Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts

Background To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. Objective We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. Methods A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2013-05, Vol.68 (5), p.729-737
Hauptverfasser: Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH, Redbord, Kelley, MD, Taylor, James S., MD, Shippy, Alison, MPH, Kostecki, James, MS, Swerlick, Robert, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 737
container_issue 5
container_start_page 729
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
container_volume 68
creator Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH
Redbord, Kelley, MD
Taylor, James S., MD
Shippy, Alison, MPH
Kostecki, James, MS
Swerlick, Robert, MD
description Background To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. Objective We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. Methods A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and distributed to dermatologists attending US meetings. A total of 150 responses were received outlining 152 most recent errors and 130 most serious errors. Survey responses, along with classification systems for other specialties, were used to develop a classification system for medical error in dermatology. Results The respondents’ demographics reflected the specialty: 63% were male, 60% were older than 50 years, and 60% were in solo or group private practice. Of the most recent errors reported, 85% happened once a year or less, and 86% did not result in harm to patients. The most common categories of both most recent and most serious errors were related to assessment (41% and 31%, respectively) and interventions (44% and 52%, respectively). Assessment errors were primarily related to investigations, and commonly involved the biopsy pathway. Intervention errors in the most recent and most serious errors were split between those related to medication (54% and 27%) and those related to procedures (46% and 73%). Of note, 5 and 21 wrong-site surgeries were reported in the most recent and most serious errors groups, respectively. Limitations Our findings are subject to respondent and recall bias and our classification system, although an important first step, is likely incomplete. Conclusion Our findings highlight several key areas of patient care in need of safety initiatives, namely the biopsy pathway, medication management, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1338393735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S019096221201198X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1338393735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3caa6b5559f2f9a1f1e4290742f83c6c2807ef11b157349ae8623bc745b0dc5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2LFDEQxYMo7rj6D3iQHL30mEr6KyLCsn7CigcVvIV0urKk7e6MSWagj_7nJszqwYOngqr3HtTvEfIU2B4YtC-m_aT1uOcMeF7sWdPfIztgsqvaru_ukx0DySrZcn5BHsU4McZkLbqH5IIL0bK-rXfk1yccndEzxRB8oG6lI4ZFJz_7240egjbJGXxJ3-AJZ39YcE3UW6qpmXWMzmZvcn6lcYsJF5o8HYM7YXY6H1zaaMSU3Hpbkg9ZWvxRW8wXtNaHFB-TB1bPEZ_czUvy7d3br9cfqpvP7z9eX91UpgZIlTBat0PTNNJyKzVYwJpL1tXc9sK0hvesQwswQNOJWmrsWy4G09XNwEbTaHFJnp9zD8H_PGJManHR4DzrFf0xKhCiF1J0oslSfpaa4GMMaFV-Z9FhU8BUQa8mVdCrgr7sMvpsenaXfxwWHP9a_rDOgldnAeYvTw6DiibzMLmAgCap0bv_57_-x25mt5bufuCGcfLHsGZ-ClTkiqkvpfzSPeQQkP138RsbXawr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1338393735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH ; Redbord, Kelley, MD ; Taylor, James S., MD ; Shippy, Alison, MPH ; Kostecki, James, MS ; Swerlick, Robert, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH ; Redbord, Kelley, MD ; Taylor, James S., MD ; Shippy, Alison, MPH ; Kostecki, James, MS ; Swerlick, Robert, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. Objective We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. Methods A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and distributed to dermatologists attending US meetings. A total of 150 responses were received outlining 152 most recent errors and 130 most serious errors. Survey responses, along with classification systems for other specialties, were used to develop a classification system for medical error in dermatology. Results The respondents’ demographics reflected the specialty: 63% were male, 60% were older than 50 years, and 60% were in solo or group private practice. Of the most recent errors reported, 85% happened once a year or less, and 86% did not result in harm to patients. The most common categories of both most recent and most serious errors were related to assessment (41% and 31%, respectively) and interventions (44% and 52%, respectively). Assessment errors were primarily related to investigations, and commonly involved the biopsy pathway. Intervention errors in the most recent and most serious errors were split between those related to medication (54% and 27%) and those related to procedures (46% and 73%). Of note, 5 and 21 wrong-site surgeries were reported in the most recent and most serious errors groups, respectively. Limitations Our findings are subject to respondent and recall bias and our classification system, although an important first step, is likely incomplete. Conclusion Our findings highlight several key areas of patient care in need of safety initiatives, namely the biopsy pathway, medication management, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23360864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biopsy - standards ; Biopsy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Dermatology ; Dermatology - standards ; Dermatology - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; medical error ; Medical Errors - classification ; Medical Errors - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medication Errors - classification ; Medication Errors - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Patient Safety ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; practice improvement ; quality of care ; Quality of Health Care ; Universal Protocol ; wrong-site surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2013-05, Vol.68 (5), p.729-737</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>2012 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3caa6b5559f2f9a1f1e4290742f83c6c2807ef11b157349ae8623bc745b0dc5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3caa6b5559f2f9a1f1e4290742f83c6c2807ef11b157349ae8623bc745b0dc5a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019096221201198X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23360864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redbord, Kelley, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, James S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shippy, Alison, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostecki, James, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swerlick, Robert, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. Objective We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. Methods A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and distributed to dermatologists attending US meetings. A total of 150 responses were received outlining 152 most recent errors and 130 most serious errors. Survey responses, along with classification systems for other specialties, were used to develop a classification system for medical error in dermatology. Results The respondents’ demographics reflected the specialty: 63% were male, 60% were older than 50 years, and 