgical techniques reflects the difficulty of understanding and treating this disease. Our prospective study reports the results of its arthroscopic treatment on 14 patients operated on between 2009 and 2012. The mean follow-up was 7.15 months. All patients underwent a well conducted medical treatment for an average of 32.5 months. The operation was carried out under regional anesthesia in an outpatient. The technique included a time of joint exploration, joint capsulotomy and a transverse division of the pathological tendon of extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC). The value on the visual analogic scale (VAS) at rest and during exercise increased from 2.85 to 0.43 and from 7.71 to 2.43, respectively, then remained stable over time. Professional activity was resumed on average at 9.1 weeks. Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications were found. No laxity was observed. The Mayo Clinic and DASH scores were significantly improved from 52.14 to 92.5 and from 54.11 to 9.7, respectively. Overall, we observed 11 very good and three good results. Although our prospective series has a few patients and limited follow-up, our results are better or similar than those reported in the literature on pain relief and functional recovery. In contrast, the average recovery of professional activity was longer. Elbow arthroscopy, less invasive than open procedures, and allowing further joint exploration, seems an excellent alternative technique in this indication.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>23582280</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.main.2013.02.014</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1769-6666
ispartof Chirurgie de la main, 2013-04, Vol.32 (2), p.80-84
issn 1769-6666
language fre
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347464608
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Arthroscopy
Debridement
Elbow Joint - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Joint Capsule - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Prospective Studies
Recovery of Function
Tendons - surgery
Tennis Elbow - surgery
Visual Analog Scale
title Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective study on 14 cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A30%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arthroscopic%20treatment%20of%20lateral%20epicondylitis:%20a%20prospective%20study%20on%2014%20cases&rft.jtitle=Chirurgie%20de%20la%20main&rft.au=Sauvage,%20A&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=80-84&rft.eissn=1769-6666&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.main.2013.02.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1347464608%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1347464608&rft_id=info:pmid/23582280&rfr_iscdi=true