Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation

Abstract Introduction To determine risk factors for and the effects of impaired perfusion (IP)—“reduced or non-perfusion”—of graft areas supplied by an accessory artery on allograft function. Objectives One hundred five consecutive grafts with multiple renal arteries were prospectively evaluated usi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2013-04, Vol.45 (3), p.1232-1236
Hauptverfasser: Harraz, A.M, Shokeir, A.A, Soliman, S.A, El-Hefnawy, A.S, Kamal, M.M, Shalaby, I, Kamal, A.I, Ghoneim, M.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1236
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1232
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 45
creator Harraz, A.M
Shokeir, A.A
Soliman, S.A
El-Hefnawy, A.S
Kamal, M.M
Shalaby, I
Kamal, A.I
Ghoneim, M.A
description Abstract Introduction To determine risk factors for and the effects of impaired perfusion (IP)—“reduced or non-perfusion”—of graft areas supplied by an accessory artery on allograft function. Objectives One hundred five consecutive grafts with multiple renal arteries were prospectively evaluated using Doppler ultrasound (US) to detect the perfusion of allograft segments supplied by the accessory artery. We studied factors predicting and the effects of IP on graft function. Results Doppler US diagnosed IP of allograft accessory arteries in 11 (10.5%) allografts. Mean values ± standard deviations and median (range) of renographic clearance of grafts with IP were 50.5 ± 26 and 40 (range, 21–92) mL/min, while those of grafts with patent accessory arteries were 68.6 ± 18.9 and 67.2 (range 21–117; P < .01). The percentage change in renographic clearance before versus after transplantation increased among grafts with patent arteries and decreased for those with IP ( P = .03). On multivariate analysis, factors predicting IP of the accessory artery were delayed graft function (odds ratio [OR] = 9.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6–58.6; P = .01) and upper polar arteries (OR = 8.9; 95% CI = 1.8–43.4; P < .01). Conclusion When considering transplants with accessory arteries, greatest attention and efforts should be exerted on upper polar arteries to avoid delayed graft function.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347258849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0041134513001796</els_id><sourcerecordid>1347258849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-9bc68252bfbf5c48793fa31a32dc29870598e36c6160943a7665c69a5579a8603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctuEzEUQC0EoqHwC8hixWamfow9YxZIUUtLpSAkKGvL8dwBB8cOtqcof49DGgl1xcq68rmvcxF6Q0lLCZUXm7YkE_IuRQswtoxQ3hLWEk6eoAUdet4wyfhTtCCkow3lnThDL3LekBqzjj9HZ4xLxqSUC1SuTQEcJ7y0FnKOaY-_QDAeL1OB5CBjF_BNMlPJ-LcrP_Cn2Re38_AYG-fkwne8cvfQXMUQ0wnwPjZ3f-f1JhRTXAwv0bPJ-AyvHt5z9O36w93lx2b1-eb2crlqbMdFadTayoEJtp7Wk7Dd0Cs-GU4NZ6NlauiJUANwaSWVRHXc9FIKK5URoldmkISfo7fHulXVrxly0VuXLfg6CMQ566qmZ2IYOlXRd0fUpphzgknvktuatNeU6IN1vdH_WtcH65owXa3X5NcPfeb1tv6dUk-aK3B1BKBue-8g6WwdBAujS2CLHqP7vz7vH5Wx3gVnjf8Je8ibOKeqvO6lc03QXw_3P5yfckJoryT_A9Wnryc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1347258849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Harraz, A.M ; Shokeir, A.A ; Soliman, S.A ; El-Hefnawy, A.S ; Kamal, M.M ; Shalaby, I ; Kamal, A.I ; Ghoneim, M.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Harraz, A.M ; Shokeir, A.A ; Soliman, S.A ; El-Hefnawy, A.S ; Kamal, M.M ; Shalaby, I ; Kamal, A.I ; Ghoneim, M.A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction To determine risk factors for and the effects of impaired perfusion (IP)—“reduced or non-perfusion”—of graft areas supplied by an accessory artery on allograft function. Objectives One hundred five consecutive grafts with multiple renal arteries were prospectively evaluated using Doppler ultrasound (US) to detect the perfusion of allograft segments supplied by the accessory artery. We studied factors predicting and the effects of IP on graft function. Results Doppler US diagnosed IP of allograft accessory arteries in 11 (10.5%) allografts. Mean values ± standard deviations and median (range) of renographic clearance of grafts with IP were 50.5 ± 26 and 40 (range, 21–92) mL/min, while those of grafts with patent accessory arteries were 68.6 ± 18.9 and 67.2 (range 21–117; P &lt; .01). The percentage change in renographic clearance before versus after transplantation increased among grafts with patent arteries and decreased for those with IP ( P = .03). On multivariate analysis, factors predicting IP of the accessory artery were delayed graft function (odds ratio [OR] = 9.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6–58.6; P = .01) and upper polar arteries (OR = 8.9; 95% CI = 1.8–43.4; P &lt; .01). Conclusion When considering transplants with accessory arteries, greatest attention and efforts should be exerted on upper polar arteries to avoid delayed graft function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23622666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation ; Living Donors ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Renal Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Renal Artery - physiopathology ; Surgery ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2013-04, Vol.45 (3), p.1232-1236</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-9bc68252bfbf5c48793fa31a32dc29870598e36c6160943a7665c69a5579a8603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-9bc68252bfbf5c48793fa31a32dc29870598e36c6160943a7665c69a5579a8603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27913,27914,45984</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23622666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harraz, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokeir, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliman, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Hefnawy, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalaby, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, A.