Sensitivity of the GCM driven summer monsoon simulations to cumulus parameterization schemes in nested RegCM3
The regional climate model (RegCM3) from the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics has been used to simulate the Indian summer monsoon for three different monsoon seasons such as deficit (1987), excess (1988) and normal (1989). Sensitivity to various cumulus parameterization and c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Theoretical and applied climatology 2013-04, Vol.112 (1-2), p.285-306 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 306 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 285 |
container_title | Theoretical and applied climatology |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Sinha, P. Mohanty, U. C. Kar, S. C. Dash, S. K. Kumari, S. |
description | The regional climate model (RegCM3) from the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics has been used to simulate the Indian summer monsoon for three different monsoon seasons such as deficit (1987), excess (1988) and normal (1989). Sensitivity to various cumulus parameterization and closure schemes of RegCM3 driven by the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting global spectral model products has been tested. The model integration of the nested RegCM3 is conducted using 90 and 30-km horizontal resolutions for outer and inner domains, respectively. The India Meteorological Department gridded rainfall (1° × 1°) and National Centre for Environment Prediction (NCEP)–Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis-2 of 2.5° × 2.5° horizontal resolution data has been used for verification. The RegCM3 forced by NCEP–DOE reanalysis-2 data simulates monsoon seasons of 1987 and 1988 reasonably well, but the monsoon season of 1989 is not represented well in the model simulations. The RegCM3 runs driven by the global model are able to bring out seasonal mean rainfall and circulations well with the use of the Grell and Anthes–Kuo cumulus scheme at 90-km resolution. While the rainfall intensity and distribution is brought out well with the Anthes–Kuo scheme, upper air circulation features are brought out better by the Grell scheme. The simulated rainfall distribution is better with RegCM3 using the MIT-Emanuel cumulus scheme for 30-km resolution. Several statistical analyses, such as correlation coefficient, root mean square error, equitable threat score, confirm that the performance of MIT-Emanuel scheme at 30-km resolution is better in simulating all-India summer monsoon rainfall. The RegCM3 simulated rainfall amount is more and closer to observations than that from the global model. The RegCM3 has corrected its driven GCM in terms of rainfall distribution and magnitude over some parts of India during extreme years. This study brings out several weaknesses of the RegCM model which are documented in this paper. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00704-012-0728-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323818681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A335292661</galeid><sourcerecordid>A335292661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-82bedfe0d6eeee1ef5626fc835246865f9c7586a599f3348e6014acc28db33293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9rFDEUxQdRcK1-AN8CIujD1PybJPNYltoWWoRWwbeQZm62KZNkTTLF-umbdYtYwQQSbvK7h5OcrntL8CHBWH4qbcG8x4T2WFLVD8-6FeGM95wr9rxbYSJlL0f1_WX3qpRbjDEVQq66cAWx-OrvfL1HyaF6A-hkfYGm7O8gorKEABmFFEtKrfRhmU31rUQ1Ibu0ciloa7IJUCH7X78vUbE3EKAgH1GEUmFCl7BZX7DX3Qtn5gJvHveD7tvn46_r0_78y8nZ-ui8t3ygtVf0GiYHeBLQBgE3CCqcVWygXCgxuNHKQQkzjKNjjCsQmHBjLVXTNWN0ZAfdh73uNqcfS3Oggy8W5tlESEvRhFGmiBKKNPTdP-htWnJs7ho1SDbycZSNOtxTGzOD9tGlmo1tc4LgbYrgfDs_Ys3h2D52J_vxSUNjKvysG7OUos-uLp-yZM_anErJ4PQ2-2DyvSZY79LV-3R1S1fv0tVD63n_aNsUa2aXTbS-_GmkUhAs2E6b7rnSruIG8l_P-6_4A9Vps74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1357394997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity of the GCM driven summer monsoon simulations to cumulus parameterization schemes in nested RegCM3</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sinha, P. ; Mohanty, U. C. ; Kar, S. C. ; Dash, S. K. ; Kumari, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinha, P. ; Mohanty, U. C. ; Kar, S. C. ; Dash, S. K. ; Kumari, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The regional climate model (RegCM3) from the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics has been used to simulate the Indian summer monsoon for three different monsoon seasons such as deficit (1987), excess (1988) and normal (1989). Sensitivity to various cumulus parameterization and closure schemes of RegCM3 driven by the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting global spectral model products has been tested. The model integration of the nested RegCM3 is conducted using 90 and 30-km horizontal resolutions for outer and inner domains, respectively. The India Meteorological Department gridded rainfall (1° × 1°) and National Centre for Environment Prediction (NCEP)–Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis-2 of 2.5° × 2.5° horizontal resolution data has been used for verification. The RegCM3 forced by NCEP–DOE reanalysis-2 data simulates monsoon seasons of 1987 and 1988 reasonably well, but the monsoon season of 1989 is not represented well in the model simulations. The RegCM3 runs driven by the global model are able to bring out seasonal mean rainfall and circulations well with the use of the Grell and Anthes–Kuo cumulus scheme at 90-km resolution. While the rainfall intensity and distribution is brought out well with the Anthes–Kuo scheme, upper air circulation features are brought out better by the Grell scheme. The simulated rainfall distribution