Ureteric Stent in Renal Transplantation
Abstract Introduction Several techniques can be used to accomplish the ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation. A ureteral catheter is a prophylactic measure to avoid urological complications (UC) of stenosis and/or fistula. In this study we evaluate the influence of using a ureteral stent up...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation proceedings 2013-04, Vol.45 (3), p.1099-1101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1101 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1099 |
container_title | Transplantation proceedings |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Gomes, G Nunes, P Castelo, D Parada, B Patrão, R Bastos, C Roseiro, A Mota, A |
description | Abstract Introduction Several techniques can be used to accomplish the ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation. A ureteral catheter is a prophylactic measure to avoid urological complications (UC) of stenosis and/or fistula. In this study we evaluate the influence of using a ureteral stent upon the rate of UC in renal transplantation. Patients and methods Retrospective review of 2061 kidney transplants (75 living and 1986 cadaveric donors) for 1360 male and 684 female recipients, from July 14, 1991, to January 13, 2012, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months A double J stent (JJ) was used in 1890 an external tumor (ET) catheter in 52 and no catheter (NC) in 119 cases. Results Mean recipient age was 44.66 ± 13.66 years. UC occurred in 5.9% among which ET showed 17.3%, 8.4% for NC, and 5.4% for JJ ( P < .0005). Urological complications were more frequent when surgery duration exceeded 3 hours (8.8% vs 5.3% ≤ 3 hours; P = .003), using older donors organs ( P = .048) and with higher donor weight ( P = .009). No differences were observed related to recipient age, gender, or weight; donor gender; pretransplant dialysis time; cold ischemia time; type of donor (living vs cadaveric); number of HLA matches; or initial immunosuppression (mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor vs other). On multivariate analysis, donor weight (odds ratio [OR]: 1.023; P = .015), use of a JJ vs ET (OR: 0.280; P = .005), and surgery time exceeding 3 hours (OR: 3.270; P < .0005) were independently associated with UC. Conclusions Catheterization of the urinary anastomosis with a JJ was associated with fewer UC. This is especially important for grafts from heavier donors. The use of an external catheter which was associated with an high rate of UC, should be avoided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.086 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347260039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0041134513002753</els_id><sourcerecordid>1347260039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-5e59cadc5fc0e304e388f9183451c18a850c5c2eea08da4d9a6b51210fc3c34f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMoWj_-ghQvetl1ktlstx4EqZ9QEKyeQ5ydhdTtriap4L83tQriyVMY8r4z8z4jxJGEXIIsT-d59LYLr74n5jpXIDEHlUNVboiBrEaYqVLhphgAFDKTWOgdsRvCHFKtCtwWOwpLpUosB-L4yXNk72g4i9zFoeuGD9zZdvj4NaK1XbTR9d2-2GpsG_jg-90TT9dXj5PbbHp_cze5mGZUoI6ZZj0mW5NuCBihYKyqZiyrtIMkWdlKA2lSzBaq2hb12JbPWioJDSFh0eCeOFn3TenelhyiWbhA3KZFuF8Gk9KMVAmA4yQ9W0vJ9yF4bsyrdwvrP4wEswJl5uY3KLMCZUCZBCqZD7_nLJ8X6e_H-kMmCS7XAk5p3x17E8hxR1w7zxRN3bv_zTn_04Za1zmy7Qt_cJj3S59op1wmJIOZrU62uphEADXSiJ8fNpRy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1347260039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ureteric Stent in Renal Transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Gomes, G ; Nunes, P ; Castelo, D ; Parada, B ; Patrão, R ; Bastos, C ; Roseiro, A ; Mota, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomes, G ; Nunes, P ; Castelo, D ; Parada, B ; Patrão, R ; Bastos, C ; Roseiro, A ; Mota, A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Several techniques can be used to accomplish the ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation. A ureteral catheter is a prophylactic measure to avoid urological complications (UC) of stenosis and/or fistula. In this study we evaluate the influence of using a ureteral stent upon the rate of UC in renal transplantation. Patients and methods Retrospective review of 2061 kidney transplants (75 living and 1986 cadaveric donors) for 1360 male and 684 female recipients, from July 14, 1991, to January 13, 2012, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months A double J stent (JJ) was