60% were in solo or group private practice. Of the most recent errors reported, 85% happened once a year or less, and 86% did not result in harm to patients. The most common categories of both most recent and most serious errors were related to assessment (41% and 31%, respectively) and interventions (44% and 52%, respectively). Assessment errors were primarily related to investigations, and commonly involved the biopsy pathway. Intervention errors in the most recent and most serious errors were split between those related to medication (54% and 27%) and those related to procedures (46% and 73%). Of note, 5 and 21 wrong-site surgeries were reported in the most recent and most serious errors groups, respectively. Limitations Our findings are subject to respondent and recall bias and our classification system, although an important first step, is likely incomplete. Conclusion Our findings highlight several key areas of patient care in need of safety initiatives, namely the biopsy pathway, medication management, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biopsy - standards</subject><subject>Biopsy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatology - standards</subject><subject>Dermatology - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>medical error</subject><subject>Medical Errors - classification</subject><subject>Medical Errors - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medication Errors - classification</subject><subject>Medication Errors - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>practice improvement</subject><subject>quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Universal Protocol</subject><subject>wrong-site surgery</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2LFDEQxYMo7rj6D3iQHL30mEr6KyLCsn7CigcVvIV0urKk7e6MSWagj_7nJszqwYOngqr3HtTvEfIU2B4YtC-m_aT1uOcMeF7sWdPfIztgsqvaru_ukx0DySrZcn5BHsU4McZkLbqH5IIL0bK-rXfk1yccndEzxRB8oG6lI4ZFJz_7240egjbJGXxJ3-AJZ39YcE3UW6qpmXWMzmZvcn6lcYsJF5o8HYM7YXY6H1zaaMSU3Hpbkg9ZWvxRW8wXtNaHFB-TB1bPEZ_czUvy7d3br9cfqpvP7z9eX91UpgZIlTBat0PTNNJyKzVYwJpL1tXc9sK0hvesQwswQNOJWmrsWy4G09XNwEbTaHFJnp9zD8H_PGJManHR4DzrFf0xKhCiF1J0oslSfpaa4GMMaFV-Z9FhU8BUQa8mVdCrgr7sMvpsenaXfxwWHP9a_rDOgldnAeYvTw6DiibzMLmAgCap0bv_57_-x25mt5bufuCGcfLHsGZ-ClTkiqkvpfzSPeQQkP138RsbXawr</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Redbord, Kelley, MD</creator><creator>Taylor, James S., MD</creator><creator>Shippy, Alison, MPH</creator><creator>Kostecki, James, MS</creator><creator>Swerlick, Robert, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts</title><author>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH ; Redbord, Kelley, MD ; Taylor, James S., MD ; Shippy, Alison, MPH ; Kostecki, James, MS ; Swerlick, Robert, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3caa6b5559f2f9a1f1e4290742f83c6c2807ef11b157349ae8623bc745b0dc5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biopsy - standards</topic><topic>Biopsy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatology - standards</topic><topic>Dermatology - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>medical error</topic><topic>Medical Errors - classification</topic><topic>Medical Errors - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medication Errors - classification</topic><topic>Medication Errors - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>practice improvement</topic><topic>quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Universal Protocol</topic><topic>wrong-site surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redbord, Kelley, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, James S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shippy, Alison, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostecki, James, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swerlick, Robert, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watson, Alice J., MD, MPH</au><au>Redbord, Kelley, MD</au><au>Taylor, James S., MD</au><au>Shippy, Alison, MPH</au><au>Kostecki, James, MS</au><au>Swerlick, Robert, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>729</spage><epage>737</epage><pages>729-737</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><abstract>Background To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. Objective We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. Methods A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and distributed to dermatologists attending US meetings. A total of 150 responses were received outlining 152 most recent errors and 130 most serious errors. Survey responses, along with classification systems for other specialties, were used to develop a classification system for medical error in dermatology. Results The respondents’ demographics reflected the specialty: 63% were male, 60% were older than 50 years, and 60% were in solo or group private practice. Of the most recent errors reported, 85% happened once a year or less, and 86% did not result in harm to patients. The most common categories of both most recent and most serious errors were related to assessment (41% and 31%, respectively) and interventions (44% and 52%, respectively). Assessment errors were primarily related to investigations, and commonly involved the biopsy pathway. Intervention errors in the most recent and most serious errors were split between those related to medication (54% and 27%) and those related to procedures (46% and 73%). Of note, 5 and 21 wrong-site surgeries were reported in the most recent and most serious errors groups, respectively. Limitations Our findings are subject to respondent and recall bias and our classification system, although an important first step, is likely incomplete. Conclusion Our findings highlight several key areas of patient care in need of safety initiatives, namely the biopsy pathway, medication management, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23360864</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.058</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-9622
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2013-05, Vol.68 (5), p.729-737
issn 0190-9622
1097-6787
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1338393735
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Biopsy - standards
Biopsy - statistics & numerical data
Dermatology
Dermatology - standards
Dermatology - statistics & numerical data
Female
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Male
medical error
Medical Errors - classification
Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data
Medication Errors - classification
Medication Errors - statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Patient Safety
Practice Guidelines as Topic
practice improvement
quality of care
Quality of Health Care
Universal Protocol
wrong-site surgery
title Medical error in dermatology practice: Development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A37%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medical%20error%20in%20dermatology%20practice:%20Development%20of%20a%20classification%20system%20to%20drive%20priority%20setting%20in%20patient%20safety%20efforts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=Watson,%20Alice%20J.,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=729&rft.epage=737&rft.pages=729-737&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1338393735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1338393735&rft_id=info:pmid/23360864&rft_els_id=S019096221201198X&rfr_iscdi=true