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghoneim, M.A</creatorcontrib><title>Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction To determine risk factors for and the effects of impaired perfusion (IP)—“reduced or non-perfusion”—of graft areas supplied by an accessory artery on allograft function. Objectives One hundred five consecutive grafts with multiple renal arteries were prospectively evaluated using Doppler ultrasound (US) to detect the perfusion of allograft segments supplied by the accessory artery. We studied factors predicting and the effects of IP on graft function. Results Doppler US diagnosed IP of allograft accessory arteries in 11 (10.5%) allografts. Mean values ± standard deviations and median (range) of renographic clearance of grafts with IP were 50.5 ± 26 and 40 (range, 21–92) mL/min, while those of grafts with patent accessory arteries were 68.6 ± 18.9 and 67.2 (range 21–117; P &lt; .01). The percentage change in renographic clearance before versus after transplantation increased among grafts with patent arteries and decreased for those with IP ( P = .03). On multivariate analysis, factors predicting IP of the accessory artery were delayed graft function (odds ratio [OR] = 9.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6–58.6; P = .01) and upper polar arteries (OR = 8.9; 95% CI = 1.8–43.4; P &lt; .01). Conclusion When considering transplants with accessory arteries, greatest attention and efforts should be exerted on upper polar arteries to avoid delayed graft function.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Living Donors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Renal Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Renal Artery - physiopathology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctuEzEUQC0EoqHwC8hixWamfow9YxZIUUtLpSAkKGvL8dwBB8cOtqcof49DGgl1xcq68rmvcxF6Q0lLCZUXm7YkE_IuRQswtoxQ3hLWEk6eoAUdet4wyfhTtCCkow3lnThDL3LekBqzjj9HZ4xLxqSUC1SuTQEcJ7y0FnKOaY-_QDAeL1OB5CBjF_BNMlPJ-LcrP_Cn2Re38_AYG-fkwne8cvfQXMUQ0wnwPjZ3f-f1JhRTXAwv0bPJ-AyvHt5z9O36w93lx2b1-eb2crlqbMdFadTayoEJtp7Wk7Dd0Cs-GU4NZ6NlauiJUANwaSWVRHXc9FIKK5URoldmkISfo7fHulXVrxly0VuXLfg6CMQ566qmZ2IYOlXRd0fUpphzgknvktuatNeU6IN1vdH_WtcH65owXa3X5NcPfeb1tv6dUk-aK3B1BKBue-8g6WwdBAujS2CLHqP7vz7vH5Wx3gVnjf8Je8ibOKeqvO6lc03QXw_3P5yfckJoryT_A9Wnryc</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Harraz, A.M</creator><creator>Shokeir, A.A</creator><creator>Soliman, S.A</creator><creator>El-Hefnawy, A.S</creator><creator>Kamal, M.M</creator><creator>Shalaby, I</creator><creator>Kamal, A.I</creator><creator>Ghoneim, M.A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation</title><author>Harraz, A.M ; Shokeir, A.A ; Soliman, S.A ; El-Hefnawy, A.S ; Kamal, M.M ; Shalaby, I ; Kamal, A.I ; Ghoneim, M.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-9bc68252bfbf5c48793fa31a32dc29870598e36c6160943a7665c69a5579a8603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Living Donors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Renal Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Renal Artery - physiopathology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harraz, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokeir, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliman, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Hefnawy, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalaby, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, A.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghoneim, M.A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harraz, A.M</au><au>Shokeir, A.A</au><au>Soliman, S.A</au><au>El-Hefnawy, A.S</au><au>Kamal, M.M</au><au>Shalaby, I</au><au>Kamal, A.I</au><au>Ghoneim, M.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1232</spage><epage>1236</epage><pages>1232-1236</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction To determine risk factors for and the effects of impaired perfusion (IP)—“reduced or non-perfusion”—of graft areas supplied by an accessory artery on allograft function. Objectives One hundred five consecutive grafts with multiple renal arteries were prospectively evaluated using Doppler ultrasound (US) to detect the perfusion of allograft segments supplied by the accessory artery. We studied factors predicting and the effects of IP on graft function. Results Doppler US diagnosed IP of allograft accessory arteries in 11 (10.5%) allografts. Mean values ± standard deviations and median (range) of renographic clearance of grafts with IP were 50.5 ± 26 and 40 (range, 21–92) mL/min, while those of grafts with patent accessory arteries were 68.6 ± 18.9 and 67.2 (range 21–117; P &lt; .01). The percentage change in renographic clearance before versus after transplantation increased among grafts with patent arteries and decreased for those with IP ( P = .03). On multivariate analysis, factors predicting IP of the accessory artery were delayed graft function (odds ratio [OR] = 9.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6–58.6; P = .01) and upper polar arteries (OR = 8.9; 95% CI = 1.8–43.4; P &lt; .01). Conclusion When considering transplants with accessory arteries, greatest attention and efforts should be exerted on upper polar arteries to avoid delayed graft function.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23622666</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.030</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2013-04, Vol.45 (3), p.1232-1236
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1347258849
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Female
Humans
Kidney Transplantation
Living Donors
Male
Middle Aged
Renal Artery - diagnostic imaging
Renal Artery - physiopathology
Surgery
Transplantation, Homologous
Ultrasonography, Doppler
title Fate of Accessory Renal Arteries in Grafts with Multiple Renal Arteries during Live-Donor Renal Allo-Transplantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A10%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fate%20of%20Accessory%20Renal%20Arteries%20in%20Grafts%20with%20Multiple%20Renal%20Arteries%20during%20Live-Donor%20Renal%20Allo-Transplantation&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Harraz,%20A.M&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1232&rft.epage=1236&rft.pages=1232-1236&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1347258849%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1347258849&rft_id=info:pmid/23622666&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0041134513001796&rfr_iscdi=true