Effects of stand structure on wind speed reduction in a Metasequoia glyptostroboides shelterbelt
In a Metasequoia glyptostroboides coastal forest shelterbelt near Shanghai, China, we studied relationships between stand structure and wind shelter effect. We located 16 plots at intervals of 500 m along the shelterbelt and characterized both horizontal and vertical structure of each plot. Wind spe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Agroforestry systems 2013-04, Vol.87 (2), p.251-257 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 257 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 251 |
| container_title | Agroforestry systems |
| container_volume | 87 |
| creator | Wu, Tonggui Yu, Mukui Wang, Geoff Wang, Zongxing Duan, Xi Dong, Yi Cheng, Xiangrong |
| description | In a
Metasequoia glyptostroboides
coastal forest shelterbelt near Shanghai, China, we studied relationships between stand structure and wind shelter effect. We located 16 plots at intervals of 500 m along the shelterbelt and characterized both horizontal and vertical structure of each plot. Wind speed was measured within each plot and at different distances windward and leeward. We found that wind shelter effects were closely related to stand structure of the studied
M. glyptostroboides
shelterbelt. Stands with high basal area but intermediate crown index and intermediate proportion of large trees (LT) produced the best shelter effects, with significantly longer shelter distance (
d
70, shelter distance which the wind speed
U
does not exceed 70 % of
U
0
) and slightly lower minimum relative wind speed (
U
m
/U
0
). Simple structural indices that can be easily measured in the field were good predictors of the shelter effect. LT was the best predictor of
d
70, while basal area at ground level was the best predictor of
U
m
/
U
0
. The relationships between stand structure and shelter effect provides a practical guideline to the design, construction and management of forest shelterbelts. In order to provide the best shelter effects, high basal area of >50 m
2
ha
−1
at ground level or >33 m
2
ha
−1
at breast height coupled with an intermediate LT value of about 60 % should be maintained for the studied
M. glyptostroboides
shelterbelt. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10457-012-9540-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323800975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2914021241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-84f9e2c9a66affbca6f6b3f6eede306a1f913773ecbc824d0c8c4da1110c74fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8BEbxU89WkPYqsH7DiRc8xTSdaqc2aaRH_vVl2ERG8TMibZ96ZvIQcc3bOGTMXyJkqTcG4KOpSsULvkBkvTb7piu2SGePaFEpqvU8OEN8YY7U21Yw8L0IAPyKNgeLohjbXNPlxSkDjQD-7tbICaGmCNutdFruBOnoPo0P4mGLn6Ev_tRpjboxN7FpAiq_Qj5CaXA_JXnA9wtH2nJOn68Xj1W2xfLi5u7pcFl6pciwqFWoQvnZauxAa73TQjQw6TwbJtOOh5tIYCb7xlVAt85VXreOcM29UaOWcnG18Vyl-TICjfe_QQ9-7AeKElkshq_xrU2b05A_6Fqc05O0yxcu6FKKUmeIbyqeImCDYVereXfqynNl15naTuc2Z23XmVuee062zQ-_6kNzgO_xpFIYrwaoqc2LDYX4aXiD92uBf829-WZLx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1315952253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of stand structure on wind speed reduction in a Metasequoia glyptostroboides shelterbelt</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wu, Tonggui ; Yu, Mukui ; Wang, Geoff ; Wang, Zongxing ; Duan, Xi ; Dong, Yi ; Cheng, Xiangrong</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tonggui ; Yu, Mukui ; Wang, Geoff ; Wang, Zongxing ; Duan, Xi ; Dong, Yi ; Cheng, Xiangrong</creatorcontrib><description>In a
Metasequoia glyptostroboides
coastal forest shelterbelt near Shanghai, China, we studied relationships between stand structure and wind shelter effect. We located 16 plots at intervals of 500 m along the shelterbelt and characterized both horizontal and vertical structure of each plot. Wind speed was measured within each plot and at different distances windward and leeward. We found that wind shelter effects were closely related to stand structure of the studied
M. glyptostroboides
shelterbelt. Stands with high basal area but intermediate crown index and intermediate proportion of large trees (LT) produced the best shelter effects, with significantly longer shelter distance (
d
70, shelter distance which the wind speed
U
does not exceed 70 % of
U
0
) and slightly lower minimum relative wind speed (
U
m
/U
0
). Simple structural indices that can be easily measured in the field were good predictors of the shelter effect. LT was the best predictor of
d
70, while basal area at ground level was the best predictor of
U
m
/
U
0
. The relationships between stand structure and shelter effect provides a practical guideline to the design, construction and management of forest shelterbelts. In order to provide the best shelter effects, high basal area of >50 m
2
ha
−1
at ground level or >33 m
2
ha
−1
at breast height coupled with an intermediate LT value of about 60 % should be maintained for the studied
M. glyptostroboides
shelterbelt.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10457-012-9540-6</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGSYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Life Sciences ; Metasequoia glyptostroboides ; Trees ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Agroforestry systems, 2013-04, Vol.87 (2), p.251-257</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-84f9e2c9a66affbca6f6b3f6eede306a1f913773ecbc824d0c8c4da1110c74fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-84f9e2c9a66affbca6f6b3f6eede306a1f913773ecbc824d0c8c4da1110c74fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-012-9540-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10457-012-9540-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27142088$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tonggui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Mukui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Geoff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zongxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiangrong</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of stand structure on wind speed reduction in a Metasequoia glyptostroboides shelterbelt</title><title>Agroforestry systems</title><addtitle>Agroforest Syst</addtitle><description>In a
Metasequoia glyptostroboides
