The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study
Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the humerus slides along the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Blocking this motion may result in decreased glenohumeral (GH) range of motion (ROM). The goal of the study was to characterize the excursion of the LHBT and measure the effect of b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2013-05, Vol.22 (5), p.658-665 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 665 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 658 |
container_title | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | McGahan, Patrick J., MD Patel, Hinesh, BS Dickinson, Ephraim, MD Leasure, Jeremi, MS Montgomery, William, MD |
description | Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the humerus slides along the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Blocking this motion may result in decreased glenohumeral (GH) range of motion (ROM). The goal of the study was to characterize the excursion of the LHBT and measure the effect of biceps adhesions on GH ROM. Materials and methods A custom biomechanical testing setup was used to measure the excursion of the LHBT and rotation of the humerus at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of GH abduction in the scapular plane. An in situ biceps tenodesis with the biceps anchor still intact, thus simulating biceps adhesions, was sequentially performed in 2 positions: 0° abduction and maximum external rotation, followed by 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation. The effect of tenodesis on ROM was measured. Results There was an average excursion of 19.4 ± 5.4 mm of the LHBT as the humerus was taken through ROM in the scapular plane. Tenodesis in 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation resulted in a significant decrease in GH external rotation of 47.3° ± 12.2° ( P = .007) with the arm in 0° abduction. Conclusions Tenodesis in maximum internal rotation limited rotation significantly, such that in situ tenodesis without proximal tenotomy should not be performed. Furthermore, in situations where the biceps is at risk for scarring, such as proximal humeral fractures, shoulder arthroplasty, and the stiff shoulder, the biomechanical consequence of biceps adhesions may be similar to in situ tenodesis and may limit ROM and clinical outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1328545175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274612002923</els_id><sourcerecordid>1328545175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b706979d122807c5eeaacd11ad3f3258f0cc48ae1dffc69189b9bd06cff5576e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQRi0Eoj_wAGyQl2wSxk6cxCAhVRUUpEpVRVlbjj3udUjii51Uum-Po1tYdNHVzOJ8nzRnCHnHoGTAmo9DOSQsOTBeQlsCVC_IKRMVLxoB8DLvILqCt3VzQs5SGgBA1sBfkxPOpZSd4Kfk9m6HFJ1Ds9DgaO8N7hPVdofJhznRMNP7EeewWyeMeqRRz_e4kVNYMvCJamq01Q8YvaFpWe3hDXnl9Jjw7eM8J7--fb27_F5c31z9uLy4LkwN3VL0LTSylZZx3kFrBKLWxjKmbeUqLjoHxtSdRmadM41knexlb6ExzgnRNlidkw_H3n0Mf1ZMi5p8MjiOesawJsUq3olasFZklB1RE0NKEZ3aRz_peFAM1GZSDSqbVJtJBa3KJnPm_WP92k9o_yf-qcvA5yOA-cgHj1El43E2aH3MNpUN_tn6L0_SZvSzN3r8jQdMQ1jjnO0pplLOqJ_bK7dPMg7AJa-qv7UlmNE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1328545175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McGahan, Patrick J., MD ; Patel, Hinesh, BS ; Dickinson, Ephraim, MD ; Leasure, Jeremi, MS ; Montgomery, William, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>McGahan, Patrick J., MD ; Patel, Hinesh, BS ; Dickinson, Ephraim, MD ; Leasure, Jeremi, MS ; Montgomery, William, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the humerus slides along the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Blocking this motion may result in decreased glenohumeral (GH) range of motion (ROM). The goal of the study was to characterize the excursion of the LHBT and measure the effect of biceps adhesions on GH ROM. Materials and methods A custom biomechanical testing setup was used to measure the excursion of the LHBT and rotation of the humerus at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of GH abduction in the scapular plane. An in situ biceps tenodesis with the biceps anchor still intact, thus simulating biceps adhesions, was sequentially performed in 2 positions: 0° abduction and maximum external rotation, followed by 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation. The effect of tenodesis on ROM was measured. Results There was an average excursion of 19.4 ± 5.4 mm of the LHBT as the humerus was taken through ROM in the scapular plane. Tenodesis in 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation resulted in a significant decrease in GH external rotation of 47.3° ± 12.2° ( P = .007) with the arm in 0° abduction. Conclusions Tenodesis in maximum internal rotation limited rotation significantly, such that in situ tenodesis without proximal tenotomy should not be performed. Furthermore, in situations where the biceps is at risk for scarring, such as proximal humeral fractures, shoulder arthroplasty, and the stiff shoulder, the biomechanical consequence of biceps adhesions may be similar to in situ tenodesis and may limit ROM and clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22999852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cadaver ; Female ; Humans ; in situ tenodesis ; Joint Diseases - etiology ; Joint Diseases - surgery ; Long head of biceps tendon ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology ; shoulder range of motion ; tendon excursion ; Tendons - surgery ; tenodesis ; Tissue Adhesions - complications ; Tissue Adhesions - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2013-05, Vol.22 (5), p.658-665</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b706979d122807c5eeaacd11ad3f3258f0cc48ae1dffc69189b9bd06cff5576e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b706979d122807c5eeaacd11ad3f3258f0cc48ae1dffc69189b9bd06cff5576e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274612002923$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22999852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGahan, Patrick J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Hinesh, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Ephraim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leasure, Jeremi, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, William, MD</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the humerus slides along the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Blocking this motion may result in decreased glenohumeral (GH) range of motion (ROM). The goal of the study was to characterize the excursion of the LHBT and measure the effect of biceps adhesions on GH ROM. Materials and methods A custom biomechanical testing