Efficacy of supplemental peripheral nerve blockade for hip fracture surgery: multiple treatment comparison
Purpose This study was designed to determine the most effective peripheral nerve block supplement to standard anesthesia management for hip fracture patients. Methods We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 1990 to 2010 and conducted multiple treatment compariso...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of anesthesia 2013-03, Vol.60 (3), p.230-243 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 243 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 230 |
container_title | Canadian journal of anesthesia |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Rashiq, Saifee Vandermeer, Ben Abou-Setta, Ahmed M. Beaupre, Lauren A. Jones, C. Allyson Dryden, Donna M. |
description | Purpose
This study was designed to determine the most effective peripheral nerve block supplement to standard anesthesia management for hip fracture patients.
Methods
We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 1990 to 2010 and conducted multiple treatment comparisons using direct and indirect evidence for two outcomes, i.e., acute pain intensity and delirium. We combined trials by type of injection (regardless of time of insertion during the perioperative phase, use of nerve block catheter, local anesthetic type, additives, or duration of treatment).
Results
Twenty-one RCTs comprising 1,422 participants were included. In most cases, the trials were conducted in Europe; they excluded patients with cognitive impairment, and they were unclear or at high risk of bias. The combination of obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blockade had the highest probability of being the most effective against acute postoperative pain. Fascia iliaca blockade had the highest probability of being the most effective against delirium. There was no difference in outcomes among other nerve blocks.
Conclusion
Not all nerve blocks are equally effective in improving outcomes after hip fracture. Multiple treatment comparison, a tool to compare the effectiveness of multiple treatments simultaneously, provides useful guidance to anesthesia providers seeking effective treatment when faced with a body of RCTs wherein each investigates one treatment. More RCTs comparing multiple nerve blocks in hip fracture are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12630-012-9880-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1326140273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2988119521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-375a176eb8300d1162fb99ad209304f8808ff9d131a62fd4768642c9caf77d273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1KJDEUhYM4aNv6AG4k4GY25dwk1UnKnYh_IMxmBtyFdOpGq62qlEmV0G8_aboVEWaVwP3Oyc05hJwyuGAA6ldiXAoogPGi0hoKvUdmrKxkoSu12Ccz0IIXksHTITlKaQUAWi70ATnkQohSaZiR1Y33jbNuTYOnaRqGFjvsR9vSAWMzvGDM1x7jO9JlG9yrrZH6EOlLM1AfrRuniFkXnzGuL2k3tWOTLegY0Y4bI-pCN9jYpNAfkx_etglPduec_L29-XN9Xzz-vnu4vnosXKnZWAi1sExJXGoBUDMmuV9Wla05VAJKn_-pva9qJpjNo7pUUsuSu8pZr1TNlZiTn1vfIYa3CdNouiY5bFvbY5iSYYJLVkImM3r-DV2FKfZ5u0zJvE65SXhO2JZyMaQU0ZshNp2Na8PAbIow2yJMLsJsijA6a852ztOyw_pT8ZF8BvgWSHnU5_i-PP1f13_8H5Pe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1364814126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of supplemental peripheral nerve blockade for hip fracture surgery: multiple treatment comparison</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rashiq, Saifee ; Vandermeer, Ben ; Abou-Setta, Ahmed M. ; Beaupre, Lauren A. ; Jones, C. Allyson ; Dryden, Donna M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rashiq, Saifee ; Vandermeer, Ben ; Abou-Setta, Ahmed M. ; Beaupre, Lauren A. ; Jones, C. Allyson ; Dryden, Donna M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
This study was designed to determine the most effective peripheral nerve block supplement to standard anesthesia management for hip fracture patients.
Methods
We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 1990 to 2010 and conducted multiple treatment comparisons using direct and indirect evidence for two outcomes, i.e., acute pain intensity and delirium. We combined trials by type of injection (regardless of time of insertion during the perioperative phase, use of nerve block catheter, local anesthetic type, additives, or duration of treatment).
