Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts
Background To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. Objective We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. Methods A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2013-05, Vol.68 (5), p.729-737 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 737 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 729 |
container_title | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH Redbord, Kelley, MD Taylor, James S., MD Shippy, Alison, MPH Kostecki, James, MS Swerlick, Robert, MD |
description | Background To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. Objective We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. Methods A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and distributed to dermatologists attending US meetings. A total of 150 responses were received outlining 152 most recent errors and 130 most serious errors. Survey responses, along with classification systems for other specialties, were used to develop a classification system for medical error in dermatology. Results The respondents’ demographics reflected the specialty: 63% were male, 60% were older than 50 years, and 60% were in solo or group private practice. Of the most recent errors reported, 85% happened once a year or less, and 86% did not result in harm to patients. The most common categories of both most recent and most serious errors were related to assessment (41% and 31%, respectively) and interventions (44% and 52%, respectively). Assessment errors were primarily related to investigations, and commonly involved the biopsy pathway. Intervention errors in the most recent and most serious errors were split between those related to medication (54% and 27%) and those related to procedures (46% and 73%). Of note, 5 and 21 wrong-site surgeries were reported in the most recent and most serious errors groups, respectively. Limitations Our findings are subject to respondent and recall bias and our classification system, although an important first step, is likely incomplete. Conclusion Our findings highlight several key areas of patient care in need of safety initiatives, namely the biopsy pathway, medication management, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1338393735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S019096221201198X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1338393735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3caa6b5559f2f9a1f1e4290742f83c6c2807ef11b157349ae8623bc745b0dc5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2LFDEQxYMo7rj6D3iQHL30mEr6KyLCsn7CigcVvIV0urKk7e6MSWagj_7nJszqwYOngqr3HtTvEfIU2B4YtC-m_aT1uOcMeF7sWdPfIztgsqvaru_ukx0DySrZcn5BHsU4McZkLbqH5IIL0bK-rXfk1yccndEzxRB8oG6lI4ZFJz_7240egjbJGXxJ3-AJZ39YcE3UW6qpmXWMzmZvcn6lcYsJF5o8HYM7YXY6H1zaaMSU3Hpbkg9ZWvxRW8wXtNaHFB-TB1bPEZ_czUvy7d3br9cfqpvP7z9eX91UpgZIlTBat0PTNNJyKzVYwJpL1tXc9sK0hvesQwswQNOJWmrsWy4G09XNwEbTaHFJnp9zD8H_PGJManHR4DzrFf0xKhCiF1J0oslSfpaa4GMMaFV-Z9FhU8BUQa8mVdCrgr7sMvpsenaXfxwWHP9a_rDOgldnAeYvTw6DiibzMLmAgCap0bv_57_-x25mt5bufuCGcfLHsGZ-ClTkiqkvpfzSPeQQkP138RsbXawr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1338393735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH ; Redbord, Kelley, MD ; Taylor, James S., MD ; Shippy, Alison, MPH ; Kostecki, James, MS ; Swerlick, Robert, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH ; Redbord, Kelley, MD ; Taylor, James S., MD ; Shippy, Alison, MPH ; Kostecki, James, MS ; Swerlick, Robert, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. Objective We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. Methods A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and distributed to dermatologists attending US meetings. A total of 150 responses were received outlining 152 most recent errors and 130 most serious errors. Survey responses, along with classification systems for other specialties, were used to develop a classification system for medical error in dermatology. Results The respondents’ demographics reflected the specialty: 63% were male, 60% were older than 50 years, and 60% were in solo or group private practice. Of the most recent errors reported, 85% happened once a year or less, and 86% did not result in harm to patients. The most common categories of both most recent and most serious errors were related to assessment (41% and 31%, respectively) and interventions (44% and 52%, respectively). Assessment errors were primarily related to investigations, and commonly involved the biopsy pathway. Intervention errors in the most recent and most serious errors were split between those related to medication (54% and 27%) and those related to procedures (46% and 73%). Of note, 5 and 21 wrong-site surgeries were reported in the most recent and most serious errors groups, respectively. Limitations Our findings are subject to respondent and recall bias and our classification system, although an important first step, is likely incomplete. Conclusion Our findings highlight several key areas of patient care in need of safety initiatives, namely the biopsy pathway, medication management, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23360864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biopsy - standards ; Biopsy - statistics & numerical data ; Dermatology ; Dermatology - standards ; Dermatology - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; medical error ; Medical Errors - classification ; Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data ; Medication Errors - classification ; Medication Errors - statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Patient Safety ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; practice improvement ; quality of care ; Quality of Health Care ; Universal Protocol ; wrong-site surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2013-05, Vol.68 (5), p.729-737</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>2012 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3caa6b5559f2f9a1f1e4290742f83c6c2807ef11b157349ae8623bc745b0dc5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3caa6b5559f2f9a1f1e4290742f83c6c2807ef11b157349ae8623bc745b0dc5a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019096221201198X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23360864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redbord, Kelley, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, James S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shippy, Alison, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostecki, James, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swerlick, Robert, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. Objective We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. Methods A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and distributed to dermatologists attending US meetings. A total of 150 responses were received outlining 152 most recent errors and 130 most serious errors. Survey responses, along with classification systems for other specialties, were used to develop a classification system for medical error in dermatology. Results The respondents’ demographics reflected the specialty: 63% were male, 60% were older than 50 years, and 60% were in solo or group private practice. Of the