is better with RegCM3 using the MIT-Emanuel cumulus scheme for 30-km resolution. Several statistical analyses, such as correlation coefficient, root mean square error, equitable threat score, confirm that the performance of MIT-Emanuel scheme at 30-km resolution is better in simulating all-India summer monsoon rainfall. The RegCM3 simulated rainfall amount is more and closer to observations than that from the global model. The RegCM3 has corrected its driven GCM in terms of rainfall distribution and magnitude over some parts of India during extreme years. This study brings out several weaknesses of the RegCM model which are documented in this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0177-798X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4483</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00704-012-0728-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Air circulation ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Climate models ; Climatology ; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change ; Correlation coefficient ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Meteorology ; Monsoons ; Original Paper ; Parameter estimation ; Rain and rainfall ; Rainfall distribution ; Rainfall intensity ; Seasons ; Sensitivity analysis ; Simulated rainfall ; Statistical analysis ; Summer ; Tidal waves ; Toy industry ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Weather ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Theoretical and applied climatology, 2013-04, Vol.112 (1-2), p.285-306</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Wien 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-82bedfe0d6eeee1ef5626fc835246865f9c7586a599f3348e6014acc28db33293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-82bedfe0d6eeee1ef5626fc835246865f9c7586a599f3348e6014acc28db33293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00704-012-0728-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00704-012-0728-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27610631$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinha, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, U. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kar, S. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dash, S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumari, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity of the GCM driven summer monsoon simulations to cumulus parameterization schemes in nested RegCM3</title><title>Theoretical and applied climatology</title><addtitle>Theor Appl Climatol</addtitle><description>The regional climate model (RegCM3) from the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics has been used to simulate the Indian summer monsoon for three different monsoon seasons such as deficit (1987), excess (1988) and normal (1989). Sensitivity to various cumulus parameterization and closure schemes of RegCM3 driven by the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting global spectral model products has been tested. The model integration of the nested RegCM3 is conducted using 90 and 30-km horizontal resolutions for outer and inner domains, respectively. The India Meteorological Department gridded rainfall (1° × 1°) and National Centre for Environment Prediction (NCEP)–Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis-2 of 2.5° × 2.5° horizontal resolution data has been used for verification. The RegCM3 forced by NCEP–DOE reanalysis-2 data simulates monsoon seasons of 1987 and 1988 reasonably well, but the monsoon season of 1989 is not represented well in the model simulations. The RegCM3 runs driven by the global model are able to bring out seasonal mean rainfall and circulations well with the use of the Grell and Anthes–Kuo cumulus scheme at 90-km resolution. While the rainfall intensity and distribution is brought out well with the Anthes–Kuo scheme, upper air circulation features are brought out better by the Grell scheme. The simulated rainfall distribution is better with RegCM3 using the MIT-Emanuel cumulus scheme for 30-km resolution. Several statistical analyses, such as correlation coefficient, root mean square error, equitable threat score, confirm that the performance of MIT-Emanuel scheme at 30-km resolution is better in simulating all-India summer monsoon rainfall. The RegCM3 simulated rainfall amount is more and closer to observations than that from the global model. The RegCM3 has corrected its driven GCM in terms of rainfall distribution and magnitude over some parts of India during extreme years. This study brings out several weaknesses of the RegCM model which are documented in this paper.</description><subject>Air circulation</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Monsoons</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Rain and rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall distribution</subject><subject>Rainfall intensity</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Simulated rainfall</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Tidal waves</subject><subject>Toy industry</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0177-798X</issn><issn>1434-4483</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9rFDEUxQdRcK1-AN8CIujD1PybJPNYltoWWoRWwbeQZm62KZNkTTLF-umbdYtYwQQSbvK7h5OcrntL8CHBWH4qbcG8x4T2WFLVD8-6FeGM95wr9rxbYSJlL0f1_WX3qpRbjDEVQq66cAWx-OrvfL1HyaF6A-hkfYGm7O8gorKEABmFFEtKrfRhmU31rUQ1Ibu0ciloa7IJUCH7X78vUbE3EKAgH1GEUmFCl7BZX7DX3Qtn5gJvHveD7tvn46_r0_78y8nZ-ui8t3ygtVf0GiYHeBLQBgE3CCqcVWygXCgxuNHKQQkzjKNjjCsQmHBjLVXTNWN0ZAfdh73uNqcfS3Oggy8W5tlESEvRhFGmiBKKNPTdP-htWnJs7ho1SDbycZSNOtxTGzOD9tGlmo1tc4LgbYrgfDs_Ys3h2D52J_vxSUNjKvysG7OUos-uLp-yZM_anErJ4PQ2-2DyvSZY79LV-3R1S1fv0tVD63n_aNsUa2aXTbS-_GmkUhAs2E6b7rnSruIG8l_P-6_4A9Vps74</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Sinha, P.