Results
Twenty-one RCTs comprising 1,422 participants were included. In most cases, the trials were conducted in Europe; they excluded patients with cognitive impairment, and they were unclear or at high risk of bias. The combination of obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blockade had the highest probability of being the most effective against acute postoperative pain. Fascia iliaca blockade had the highest probability of being the most effective against delirium. There was no difference in outcomes among other nerve blocks.
Conclusion
Not all nerve blocks are equally effective in improving outcomes after hip fracture. Multiple treatment comparison, a tool to compare the effectiveness of multiple treatments simultaneously, provides useful guidance to anesthesia providers seeking effective treatment when faced with a body of RCTs wherein each investigates one treatment. More RCTs comparing multiple nerve blocks in hip fracture are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0832-610X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1496-8975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12630-012-9880-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23334780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Acute Pain - etiology ; Acute Pain - prevention & control ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia - methods ; Anesthesiology ; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage ; Bone surgery ; Cardiology ; Catheters ; Clinical trials ; Critical Care Medicine ; Delirium ; Delirium - etiology ; Delirium - prevention & control ; Dentistry ; Fractures ; Hip Fractures - surgery ; Hip joint ; Humans ; Intensive ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nerve Block - methods ; Pain ; Pain Medicine ; Pediatrics ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Reports of Original Investigations ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of anesthesia, 2013-03, Vol.60 (3), p.230-243</ispartof><rights>Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-375a176eb8300d1162fb99ad209304f8808ff9d131a62fd4768642c9caf77d273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-375a176eb8300d1162fb99ad209304f8808ff9d131a62fd4768642c9caf77d273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12630-012-9880-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12630-012-9880-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23334780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rashiq, Saifee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandermeer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaupre, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, C. Allyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dryden, Donna M.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of supplemental peripheral nerve blockade for hip fracture surgery: multiple treatment comparison</title><title>Canadian journal of anesthesia</title><addtitle>Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth</addtitle><addtitle>Can J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Purpose
This study was designed to determine the most effective peripheral nerve block supplement to standard anesthesia management for hip fracture patients.
Methods
We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 1990 to 2010 and conducted multiple treatment comparisons using direct and indirect evidence for two outcomes, i.e., acute pain intensity and delirium. We combined trials by type of injection (regardless of time of insertion during the perioperative phase, use of nerve block catheter, local anesthetic type, additives, or duration of treatment).
Results
Twenty-one RCTs comprising 1,422 participants were included. In most cases, the trials were conducted in Europe; they excluded patients with cognitive impairment, and they were unclear or at high risk of bias. The combination of obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blockade had the highest probability of being the most effective against acute postoperative pain. Fascia iliaca blockade had the highest probability of being the most effective against delirium. There was no difference in outcomes among other nerve blocks.
Conclusion
Not all nerve blocks are equally effective in improving outcomes after hip fracture. Multiple treatment comparison, a tool to compare the effectiveness of multiple treatments simultaneously, provides useful guidance to anesthesia providers seeking effective treatment when faced with a body of RCTs wherein each investigates one treatment. More RCTs comparing multiple nerve blocks in hip fracture are needed.</description><subject>Acute Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Acute Pain - prevention & control</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Delirium</subject><subject>Delirium - etiology</subject><subject>Delirium - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Hip joint</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Reports of Original Investigations</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0832-610X</issn><issn>1496-8975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1KJDEUhYM4aNv6AG4k4GY25dwk1UnKnYh_IMxmBtyFdOpGq62qlEmV0G8_aboVEWaVwP3Oyc05hJwyuGAA6ldiXAoogPGi0hoKvUdmrKxkoSu12Ccz0IIXksHTITlKaQUAWi70ATnkQohSaZiR1Y33jbNuTYOnaRqGFjvsR9vSAWMzvGDM1x7jO9JlG9yrrZH6EOlLM1AfrRuniFkXnzGuL2k3tWOTLegY0Y4bI-pCN9jYpNAfkx_etglPduec_L29-XN9Xzz-vnu4vnosXKnZWAi1sExJXGoBUDMmuV9Wla05VAJKn_-pva9qJpjNo7pUUsuSu8pZr1TNlZiTn1vfIYa3CdNouiY5bFvbY5iSYYJLVkImM3r-DV2FKfZ5u0zJvE65SXhO2JZyMaQU0ZshNp2Na8PAbIow2yJMLsJsijA6a852ztOyw_pT8ZF8BvgWSHnU5_i-PP1f13_8H5Pe</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Rashiq, Saifee</creator><creator>Vandermeer, Ben</creator><creator>Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.