Habitat Use and Separation among Congeneric Darter Species

Five darter species (Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides , Rainbow Darter E. caeruleum , Fantail Darter E. flabellare , Johnny Darter E. nigrum , and Orangethroat Darter E. spectabile) were collected from seven streams and rivers in two Indiana watersheds to determine patterns of microhabitat se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) 2013-03, Vol.142 (2), p.568-577
Hauptverfasser: Pratt, Anne E, Lauer, Thomas E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 577
container_issue 2
container_start_page 568
container_title Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)
container_volume 142
creator Pratt, Anne E
Lauer, Thomas E
description Five darter species (Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides , Rainbow Darter E. caeruleum , Fantail Darter E. flabellare , Johnny Darter E. nigrum , and Orangethroat Darter E. spectabile) were collected from seven streams and rivers in two Indiana watersheds to determine patterns of microhabitat selection with respect to depth, water velocity (flow), and substrate size. Heterogeneous habitats create a variety of niche dimensions, promoting the coexistence of congeneric species. Greenside and Rainbow darters were most commonly found among intermediate substrate sizes (cobble + boulder) and in locations with higher velocities and deeper water. Fantail and Orangethroat darters associated with intermediate to large substrate sizes (cobble + bedrock) were found in shallower water with lower velocities. Fantail Darters were only observed in the Whitewater River watershed. In contrast, Johnny Darters were observed only within the White River watershed among small substrate sizes (silt + sand), moderate velocities, and deeper water. Based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling and multinomial logistic regression, substrate size was the most important variable in characterizing microhabitat selection. Ultimately, habitats produced patterns of segregation and coexistence among these five darters in Indiana streams. Although ecological patterns of microhabitat use are additionally influenced by competition, morphology, and life history traits, heterogeneous habitat features within ecosystems appear to be structuring fish assemblages. Received January 16, 2012; accepted November 25, 2012
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00028487.2012.754787
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1328512901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1328512901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3598-78ad991f32d866979f8c39c6c7ea59d9d3d054bf0f00edc278f56457f824b8533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQQC0EEqXwD5DIyJJytuOvblWhFKkSQ9rZch27MkqTYqdC_fekCkiMLHc3vHfDQ-gewwSDhCcAILKQYkIAk4lghZDiAo0wK2QuOVOXf-5rdJPSR28wweUITZdmGzrTZZvkMtNUWekOJpoutE1m9m2zy-b9cI2LwWbPJnYuZuXB2eDSLbrypk7u7meP0Wbxsp4v89X769t8tsotZUrmQppKKewpqSTnSigvLVWWW-EMU5WqaAWs2HrwAK6yREjPeMGEl6TYSkbpGD0Ofw-x_Ty61Ol9SNbVtWlce0waUyIZJgpwjxYDamObUnReH2LYm3jSGPQ5lf5Npc-p9JCq16aD9hVqd_qXo9ezRQmMy15-GGRvWm12MSS9KXuSA2Agggv6DRh_dAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1328512901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Habitat Use and Separation among Congeneric Darter Species</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Pratt, Anne E ; Lauer, Thomas E</creator><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Anne E ; Lauer, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><description>Five darter species (Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides , Rainbow Darter E. caeruleum , Fantail Darter E. flabellare , Johnny Darter E. nigrum , and Orangethroat Darter E. spectabile) were collected from seven streams and rivers in two Indiana watersheds to determine patterns of microhabitat selection with respect to depth, water velocity (flow), and substrate size. Heterogeneous habitats create a variety of niche dimensions, promoting the coexistence of congeneric species. Greenside and Rainbow darters were most commonly found among intermediate substrate sizes (cobble + boulder) and in locations with higher velocities and deeper water. Fantail and Orangethroat darters associated with intermediate to large substrate sizes (cobble + bedrock) were found in shallower water with lower velocities. Fantail Darters were only observed in the Whitewater River watershed. In contrast, Johnny Darters were observed only within the White River watershed among small substrate sizes (silt + sand), moderate velocities, and deeper water. Based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling and multinomial logistic regression, substrate size was the most important variable in characterizing microhabitat selection. Ultimately, habitats produced patterns of segregation and coexistence among these five darters in Indiana streams. Although ecological patterns of microhabitat use are additionally influenced by competition, morphology, and life history traits, heterogeneous habitat features within ecosystems appear to be structuring fish assemblages. Received January 16, 2012; accepted November 25, 2012</description><identifier>ISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2012.754787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>bedrock ; ecosystems ; Etheostoma ; Etheostoma blennioides ; fish ; Freshwater ; habitat preferences ; life history ; microhabitats ; multidimensional scaling ; regression analysis ; rivers ; sand ; silt ; streams ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2013-03, Vol.142 (2), p.568-577</ispartof><rights>2013 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3598-78ad991f32d866979f8c39c6c7ea59d9d3d054bf0f00edc278f56457f824b8533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3598-78ad991f32d866979f8c39c6c7ea59d9d3d054bf0f00edc278f56457f824b8533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1080%2F00028487.2012.754787$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1080%2F00028487.2012.754787$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Anne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><title>Habitat Use and Separation among Congeneric Darter Species</title><title>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</title><description>Five darter species (Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides , Rainbow Darter E. caeruleum , Fantail Darter E. flabellare , Johnny Darter E. nigrum , and Orangethroat Darter E. spectabile) were collected from seven streams