used in 1890 an external tumor (ET) catheter in 52 and no catheter (NC) in 119 cases. Results Mean recipient age was 44.66 ± 13.66 years. UC occurred in 5.9% among which ET showed 17.3%, 8.4% for NC, and 5.4% for JJ ( P < .0005). Urological complications were more frequent when surgery duration exceeded 3 hours (8.8% vs 5.3% ≤ 3 hours; P = .003), using older donors organs ( P = .048) and with higher donor weight ( P = .009). No differences were observed related to recipient age, gender, or weight; donor gender; pretransplant dialysis time; cold ischemia time; type of donor (living vs cadaveric); number of HLA matches; or initial immunosuppression (mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor vs other). On multivariate analysis, donor weight (odds ratio [OR]: 1.023; P = .015), use of a JJ vs ET (OR: 0.280; P = .005), and surgery time exceeding 3 hours (OR: 3.270; P < .0005) were independently associated with UC. Conclusions Catheterization of the urinary anastomosis with a JJ was associated with fewer UC. This is especially important for grafts from heavier donors. The use of an external catheter which was associated with an high rate of UC, should be avoided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.086</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23622636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Surgery ; Ureter - surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2013-04, Vol.45 (3), p.1099-1101</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-5e59cadc5fc0e304e388f9183451c18a850c5c2eea08da4d9a6b51210fc3c34f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-5e59cadc5fc0e304e388f9183451c18a850c5c2eea08da4d9a6b51210fc3c34f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.086$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23622636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomes, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelo, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parada, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrão, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roseiro, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mota, A</creatorcontrib><title>Ureteric Stent in Renal Transplantation</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Several techniques can be used to accomplish the ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation. A ureteral catheter is a prophylactic measure to avoid urological complications (UC) of stenosis and/or fistula. In this study we evaluate the influence of using a ureteral stent upon the rate of UC in renal transplantation. Patients and methods Retrospective review of 2061 kidney transplants (75 living and 1986 cadaveric donors) for 1360 male and 684 female recipients, from July 14, 1991, to January 13, 2012, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months A double J stent (JJ) was used in 1890 an external tumor (ET) catheter in 52 and no catheter (NC) in 119 cases. Results Mean recipient age was 44.66 ± 13.66 years. UC occurred in 5.9% among which ET showed 17.3%, 8.4% for NC, and 5.4% for JJ ( P < .0005). Urological complications were more frequent when surgery duration exceeded 3 hours (8.8% vs 5.3% ≤ 3 hours; P = .003), using older donors organs ( P = .048) and with higher donor weight ( P = .009). No differences were observed related to recipient age, gender, or weight; donor gender; pretransplant dialysis time; cold ischemia time; type of donor (living vs cadaveric); number of HLA matches; or initial immunosuppression (mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor vs other). On multivariate analysis, donor weight (odds ratio [OR]: 1.023; P = .015), use of a JJ vs ET (OR: 0.280; P = .005), and surgery time exceeding 3 hours (OR: 3.270; P < .0005) were independently associated with UC. Conclusions Catheterization of the urinary anastomosis with a JJ was associated with fewer UC. This is especially important for grafts from heavier donors. The use of an external catheter which was associated with an high rate of UC, should be avoided.