Crosswords to Computers: A Critical Review of Popular Approaches to Cognitive Enhancement

Cognitive enhancement strategies have gained recent popularity and have the potential to benefit clinical and non-clinical populations. As technology advances and the number of cognitively healthy adults seeking methods of improving or preserving cognitive functioning grows, the role of electronic (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychology review 2013-03, Vol.23 (1), p.13-26
Hauptverfasser: Jak, Amy J., Seelye, Adriana M., Jurick, Sarah M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title Neuropsychology review
container_volume 23
creator Jak, Amy J.
Seelye, Adriana M.
Jurick, Sarah M.
description Cognitive enhancement strategies have gained recent popularity and have the potential to benefit clinical and non-clinical populations. As technology advances and the number of cognitively healthy adults seeking methods of improving or preserving cognitive functioning grows, the role of electronic (e.g., computer and video game based) cognitive training becomes more relevant and warrants greater scientific scrutiny. This paper serves as a critical review of empirical evaluations of publically available electronic cognitive training programs. Many studies have found that electronic training approaches result in significant improvements in trained cognitive tasks. Fewer studies have demonstrated improvements in untrained tasks within the trained cognitive domain, non-trained cognitive domains, or on measures of everyday function. Successful cognitive training programs will elicit effects that generalize to untrained, practical tasks for extended periods of time. Unfortunately, many studies of electronic cognitive training programs are hindered by methodological limitations such as lack of an adequate control group, long-term follow-up and ecologically valid outcome measures. Despite these limitations, evidence suggests that computerized cognitive training has the potential to positively impact one’s sense of social connectivity and self-efficacy.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11065-013-9226-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323809896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1323809896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-785d05cdbe79f759cd1cc2fb7c73681685dd09064f972eadab3ff987fcefb3e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMotlZ_gBsJuOlm9CSZJBN3l6GtQkERXbgKmcxJO2VmMiYzLf57c7lXEUFwlcB53jcfDyEvGbxhAPptZgyUrICJynCuKvmInDKpRaWUgsdlDzVUWkBzQp7lfAdQUpw_JSdc1FxIKU7JtzbFnB9i6jNdI23jtGwrpvyO7mibhnXwbqSf8X7ABxoD_RSXbXSJ7pYlRedv8Zi6mQt6j_RivnWzxwnn9Tl5EtyY8cVxPSNfLy--tO-r649XH9rddeVrkGulG9mD9H2H2gQtje-Z9zx02muhGqbKuAcDqg5Gc3S960QIptHBY-gENuKMnB96y42-b5hXOw3Z4zi6GeOWLRNcNGAao_4DZUpo3She0Nd_oXdxS3N5yJ6SRilei0KxA-X3v5gw2CUNk0s_LAO7V2QPimxRZPeKrCyZV8fmrZuw_5345aQA_ADkMppvMP1x9D9bfwJ3KJtY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1315966243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crosswords to Computers: A Critical Review of Popular Approaches to Cognitive Enhancement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Jak, Amy J. ; Seelye, Adriana M. ; Jurick, Sarah M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jak, Amy J. ; Seelye, Adriana M. ; Jurick, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive enhancement strategies have gained recent popularity and have the potential to benefit clinical and non-clinical populations. As technology advances and the number of cognitively healthy adults seeking methods of improving or preserving cognitive functioning grows, the role of electronic (e.g., computer and video game based) cognitive training becomes more relevant and warrants greater scientific scrutiny. This paper serves as a critical review of empirical evaluations of publically available electronic cognitive training programs. Many studies have found that electronic training approaches result in significant improvements in trained cognitive tasks. Fewer studies have demonstrated improvements in untrained tasks within the trained cognitive domain, non-trained cognitive domains, or on measures of everyday function. Successful cognitive training programs will elicit effects that generalize to untrained, practical tasks for extended periods of time. Unfortunately, many studies of electronic cognitive training programs are hindered by methodological limitations such as lack of an adequate control group, long-term follow-up and ecologically valid outcome measures. Despite these limitations, evidence suggests that computerized cognitive training has the potential to positively impact one’s sense of social connectivity and self-efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-7308</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11065-013-9226-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23423553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aging ; Alzheimer's disease ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive enhancement ; Computer &amp; video games ; Computers ; Crossword puzzles ; Dementia ; Humans ; Internet access ; Memory ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental Disorders - rehabilitation ; Neural networks ; Neurology ; Neuropsychology ; Neurosciences ; Nootropic Agents ; Older people ; Popularity ; Review ; Reviews ; Video Games</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychology review, 2013-03, Vol.23 (1), p.13-26</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-785d05cdbe79f759cd1cc2fb7c73681685dd09064f972eadab3ff987fcefb3e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-785d05cdbe79f759cd1cc2fb7c73681685dd09064f972eadab3ff987fcefb3e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11065-013-9226-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11065-013-9226-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23423553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jak, Amy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seelye, Adriana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurick, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><title>Crosswords to Computers: A Critical Review of Popular Approaches to Cognitive Enhancement</title><title>Neuropsychology review</title><addtitle>Neuropsychol Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychol Rev</addtitle><description>Cognitive enhancement strategies have gained recent popularity and have the potential to benefit clinical and non-clinical populations. As technology