Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates and Fibrinogen Concentrates in the Perioperative Setting: A Systematic Review
Abstract The use of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) and fibrinogen concentrates (FIBCs) to achieve hemostasis in the perioperative setting as alternatives to allogeneic blood products remains controversial. To examine the efficacy and safety of PCCs and FIBCs, we conducted a systematic revie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transfusion medicine reviews 2013-04, Vol.27 (2), p.91-104 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | Transfusion medicine reviews |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Lin, David M Murphy, Linda S Tran, Minh-Ha |
description | Abstract The use of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) and fibrinogen concentrates (FIBCs) to achieve hemostasis in the perioperative setting as alternatives to allogeneic blood products remains controversial. To examine the efficacy and safety of PCCs and FIBCs, we conducted a systematic review—in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement—to compare the use of these transfusion alternatives in bleeding surgical patients. We performed a literature search of English articles published between July 1997 and July 2012 in MEDLINE via PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Five randomized trials and 15 nonrandomized studies with a comparator group were included in the final review. Studies were sorted into 1 of the following 3 clinical settings: cardiac surgery, non–cardiac surgery, and reversal of warfarin anticoagulation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. With the exception of 2 randomized controlled trials, the existing body of literature on the use of PCCs and FIBCs in the perioperative setting was assessed to have a high degree of methodological bias. Overall, prospective studies in the cardiac surgery grouping suggested that patients receiving FIBC and/or PCCs required less allogeneic blood transfusion and had less chest tube drainage. In studies of warfarin reversal, PCCs more rapidly corrected the International Normalized Ratio compared to plasma; however, in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage, functional outcomes were poor regardless of the reversal strategy. With regards to safety outcomes, reporting was not uniform and raises concerns of underreporting. Adequately powered, methodologically sound trials would be required for more definitive conclusions to be drawn about the efficacy of PCCs and FIBC over conventional blood components for the treatment of perioperative coagulopathy in bleeding patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.01.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1326730021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0887796313000035</els_id><sourcerecordid>1326730021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c6fdfa68b2cd36ac88be663101ef192ce1022f6b684d7bd0e2eeea820158fb9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq1-AR8kj77MmD872YyIUJZWCwWLa59DkrnTZp1J1iSzut--GbYW9KFPF-4958D5XYTeUlJTQsWHbZ3HuK8ZobwmtCaEPUML2nBWtctWPEcLIuWqWrWCn6BXKW2LgEoiXqITxpeCNZws0HSTAIceX8eQ72IYjfN4HcbdAH_K9BZ8jjpDwtp3-MKZ6Hy4Bf_vrXjyHeBriC7soOzcHvAGcnb-9iM-w5tDyjCWtcXfYe_g92v0otdDgjcP8xTdXJz_WH-trr59uVyfXVV22TS5sqLvei2kYbbjQlspDQjBS3noacssUMJYL4yQy25lOgIMALQsQBrZm9bwU_T-mLuL4dcEKavRJQvDoD2EKSnKmVjxmUuRsqPUxpBShF7toht1PChK1IxbbdWMW824FaGquIrp3UP-ZEboHi1_-RbBp6MASsvSPKpkHRR0nYtgs-qCezr_8392OzjvrB5-wgHSNkzRF36KqsQUUZv54fO_aelECG_4PV5yqEM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326730021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates and Fibrinogen Concentrates in the Perioperative Setting: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lin, David M ; Murphy, Linda S ; Tran, Minh-Ha</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, David M ; Murphy, Linda S ; Tran, Minh-Ha</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The use of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) and fibrinogen concentrates (FIBCs) to achieve hemostasis in the perioperative setting as alternatives to allogeneic blood products remains controversial. To examine the efficacy and safety of PCCs and FIBCs, we conducted a systematic review—in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement—to compare the use of these transfusion alternatives in bleeding surgical patients. We performed a literature search of English articles published between July 1997 and July 2012 in MEDLINE via PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Five randomized trials and 15 nonrandomized studies with a comparator group were included in the final review. Studies were sorted into 1 of the following 3 clinical settings: cardiac surgery, non–cardiac surgery, and reversal of warfarin anticoagulation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. With the exception of 2 randomized controlled trials, the existing body of literature on the use of PCCs and FIBCs in the perioperative setting was assessed to have a high degree of methodological bias. Overall, prospective studies in the cardiac surgery grouping suggested that patients receiving FIBC and/or PCCs required less allogeneic blood transfusion and had less chest tube drainage. In studies of warfarin reversal, PCCs more rapidly corrected the International Normalized Ratio compared to