Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality

Summary Objectives/Hypothesis This study investigates the effect of consensus training of listeners on intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of perceptual voice analysis. The use of such training, including a reference voice sample, could be assumed to make the internal standards held...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of voice 2012-05, Vol.26 (3), p.304-312
Hauptverfasser: Iwarsson, Jenny, Reinholt Petersen, Niels
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 312
container_issue 3
container_start_page 304
container_title Journal of voice
container_volume 26
creator Iwarsson, Jenny
Reinholt Petersen, Niels
description Summary Objectives/Hypothesis This study investigates the effect of consensus training of listeners on intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of perceptual voice analysis. The use of such training, including a reference voice sample, could be assumed to make the internal standards held in memory common and more robust, which is of great importance to reduce the variability of auditory perceptual ratings. Study Design A prospective design with testing before and after training. Methods Thirteen students of audiologopedics served as listening subjects. The ratings were made using a multidimensional protocol with four-point equal-appearing interval scales. The stimuli consisted of text reading by authentic dysphonic patients. The consensus training for each perceptual voice parameter included (1) definition, (2) underlying physiology, (3) presentation of carefully selected sound examples representing the parameter in three different grades followed by group discussions of perceived characteristics, and (4) practical exercises including imitation to make use of the listeners' proprioception. Results Intrarater reliability and agreement showed a marked improvement for intermittent aphonia but not for vocal fry. Interrater reliability was high for most parameters before training with a slight increase after training. Interrater agreement showed marked increases for most voice quality parameters as a result of the training. Conclusion The results support the recommendation of specific consensus training, including use of a reference voice sample material, to calibrate, equalize, and stabilize the internal standards held in memory by the listeners.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323346960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0892199711001032</els_id><sourcerecordid>1011195823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-b715405f01d6698c6fa90b31478450af529126e004255990418aefc8292e2ec23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkFv1DAQhS0EosvCP0DIEhcuCWPHcewLUrUqFKkSUApX43Um4JCNt3ZSaf89TreA1EtPluzvPc_MG0JeMigZMPm2L_ub4B2WHBgrQZYA1SOyYqqpClEr9ZisQGleMK2bE_IspR4AeH59Sk44UwJYAyvy46zr0E2Jho5uwphwTHOiV9H60Y8_aRjp9AvpJQ7ebv3gp8MCns6tn0I80M8YHe6n2Q700k5ZcOvzfSmLfsm3mX9OnnR2SPji7lyTb-_PrjbnxcWnDx83pxeFq4WYim3DagF1B6yVUisnO6thWzHRKFGD7WquGZcIIHhdaw2CKYudU1xz5Oh4tSZvjr77GK5nTJPZ-eRwGOyIYU6GVbyqhNQSHkbzQJmuVRasyet7aB_mOOZGMlVpJblWKlPiSLkYUorYmX30OxsPGVrcpOnNMSyzhGVAmhxWlr26M5-3O2z_if6mk4F3RwDz4G48RpOcx9Fh62MOzbTBP_TDfQM35GCdHX7jAdP_XkziBszXZWGWfWEMIPfHqz-VyrmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1039862988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Iwarsson, Jenny ; Reinholt Petersen, Niels</creator><creatorcontrib>Iwarsson, Jenny ; Reinholt Petersen, Niels</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Objectives/Hypothesis This study investigates the effect of consensus training of listeners on intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of perceptual voice analysis. The use of such training, including a reference voice sample, could be assumed to make the internal standards held in memory common and more robust, which is of great importance to reduce the variability of auditory perceptual ratings. Study Design A prospective design with testing before and after training. Methods Thirteen students of audiologopedics served as listening subjects. The ratings were made using a multidimensional protocol with four-point equal-appearing interval scales. The stimuli consisted of text reading by authentic dysphonic patients. The consensus training for each perceptual voice parameter included (1) definition, (2) underlying physiology, (3) presentation of carefully selected sound examples representing the parameter in three different grades followed by group discussions of perceived characteristics, and (4) practical exercises including imitation to make use of the listeners' proprioception. Results Intrarater reliability and agreement showed a marked improvement for intermittent aphonia but not for vocal fry. Interrater reliability was high for most parameters before training with a slight increase after training. Interrater agreement showed marked increases for most voice quality parameters as a result of the training. Conclusion The results support the recommendation of specific consensus training, including use of a reference voice sample material, to calibrate, equalize, and stabilize the internal standards held in memory by the listeners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-1997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4588</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21840170</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOVOEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Audiology - standards ; Auditory perceptual ratings ; Calibration ; Consensus ; Consensus training ; Denmark ; Humans ; Internal standards ; Listening ; Memory ; Observer Variation ; Otolaryngology ; Perception ; Professional Competence - standards ; Prospective Studies ; Quality ; Reading ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severity of Illness Index ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Perception ; Speech Production Measurement - standards ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Training ; Voice ; Voice Disorders - diagnosis ; Voice Disorders - physiopathology ; Voice Disorders - psychology ; Voice Quality</subject><ispartof>Journal of voice, 2012-05, Vol.26 (3), p.304-312</ispartof><rights>The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>2012 The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-b715405f01d6698c6fa90b31478450af529126e004255990418aefc8292e2ec23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-b715405f01d6698c6fa90b31478450af529126e004255990418aefc8292e2ec23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21840170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iwarsson, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinholt Petersen, Niels</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality</title><title>Journal of voice</title><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><description>Summary Objectives/Hypothesis This study investigates the effect of consensus training of listeners on intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of perceptual