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Ureter - surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMoWj_-ghQvetl1ktlstx4EqZ9QEKyeQ5ydhdTtriap4L83tQriyVMY8r4z8z4jxJGEXIIsT-d59LYLr74n5jpXIDEHlUNVboiBrEaYqVLhphgAFDKTWOgdsRvCHFKtCtwWOwpLpUosB-L4yXNk72g4i9zFoeuGD9zZdvj4NaK1XbTR9d2-2GpsG_jg-90TT9dXj5PbbHp_cze5mGZUoI6ZZj0mW5NuCBihYKyqZiyrtIMkWdlKA2lSzBaq2hb12JbPWioJDSFh0eCeOFn3TenelhyiWbhA3KZFuF8Gk9KMVAmA4yQ9W0vJ9yF4bsyrdwvrP4wEswJl5uY3KLMCZUCZBCqZD7_nLJ8X6e_H-kMmCS7XAk5p3x17E8hxR1w7zxRN3bv_zTn_04Za1zmy7Qt_cJj3S59op1wmJIOZrU62uphEADXSiJ8fNpRy</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Gomes, G</creator><creator>Nunes, P</creator><creator>Castelo, D</creator><creator>Parada, B</creator><creator>Patrão, R</creator><creator>Bastos, C</creator><creator>Roseiro, A</creator><creator>Mota, A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Ureteric Stent in Renal Transplantation</title><author>Gomes, G ; Nunes, P ; Castelo, D ; Parada, B ; Patrão, R ; Bastos, C ; Roseiro, A ; Mota, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-5e59cadc5fc0e304e388f9183451c18a850c5c2eea08da4d9a6b51210fc3c34f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Ureter - surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomes, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelo, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parada, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrão, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roseiro, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mota, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomes, G</au><au>Nunes, P</au><au>Castelo, D</au><au>Parada, B</au><au>Patrão, R</au><au>Bastos, C</au><au>Roseiro, A</au><au>Mota, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ureteric Stent in Renal Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1099</spage><epage>1101</epage><pages>1099-1101</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Several techniques can be used to accomplish the ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation. A ureteral catheter is a prophylactic measure to avoid urological complications (UC) of stenosis and/or fistula. In this study we evaluate the influence of using a ureteral stent upon the rate of UC in renal transplantation. Patients and methods Retrospective review of 2061 kidney transplants (75 living and 1986 cadaveric donors) for 1360 male and 684 female recipients, from July 14, 1991, to January 13, 2012, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months A double J stent (JJ) was used in 1890 an external tumor (ET) catheter in 52 and no catheter (NC) in 119 cases. Results Mean recipient age was 44.66 ± 13.66 years. UC occurred in 5.9% among which ET showed 17.3%, 8.4% for NC, and 5.4% for JJ ( P < .0005). Urological complications were more frequent when surgery duration exceeded 3 hours (8.8% vs 5.3% ≤ 3 hours; P = .003), using older donors organs ( P = .048) and with higher donor weight ( P = .009). No differences were observed related to recipient age, gender, or weight; donor gender; pretransplant dialysis time; cold ischemia time; type of donor (living vs cadaveric); number of HLA matches; or initial immunosuppression (mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor vs other). On multivariate analysis, donor weight (odds ratio [OR]: 1.023; P = .015), use of a JJ vs ET (OR: 0.280; P = .005), and surgery time exceeding 3 hours (OR: 3.270; P < .0005) were independently associated with UC. Conclusions Catheterization of the urinary anastomosis with a JJ was associated with fewer UC. This is especially important for grafts from heavier donors. The use of an external catheter which was associated with an high rate of UC, should be avoided.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23622636</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.086</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1345 |
ispartof | Transplantation proceedings, 2013-04, Vol.45 (3), p.1099-1101 |
issn | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347260039 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Anastomosis, Surgical Child Female Humans Kidney Transplantation Male Middle Aged Retrospective Studies Stents Surgery Ureter - surgery Young Adult |
title | Ureteric Stent in Renal Transplantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A51%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ureteric%20Stent%20in%20Renal%20Transplantation&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Gomes,%20G&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1099&rft.epage=1101&rft.pages=1099-1101&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.086&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1347260039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1347260039&rft_id=info:pmid/23622636&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0041134513002753&rfr_iscdi=true |