Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality
Summary Objectives/Hypothesis This study investigates the effect of consensus training of listeners on intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of perceptual voice analysis. The use of such training, including a reference voice sample, could be assumed to make the internal standards held...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of voice 2012-05, Vol.26 (3), p.304-312 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 312 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 304 |
container_title | Journal of voice |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Iwarsson, Jenny Reinholt Petersen, Niels |
description | Summary Objectives/Hypothesis This study investigates the effect of consensus training of listeners on intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of perceptual voice analysis. The use of such training, including a reference voice sample, could be assumed to make the internal standards held in memory common and more robust, which is of great importance to reduce the variability of auditory perceptual ratings. Study Design A prospective design with testing before and after training. Methods Thirteen students of audiologopedics served as listening subjects. The ratings were made using a multidimensional protocol with four-point equal-appearing interval scales. The stimuli consisted of text reading by authentic dysphonic patients. The consensus training for each perceptual voice parameter included (1) definition, (2) underlying physiology, (3) presentation of carefully selected sound examples representing the parameter in three different grades followed by group discussions of perceived characteristics, and (4) practical exercises including imitation to make use of the listeners' proprioception. Results Intrarater reliability and agreement showed a marked improvement for intermittent aphonia but not for vocal fry. Interrater reliability was high for most parameters before training with a slight increase after training. Interrater agreement showed marked increases for most voice quality parameters as a result of the training. Conclusion The results support the recommendation of specific consensus training, including use of a reference voice sample material, to calibrate, equalize, and stabilize the internal standards held in memory by the listeners. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323346960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0892199711001032</els_id><sourcerecordid>1011195823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-b715405f01d6698c6fa90b31478450af529126e004255990418aefc8292e2ec23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkFv1DAQhS0EosvCP0DIEhcuCWPHcewLUrUqFKkSUApX43Um4JCNt3ZSaf89TreA1EtPluzvPc_MG0JeMigZMPm2L_ub4B2WHBgrQZYA1SOyYqqpClEr9ZisQGleMK2bE_IspR4AeH59Sk44UwJYAyvy46zr0E2Jho5uwphwTHOiV9H60Y8_aRjp9AvpJQ7ebv3gp8MCns6tn0I80M8YHe6n2Q700k5ZcOvzfSmLfsm3mX9OnnR2SPji7lyTb-_PrjbnxcWnDx83pxeFq4WYim3DagF1B6yVUisnO6thWzHRKFGD7WquGZcIIHhdaw2CKYudU1xz5Oh4tSZvjr77GK5nTJPZ-eRwGOyIYU6GVbyqhNQSHkbzQJmuVRasyet7aB_mOOZGMlVpJblWKlPiSLkYUorYmX30OxsPGVrcpOnNMSyzhGVAmhxWlr26M5-3O2z_if6mk4F3RwDz4G48RpOcx9Fh62MOzbTBP_TDfQM35GCdHX7jAdP_XkziBszXZWGWfWEMIPfHqz-VyrmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1039862988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Iwarsson, Jenny ; Reinholt Petersen, Niels</creator><creatorcontrib>Iwarsson, Jenny ; Reinholt Petersen, Niels</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Objectives/Hypothesis This study investigates the effect of consensus training of listeners on intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of perceptual voice analysis. The use of such training, including a reference voice sample, could be assumed to make the internal standards held in memory common and more robust, which is of great importance to reduce the variability of auditory perceptual ratings. Study Design A prospective design with testing before and after training. Methods Thirteen students of audiologopedics served as listening subjects. The ratings were made using a multidimensional protocol with four-point equal-appearing interval scales. The stimuli consisted of text reading by authentic dysphonic patients. The consensus training for each perceptual voice parameter included (1) definition, (2) underlying physiology, (3) presentation of carefully selected sound examples representing the parameter in three different grades followed by group discussions of perceived characteristics, and (4) practical exercises including imitation to make use of the listeners' proprioception. Results Intrarater reliability and agreement showed a marked improvement for intermittent aphonia but not for vocal fry. Interrater reliability was high for most parameters before training with a slight increase after training. Interrater agreement showed marked increases for most voice quality parameters as a result of the training. Conclusion The results support the recommendation of specific consensus training, including use of a reference voice sample material, to calibrate, equalize, and stabilize the internal standards held in memory by the listeners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-1997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4588</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21840170</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOVOEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Audiology - standards ; Auditory perceptual ratings ; Calibration ; Consensus ; Consensus training ; Denmark ; Humans ; Internal standards ; Listening ; Memory ; Observer Variation ; Otolaryngology ; Perception ; Professional Competence - standards ; Prospective Studies ; Quality ; Reading ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severity of Illness Index ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Perception ; Speech Production Measurement - standards ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Training ; Voice ; Voice Disorders - diagnosis ; Voice Disorders - physiopathology ; Voice Disorders - psychology ; Voice Quality</subject><ispartof>Journal of voice, 2012-05, Vol.26 (3), p.304-312</ispartof><rights>The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>2012 The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-b715405f01d6698c6fa90b31478450af529126e004255990418aefc8292e2ec23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-b715405f01d6698c6fa90b31478450af529126e004255990418aefc8292e2ec23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21840170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iwarsson, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinholt Petersen, Niels</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality</title><title>Journal of voice</title><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><description>Summary Objectives/Hypothesis This study investigates the effect of consensus training of listeners on intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of perceptual voice analysis. The use of such training, including a reference voice sample, could be assumed to make the internal standards held in memory common and more robust, which is of great importance to reduce the variability of auditory perceptual ratings. Study Design A prospective design with testing before and after training. Methods Thirteen students of audiologopedics served as listening subjects. The ratings were made using a multidimensional protocol with four-point equal-appearing interval scales. The stimuli consisted of text reading by authentic dysphonic patients. The consensus training for each perceptual voice parameter included (1) definition, (2) underlying physiology, (3) presentation of carefully selected sound examples representing the parameter in three different grades followed by group discussions of perceived characteristics, and (4) practical exercises including imitation to make use of the listeners' proprioception. Results Intrarater reliability and agreement showed a marked improvement for intermittent aphonia but not for vocal fry. Interrater reliability was high for most parameters before training with a slight increase after training. Interrater agreement showed marked increases for most voice quality parameters as a result of the training. Conclusion The results support the recommendation of specific consensus training, including use of a reference voice sample material, to calibrate, equalize, and stabilize the internal standards held in memory by the listeners.</description><subject>Audiology - standards</subject><subject>Auditory perceptual ratings</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Consensus training</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal standards</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Professional Competence - standards</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Voice</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Voice Quality</subject><issn>0892-1997</issn><issn>1873-4588</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkFv1DAQhS0EosvCP0DIEhcuCWPHcewLUrUqFKkSUApX43Um4JCNt3ZSaf89TreA1EtPluzvPc_MG0JeMigZMPm2L_ub4B2WHBgrQZYA1SOyYqqpClEr9ZisQGleMK2bE_IspR4AeH59Sk44UwJYAyvy46zr0E2Jho5uwphwTHOiV9H60Y8_aRjp9AvpJQ7ebv3gp8MCns6tn0I80M8YHe6n2Q700k5ZcOvzfSmLfsm3mX9OnnR2SPji7lyTb-_PrjbnxcWnDx83pxeFq4WYim3DagF1B6yVUisnO6thWzHRKFGD7WquGZcIIHhdaw2CKYudU1xz5Oh4tSZvjr77GK5nTJPZ-eRwGOyIYU6GVbyqhNQSHkbzQJmuVRasyet7aB_mOOZGMlVpJblWKlPiSLkYUorYmX30OxsPGVrcpOnNMSyzhGVAmhxWlr26M5-3O2z_if6mk4F3RwDz4G48RpOcx9Fh62MOzbTBP_TDfQM35GCdHX7jAdP_XkziBszXZWGWfWEMIPfHqz-VyrmQ</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Iwarsson, Jenny</creator><creator>Reinholt Petersen, Niels</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality</title><author>Iwarsson, Jenny ; Reinholt Petersen, Niels</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-b715405f01d6698c6fa90b31478450af529126e004255990418aefc8292e2ec23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Audiology - standards</topic><topic>Auditory perceptual ratings</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Consensus training</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal standards</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Professional Competence - standards</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Voice</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Voice Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iwarsson, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinholt Petersen, Niels</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iwarsson, Jenny</au><au>Reinholt Petersen, Niels</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality</atitle><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>304-312</pages><issn>0892-1997</issn><eissn>1873-4588</eissn><coden>JOVOEA</coden><abstract>Summary Objectives/Hypothesis This study investigates the effect of consensus training of listeners on intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of perceptual voice analysis. The use of such training, including a reference voice sample, could be assumed to make the internal standards held in memory common and more robust, which is of great importance to reduce the variability of auditory perceptual ratings. Study Design A prospective design with testing before and after training. Methods Thirteen students of audiologopedics served as listening subjects. The ratings were made using a multidimensional protocol with four-point equal-appearing interval scales. The stimuli consisted of text reading by authentic dysphonic patients. The consensus training for each perceptual voice parameter included (1) definition, (2) underlying physiology, (3) presentation of carefully selected sound examples representing the parameter in three different grades followed by group discussions of perceived characteristics, and (4) practical exercises including imitation to make use of the listeners' proprioception. Results Intrarater reliability and agreement showed a marked improvement for intermittent aphonia but not for vocal fry. Interrater reliability was high for most parameters before training with a slight increase after training. Interrater agreement showed marked increases for most voice quality parameters as a result of the training. Conclusion The results support the recommendation of specific consensus training, including use of a reference voice sample material, to calibrate, equalize, and stabilize the internal standards held in memory by the listeners.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21840170</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0892-1997 |
ispartof | Journal of voice, 2012-05, Vol.26 (3), p.304-312 |
issn | 0892-1997 1873-4588 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323346960 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Audiology - standards Auditory perceptual ratings Calibration Consensus Consensus training Denmark Humans Internal standards Listening Memory Observer Variation Otolaryngology Perception Professional Competence - standards Prospective Studies Quality Reading Reference Standards Reproducibility of Results Severity of Illness Index Speech Acoustics Speech Perception Speech Production Measurement - standards Task Performance and Analysis Training Voice Voice Disorders - diagnosis Voice Disorders - physiopathology Voice Disorders - psychology Voice Quality |
title | Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A20%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Consensus%20Training%20on%20the%20Reliability%20of%20Auditory%20Perceptual%20Ratings%20of%20Voice%20Quality&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20voice&rft.au=Iwarsson,%20Jenny&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=304-312&rft.issn=0892-1997&rft.eissn=1873-4588&rft.coden=JOVOEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1011195823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1039862988&rft_id=info:pmid/21840170&rft_els_id=S0892199711001032&rfr_iscdi=true |