Bacteria immobilisation on hydroxyapatite surface for heavy metals removal

Selected bacterial strains were immobilised on the surface of hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 – HAp) of natural origin (fish bones). The capacity of the material, alone and in combination with the bacterial strains to act as heavy metal removers from aqueous streams was assessed. Pseudomonas fluores...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2013-05, Vol.121, p.87-95
Hauptverfasser: Piccirillo, C., Pereira, S.I.A., Marques, A.P.G.C., Pullar, R.C., Tobaldi, D.M., Pintado, M.E., Castro, P.M.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95
container_issue
container_start_page 87
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 121
creator Piccirillo, C.
Pereira, S.I.A.
Marques, A.P.G.C.
Pullar, R.C.
Tobaldi, D.M.
Pintado, M.E.
Castro, P.M.L.
description Selected bacterial strains were immobilised on the surface of hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 – HAp) of natural origin (fish bones). The capacity of the material, alone and in combination with the bacterial strains to act as heavy metal removers from aqueous streams was assessed. Pseudomonas fluorescens (S3X), Microbacterium oxydans (EC29) and Cupriavidus sp. (1C2) were chosen based on their resistance to heavy metals and capacity of adsorbing the metals. These systems were tested using solutions of Zn(II), Cd(II) and in solutions containing both metals. A synergistic effect between the strains and HAp, which is effective in removing the target heavy metals on its own, was observed, as the combination of HAp with the bacterial strains led to higher adsorption capacity for both elements. For the solutions containing only one metal the synergistic effect was greater for higher metal concentrations; 1C2 and EC29 were the most effective strains for Zn(II) and Cd(II) respectively, while S3X was less effective. Overall, an almost four-fold increase was observed for the maximum adsorption capacity for Zn(II) when 1C2 was employed – 0.433 mmol/g in comparison of 0.121 mmol/g for the unmodified HAp. For Cd(II), on the other hand, an almost three-fold increase was registered with EC29 bacterial strain – 0.090 vs 0.036 mmol/g for the unmodified HAp. When the solutions containing both metals were tested, the effect was more marked for lower concentrations. ► Bacterial strains were successfully immobilised on a hydroxyapatite (HAp) surface. ► The combined HAp + bacteria systems were used for removal of Zn(II) and Cd(II). ► The removal efficiency was higher for both metals if compared with unmodified HAp. ► Different strains showed different abilities for metals removal.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1327726689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479713001242</els_id><sourcerecordid>2943504891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-8b3b9722048b9016390ff59755e1a296dbf0bd8a3e22ad89ae142b6d112387cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV-L1DAUxYso7rj6EdSCCr5MvUnapH0SXfzLgg-6z-E2vXUztM2YtIPz7b1DRwVfhAsh4XcP55xk2WMBhQChX-2KHU2HEadCglAFyAKUvpNtBDTVttYK7mYbUCC2pWnMRfYgpR0AKCnM_exCqkqWJcAm-_wW3UzRY-7HMbR-8AlnH6ac5_bYxfDziHt-mSlPS-zRUd6HmN8SHo75SDMOKY80hgMOD7N7PV_p0fm8zG7ev_t29XF7_eXDp6s311tXGj1v61a1jZESyrptOIlqoO-rxlQVCZSN7toe2q5GRVJiVzdIopSt7oSQqjauVZfZy1V3H8OPhdJsR58cDQNOFJZkhZLGSK3rhtFn_6C7sMSJ3Z0oXcpKa8NUtVIuhpQi9XYf_YjxaAXYU9l2Z89l21PZFqTlsnnvyVl9aUfq_mz9bpeBF2cAk8Ohjzg5n_5yRjYS6pOB5ysXHeLeRjr4NCN7BFaxouRhlrGnK9ZjsPg9stTNVzZU8ceKiqMw8XoliPs_eIo2OU-To85HcrPtgv9Ppl8BBLNe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326425667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacteria immobilisation on hydroxyapatite surface for heavy metals removal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Piccirillo, C. ; Pereira, S.I.A. ; Marques, A.P.G.C. ; Pullar, R.C. ; Tobaldi, D.M. ; Pintado, M.E. ; Castro, P.M.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Piccirillo, C. ; Pereira, S.I.A. ; Marques, A.P.G.C. ; Pullar, R.C. ; Tobaldi, D.M. ; Pintado, M.E. ; Castro, P.M.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Selected bacterial strains were immobilised on the surface of hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 – HAp) of natural origin (fish bones). The capacity of the material, alone and in combination with the bacterial strains to act as heavy metal removers from aqueous streams was assessed. Pseudomonas fluorescens (S3X), Microbacterium oxydans (EC29) and Cupriavidus sp. (1C2) were chosen based on their resistance to heavy metals and capacity of adsorbing the metals. These systems were tested using solutions of Zn(II), Cd(II) and in solutions containing both metals. A synergistic effect between the strains and HAp, which is effective in removing the target heavy metals on its own, was observed, as the combination of HAp with the bacterial strains led to higher adsorption capacity for both elements. For the solutions containing only one metal the synergistic effect was greater for higher metal concentrations; 1C2 and EC29 were the most effective strains for Zn(II) and Cd(II) respectively, while S3X was less effective. Overall, an almost four-fold increase was observed for the maximum adsorption capacity for Zn(II) when 1C2 was employed – 0.433 mmol/g in comparison of 0.121 mmol/g for the unmodified HAp. For Cd(II), on the other hand, an almost three-fold increase was registered with EC29 bacterial strain – 0.090 vs 0.036 mmol/g for the unmodified HAp. When the solutions containing both metals were tested, the effect was more marked for lower concentrations. ► Bacterial strains were successfully immobilised on a hydroxyapatite (HAp) surface. ► The combined HAp + bacteria systems were used for removal of Zn(II) and Cd(II). ► The removal efficiency was higher for both metals if compared with unmodified HAp. ► Different strains showed different abilities for metals removal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23524400</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Bacteria ; Bacterial