voice analysis. The use of such training, including a reference voice sample, could be assumed to make the internal standards held in memory common and more robust, which is of great importance to reduce the variability of auditory perceptual ratings. Study Design A prospective design with testing before and after training. Methods Thirteen students of audiologopedics served as listening subjects. The ratings were made using a multidimensional protocol with four-point equal-appearing interval scales. The stimuli consisted of text reading by authentic dysphonic patients. The consensus training for each perceptual voice parameter included (1) definition, (2) underlying physiology, (3) presentation of carefully selected sound examples representing the parameter in three different grades followed by group discussions of perceived characteristics, and (4) practical exercises including imitation to make use of the listeners' proprioception. Results Intrarater reliability and agreement showed a marked improvement for intermittent aphonia but not for vocal fry. Interrater reliability was high for most parameters before training with a slight increase after training. Interrater agreement showed marked increases for most voice quality parameters as a result of the training. Conclusion The results support the recommendation of specific consensus training, including use of a reference voice sample material, to calibrate, equalize, and stabilize the internal standards held in memory by the listeners.</description><subject>Audiology - standards</subject><subject>Auditory perceptual ratings</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Consensus training</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal standards</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Professional Competence - standards</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Voice</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Voice Quality</subject><issn>0892-1997</issn><issn>1873-4588</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkFv1DAQhS0EosvCP0DIEhcuCWPHcewLUrUqFKkSUApX43Um4JCNt3ZSaf89TreA1EtPluzvPc_MG0JeMigZMPm2L_ub4B2WHBgrQZYA1SOyYqqpClEr9ZisQGleMK2bE_IspR4AeH59Sk44UwJYAyvy46zr0E2Jho5uwphwTHOiV9H60Y8_aRjp9AvpJQ7ebv3gp8MCns6tn0I80M8YHe6n2Q700k5ZcOvzfSmLfsm3mX9OnnR2SPji7lyTb-_PrjbnxcWnDx83pxeFq4WYim3DagF1B6yVUisnO6thWzHRKFGD7WquGZcIIHhdaw2CKYudU1xz5Oh4tSZvjr77GK5nTJPZ-eRwGOyIYU6GVbyqhNQSHkbzQJmuVRasyet7aB_mOOZGMlVpJblWKlPiSLkYUorYmX30OxsPGVrcpOnNMSyzhGVAmhxWlr26M5-3O2z_if6mk4F3RwDz4G48RpOcx9Fh62MOzbTBP_TDfQM35GCdHX7jAdP_XkziBszXZWGWfWEMIPfHqz-VyrmQ</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Iwarsson, Jenny</creator><creator>Reinholt Petersen, Niels</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality</title><author>Iwarsson, Jenny ; Reinholt Petersen, Niels</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-b715405f01d6698c6fa90b31478450af529126e004255990418aefc8292e2ec23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Audiology - standards</topic><topic>Auditory perceptual ratings</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Consensus training</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal standards</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Professional Competence - standards</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Voice</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Voice Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iwarsson, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinholt Petersen, Niels</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iwarsson, Jenny</au><au>Reinholt Petersen, Niels</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality</atitle><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>304-312</pages><issn>0892-1997</issn><eissn>1873-4588</eissn><coden>JOVOEA</coden><abstract>Summary Objectives/Hypothesis This study investigates the effect of consensus training of listeners on intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of perceptual voice analysis. The use of such training, including a reference voice sample, could be assumed to make the internal standards held in memory common and more robust, which is of great importance to reduce the variability of auditory perceptual ratings. Study Design A prospective design with testing before and after training. Methods Thirteen students of audiologopedics served as listening subjects. The ratings were made using a multidimensional protocol with four-point equal-appearing interval scales. The stimuli consisted of text reading by authentic dysphonic patients. The consensus training for each perceptual voice parameter included (1) definition, (2) underlying physiology, (3) presentation of carefully selected sound examples representing the parameter in three different grades followed by group discussions of perceived characteristics, and (4) practical exercises including imitation to make use of the listeners' proprioception. Results Intrarater reliability and agreement showed a marked improvement for intermittent aphonia but not for vocal fry. Interrater reliability was high for most parameters before training with a slight increase after training. Interrater agreement showed marked increases for most voice quality parameters as a result of the training. Conclusion The results support the recommendation of specific consensus training, including use of a reference voice sample material, to calibrate, equalize, and stabilize the internal standards held in memory by the listeners.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21840170</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-1997
ispartof Journal of voice, 2012-05, Vol.26 (3), p.304-312
issn 0892-1997
1873-4588
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323346960
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Audiology - standards
Auditory perceptual ratings
Calibration
Consensus
Consensus training
Denmark
Humans
Internal standards
Listening
Memory
Observer Variation
Otolaryngology
Perception
Professional Competence - standards
Prospective Studies
Quality
Reading
Reference Standards
Reproducibility of Results
Severity of Illness Index
Speech Acoustics
Speech Perception
Speech Production Measurement - standards
Task Performance and Analysis
Training
Voice
Voice Disorders - diagnosis
Voice Disorders - physiopathology
Voice Disorders - psychology
Voice Quality
title Effects of Consensus Training on the Reliability of Auditory Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A20%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Consensus%20Training%20on%20the%20Reliability%20of%20Auditory%20Perceptual%20Ratings%20of%20Voice%20Quality&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20voice&rft.au=Iwarsson,%20Jenny&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=304-312&rft.issn=0892-1997&rft.eissn=1873-4588&rft.coden=JOVOEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1011195823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1039862988&rft_id=info:pmid/21840170&rft_els_id=S0892199711001032&rfr_iscdi=true