The Use of a Family History Risk Assessment Tool within a Community Health Care System: Views of Primary Care Providers
Primary care providers (PCPs) offered input regarding the incorporation of a family health history (FHH) risk assessment tool into a community health care system (CHCS). Sixteen PCPs participated in one of three focus groups. Perceived impediments included the lack of standard screening guidelines,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of genetic counseling 2012-10, Vol.21 (5), p.652-661 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 661 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 652 |
container_title | Journal of genetic counseling |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Christianson, Carol A. Powell, Karen Potter Hahn, Susan Estabrooks Blanton, Susan H. Bogacik, Jessica Henrich, Vincent C. |
description | Primary care providers (PCPs) offered input regarding the incorporation of a family health history (FHH) risk assessment tool into a community health care system (CHCS). Sixteen PCPs participated in one of three focus groups. Perceived impediments included the lack of standard screening guidelines, effective screening tests, genetic counseling resources, and services for high-risk patients. The PCPs were concerned about their level of expertise, the cost of preventive health care, and genetic discrimination. They also were concerned about the use of a FHH tool by oncologists within the CHCS because of communication gaps between oncologists and PCPs, lack of clarity regarding follow-up and legal liability, and reimbursement issues. To integrate a FHH tool into a CHCS, PCPs will need consultation and referral services, evidence-based recommendations, and “just-in-time” educational resources. Oncologists who use the tool will need to develop a streamlined communication system with PCPs, establish clearly defined roles, and ensure patient follow-up. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10897-011-9479-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323339705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2748873861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5292-50ba5bb15d0ad98e1158f655a8dcf48310c9222b7ae4220559d41e4bbcf430ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EomXhB3BBlrhwCYzteB1zqyLagipRwZZr5CQT1iWJiydhtf8eLykIIaE92dJ872nePMaeC3gtAMwbElBYk4EQmc2NzcQDdiq0UZnS1j5Mf9A2MwbghD0hugUAW2jxmJ1IKY1Qxp6y3WaL_IaQh447fu4G3-_5pacpxD3_5OkbPyNCogHHiW9C6PnOT1s_JrgMwzCPfko8un7a8tJF5J_3NOHwln_xuKOD63X0g0tmv6bXMfzwLUZ6yh51rid8dv-u2M35u015mV19vHhfnl1ljZZWZhpqp-ta6BZcawsUQhfdWmtXtE2XF0pAY1OY2jjMpQStbZsLzOs6TRW4Wq3Yq8X3LobvM9JUDZ4a7Hs3YpipEkoqpawBfRwVIjeQy7U8jsLaCmtyyBP68h_0NsxxTJkTpUzqQUKRKLFQTQxEEbvqbjlbgqpD19XSdZW6rg5dp8VX7MW981wP2P5R_C43AWYBdr7H_XHH6sNFmcNaH_LJRUlJNH7F-PfS_9vnJ-87wkY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037271208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of a Family History Risk Assessment Tool within a Community Health Care System: Views of Primary Care Providers</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Christianson, Carol A. ; Powell, Karen Potter ; Hahn, Susan Estabrooks ; Blanton, Susan H. ; Bogacik, Jessica ; Henrich, Vincent C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Christianson, Carol A. ; Powell, Karen Potter ; Hahn, Susan Estabrooks ; Blanton, Susan H. ; Bogacik, Jessica ; Henrich, Vincent C. ; Genomedical Connection ; The Genomedical Connection</creatorcontrib><description>Primary care providers (PCPs) offered input regarding the incorporation of a family health history (FHH) risk assessment tool into a community health care system (CHCS). Sixteen PCPs participated in one of three focus groups. Perceived impediments included the lack of standard screening guidelines, effective screening tests, genetic counseling resources, and services for high-risk patients. The PCPs were concerned about their level of expertise, the cost of preventive health care, and genetic discrimination. They also were concerned about the use of a FHH tool by oncologists within the CHCS because of communication gaps between oncologists and PCPs, lack of clarity regarding follow-up and legal liability, and reimbursement issues. To integrate a FHH tool into a CHCS, PCPs will need consultation and referral services, evidence-based recommendations, and “just-in-time” educational resources. Oncologists who use the tool will need to develop a streamlined communication system with PCPs, establish clearly defined roles, and ensure patient follow-up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-7700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9479-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22271379</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JGCOET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Clinical Psychology ; Communication ; Communication systems ; Communications ; Community health care ; Community health care system ; Community Health Services - organization & administration ; Ethics ; Family ; Family history ; Family medical history ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Genetic counseling ; Genetic screening ; Genetic testing ; Genetics ; Guidelines ; Gynecology ; Health care ; Historical account ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Incorporation ; Liability ; Male ; Medical History Taking ; Middle Aged ; Oncologists ; Original Research ; Perception ; Personalized medicine ; Primary care ; Primary care providers ; Primary health care ; Primary Health Care - manpower ; Public Health ; Risk Assessment ; Risk groups ; Screening</subject><ispartof>Journal of genetic counseling, 2012-10, Vol.21 (5), p.652-661</ispartof><rights>National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2012</rights><rights>2012 National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5292-50ba5bb15d0ad98e1158f655a8dcf48310c9222b7ae4220559d41e4bbcf430ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5292-50ba5bb15d0ad98e1158f655a8dcf48310c9222b7ae4220559d41e4bbcf430ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10897-011-9479-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10897-011-9479-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,12826,27903,27904,30978,30979,41467,42536,45553,45554,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22271379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christianson, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Karen Potter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Susan Estabrooks</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanton, Susan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogacik, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henrich, Vincent C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genomedical Connection</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Genomedical Connection</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of a Family History Risk Assessment Tool within a Community Health Care System: Views of Primary Care Providers</title><title>Journal of genetic counseling</title><addtitle>J Genet Counsel</addtitle><addtitle>J Genet Couns</addtitle><description>Primary care providers (PCPs) offered input regarding the incorporation of a family health history (FHH) risk assessment tool into a community health care system (CHCS). Sixteen PCPs participated in one of three focus groups. Perceived impediments included the lack of standard screening guidelines, effective screening tests, genetic counseling resources, and services for high-risk patients. The PCPs were concerned about their level of expertise, the cost of preventive health care, and genetic discrimination. They also were concerned about the use of a FHH tool by oncologists within the CHCS because of communication gaps between oncologists and PCPs, lack of clarity regarding follow-up and legal liability, and reimbursement issues. To integrate a FHH tool into a CHCS, PCPs will need consultation and referral services, evidence-based recommendations, and “just-in-time” educational resources. Oncologists who use the tool will need to develop a streamlined communication system with PCPs, establish clearly defined roles, and ensure patient follow-up.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication systems</subject><subject>Communications</subject><subject>Community health care</subject><subject>Community health care system</subject><subject>Community Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family history</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Genetic counseling</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Historical account</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incorporation</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical History Taking</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncologists</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Personalized medicine</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary care providers</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - manpower</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Screening</subject><issn>1059-7700</issn><issn>1573-3599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EomXhB3BBlrhwCYzteB1zqyLagipRwZZr5CQT1iWJiydhtf8eLykIIaE92dJ872nePMaeC3gtAMwbElBYk4EQmc2NzcQDdiq0UZnS1j5Mf9A2MwbghD0hugUAW2jxmJ1IKY1Qxp6y3WaL_IaQh447fu4G3-_5pacpxD3_5OkbPyNCogHHiW9C6PnOT1s_JrgMwzCPfko8un7a8tJF5J_3NOHwln_xuKOD63X0g0tmv6bXMfzwLUZ6yh51rid8dv-u2M35u015mV19vHhfnl1ljZZWZhpqp-ta6BZcawsUQhfdWmtXtE2XF0pAY1OY2jjMpQStbZsLzOs6TRW4Wq3Yq8X3LobvM9JUDZ4a7Hs3YpipEkoqpawBfRwVIjeQy7U8jsLaCmtyyBP68h_0NsxxTJkTpUzqQUKRKLFQTQxEEbvqbjlbgqpD19XSdZW6rg5dp8VX7MW981wP2P5R_C43AWYBdr7H_XHH6sNFmcNaH_LJRUlJNH7F-PfS_9vnJ-87wkY</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Christianson, Carol A.</creator><creator>Powell, Karen Potter</creator><creator>Hahn, Susan Estabrooks</creator><creator>Blanton, Susan H.</creator><creator>Bogacik, Jessica</creator><creator>Henrich, Vincent C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>The Use of a Family History Risk Assessment Tool within a Community Health Care System: Views of Primary Care Providers</title><author>Christianson, Carol A. ; Powell, Karen Potter ; Hahn, Susan Estabrooks ; Blanton, Susan H. ; Bogacik, Jessica ; Henrich, Vincent C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5292-50ba5bb15d0ad98e1158f655a8dcf48310c9222b7ae4220559d41e4bbcf430ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication systems</topic><topic>Communications</topic><topic>Community health care</topic><topic>Community health care system</topic><topic>Community Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family history</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Genetic counseling</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Historical account</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incorporation</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical History Taking</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncologists</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Personalized medicine</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary care providers</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - manpower</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Screening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christianson, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Karen Potter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Susan Estabrooks</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanton, Susan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogacik, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henrich, Vincent C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genomedical Connection</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Genomedical Connection</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of genetic counseling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christianson, Carol A.</au><au>Powell, Karen Potter</au><au>Hahn, Susan Estabrooks</au><au>Blanton, Susan H.</au><au>Bogacik, Jessica</au><au>Henrich, Vincent C.</au><aucorp>Genomedical Connection</aucorp><aucorp>The Genomedical Connection</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of a Family History Risk Assessment Tool within a Community Health Care System: Views of Primary Care Providers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of genetic counseling</jtitle><stitle>J Genet Counsel</stitle><addtitle>J Genet Couns</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>652</spage><epage>661</epage><pages>652-661</pages><issn>1059-7700</issn><eissn>1573-3599</eissn><coden>JGCOET</coden><abstract>Primary care providers (PCPs) offered input regarding the incorporation of a family health history (FHH) risk assessment tool into a community health care system (CHCS). Sixteen PCPs participated in one of three focus groups. Perceived impediments included the lack of standard screening guidelines, effective screening tests, genetic counseling resources, and services for high-risk patients. The PCPs were concerned about their level of expertise, the cost of preventive health care, and genetic discrimination. They also were concerned about the use of a FHH tool by oncologists within the CHCS because of communication gaps between oncologists and PCPs, lack of clarity regarding follow-up and legal liability, and reimbursement issues. To integrate a FHH tool into a CHCS, PCPs will need consultation and referral services, evidence-based recommendations, and “just-in-time” educational resources. Oncologists who use the tool will need to develop a streamlined communication system with PCPs, establish clearly defined roles, and ensure patient follow-up.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>22271379</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10897-011-9479-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1059-7700 |
ispartof | Journal of genetic counseling, 2012-10, Vol.21 (5), p.652-661 |
issn | 1059-7700 1573-3599 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323339705 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Clinical Psychology Communication Communication systems Communications Community health care Community health care system Community Health Services - organization & administration Ethics Family Family history Family medical history Female Focus Groups Genetic counseling Genetic screening Genetic testing Genetics Guidelines Gynecology Health care Historical account Human Genetics Humans Incorporation Liability Male Medical History Taking Middle Aged Oncologists Original Research Perception Personalized medicine Primary care Primary care providers Primary health care Primary Health Care - manpower Public Health Risk Assessment Risk groups Screening |
title | The Use of a Family History Risk Assessment Tool within a Community Health Care System: Views of Primary Care Providers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T05%3A15%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20a%20Family%20History%20Risk%20Assessment%20Tool%20within%20a%20Community%20Health%20Care%20System:%20Views%20of%20Primary%20Care%20Providers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20genetic%20counseling&rft.au=Christianson,%20Carol%20A.&rft.aucorp=Genomedical%20Connection&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=652&rft.epage=661&rft.pages=652-661&rft.issn=1059-7700&rft.eissn=1573-3599&rft.coden=JGCOET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10897-011-9479-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2748873861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037271208&rft_id=info:pmid/22271379&rfr_iscdi=true |