strains ; Biofilm ; Biofilms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biosorption ; Bone and Bones ; bones ; cadmium ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Cupriavidus ; Cupriavidus - metabolism ; Durapatite ; Environmental management ; fish ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gadus morhua ; General aspects ; Heavy metals ; Heavy metals adsorption ; Hydroxyapatite ; Metals, Heavy - isolation &amp; purification ; Metals, Heavy - metabolism ; Microbacterium oxydans ; Pseudomonas fluorescens ; Pseudomonas fluorescens - metabolism ; streams ; synergism ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation &amp; purification ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism ; zinc</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2013-05, Vol.121, p.87-95</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. May 30, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-8b3b9722048b9016390ff59755e1a296dbf0bd8a3e22ad89ae142b6d112387cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-8b3b9722048b9016390ff59755e1a296dbf0bd8a3e22ad89ae142b6d112387cb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5897-687X ; 0000-0002-0112-8570 ; 0000-0001-8232-1155 ; 0000-0001-6844-4482 ; 0000-0002-0760-3184 ; 0000-0002-6339-716X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27292087$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23524400$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piccirillo, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, S.I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, A.P.G.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullar, R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobaldi, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintado, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, P.M.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Bacteria immobilisation on hydroxyapatite surface for heavy metals removal</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Selected bacterial strains were immobilised on the surface of hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 – HAp) of natural origin (fish bones). The capacity of the material, alone and in combination with the bacterial strains to act as heavy metal removers from aqueous streams was assessed. Pseudomonas fluorescens (S3X), Microbacterium oxydans (EC29) and Cupriavidus sp. (1C2) were chosen based on their resistance to heavy metals and capacity of adsorbing the metals. These systems were tested using solutions of Zn(II), Cd(II) and in solutions containing both metals. A synergistic effect between the strains and HAp, which is effective in removing the target heavy metals on its own, was observed, as the combination of HAp with the bacterial strains led to higher adsorption capacity for both elements. For the solutions containing only one metal the synergistic effect was greater for higher metal concentrations; 1C2 and EC29 were the most effective strains for Zn(II) and Cd(II) respectively, while S3X was less effective. Overall, an almost four-fold increase was observed for the maximum adsorption capacity for Zn(II) when 1C2 was employed – 0.433 mmol/g in comparison of 0.121 mmol/g for the unmodified HAp. For Cd(II), on the other hand, an almost three-fold increase was registered with EC29 bacterial strain – 0.090 vs 0.036 mmol/g for the unmodified HAp. When the solutions containing both metals were tested, the effect was more marked for lower concentrations. ► Bacterial strains were successfully immobilised on a hydroxyapatite (HAp) surface. ► The combined HAp + bacteria systems were used for removal of Zn(II) and Cd(II). ► The removal efficiency was higher for both metals if compared with unmodified HAp. ► Different strains showed different abilities for metals removal.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial strains</subject><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biosorption</subject><subject>Bone and Bones</subject><subject>bones</subject><subject>cadmium</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Cupriavidus</subject><subject>Cupriavidus - metabolism</subject><subject>Durapatite</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gadus morhua</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Heavy metals adsorption</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - metabolism</subject><subject>Microbacterium oxydans</subject><subject>Pseudomonas fluorescens</subject><subject>Pseudomonas fluorescens - metabolism</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>synergism</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</subject><subject>zinc</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV-L1DAUxYso7rj6EdSCCr5MvUnapH0SXfzLgg-6z-E2vXUztM2YtIPz7b1DRwVfhAsh4XcP55xk2WMBhQChX-2KHU2HEadCglAFyAKUvpNtBDTVttYK7mYbUCC2pWnMRfYgpR0AKCnM_exCqkqWJcAm-_wW3UzRY-7HMbR-8AlnH6ac5_bYxfDziHt-mSlPS-zRUd6HmN8SHo75SDMOKY80hgMOD7N7PV_p0fm8zG7ev_t29XF7_eXDp6s311tXGj1v61a1jZESyrptOIlqoO-rxlQVCZSN7toe2q5GRVJiVzdIopSt7oSQqjauVZfZy1V3H8OPhdJsR58cDQNOFJZkhZLGSK3rhtFn_6C7sMSJ3Z0oXcpKa8NUtVIuhpQi9XYf_YjxaAXYU9l2Z89l21PZFqTlsnnvyVl9aUfq_mz9bpeBF2cAk8Ohjzg5n_5yRjYS6pOB5ysXHeLeRjr4NCN7BFaxouRhlrGnK9ZjsPg9stTNVzZU8ceKiqMw8XoliPs_eIo2OU-To85HcrPtgv9Ppl8BBLNe</recordid><startdate>20130530</startdate><enddate>20130530</enddate><creator>Piccirillo, C.</creator><creator>Pereira, S.I.A.</creator><creator>Marques, A.P.G.C.</creator><creator>Pullar, R.C.</creator><creator>Tobaldi, D.M.</creator><creator>Pintado, M.E.</creator><creator>Castro, P.M.L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>RCLKO</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-687X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-8570</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8232-1155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-4482</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-3184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6339-716X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20130530</creationdate><title>Bacteria immobilisation on hydroxyapatite surface for heavy metals removal</title><author>Piccirillo, C. ; Pereira, S.I.A. ; Marques, A.P.G.C. ; Pullar, R.C. ; Tobaldi, D.M. ; Pintado, M.E. ; Castro, P.M.