setup was used to measure the excursion of the LHBT and rotation of the humerus at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of GH abduction in the scapular plane. An in situ biceps tenodesis with the biceps anchor still intact, thus simulating biceps adhesions, was sequentially performed in 2 positions: 0° abduction and maximum external rotation, followed by 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation. The effect of tenodesis on ROM was measured. Results There was an average excursion of 19.4 ± 5.4 mm of the LHBT as the humerus was taken through ROM in the scapular plane. Tenodesis in 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation resulted in a significant decrease in GH external rotation of 47.3° ± 12.2° ( P = .007) with the arm in 0° abduction. Conclusions Tenodesis in maximum internal rotation limited rotation significantly, such that in situ tenodesis without proximal tenotomy should not be performed. Furthermore, in situations where the biceps is at risk for scarring, such as proximal humeral fractures, shoulder arthroplasty, and the stiff shoulder, the biomechanical consequence of biceps adhesions may be similar to in situ tenodesis and may limit ROM and clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>in situ tenodesis</subject><subject>Joint Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Joint Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Long head of biceps tendon</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>shoulder range of motion</subject><subject>tendon excursion</subject><subject>Tendons - surgery</subject><subject>tenodesis</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - complications</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - surgery</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQRi0Eoj_wAGyQl2wSxk6cxCAhVRUUpEpVRVlbjj3udUjii51Uum-Po1tYdNHVzOJ8nzRnCHnHoGTAmo9DOSQsOTBeQlsCVC_IKRMVLxoB8DLvILqCt3VzQs5SGgBA1sBfkxPOpZSd4Kfk9m6HFJ1Ds9DgaO8N7hPVdofJhznRMNP7EeewWyeMeqRRz_e4kVNYMvCJamq01Q8YvaFpWe3hDXnl9Jjw7eM8J7--fb27_F5c31z9uLy4LkwN3VL0LTSylZZx3kFrBKLWxjKmbeUqLjoHxtSdRmadM41knexlb6ExzgnRNlidkw_H3n0Mf1ZMi5p8MjiOesawJsUq3olasFZklB1RE0NKEZ3aRz_peFAM1GZSDSqbVJtJBa3KJnPm_WP92k9o_yf-qcvA5yOA-cgHj1El43E2aH3MNpUN_tn6L0_SZvSzN3r8jQdMQ1jjnO0pplLOqJ_bK7dPMg7AJa-qv7UlmNE</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>McGahan, Patrick J., MD</creator><creator>Patel, Hinesh, BS</creator><creator>Dickinson, Ephraim, MD</creator><creator>Leasure, Jeremi, MS</creator><creator>Montgomery, William, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study</title><author>McGahan, Patrick J., MD ; Patel, Hinesh, BS ; Dickinson, Ephraim, MD ; Leasure, Jeremi, MS ; Montgomery, William, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b706979d122807c5eeaacd11ad3f3258f0cc48ae1dffc69189b9bd06cff5576e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>in situ tenodesis</topic><topic>Joint Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Joint Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Long head of biceps tendon</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>shoulder range of motion</topic><topic>tendon excursion</topic><topic>Tendons - surgery</topic><topic>tenodesis</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - complications</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGahan, Patrick J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Hinesh, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Ephraim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leasure, Jeremi, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, William, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGahan, Patrick J., MD</au><au>Patel, Hinesh, BS</au><au>Dickinson, Ephraim, MD</au><au>Leasure, Jeremi, MS</au><au>Montgomery, William, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>658</spage><epage>665</epage><pages>658-665</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the humerus slides along the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Blocking this motion may result in decreased glenohumeral (GH) range of motion (ROM). The goal of the study was to characterize the excursion of the LHBT and measure the effect of biceps adhesions on GH ROM. Materials and methods A custom biomechanical testing setup was used to measure the excursion of the LHBT and rotation of the humerus at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of GH abduction in the scapular plane. An in situ biceps tenodesis with the biceps anchor still intact, thus simulating biceps adhesions, was sequentially performed in 2 positions: 0° abduction and maximum external rotation, followed by 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation. The effect of tenodesis on ROM was measured. Results There was an average excursion of 19.4 ± 5.4 mm of the LHBT as the humerus was taken through ROM in the scapular plane. Tenodesis in 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation resulted in a significant decrease in GH external rotation of 47.3° ± 12.2° ( P = .007) with the arm in 0° abduction. Conclusions Tenodesis in maximum internal rotation limited rotation significantly, such that in situ tenodesis without proximal tenotomy should not be performed. Furthermore, in situations where the biceps is at risk for scarring, such as proximal humeral fractures, shoulder arthroplasty, and the stiff shoulder, the biomechanical consequence of biceps adhesions may be similar to in situ tenodesis and may limit ROM and clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22999852</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-2746 |
ispartof | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2013-05, Vol.22 (5), p.658-665 |
issn | 1058-2746 1532-6500 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1328545175 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Biomechanical Phenomena Cadaver Female Humans in situ tenodesis Joint Diseases - etiology Joint Diseases - surgery Long head of biceps tendon Male Middle Aged Orthopedics Range of Motion, Articular Shoulder Joint - physiopathology shoulder range of motion tendon excursion Tendons - surgery tenodesis Tissue Adhesions - complications Tissue Adhesions - surgery |
title | The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A55%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20biceps%20adhesions%20on%20glenohumeral%20range%20of%20motion:%20a%20cadaveric%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=McGahan,%20Patrick%20J.,%20MD&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=658&rft.epage=665&rft.pages=658-665&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1328545175%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1328545175&rft_id=info:pmid/22999852&rft_els_id=S1058274612002923&rfr_iscdi=true |