ACR Appropriateness Criteria Routine Chest Radiographs in Intensive Care Unit Patients
Daily routine chest radiographs in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been a tradition for many years. Anecdotal reports of misplacement of life support items, acute lung processes, and extra pulmonary air collections in a small number of patients served as a justification for routine chest radiogra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Radiology 2013-03, Vol.10 (3), p.170-174 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 174 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 170 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Radiology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Amorosa, Judith K., MD Bramwit, Mark Paul, MD Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H., MD Reddy, Gautham P., MD, MPH Brown, Kathleen, MD Dyer, Debra Sue, MD Ginsburg, Mark E., MD Heitkamp, Darel E., MD Jeudy, Jean, MD Kirsch, Jacobo, MD MacMahon, Heber, MB, BCh Ravenel, James G., MD Saleh, Anthony G., MD Shah, Rakesh D., MD |
description | Daily routine chest radiographs in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been a tradition for many years. Anecdotal reports of misplacement of life support items, acute lung processes, and extra pulmonary air collections in a small number of patients served as a justification for routine chest radiographs in the ICU. Having analyzed this practice, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging has made the following recommendations: • When monitoring a stable patient or a patient on mechanical ventilation in the ICU, a portable chest radiograph is appropriate for clinical indications only. • It is appropriate to obtain a chest radiograph after placement of an endotracheal tube, central venous line, Swan-Ganz catheter, nasogastric tube, feeding tube, or chest tube. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The strongest data contributing to these recommendations were derived from a meta-analysis of 8 trials comprising 7,078 ICU patients by Oba and Zaza [ 1 ]. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.11.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1326142767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1546144012007107</els_id><sourcerecordid>1326142767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c6e10ca8061019aa3137ae968cecd4215479dd39ab2c59c1c47a84191a3533313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFLHTEUhUOpqLX-gS5Klt3MNDfJTGagFB5DawVBeVZxF2LmWjOdl3kmGcF_b4Znu3DhKgk553LOdwn5BKwEBvXXoRyMDSVnwEuAkoF4Rw6hqppCyPbm_XKXdQFSsgPyIcaBMa5U0-yTAy4qBaxSh-R61a3parsN0zY4k9BjjLQLLmF-0vU0J-eRdvcYE12b3k1_gtneR-o8PfVZHt1j_jYB6ZV3iV6Y5NCn-JHs3Zkx4vHLeUSufv743f0qzs5PTrvVWWFlA6mwNQKzpmF1LtQaI0Aog23dWLS95Dm_avtetOaW26q1YKUyjYQWjKiEyOoj8mU3Nxd4mHNIvXHR4jgaj9McNQheg-SqVlnKd1IbphgD3unceGPCkwamF5560AtPvfDUADrzzKbPL_Pn2w32_y3_AGbBt50Ac8tHh0FHmwlY7F1Am3Q_ubfnf39lt6PzzprxLz5hHKY5-MxPg45cM325bHRZKHDGcgAlngEPTpps</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326142767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ACR Appropriateness Criteria Routine Chest Radiographs in Intensive Care Unit Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Amorosa, Judith K., MD ; Bramwit, Mark Paul, MD ; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H., MD ; Reddy, Gautham P., MD, MPH ; Brown, Kathleen, MD ; Dyer, Debra Sue, MD ; Ginsburg, Mark E., MD ; Heitkamp, Darel E., MD ; Jeudy, Jean, MD ; Kirsch, Jacobo, MD ; MacMahon, Heber, MB, BCh ; Ravenel, James G., MD ; Saleh, Anthony G., MD ; Shah, Rakesh D., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Amorosa, Judith K., MD ; Bramwit, Mark Paul, MD ; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H., MD ; Reddy, Gautham P., MD, MPH ; Brown, Kathleen, MD ; Dyer, Debra Sue, MD ; Ginsburg, Mark E., MD ; Heitkamp, Darel E., MD ; Jeudy, Jean, MD ; Kirsch, Jacobo, MD ; MacMahon, Heber, MB, BCh ; Ravenel, James G., MD ; Saleh, Anthony G., MD ; Shah, Rakesh D., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Daily routine chest radiographs in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been a tradition for many years. Anecdotal reports of misplacement of life support items, acute lung processes, and extra pulmonary air collections in a small number of patients served as a justification for routine chest radiographs in the ICU. Having analyzed this practice, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging has made the following recommendations: • When monitoring a stable patient or a patient on mechanical ventilation in the ICU, a portable chest radiograph is appropriate for clinical indications only. • It is appropriate to obtain a chest radiograph after placement of an endotracheal tube, central venous line, Swan-Ganz catheter, nasogastric tube, feeding tube, or chest tube. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The strongest data contributing to these recommendations were derived from a meta-analysis of 8 trials comprising 7,078 ICU patients by Oba and Zaza [ 1 ].</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-1440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-349X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.11.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23571057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Appropriateness criteria ; chest radiograph ; Critical Care - standards ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; ICU ; Intensive Care Units - standards ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Radiography, Thoracic - standards ; Radiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2013-03, Vol.10 (3), p.170-174</ispartof><rights>American College of Radiology</rights><rights>2013 American College of Radiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c6e10ca8061019aa3137ae968cecd4215479dd39ab2c59c1c47a84191a3533313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c6e10ca8061019aa3137ae968cecd4215479dd39ab2c59c1c47a84191a3533313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2012.11.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23571057$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amorosa, Judith K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bramwit, Mark Paul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Gautham P., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Kathleen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Debra Sue, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Mark E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitkamp, Darel E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeudy, Jean, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsch, Jacobo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacMahon, Heber, MB, BCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravenel, James G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Anthony G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Rakesh D., MD</creatorcontrib><title>ACR Appropriateness Criteria Routine Chest Radiographs in Intensive Care Unit Patients</title><title>Journal of the American College of Radiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><description>Daily routine chest radiographs in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been a tradition for many years. Anecdotal reports of misplacement of life support items, acute lung processes, and extra pulmonary air collections in a small number of patients served as a justification for routine chest radiographs in the ICU. Having analyzed this practice, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging has made the following recommendations: • When monitoring a stable patient or a patient on mechanical ventilation in the ICU, a portable chest radiograph is appropriate for clinical indications only. • It is appropriate to obtain a chest radiograph after placement of an endotracheal tube, central venous line, Swan-Ganz catheter, nasogastric tube, feeding tube, or chest tube. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The strongest data contributing to these recommendations were derived from a meta-analysis of 8 trials comprising 7,078 ICU patients by Oba and Zaza [ 1 ].</description><subject>Appropriateness criteria</subject><subject>chest radiograph</subject><subject>Critical Care - standards</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ICU</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - standards</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - standards</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>1546-1440</issn><issn>1558-349X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFLHTEUhUOpqLX-gS5Klt3MNDfJTGagFB5DawVBeVZxF2LmWjOdl3kmGcF_b4Znu3DhKgk553LOdwn5BKwEBvXXoRyMDSVnwEuAkoF4Rw6hqppCyPbm_XKXdQFSsgPyIcaBMa5U0-yTAy4qBaxSh-R61a3parsN0zY4k9BjjLQLLmF-0vU0J-eRdvcYE12b3k1_gtneR-o8PfVZHt1j_jYB6ZV3iV6Y5NCn-JHs3Zkx4vHLeUSufv743f0qzs5PTrvVWWFlA6mwNQKzpmF1LtQaI0Aog23dWLS95Dm_avtetOaW26q1YKUyjYQWjKiEyOoj8mU3Nxd4mHNIvXHR4jgaj9McNQheg-SqVlnKd1IbphgD3unceGPCkwamF5560AtPvfDUADrzzKbPL_Pn2w32_y3_AGbBt50Ac8tHh0FHmwlY7F1Am3Q_ubfnf39lt6PzzprxLz5hHKY5-MxPg45cM325bHRZKHDGcgAlngEPTpps</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Amorosa, Judith K., MD</creator><creator>Bramwit, Mark Paul, MD</creator><creator>Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H., MD</creator><creator>Reddy, Gautham P., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Brown, Kathleen, MD</creator><creator>Dyer, Debra Sue, MD</creator><creator>Ginsburg, Mark E., MD</creator><creator>Heitkamp, Darel E., MD</creator><creator>Jeudy, Jean, MD</creator><creator>Kirsch, Jacobo, MD</creator><creator>MacMahon, Heber, MB, BCh</creator><creator>Ravenel, James G., MD</creator><creator>Saleh, Anthony G., MD</creator><creator>Shah, Rakesh D., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>ACR Appropriateness Criteria Routine Chest Radiographs in Intensive Care Unit Patients</title><author>Amorosa, Judith K., MD ; Bramwit, Mark Paul, MD ; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H., MD ; Reddy, Gautham P., MD, MPH ; Brown, Kathleen, MD ; Dyer, Debra Sue, MD ; Ginsburg, Mark E., MD ; Heitkamp, Darel E., MD ; Jeudy, Jean, MD ; Kirsch, Jacobo, MD ; MacMahon, Heber, MB, BCh ; Ravenel, James G., MD ; Saleh, Anthony G., MD ; Shah, Rakesh D., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-c6e10ca8061019aa3137ae968cecd4215479dd39ab2c59c1c47a84191a3533313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Appropriateness criteria</topic><topic>chest radiograph</topic><topic>Critical Care - standards</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ICU</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - standards</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - standards</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amorosa, Judith K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bramwit, Mark Paul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Gautham P., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Kathleen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Debra Sue, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Mark E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitkamp, Darel E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeudy, Jean, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsch, Jacobo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacMahon, Heber, MB, BCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravenel, James G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Anthony G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Rakesh D., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amorosa, Judith K., MD</au><au>Bramwit, Mark Paul, MD</au><au>Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H., MD</au><au>Reddy, Gautham P., MD, MPH</au><au>Brown, Kathleen, MD</au><au>Dyer, Debra Sue, MD</au><au>Ginsburg, Mark E., MD</au><au>Heitkamp, Darel E., MD</au><au>Jeudy, Jean, MD</au><au>Kirsch, Jacobo, MD</au><au>MacMahon, Heber, MB, BCh</au><au>Ravenel, James G., MD</au><au>Saleh, Anthony G., MD</au><au>Shah, Rakesh D., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ACR Appropriateness Criteria Routine Chest Radiographs in Intensive Care Unit Patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>170-174</pages><issn>1546-1440</issn><eissn>1558-349X</eissn><abstract>Daily routine chest radiographs in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been a tradition for many years. Anecdotal reports of misplacement of life support items, acute lung processes, and extra pulmonary air collections in a small number of patients served as a justification for routine chest radiographs in the ICU. Having analyzed this practice, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging has made the following recommendations: • When monitoring a stable patient or a patient on mechanical ventilation in the ICU, a portable chest radiograph is appropriate for clinical indications only. • It is appropriate to obtain a chest radiograph after placement of an endotracheal tube, central venous line, Swan-Ganz catheter, nasogastric tube, feeding tube, or chest tube. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The strongest data contributing to these recommendations were derived from a meta-analysis of 8 trials comprising 7,078 ICU patients by Oba and Zaza [ 1 ].</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23571057</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacr.2012.11.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1546-1440 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2013-03, Vol.10 (3), p.170-174 |
issn | 1546-1440 1558-349X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1326142767 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Appropriateness criteria chest radiograph Critical Care - standards Evidence-Based Medicine Humans ICU Intensive Care Units - standards Point-of-Care Systems Radiography, Thoracic - standards Radiology |
title | ACR Appropriateness Criteria Routine Chest Radiographs in Intensive Care Unit Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A18%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ACR%20Appropriateness%20Criteria%20Routine%20Chest%20Radiographs%20in%20Intensive%20Care%20Unit%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Amorosa,%20Judith%20K.,%20MD&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=170-174&rft.issn=1546-1440&rft.eissn=1558-349X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacr.2012.11.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1326142767%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326142767&rft_id=info:pmid/23571057&rft_els_id=S1546144012007107&rfr_iscdi=true |