The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study

Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the humerus slides along the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Blocking this motion may result in decreased glenohumeral (GH) range of motion (ROM). The goal of the study was to characterize the excursion of the LHBT and measure the effect of b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2013-05, Vol.22 (5), p.658-665
Hauptverfasser: McGahan, Patrick J., MD, Patel, Hinesh, BS, Dickinson, Ephraim, MD, Leasure, Jeremi, MS, Montgomery, William, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 665
container_issue 5
container_start_page 658
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 22
creator McGahan, Patrick J., MD
Patel, Hinesh, BS
Dickinson, Ephraim, MD
Leasure, Jeremi, MS
Montgomery, William, MD
description Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the humerus slides along the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Blocking this motion may result in decreased glenohumeral (GH) range of motion (ROM). The goal of the study was to characterize the excursion of the LHBT and measure the effect of biceps adhesions on GH ROM. Materials and methods A custom biomechanical testing setup was used to measure the excursion of the LHBT and rotation of the humerus at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of GH abduction in the scapular plane. An in situ biceps tenodesis with the biceps anchor still intact, thus simulating biceps adhesions, was sequentially performed in 2 positions: 0° abduction and maximum external rotation, followed by 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation. The effect of tenodesis on ROM was measured. Results There was an average excursion of 19.4 ± 5.4 mm of the LHBT as the humerus was taken through ROM in the scapular plane. Tenodesis in 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation resulted in a significant decrease in GH external rotation of 47.3° ± 12.2° ( P = .007) with the arm in 0° abduction. Conclusions Tenodesis in maximum internal rotation limited rotation significantly, such that in situ tenodesis without proximal tenotomy should not be performed. Furthermore, in situations where the biceps is at risk for scarring, such as proximal humeral fractures, shoulder arthroplasty, and the stiff shoulder, the biomechanical consequence of biceps adhesions may be similar to in situ tenodesis and may limit ROM and clinical outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1328545175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274612002923</els_id><sourcerecordid>1328545175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b706979d122807c5eeaacd11ad3f3258f0cc48ae1dffc69189b9bd06cff5576e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQRi0Eoj_wAGyQl2wSxk6cxCAhVRUUpEpVRVlbjj3udUjii51Uum-Po1tYdNHVzOJ8nzRnCHnHoGTAmo9DOSQsOTBeQlsCVC_IKRMVLxoB8DLvILqCt3VzQs5SGgBA1sBfkxPOpZSd4Kfk9m6HFJ1Ds9DgaO8N7hPVdofJhznRMNP7EeewWyeMeqRRz_e4kVNYMvCJamq01Q8YvaFpWe3hDXnl9Jjw7eM8J7--fb27_F5c31z9uLy4LkwN3VL0LTSylZZx3kFrBKLWxjKmbeUqLjoHxtSdRmadM41knexlb6ExzgnRNlidkw_H3n0Mf1ZMi5p8MjiOesawJsUq3olasFZklB1RE0NKEZ3aRz_peFAM1GZSDSqbVJtJBa3KJnPm_WP92k9o_yf-qcvA5yOA-cgHj1El43E2aH3MNpUN_tn6L0_SZvSzN3r8jQdMQ1jjnO0pplLOqJ_bK7dPMg7AJa-qv7UlmNE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1328545175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McGahan, Patrick J., MD ; Patel, Hinesh, BS ; Dickinson, Ephraim, MD ; Leasure, Jeremi, MS ; Montgomery, William, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>McGahan, Patrick J., MD ; Patel, Hinesh, BS ; Dickinson, Ephraim, MD ; Leasure, Jeremi, MS ; Montgomery, William, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the humerus slides along the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Blocking this motion may result in decreased glenohumeral (GH) range of motion (ROM). The goal of the study was to characterize the excursion of the LHBT and measure the effect of biceps adhesions on GH ROM. Materials and methods A custom biomechanical testing setup was used to measure the excursion of the LHBT and rotation of the humerus at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of GH abduction in the scapular plane. An in situ biceps tenodesis with the biceps anchor still intact, thus simulating biceps adhesions, was sequentially performed in 2 positions: 0° abduction and maximum external rotation, followed by 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation. The effect of tenodesis on ROM was measured. Results There was an average excursion of 19.4 ± 5.4 mm of the LHBT as the humerus was taken through ROM in the scapular plane. Tenodesis in 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation resulted in a significant decrease in GH external rotation of 47.3° ± 12.2° ( P = .007) with the arm in 0° abduction. Conclusions Tenodesis in maximum internal rotation limited rotation significantly, such that in situ tenodesis without proximal tenotomy should not be performed. Furthermore, in situations where the biceps is at risk for scarring, such as proximal humeral fractures, shoulder arthroplasty, and the stiff shoulder, the biomechanical consequence of biceps adhesions may be similar to in situ tenodesis and may limit ROM and clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22999852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cadaver ; Female ; Humans ; in situ tenodesis ; Joint Diseases - etiology ; Joint Diseases - surgery ; Long head of biceps tendon ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology ; shoulder range of motion ; tendon excursion ; Tendons - surgery ; tenodesis ; Tissue Adhesions - complications ; Tissue Adhesions - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2013-05, Vol.22 (5), p.658-665</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b706979d122807c5eeaacd11ad3f3258f0cc48ae1dffc69189b9bd06cff5576e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b706979d122807c5eeaacd11ad3f3258f0cc48ae1dffc69189b9bd06cff5576e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274612002923$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22999852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGahan, Patrick J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Hinesh, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Ephraim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leasure, Jeremi, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, William, MD</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the humerus slides along the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Blocking this motion may result in decreased glenohumeral (GH) range of motion (ROM). The goal of the study was to characterize the excursion of the LHBT and measure the effect of biceps adhesions on GH ROM. Materials