</creator><creator>Mohanty, U. C.</creator><creator>Kar, S. C.</creator><creator>Dash, S. K.</creator><creator>Kumari, S.</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Sensitivity of the GCM driven summer monsoon simulations to cumulus parameterization schemes in nested RegCM3</title><author>Sinha, P. ; Mohanty, U. C. ; Kar, S. C. ; Dash, S. K. ; Kumari, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-82bedfe0d6eeee1ef5626fc835246865f9c7586a599f3348e6014acc28db33293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air circulation</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Monsoons</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Rain and rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall distribution</topic><topic>Rainfall intensity</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Simulated rainfall</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Tidal waves</topic><topic>Toy industry</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinha, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, U. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kar, S. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dash, S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumari, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Theoretical and applied climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinha, P.</au><au>Mohanty, U. C.</au><au>Kar, S. C.</au><au>Dash, S. K.</au><au>Kumari, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity of the GCM driven summer monsoon simulations to cumulus parameterization schemes in nested RegCM3</atitle><jtitle>Theoretical and applied climatology</jtitle><stitle>Theor Appl Climatol</stitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>285-306</pages><issn>0177-798X</issn><eissn>1434-4483</eissn><abstract>The regional climate model (RegCM3) from the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics has been used to simulate the Indian summer monsoon for three different monsoon seasons such as deficit (1987), excess (1988) and normal (1989). Sensitivity to various cumulus parameterization and closure schemes of RegCM3 driven by the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting global spectral model products has been tested. The model integration of the nested RegCM3 is conducted using 90 and 30-km horizontal resolutions for outer and inner domains, respectively. The India Meteorological Department gridded rainfall (1° × 1°) and National Centre for Environment Prediction (NCEP)–Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis-2 of 2.5° × 2.5° horizontal resolution data has been used for verification. The RegCM3 forced by NCEP–DOE reanalysis-2 data simulates monsoon seasons of 1987 and 1988 reasonably well, but the monsoon season of 1989 is not represented well in the model simulations. The RegCM3 runs driven by the global model are able to bring out seasonal mean rainfall and circulations well with the use of the Grell and Anthes–Kuo cumulus scheme at 90-km resolution. While the rainfall intensity and distribution is brought out well with the Anthes–Kuo scheme, upper air circulation features are brought out better by the Grell scheme. The simulated rainfall distribution is better with RegCM3 using the MIT-Emanuel cumulus scheme for 30-km resolution. Several statistical analyses, such as correlation coefficient, root mean square error, equitable threat score, confirm that the performance of MIT-Emanuel scheme at 30-km resolution is better in simulating all-India summer monsoon rainfall. The RegCM3 simulated rainfall amount is more and closer to observations than that from the global model. The RegCM3 has corrected its driven GCM in terms of rainfall distribution and magnitude over some parts of India during extreme years. This study brings out several weaknesses of the RegCM model which are documented in this paper.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><doi>10.1007/s00704-012-0728-5</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0177-798X |
ispartof | Theoretical and applied climatology, 2013-04, Vol.112 (1-2), p.285-306 |
issn | 0177-798X 1434-4483 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323818681 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Air circulation Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Atmospheric Sciences Climate models Climatology Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change Correlation coefficient Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Meteorology Monsoons Original Paper Parameter estimation Rain and rainfall Rainfall distribution Rainfall intensity Seasons Sensitivity analysis Simulated rainfall Statistical analysis Summer Tidal waves Toy industry Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control Weather Weather forecasting |
title | Sensitivity of the GCM driven summer monsoon simulations to cumulus parameterization schemes in nested RegCM3 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A12%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20of%20the%20GCM%20driven%20summer%20monsoon%20simulations%20to%20cumulus%20parameterization%20schemes%20in%20nested%20RegCM3&rft.jtitle=Theoretical%20and%20applied%20climatology&rft.au=Sinha,%20P.&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=285-306&rft.issn=0177-798X&rft.eissn=1434-4483&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00704-012-0728-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA335292661%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1357394997&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A335292661&rfr_iscdi=true |