Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation
Abstract Introduction To determine risk factors for and the effects of impaired perfusion (IP)—“reduced or non-perfusion”—of graft areas supplied by an accessory artery on allograft function. Objectives One hundred five consecutive grafts with multiple renal arteries were prospectively evaluated usi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation proceedings 2013-04, Vol.45 (3), p.1232-1236 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1236 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1232 |
container_title | Transplantation proceedings |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Harraz, A.M Shokeir, A.A Soliman, S.A El-Hefnawy, A.S Kamal, M.M Shalaby, I Kamal, A.I Ghoneim, M.A |
description | Abstract Introduction To determine risk factors for and the effects of impaired perfusion (IP)—“reduced or non-perfusion”—of graft areas supplied by an accessory artery on allograft function. Objectives One hundred five consecutive grafts with multiple renal arteries were prospectively evaluated using Doppler ultrasound (US) to detect the perfusion of allograft segments supplied by the accessory artery. We studied factors predicting and the effects of IP on graft function. Results Doppler US diagnosed IP of allograft accessory arteries in 11 (10.5%) allografts. Mean values ± standard deviations and median (range) of renographic clearance of grafts with IP were 50.5 ± 26 and 40 (range, 21–92) mL/min, while those of grafts with patent accessory arteries were 68.6 ± 18.9 and 67.2 (range 21–117; P < .01). The percentage change in renographic clearance before versus after transplantation increased among grafts with patent arteries and decreased for those with IP ( P = .03). On multivariate analysis, factors predicting IP of the accessory artery were delayed graft function (odds ratio [OR] = 9.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6–58.6; P = .01) and upper polar arteries (OR = 8.9; 95% CI = 1.8–43.4; P < .01). Conclusion When considering transplants with accessory arteries, greatest attention and efforts should be exerted on upper polar arteries to avoid delayed graft function. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347258849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0041134513001796</els_id><sourcerecordid>1347258849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-9bc68252bfbf5c48793fa31a32dc29870598e36c6160943a7665c69a5579a8603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctuEzEUQC0EoqHwC8hixWamfow9YxZIUUtLpSAkKGvL8dwBB8cOtqcof49DGgl1xcq68rmvcxF6Q0lLCZUXm7YkE_IuRQswtoxQ3hLWEk6eoAUdet4wyfhTtCCkow3lnThDL3LekBqzjj9HZ4xLxqSUC1SuTQEcJ7y0FnKOaY-_QDAeL1OB5CBjF_BNMlPJ-LcrP_Cn2Re38_AYG-fkwne8cvfQXMUQ0wnwPjZ3f-f1JhRTXAwv0bPJ-AyvHt5z9O36w93lx2b1-eb2crlqbMdFadTayoEJtp7Wk7Dd0Cs-GU4NZ6NlauiJUANwaSWVRHXc9FIKK5URoldmkISfo7fHulXVrxly0VuXLfg6CMQ566qmZ2IYOlXRd0fUpphzgknvktuatNeU6IN1vdH_WtcH65owXa3X5NcPfeb1tv6dUk-aK3B1BKBue-8g6WwdBAujS2CLHqP7vz7vH5Wx3gVnjf8Je8ibOKeqvO6lc03QXw_3P5yfckJoryT_A9Wnryc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1347258849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Harraz, A.M ; Shokeir, A.A ; Soliman, S.A ; El-Hefnawy, A.S ; Kamal, M.M ; Shalaby, I ; Kamal, A.I ; Ghoneim, M.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Harraz, A.M ; Shokeir, A.A ; Soliman, S.A ; El-Hefnawy, A.S ; Kamal, M.M ; Shalaby, I ; Kamal, A.I ; Ghoneim, M.A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction To determine risk factors for and the effects of impaired perfusion (IP)—“reduced or non-perfusion”—of graft areas supplied by an accessory artery on allograft function. Objectives One hundred five consecutive grafts with multiple renal arteries were prospectively evaluated using Doppler ultrasound (US) to detect the perfusion of allograft segments supplied by the accessory artery. We studied factors predicting and the effects of IP on graft function. Results Doppler US diagnosed IP of allograft accessory arteries in 11 (10.5%) allografts. Mean values ± standard deviations and median (range) of renographic clearance of grafts with IP were 50.5 ± 26 and 40 (range, 21–92) mL/min, while those of grafts with patent accessory arteries were 68.6 ± 18.9 and 67.2 (range 21–117; P < .01). The percentage change in renographic clearance before versus after transplantation increased among grafts with patent arteries and decreased for those with IP ( P = .03). On multivariate analysis, factors predicting IP of the accessory artery were delayed graft function (odds ratio [OR] = 9.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6–58.6; P = .01) and upper polar arteries (OR = 8.9; 95% CI = 1.8–43.4; P < .01). Conclusion When considering transplants with accessory arteries, greatest attention and efforts should be exerted on upper polar arteries to avoid delayed graft function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23622666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation ; Living Donors ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Renal Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Renal Artery - physiopathology ; Surgery ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2013-04, Vol.45 (3), p.1232-1236</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-9bc68252bfbf5c48793fa31a32dc29870598e36c6160943a7665c69a5579a8603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-9bc68252bfbf5c48793fa31a32dc29870598e36c6160943a7665c69a5579a8603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27913,27914,45984</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23622666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harraz, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokeir, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliman, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Hefnawy, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalaby, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, A.