and methods A custom biomechanical testing setup was used to measure the excursion of the LHBT and rotation of the humerus at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of GH abduction in the scapular plane. An in situ biceps tenodesis with the biceps anchor still intact, thus simulating biceps adhesions, was sequentially performed in 2 positions: 0° abduction and maximum external rotation, followed by 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation. The effect of tenodesis on ROM was measured. Results There was an average excursion of 19.4 ± 5.4 mm of the LHBT as the humerus was taken through ROM in the scapular plane. Tenodesis in 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation resulted in a significant decrease in GH external rotation of 47.3° ± 12.2° ( P = .007) with the arm in 0° abduction. Conclusions Tenodesis in maximum internal rotation limited rotation significantly, such that in situ tenodesis without proximal tenotomy should not be performed. Furthermore, in situations where the biceps is at risk for scarring, such as proximal humeral fractures, shoulder arthroplasty, and the stiff shoulder, the biomechanical consequence of biceps adhesions may be similar to in situ tenodesis and may limit ROM and clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>in situ tenodesis</subject><subject>Joint Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Joint Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Long head of biceps tendon</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>shoulder range of motion</subject><subject>tendon excursion</subject><subject>Tendons - surgery</subject><subject>tenodesis</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - complications</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - surgery</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQRi0Eoj_wAGyQl2wSxk6cxCAhVRUUpEpVRVlbjj3udUjii51Uum-Po1tYdNHVzOJ8nzRnCHnHoGTAmo9DOSQsOTBeQlsCVC_IKRMVLxoB8DLvILqCt3VzQs5SGgBA1sBfkxPOpZSd4Kfk9m6HFJ1Ds9DgaO8N7hPVdofJhznRMNP7EeewWyeMeqRRz_e4kVNYMvCJamq01Q8YvaFpWe3hDXnl9Jjw7eM8J7--fb27_F5c31z9uLy4LkwN3VL0LTSylZZx3kFrBKLWxjKmbeUqLjoHxtSdRmadM41knexlb6ExzgnRNlidkw_H3n0Mf1ZMi5p8MjiOesawJsUq3olasFZklB1RE0NKEZ3aRz_peFAM1GZSDSqbVJtJBa3KJnPm_WP92k9o_yf-qcvA5yOA-cgHj1El43E2aH3MNpUN_tn6L0_SZvSzN3r8jQdMQ1jjnO0pplLOqJ_bK7dPMg7AJa-qv7UlmNE</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>McGahan, Patrick J., MD</creator><creator>Patel, Hinesh, BS</creator><creator>Dickinson, Ephraim, MD</creator><creator>Leasure, Jeremi, MS</creator><creator>Montgomery, William, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study</title><author>McGahan, Patrick J., MD ; Patel, Hinesh, BS ; Dickinson, Ephraim, MD ; Leasure, Jeremi, MS ; Montgomery, William, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b706979d122807c5eeaacd11ad3f3258f0cc48ae1dffc69189b9bd06cff5576e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>in situ tenodesis</topic><topic>Joint Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Joint Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Long head of biceps tendon</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>shoulder range of motion</topic><topic>tendon excursion</topic><topic>Tendons - surgery</topic><topic>tenodesis</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - complications</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGahan, Patrick J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Hinesh, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Ephraim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leasure, Jeremi, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, William, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGahan, Patrick J., MD</au><au>Patel, Hinesh, BS</au><au>Dickinson, Ephraim, MD</au><au>Leasure, Jeremi, MS</au><au>Montgomery, William, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>658</spage><epage>665</epage><pages>658-665</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background Previous studies have demonstrated that the humerus slides along the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). Blocking this motion may result in decreased glenohumeral (GH) range of motion (ROM). The goal of the study was to characterize the excursion of the LHBT and measure the effect of biceps adhesions on GH ROM. Materials and methods A custom biomechanical testing setup was used to measure the excursion of the LHBT and rotation of the humerus at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of GH abduction in the scapular plane. An in situ biceps tenodesis with the biceps anchor still intact, thus simulating biceps adhesions, was sequentially performed in 2 positions: 0° abduction and maximum external rotation, followed by 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation. The effect of tenodesis on ROM was measured. Results There was an average excursion of 19.4 ± 5.4 mm of the LHBT as the humerus was taken through ROM in the scapular plane. Tenodesis in 0° abduction and maximum internal rotation resulted in a significant decrease in GH external rotation of 47.3° ± 12.2° ( P = .007) with the arm in 0° abduction. Conclusions Tenodesis in maximum internal rotation limited rotation significantly, such that in situ tenodesis without proximal tenotomy should not be performed. Furthermore, in situations where the biceps is at risk for scarring, such as proximal humeral fractures, shoulder arthroplasty, and the stiff shoulder, the biomechanical consequence of biceps adhesions may be similar to in situ tenodesis and may limit ROM and clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22999852</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2013-05, Vol.22 (5), p.658-665
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1328545175
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cadaver
Female
Humans
in situ tenodesis
Joint Diseases - etiology
Joint Diseases - surgery
Long head of biceps tendon
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Range of Motion, Articular
Shoulder Joint - physiopathology
shoulder range of motion
tendon excursion
Tendons - surgery
tenodesis
Tissue Adhesions - complications
Tissue Adhesions - surgery
title The effect of biceps adhesions on glenohumeral range of motion: a cadaveric study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A55%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20biceps%20adhesions%20on%20glenohumeral%20range%20of%20motion:%20a%20cadaveric%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=McGahan,%20Patrick%20J.,%20MD&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=658&rft.epage=665&rft.pages=658-665&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1328545175%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1328545175&rft_id=info:pmid/22999852&rft_els_id=S1058274612002923&rfr_iscdi=true