plasma; however, in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage, functional outcomes were poor regardless of the reversal strategy. With regards to safety outcomes, reporting was not uniform and raises concerns of underreporting. Adequately powered, methodologically sound trials would be required for more definitive conclusions to be drawn about the efficacy of PCCs and FIBC over conventional blood components for the treatment of perioperative coagulopathy in bleeding patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-7963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-9496</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23462530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anticoagulants - adverse effects ; Blood Coagulation - drug effects ; Blood Coagulation Factors - adverse effects ; Blood Coagulation Factors - therapeutic use ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data ; Fibrinogen - adverse effects ; Fibrinogen - therapeutic use ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Hemostatics - adverse effects ; Hemostatics - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Perioperative Care - methods ; Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology ; Postoperative Hemorrhage - prevention & control ; Treatment Outcome ; Warfarin - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Transfusion medicine reviews, 2013-04, Vol.27 (2), p.91-104</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c6fdfa68b2cd36ac88be663101ef192ce1022f6b684d7bd0e2eeea820158fb9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c6fdfa68b2cd36ac88be663101ef192ce1022f6b684d7bd0e2eeea820158fb9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23462530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Linda S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Minh-Ha</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates and Fibrinogen Concentrates in the Perioperative Setting: A Systematic Review</title><title>Transfusion medicine reviews</title><addtitle>Transfus Med Rev</addtitle><description>Abstract The use of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) and fibrinogen concentrates (FIBCs) to achieve hemostasis in the perioperative setting as alternatives to allogeneic blood products remains controversial. To examine the efficacy and safety of PCCs and FIBCs, we conducted a systematic review—in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement—to compare the use of these transfusion alternatives in bleeding surgical patients. We performed a literature search of English articles published between July 1997 and July 2012 in MEDLINE via PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Five randomized trials and 15 nonrandomized studies with a comparator group were included in the final review. Studies were sorted into 1 of the following 3 clinical settings: cardiac surgery, non–cardiac surgery, and reversal of warfarin anticoagulation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. With the exception of 2 randomized controlled trials, the existing body of literature on the use of PCCs and FIBCs in the perioperative setting was assessed to have a high degree of methodological bias. Overall, prospective studies in the cardiac surgery grouping suggested that patients receiving FIBC and/or PCCs required less allogeneic blood transfusion and had less chest tube drainage. In studies of warfarin reversal, PCCs more rapidly corrected the International Normalized Ratio compared to plasma; however, in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage, functional outcomes were poor regardless of the reversal strategy. With regards to safety outcomes, reporting was not uniform and raises concerns of underreporting. Adequately powered, methodologically sound trials would be required for more definitive conclusions to be drawn about the efficacy of PCCs and FIBC over conventional blood components for the treatment of perioperative coagulopathy in bleeding patients.</description><subject>Anticoagulants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Coagulation - drug effects</subject><subject>Blood Coagulation Factors - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Coagulation Factors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Fibrinogen - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fibrinogen - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Hemostatics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemostatics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Perioperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Hemorrhage - prevention & control</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Warfarin - adverse effects</subject><issn>0887-7963</issn><issn>1532-9496</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq1-AR8kj77MmD872YyIUJZWCwWLa59DkrnTZp1J1iSzut--GbYW9KFPF-4958D5XYTeUlJTQsWHbZ3HuK8ZobwmtCaEPUML2nBWtctWPEcLIuWqWrWCn6BXKW2LgEoiXqITxpeCNZws0HSTAIceX8eQ72IYjfN4HcbdAH_K9BZ8jjpDwtp3-MKZ6Hy4Bf_vrXjyHeBriC7soOzcHvAGcnb-9iM-w5tDyjCWtcXfYe_g92v0otdDgjcP8xTdXJz_WH-trr59uVyfXVV22TS5sqLvei2kYbbjQlspDQjBS3noacssUMJYL4yQy25lOgIMALQsQBrZm9bwU_T-mLuL4dcEKavRJQvDoD2EKSnKmVjxmUuRsqPUxpBShF7toht1PChK1IxbbdWMW824FaGquIrp3UP-ZEboHi1_-RbBp6MASsvSPKpkHRR0nYtgs-qCezr_8392OzjvrB5-wgHSNkzRF36KqsQUUZv54fO_aelECG_4PV5yqEM</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Lin, David M</creator><creator>Murphy, Linda S</creator><creator>Tran, Minh-Ha</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates and Fibrinogen Concentrates in the Perioperative Setting: A Systematic Review</title><author>Lin, David M ; Murphy, Linda S ; Tran, Minh-Ha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c6fdfa68b2cd36ac88be663101ef192ce1022f6b684d7bd0e2eeea820158fb9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anticoagulants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Coagulation - drug effects</topic><topic>Blood Coagulation Factors - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Coagulation Factors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Fibrinogen - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fibrinogen - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Hemostatics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemostatics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Perioperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Hemorrhage - prevention & control</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Warfarin - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Linda S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Minh-Ha</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion medicine reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, David M</au><au>Murphy, Linda S</au><au>Tran, Minh-Ha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates and Fibrinogen Concentrates in the Perioperative Setting: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion medicine reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Transfus Med Rev</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>91-104</pages><issn>0887-7963</issn><eissn>1532-9496</eissn><abstract>Abstract The use of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) and fibrinogen concentrates (FIBCs) to achieve hemostasis in the perioperative setting as alternatives to allogeneic blood products remains controversial. To examine the efficacy and safety of PCCs and FIBCs, we conducted a systematic review—in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement—to compare the use of these transfusion alternatives in bleeding surgical patients. We performed a literature search of English articles published between July 1997 and July 2012 in MEDLINE via PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Five randomized trials and 15 nonrandomized studies with a comparator group were included in the final review. Studies were sorted into 1 of the following 3 clinical settings: cardiac surgery, non–cardiac surgery, and reversal of warfarin anticoagulation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. With the exception of 2 randomized controlled trials, the existing body of literature on the use of PCCs and FIBCs in the perioperative setting was assessed to have a high degree of methodological bias. Overall, prospective studies in the cardiac surgery grouping suggested that patients receiving FIBC and/or PCCs required less allogeneic blood transfusion and had less chest tube drainage. In studies of warfarin reversal, PCCs more rapidly corrected the International Normalized Ratio compared to plasma; however, in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage, functional outcomes were poor regardless of the reversal strategy. With regards to safety outcomes, reporting was not uniform and raises concerns of underreporting. Adequately powered, methodologically sound trials would be required for more definitive conclusions to be drawn about the efficacy of PCCs and FIBC over conventional blood components for the treatment of perioperative coagulopathy in bleeding patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23462530</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.01.002</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0887-7963 |
ispartof | Transfusion medicine reviews, 2013-04, Vol.27 (2), p.91-104 |
issn | 0887-7963 1532-9496 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1326730021 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Anticoagulants - adverse effects Blood Coagulation - drug effects Blood Coagulation Factors - adverse effects Blood Coagulation Factors - therapeutic use Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods Cardiac Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data Fibrinogen - adverse effects Fibrinogen - therapeutic use Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Hemostatics - adverse effects Hemostatics - therapeutic use Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Perioperative Care - methods Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology Postoperative Hemorrhage - prevention & control Treatment Outcome Warfarin - adverse effects |
title | Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates and Fibrinogen Concentrates in the Perioperative Setting: A Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A06%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Prothrombin%20Complex%20Concentrates%20and%20Fibrinogen%20Concentrates%20in%20the%20Perioperative%20Setting:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20medicine%20reviews&rft.au=Lin,%20David%20M&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=91-104&rft.issn=0887-7963&rft.eissn=1532-9496&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1326730021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326730021&rft_id=info:pmid/23462530&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0887796313000035&rfr_iscdi=true |