</creator><creator>Beaupre, Lauren A.</creator><creator>Jones, C. Allyson</creator><creator>Dryden, Donna M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Efficacy of supplemental peripheral nerve blockade for hip fracture surgery: multiple treatment comparison</title><author>Rashiq, Saifee ; Vandermeer, Ben ; Abou-Setta, Ahmed M. ; Beaupre, Lauren A. ; Jones, C. Allyson ; Dryden, Donna M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-375a176eb8300d1162fb99ad209304f8808ff9d131a62fd4768642c9caf77d273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acute Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Acute Pain - prevention & control</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Delirium</topic><topic>Delirium - etiology</topic><topic>Delirium - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Hip joint</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Reports of Original Investigations</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rashiq, Saifee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandermeer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaupre, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, C. Allyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dryden, Donna M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rashiq, Saifee</au><au>Vandermeer, Ben</au><au>Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.</au><au>Beaupre, Lauren A.</au><au>Jones, C. Allyson</au><au>Dryden, Donna M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of supplemental peripheral nerve blockade for hip fracture surgery: multiple treatment comparison</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of anesthesia</jtitle><stitle>Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth</stitle><addtitle>Can J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>230-243</pages><issn>0832-610X</issn><eissn>1496-8975</eissn><abstract>Purpose
This study was designed to determine the most effective peripheral nerve block supplement to standard anesthesia management for hip fracture patients.
Methods
We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 1990 to 2010 and conducted multiple treatment comparisons using direct and indirect evidence for two outcomes, i.e., acute pain intensity and delirium. We combined trials by type of injection (regardless of time of insertion during the perioperative phase, use of nerve block catheter, local anesthetic type, additives, or duration of treatment).
Results
Twenty-one RCTs comprising 1,422 participants were included. In most cases, the trials were conducted in Europe; they excluded patients with cognitive impairment, and they were unclear or at high risk of bias. The combination of obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blockade had the highest probability of being the most effective against acute postoperative pain. Fascia iliaca blockade had the highest probability of being the most effective against delirium. There was no difference in outcomes among other nerve blocks.
Conclusion
Not all nerve blocks are equally effective in improving outcomes after hip fracture. Multiple treatment comparison, a tool to compare the effectiveness of multiple treatments simultaneously, provides useful guidance to anesthesia providers seeking effective treatment when faced with a body of RCTs wherein each investigates one treatment. More RCTs comparing multiple nerve blocks in hip fracture are needed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23334780</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12630-012-9880-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0832-610X |
ispartof | Canadian journal of anesthesia, 2013-03, Vol.60 (3), p.230-243 |
issn | 0832-610X 1496-8975 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1326140273 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Acute Pain - etiology Acute Pain - prevention & control Anesthesia Anesthesia - methods Anesthesiology Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Bone surgery Cardiology Catheters Clinical trials Critical Care Medicine Delirium Delirium - etiology Delirium - prevention & control Dentistry Fractures Hip Fractures - surgery Hip joint Humans Intensive Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nerve Block - methods Pain Pain Medicine Pediatrics Pneumology/Respiratory System Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Reports of Original Investigations Treatment Outcome |
title | Efficacy of supplemental peripheral nerve blockade for hip fracture surgery: multiple treatment comparison |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A44%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20supplemental%20peripheral%20nerve%20blockade%20for%20hip%20fracture%20surgery:%20multiple%20treatment%20comparison&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20anesthesia&rft.au=Rashiq,%20Saifee&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=230-243&rft.issn=0832-610X&rft.eissn=1496-8975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12630-012-9880-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2988119521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1364814126&rft_id=info:pmid/23334780&rfr_iscdi=true |