and rivers in two Indiana watersheds to determine patterns of microhabitat selection with respect to depth, water velocity (flow), and substrate size. Heterogeneous habitats create a variety of niche dimensions, promoting the coexistence of congeneric species. Greenside and Rainbow darters were most commonly found among intermediate substrate sizes (cobble + boulder) and in locations with higher velocities and deeper water. Fantail and Orangethroat darters associated with intermediate to large substrate sizes (cobble + bedrock) were found in shallower water with lower velocities. Fantail Darters were only observed in the Whitewater River watershed. In contrast, Johnny Darters were observed only within the White River watershed among small substrate sizes (silt + sand), moderate velocities, and deeper water. Based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling and multinomial logistic regression, substrate size was the most important variable in characterizing microhabitat selection. Ultimately, habitats produced patterns of segregation and coexistence among these five darters in Indiana streams. Although ecological patterns of microhabitat use are additionally influenced by competition, morphology, and life history traits, heterogeneous habitat features within ecosystems appear to be structuring fish assemblages. Received January 16, 2012; accepted November 25, 2012</description><subject>bedrock</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>Etheostoma</subject><subject>Etheostoma blennioides</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>habitat preferences</subject><subject>life history</subject><subject>microhabitats</subject><subject>multidimensional scaling</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>sand</subject><subject>silt</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>1548-8659</issn><issn>0002-8487</issn><issn>1548-8659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQQC0EEqXwD5DIyJJytuOvblWhFKkSQ9rZch27MkqTYqdC_fekCkiMLHc3vHfDQ-gewwSDhCcAILKQYkIAk4lghZDiAo0wK2QuOVOXf-5rdJPSR28wweUITZdmGzrTZZvkMtNUWekOJpoutE1m9m2zy-b9cI2LwWbPJnYuZuXB2eDSLbrypk7u7meP0Wbxsp4v89X769t8tsotZUrmQppKKewpqSTnSigvLVWWW-EMU5WqaAWs2HrwAK6yREjPeMGEl6TYSkbpGD0Ofw-x_Ty61Ol9SNbVtWlce0waUyIZJgpwjxYDamObUnReH2LYm3jSGPQ5lf5Npc-p9JCq16aD9hVqd_qXo9ezRQmMy15-GGRvWm12MSS9KXuSA2Agggv6DRh_dAQ</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Pratt, Anne E</creator><creator>Lauer, Thomas E</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Habitat Use and Separation among Congeneric Darter Species</title><author>Pratt, Anne E ; Lauer, Thomas E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3598-78ad991f32d866979f8c39c6c7ea59d9d3d054bf0f00edc278f56457f824b8533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>bedrock</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>Etheostoma</topic><topic>Etheostoma blennioides</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>habitat preferences</topic><topic>life history</topic><topic>microhabitats</topic><topic>multidimensional scaling</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>sand</topic><topic>silt</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Anne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pratt, Anne E</au><au>Lauer, Thomas E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Habitat Use and Separation among Congeneric Darter Species</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>568</spage><epage>577</epage><pages>568-577</pages><issn>1548-8659</issn><issn>0002-8487</issn><eissn>1548-8659</eissn><abstract>Five darter species (Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides , Rainbow Darter E. caeruleum , Fantail Darter E. flabellare , Johnny Darter E. nigrum , and Orangethroat Darter E. spectabile) were collected from seven streams and rivers in two Indiana watersheds to determine patterns of microhabitat selection with respect to depth, water velocity (flow), and substrate size. Heterogeneous habitats create a variety of niche dimensions, promoting the coexistence of congeneric species. Greenside and Rainbow darters were most commonly found among intermediate substrate sizes (cobble + boulder) and in locations with higher velocities and deeper water. Fantail and Orangethroat darters associated with intermediate to large substrate sizes (cobble + bedrock) were found in shallower water with lower velocities. Fantail Darters were only observed in the Whitewater River watershed. In contrast, Johnny Darters were observed only within the White River watershed among small substrate sizes (silt + sand), moderate velocities, and deeper water. Based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling and multinomial logistic regression, substrate size was the most important variable in characterizing microhabitat selection. Ultimately, habitats produced patterns of segregation and coexistence among these five darters in Indiana streams. Although ecological patterns of microhabitat use are additionally influenced by competition, morphology, and life history traits, heterogeneous habitat features within ecosystems appear to be structuring fish assemblages. Received January 16, 2012; accepted November 25, 2012</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00028487.2012.754787</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1548-8659
ispartof Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2013-03, Vol.142 (2), p.568-577
issn 1548-8659
0002-8487
1548-8659
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1328512901
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects bedrock
ecosystems
Etheostoma
Etheostoma blennioides
fish
Freshwater
habitat preferences
life history
microhabitats
multidimensional scaling
regression analysis
rivers
sand
silt
streams
watersheds
title Habitat Use and Separation among Congeneric Darter Species
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T22%3A38%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Habitat%20Use%20and%20Separation%20among%20Congeneric%20Darter%20Species&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20American%20Fisheries%20Society%20(1900)&rft.au=Pratt,%20Anne%20E&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=568&rft.epage=577&rft.pages=568-577&rft.issn=1548-8659&rft.eissn=1548-8659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00028487.2012.754787&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1328512901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1328512901&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true