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-8b3b9722048b9016390ff59755e1a296dbf0bd8a3e22ad89ae142b6d112387cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial strains</topic><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biosorption</topic><topic>Bone and Bones</topic><topic>bones</topic><topic>cadmium</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Cupriavidus</topic><topic>Cupriavidus - metabolism</topic><topic>Durapatite</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gadus morhua</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Heavy metals adsorption</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - metabolism</topic><topic>Microbacterium oxydans</topic><topic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</topic><topic>Pseudomonas fluorescens - metabolism</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>synergism</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</topic><topic>zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piccirillo, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, S.I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, A.P.G.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullar, R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobaldi, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintado, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, P.M.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>RCAAP open access repository</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piccirillo, C.</au><au>Pereira, S.I.A.</au><au>Marques, A.P.G.C.</au><au>Pullar, R.C.</au><au>Tobaldi, D.M.</au><au>Pintado, M.E.</au><au>Castro, P.M.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacteria immobilisation on hydroxyapatite surface for heavy metals removal</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2013-05-30</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>87</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>87-95</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>Selected bacterial strains were immobilised on the surface of hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 – HAp) of natural origin (fish bones). The capacity of the material, alone and in combination with the bacterial strains to act as heavy metal removers from aqueous streams was assessed. Pseudomonas fluorescens (S3X), Microbacterium oxydans (EC29) and Cupriavidus sp. (1C2) were chosen based on their resistance to heavy metals and capacity of adsorbing the metals. These systems were tested using solutions of Zn(II), Cd(II) and in solutions containing both metals. A synergistic effect between the strains and HAp, which is effective in removing the target heavy metals on its own, was observed, as the combination of HAp with the bacterial strains led to higher adsorption capacity for both elements. For the solutions containing only one metal the synergistic effect was greater for higher metal concentrations; 1C2 and EC29 were the most effective strains for Zn(II) and Cd(II) respectively, while S3X was less effective. Overall, an almost four-fold increase was observed for the maximum adsorption capacity for Zn(II) when 1C2 was employed – 0.433 mmol/g in comparison of 0.121 mmol/g for the unmodified HAp. For Cd(II), on the other hand, an almost three-fold increase was registered with EC29 bacterial strain – 0.090 vs 0.036 mmol/g for the unmodified HAp. When the solutions containing both metals were tested, the effect was more marked for lower concentrations. ► Bacterial strains were successfully immobilised on a hydroxyapatite (HAp) surface. ► The combined HAp + bacteria systems were used for removal of Zn(II) and Cd(II). ► The removal efficiency was higher for both metals if compared with unmodified HAp. ► Different strains showed different abilities for metals removal.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23524400</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.036</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-687X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-8570</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8232-1155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-4482</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-3184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6339-716X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2013-05, Vol.121, p.87-95
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1327726689
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adsorption
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied ecology
Bacteria
Bacterial strains
Biofilm
Biofilms
Biological and medical sciences
Biosorption
Bone and Bones
bones
cadmium
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Cupriavidus
Cupriavidus - metabolism
Durapatite
Environmental management
fish
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gadus morhua
General aspects
Heavy metals
Heavy metals adsorption
Hydroxyapatite
Metals, Heavy - isolation & purification
Metals, Heavy - metabolism
Microbacterium oxydans
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens - metabolism
streams
synergism
Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification
Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism
zinc
title Bacteria immobilisation on hydroxyapatite surface for heavy metals removal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T01%3A56%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacteria%20immobilisation%20on%20hydroxyapatite%20surface%20for%20heavy%20metals%20removal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Piccirillo,%20C.&rft.date=2013-05-30&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=87-95&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2943504891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326425667&rft_id=info:pmid/23524400&rft_els_id=S0301479713001242&rfr_iscdi=true