advances and the number of cognitively healthy adults seeking methods of improving or preserving cognitive functioning grows, the role of electronic (e.g., computer and video game based) cognitive training becomes more relevant and warrants greater scientific scrutiny. This paper serves as a critical review of empirical evaluations of publically available electronic cognitive training programs. Many studies have found that electronic training approaches result in significant improvements in trained cognitive tasks. Fewer studies have demonstrated improvements in untrained tasks within the trained cognitive domain, non-trained cognitive domains, or on measures of everyday function. Successful cognitive training programs will elicit effects that generalize to untrained, practical tasks for extended periods of time. Unfortunately, many studies of electronic cognitive training programs are hindered by methodological limitations such as lack of an adequate control group, long-term follow-up and ecologically valid outcome measures. Despite these limitations, evidence suggests that computerized cognitive training has the potential to positively impact one’s sense of social connectivity and self-efficacy.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive enhancement</subject><subject>Computer &amp; video games</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Crossword puzzles</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Nootropic Agents</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Video Games</subject><issn>1040-7308</issn><issn>1573-6660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMotlZ_gBsJuOlm9CSZJBN3l6GtQkERXbgKmcxJO2VmMiYzLf57c7lXEUFwlcB53jcfDyEvGbxhAPptZgyUrICJynCuKvmInDKpRaWUgsdlDzVUWkBzQp7lfAdQUpw_JSdc1FxIKU7JtzbFnB9i6jNdI23jtGwrpvyO7mibhnXwbqSf8X7ABxoD_RSXbXSJ7pYlRedv8Zi6mQt6j_RivnWzxwnn9Tl5EtyY8cVxPSNfLy--tO-r649XH9rddeVrkGulG9mD9H2H2gQtje-Z9zx02muhGqbKuAcDqg5Gc3S960QIptHBY-gENuKMnB96y42-b5hXOw3Z4zi6GeOWLRNcNGAao_4DZUpo3She0Nd_oXdxS3N5yJ6SRilei0KxA-X3v5gw2CUNk0s_LAO7V2QPimxRZPeKrCyZV8fmrZuw_5345aQA_ADkMppvMP1x9D9bfwJ3KJtY</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Jak, Amy J.</creator><creator>Seelye, Adriana M.</creator><creator>Jurick, Sarah M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Crosswords to Computers: A Critical Review of Popular Approaches to Cognitive Enhancement</title><author>Jak, Amy J. ; Seelye, Adriana M. ; Jurick, Sarah M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-785d05cdbe79f759cd1cc2fb7c73681685dd09064f972eadab3ff987fcefb3e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive enhancement</topic><topic>Computer &amp; video games</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Crossword puzzles</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Nootropic Agents</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Video Games</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jak, Amy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seelye, Adriana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurick, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jak, Amy J.</au><au>Seelye, Adriana M.</au><au>Jurick, Sarah M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crosswords to Computers: A Critical Review of Popular Approaches to Cognitive Enhancement</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychology review</jtitle><stitle>Neuropsychol Rev</stitle><addtitle>Neuropsychol Rev</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>13-26</pages><issn>1040-7308</issn><eissn>1573-6660</eissn><abstract>Cognitive enhancement strategies have gained recent popularity and have the potential to benefit clinical and non-clinical populations. As technology advances and the number of cognitively healthy adults seeking methods of improving or preserving cognitive functioning grows, the role of electronic (e.g., computer and video game based) cognitive training becomes more relevant and warrants greater scientific scrutiny. This paper serves as a critical review of empirical evaluations of publically available electronic cognitive training programs. Many studies have found that electronic training approaches result in significant improvements in trained cognitive tasks. Fewer studies have demonstrated improvements in untrained tasks within the trained cognitive domain, non-trained cognitive domains, or on measures of everyday function. Successful cognitive training programs will elicit effects that generalize to untrained, practical tasks for extended periods of time. Unfortunately, many studies of electronic cognitive training programs are hindered by methodological limitations such as lack of an adequate control group, long-term follow-up and ecologically valid outcome measures. Despite these limitations, evidence suggests that computerized cognitive training has the potential to positively impact one’s sense of social connectivity and self-efficacy.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>23423553</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11065-013-9226-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-7308
ispartof Neuropsychology review, 2013-03, Vol.23 (1), p.13-26
issn 1040-7308
1573-6660
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323809896
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aging
Alzheimer's disease
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Brain
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Cognitive enhancement
Computer & video games
Computers
Crossword puzzles
Dementia
Humans
Internet access
Memory
Mental Disorders - psychology
Mental Disorders - rehabilitation
Neural networks
Neurology
Neuropsychology
Neurosciences
Nootropic Agents
Older people
Popularity
Review
Reviews
Video Games
title Crosswords to Computers: A Critical Review of Popular Approaches to Cognitive Enhancement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T15%3A04%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crosswords%20to%20Computers:%20A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20Popular%20Approaches%20to%20Cognitive%20Enhancement&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychology%20review&rft.au=Jak,%20Amy%20J.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=13-26&rft.issn=1040-7308&rft.eissn=1573-6660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11065-013-9226-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1323809896%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1315966243&rft_id=info:pmid/23423553&rfr_iscdi=true