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghoneim, M.A</creatorcontrib><title>Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction To determine risk factors for and the effects of impaired perfusion (IP)—“reduced or non-perfusion”—of graft areas supplied by an accessory artery on allograft function. Objectives One hundred five consecutive grafts with multiple renal arteries were prospectively evaluated using Doppler ultrasound (US) to detect the perfusion of allograft segments supplied by the accessory artery. We studied factors predicting and the effects of IP on graft function. Results Doppler US diagnosed IP of allograft accessory arteries in 11 (10.5%) allografts. Mean values ± standard deviations and median (range) of renographic clearance of grafts with IP were 50.5 ± 26 and 40 (range, 21–92) mL/min, while those of grafts with patent accessory arteries were 68.6 ± 18.9 and 67.2 (range 21–117; P < .01). The percentage change in renographic clearance before versus after transplantation increased among grafts with patent arteries and decreased for those with IP ( P = .03). On multivariate analysis, factors predicting IP of the accessory artery were delayed graft function (odds ratio [OR] = 9.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6–58.6; P = .01) and upper polar arteries (OR = 8.9; 95% CI = 1.8–43.4; P < .01). Conclusion When considering transplants with accessory arteries, greatest attention and efforts should be exerted on upper polar arteries to avoid delayed graft function.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Living Donors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Renal Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Renal Artery - physiopathology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctuEzEUQC0EoqHwC8hixWamfow9YxZIUUtLpSAkKGvL8dwBB8cOtqcof49DGgl1xcq68rmvcxF6Q0lLCZUXm7YkE_IuRQswtoxQ3hLWEk6eoAUdet4wyfhTtCCkow3lnThDL3LekBqzjj9HZ4xLxqSUC1SuTQEcJ7y0FnKOaY-_QDAeL1OB5CBjF_BNMlPJ-LcrP_Cn2Re38_AYG-fkwne8cvfQXMUQ0wnwPjZ3f-f1JhRTXAwv0bPJ-AyvHt5z9O36w93lx2b1-eb2crlqbMdFadTayoEJtp7Wk7Dd0Cs-GU4NZ6NlauiJUANwaSWVRHXc9FIKK5URoldmkISfo7fHulXVrxly0VuXLfg6CMQ566qmZ2IYOlXRd0fUpphzgknvktuatNeU6IN1vdH_WtcH65owXa3X5NcPfeb1tv6dUk-aK3B1BKBue-8g6WwdBAujS2CLHqP7vz7vH5Wx3gVnjf8Je8ibOKeqvO6lc03QXw_3P5yfckJoryT_A9Wnryc</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Harraz, A.M</creator><creator>Shokeir, A.A</creator><creator>Soliman, S.A</creator><creator>El-Hefnawy, A.S</creator><creator>Kamal, M.M</creator><creator>Shalaby, I</creator><creator>Kamal, A.I</creator><creator>Ghoneim, M.A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation</title><author>Harraz, A.M ; Shokeir, A.A ; Soliman, S.A ; El-Hefnawy, A.S ; Kamal, M.M ; Shalaby, I ; Kamal, A.I ; Ghoneim, M.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-9bc68252bfbf5c48793fa31a32dc29870598e36c6160943a7665c69a5579a8603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Living Donors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Renal Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Renal Artery - physiopathology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harraz, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokeir, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliman, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Hefnawy, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalaby, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, A.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghoneim, M.A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harraz, A.M</au><au>Shokeir, A.A</au><au>Soliman, S.A</au><au>El-Hefnawy, A.S</au><au>Kamal, M.M</au><au>Shalaby, I</au><au>Kamal, A.I</au><au>Ghoneim, M.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1232</spage><epage>1236</epage><pages>1232-1236</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction To determine risk factors for and the effects of impaired perfusion (IP)—“reduced or non-perfusion”—of graft areas supplied by an accessory artery on allograft function. Objectives One hundred five consecutive grafts with multiple renal arteries were prospectively evaluated using Doppler ultrasound (US) to detect the perfusion of allograft segments supplied by the accessory artery. We studied factors predicting and the effects of IP on graft function. Results Doppler US diagnosed IP of allograft accessory arteries in 11 (10.5%) allografts. Mean values ± standard deviations and median (range) of renographic clearance of grafts with IP were 50.5 ± 26 and 40 (range, 21–92) mL/min, while those of grafts with patent accessory arteries were 68.6 ± 18.9 and 67.2 (range 21–117; P < .01). The percentage change in renographic clearance before versus after transplantation increased among grafts with patent arteries and decreased for those with IP ( P = .03). On multivariate analysis, factors predicting IP of the accessory artery were delayed graft function (odds ratio [OR] = 9.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6–58.6; P = .01) and upper polar arteries (OR = 8.9; 95% CI = 1.8–43.4; P < .01). Conclusion When considering transplants with accessory arteries, greatest attention and efforts should be exerted on upper polar arteries to avoid delayed graft function.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23622666</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.030</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1345 |
ispartof | Transplantation proceedings, 2013-04, Vol.45 (3), p.1232-1236 |
issn | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347258849 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Female Humans Kidney Transplantation Living Donors Male Middle Aged Renal Artery - diagnostic imaging Renal Artery - physiopathology Surgery Transplantation, Homologous Ultrasonography, Doppler |
title | Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A10%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fate%20of%20Accessory%20Renal%20Arteries%20in%20Grafts%20with%20Multiple%20Renal%20Arteries%20during%20Live-Donor%20Renal%20Allo-Transplantation&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Harraz,%20A.M&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1232&rft.epage=1236&rft.pages=1232-1236&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1347258849%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1347258849&rft_id=info:pmid/23622666&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0041134513001796&rfr_iscdi=true |