most recent errors reported, 85% happened once a year or less, and 86% did not result in harm to patients. The most common categories of both most recent and most serious errors were related to assessment (41% and 31%, respectively) and interventions (44% and 52%, respectively). Assessment errors were primarily related to investigations, and commonly involved the biopsy pathway. Intervention errors in the most recent and most serious errors were split between those related to medication (54% and 27%) and those related to procedures (46% and 73%). Of note, 5 and 21 wrong-site surgeries were reported in the most recent and most serious errors groups, respectively. Limitations Our findings are subject to respondent and recall bias and our classification system, although an important first step, is likely incomplete. Conclusion Our findings highlight several key areas of patient care in need of safety initiatives, namely the biopsy pathway, medication management, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biopsy - standards</subject><subject>Biopsy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatology - standards</subject><subject>Dermatology - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>medical error</subject><subject>Medical Errors - classification</subject><subject>Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medication Errors - classification</subject><subject>Medication Errors - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>practice improvement</subject><subject>quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Universal Protocol</subject><subject>wrong-site surgery</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2LFDEQxYMo7rj6D3iQHL30mEr6KyLCsn7CigcVvIV0urKk7e6MSWagj_7nJszqwYOngqr3HtTvEfIU2B4YtC-m_aT1uOcMeF7sWdPfIztgsqvaru_ukx0DySrZcn5BHsU4McZkLbqH5IIL0bK-rXfk1yccndEzxRB8oG6lI4ZFJz_7240egjbJGXxJ3-AJZ39YcE3UW6qpmXWMzmZvcn6lcYsJF5o8HYM7YXY6H1zaaMSU3Hpbkg9ZWvxRW8wXtNaHFB-TB1bPEZ_czUvy7d3br9cfqpvP7z9eX91UpgZIlTBat0PTNNJyKzVYwJpL1tXc9sK0hvesQwswQNOJWmrsWy4G09XNwEbTaHFJnp9zD8H_PGJManHR4DzrFf0xKhCiF1J0oslSfpaa4GMMaFV-Z9FhU8BUQa8mVdCrgr7sMvpsenaXfxwWHP9a_rDOgldnAeYvTw6DiibzMLmAgCap0bv_57_-x25mt5bufuCGcfLHsGZ-ClTkiqkvpfzSPeQQkP138RsbXawr</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Redbord, Kelley, MD</creator><creator>Taylor, James S., MD</creator><creator>Shippy, Alison, MPH</creator><creator>Kostecki, James, MS</creator><creator>Swerlick, Robert, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts</title><author>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH ; Redbord, Kelley, MD ; Taylor, James S., MD ; Shippy, Alison, MPH ; Kostecki, James, MS ; Swerlick, Robert, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3caa6b5559f2f9a1f1e4290742f83c6c2807ef11b157349ae8623bc745b0dc5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biopsy - standards</topic><topic>Biopsy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatology - standards</topic><topic>Dermatology - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>medical error</topic><topic>Medical Errors - classification</topic><topic>Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medication Errors - classification</topic><topic>Medication Errors - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>practice improvement</topic><topic>quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Universal Protocol</topic><topic>wrong-site surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redbord, Kelley, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, James S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shippy, Alison, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostecki, James, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swerlick, Robert, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH</au><au>Redbord, Kelley, MD</au><au>Taylor, James S., MD</au><au>Shippy, Alison, MPH</au><au>Kostecki, James, MS</au><au>Swerlick, Robert, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>729</spage><epage>737</epage><pages>729-737</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><abstract>Background To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. Objective We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. Methods A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and distributed to dermatologists attending US meetings. A total of 150 responses were received outlining 152 most recent errors and 130 most serious errors. Survey responses, along with classification systems for other specialties, were used to develop a classification system for medical error in dermatology. Results The respondents’ demographics reflected the specialty: 63% were male, 60% were older than 50 years, and 60% were in solo or group private practice. Of the most recent errors reported, 85% happened once a year or less, and 86% did not result in harm to patients. The most common categories of both most recent and most serious errors were related to assessment (41% and 31%, respectively) and interventions (44% and 52%, respectively). Assessment errors were primarily related to investigations, and commonly involved the biopsy pathway. Intervention errors in the most recent and most serious errors were split between those related to medication (54% and 27%) and those related to procedures (46% and 73%). Of note, 5 and 21 wrong-site surgeries were reported in the most recent and most serious errors groups, respectively. Limitations Our findings are subject to respondent and recall bias and our classification system, although an important first step, is likely incomplete. Conclusion Our findings highlight several key areas of patient care in need of safety initiatives, namely the biopsy pathway, medication management, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23360864</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.058</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-9622 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2013-05, Vol.68 (5), p.729-737 |
issn | 0190-9622 1097-6787 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1338393735 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Biopsy - standards Biopsy - statistics & numerical data Dermatology Dermatology - standards Dermatology - statistics & numerical data Female Health Care Surveys Humans Male medical error Medical Errors - classification Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data Medication Errors - classification Medication Errors - statistics & numerical data Middle Aged Patient Safety Practice Guidelines as Topic practice improvement quality of care Quality of Health Care Universal Protocol wrong-site surgery |
title | Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A37%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medical%20error%20in%20dermatology%20practice:%20Development%20of%20a%20classification%20system%20to%20drive%20priority%20setting%20in%20patient%20safety%20efforts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=Watson,%20Alice%20J.,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=729&rft.epage=737&rft.pages=729-737&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1338393735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1338393735&rft_id=info:pmid/23360864&rft_els_id=S019096221201198X&rfr_iscdi=true |