coastal forest shelterbelt near Shanghai, China, we studied relationships between stand structure and wind shelter effect. We located 16 plots at intervals of 500 m along the shelterbelt and characterized both horizontal and vertical structure of each plot. Wind speed was measured within each plot and at different distances windward and leeward. We found that wind shelter effects were closely related to stand structure of the studied
M. glyptostroboides
shelterbelt. Stands with high basal area but intermediate crown index and intermediate proportion of large trees (LT) produced the best shelter effects, with significantly longer shelter distance (
d
70, shelter distance which the wind speed
U
does not exceed 70 % of
U
0
) and slightly lower minimum relative wind speed (
U
m
/U
0
). Simple structural indices that can be easily measured in the field were good predictors of the shelter effect. LT was the best predictor of
d
70, while basal area at ground level was the best predictor of
U
m
/
U
0
. The relationships between stand structure and shelter effect provides a practical guideline to the design, construction and management of forest shelterbelts. In order to provide the best shelter effects, high basal area of >50 m
2
ha
−1
at ground level or >33 m
2
ha
−1
at breast height coupled with an intermediate LT value of about 60 % should be maintained for the studied
M. glyptostroboides
shelterbelt.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Metasequoia glyptostroboides</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>0167-4366</issn><issn>1572-9680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8BEbxU89WkPYqsH7DiRc8xTSdaqc2aaRH_vVl2ERG8TMibZ96ZvIQcc3bOGTMXyJkqTcG4KOpSsULvkBkvTb7piu2SGePaFEpqvU8OEN8YY7U21Yw8L0IAPyKNgeLohjbXNPlxSkDjQD-7tbICaGmCNutdFruBOnoPo0P4mGLn6Ev_tRpjboxN7FpAiq_Qj5CaXA_JXnA9wtH2nJOn68Xj1W2xfLi5u7pcFl6pciwqFWoQvnZauxAa73TQjQw6TwbJtOOh5tIYCb7xlVAt85VXreOcM29UaOWcnG18Vyl-TICjfe_QQ9-7AeKElkshq_xrU2b05A_6Fqc05O0yxcu6FKKUmeIbyqeImCDYVereXfqynNl15naTuc2Z23XmVuee062zQ-_6kNzgO_xpFIYrwaoqc2LDYX4aXiD92uBf829-WZLx</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Wu, Tonggui</creator><creator>Yu, Mukui</creator><creator>Wang, Geoff</creator><creator>Wang, Zongxing</creator><creator>Duan, Xi</creator><creator>Dong, Yi</creator><creator>Cheng, Xiangrong</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Effects of stand structure on wind speed reduction in a Metasequoia glyptostroboides shelterbelt</title><author>Wu, Tonggui ; Yu, Mukui ; Wang, Geoff ; Wang, Zongxing ; Duan, Xi ; Dong, Yi ; Cheng, Xiangrong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-84f9e2c9a66affbca6f6b3f6eede306a1f913773ecbc824d0c8c4da1110c74fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Metasequoia glyptostroboides</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tonggui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Mukui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Geoff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zongxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiangrong</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Tonggui</au><au>Yu, Mukui</au><au>Wang, Geoff</au><au>Wang, Zongxing</au><au>Duan, Xi</au><au>Dong, Yi</au><au>Cheng, Xiangrong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of stand structure on wind speed reduction in a Metasequoia glyptostroboides shelterbelt</atitle><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle><stitle>Agroforest Syst</stitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>251-257</pages><issn>0167-4366</issn><eissn>1572-9680</eissn><coden>AGSYE6</coden><abstract>In a
Metasequoia glyptostroboides
coastal forest shelterbelt near Shanghai, China, we studied relationships between stand structure and wind shelter effect. We located 16 plots at intervals of 500 m along the shelterbelt and characterized both horizontal and vertical structure of each plot. Wind speed was measured within each plot and at different distances windward and leeward. We found that wind shelter effects were closely related to stand structure of the studied
M. glyptostroboides
shelterbelt. Stands with high basal area but intermediate crown index and intermediate proportion of large trees (LT) produced the best shelter effects, with significantly longer shelter distance (
d
70, shelter distance which the wind speed
U
does not exceed 70 % of
U
0
) and slightly lower minimum relative wind speed (
U
m
/U
0
). Simple structural indices that can be easily measured in the field were good predictors of the shelter effect. LT was the best predictor of
d
70, while basal area at ground level was the best predictor of
U
m
/
U
0
. The relationships between stand structure and shelter effect provides a practical guideline to the design, construction and management of forest shelterbelts. In order to provide the best shelter effects, high basal area of >50 m
2
ha
−1
at ground level or >33 m
2
ha
−1
at breast height coupled with an intermediate LT value of about 60 % should be maintained for the studied
M. glyptostroboides
shelterbelt.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10457-012-9540-6</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-4366 |
| ispartof | Agroforestry systems, 2013-04, Vol.87 (2), p.251-257 |
| issn | 0167-4366 1572-9680 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323800975 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Agriculture Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Forest management Forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Life Sciences Metasequoia glyptostroboides Trees Wind speed |
| title | Effects of stand structure on wind speed reduction in a Metasequoia glyptostroboides shelterbelt |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A09%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20stand%20structure%20on%20wind%20speed%20reduction%20in%20a%20Metasequoia%20glyptostroboides%20shelterbelt&rft.jtitle=Agroforestry%20systems&rft.au=Wu,%20Tonggui&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=251-257&rft.issn=0167-4366&rft.eissn=1572-9680&rft.coden=AGSYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10457-012-9540-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2914021241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1315952253&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |