Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract Two sets of research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are now available: those published by an International Working Group in 2007, and the recommendations published by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) in 2011. They both provide guidelines for the dia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2012-11, Vol.8 (6), p.560-563
Hauptverfasser: Visser, Pieter Jelle, Vos, Stephanie, van Rossum, Ineke, Scheltens, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 563
container_issue 6
container_start_page 560
container_title Alzheimer's & dementia
container_volume 8
creator Visser, Pieter Jelle
Vos, Stephanie
van Rossum, Ineke
Scheltens, Philip
description Abstract Two sets of research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are now available: those published by an International Working Group in 2007, and the recommendations published by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) in 2011. They both provide guidelines for the diagnosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. The coexistence of two sets of criteria for the same disorder raises the question of which set of criteria should be preferred. A comparison of the criteria revealed differences in approach, terminology, and use of cognitive markers and biomarkers. Most persons who meet the International Working Group criteria will also meet the NIA–AA criteria and vice versa. However, the NIA–AA criteria allow for a subclassification of persons based on biomarker results within each diagnostic category. Further research is needed to validate the criteria. Modifications are likely to be made before the criteria can be used in daily practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323338888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1552526011030020</els_id><sourcerecordid>1122624751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1ef841e958ac46ee218b2a1d06189a7b187394a6856fe2455515de635f1f8acb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhxQjlx28dhxkpUQUrSCstUKDoCQuFheZ1KcOvbWTkDbU58BTtx4Fh6lT4JD2iI4UHyIo8n3_xPNP0nyEMgcCORP2nkrzdmcEoBYmBNS3kr2gXM647RY3L5-z8leci-ElpCMlMDvJnuUAaFA8_3ky9J1W-l1cDZ1TbqyPXore-2sNOl750-0PU4PvRu2qfI6ftQylbZOX10xKxt63Q89ptGhOo74xfnXypx9RN2hvzj_FtIqBKf0L8Fvk8b59A_sx_daB5QB7yd3GmkCPri8D5J3L56_Xb6crV8frpbVeqY44-UMsCkzwAUvpcpyRArlhkqoSQ7lQhYbKAu2yGRe8rxBmnHOgdeYM95AEyUbdpA8nny33p0OGHrR6aDQGGnRDUEAo4yxMp6bUVrQAoqckptRoDSnWcEhonRClXcheGzE1utO-p0AIsaERSvGhMWY8FiLCUfRo0v_YdNhfS25ijQC1QR81gZ3_2EpqvWHo6P4GGtApiZPJw-M8_-k0YugNFqFtfaoelE7_e9_fPaXXBlttZLmBHcYWjfEHTNxFiJQQcSbcU_HNY3dGSFxiD8B43Tkqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1122624751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Visser, Pieter Jelle ; Vos, Stephanie ; van Rossum, Ineke ; Scheltens, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Visser, Pieter Jelle ; Vos, Stephanie ; van Rossum, Ineke ; Scheltens, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Two sets of research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are now available: those published by an International Working Group in 2007, and the recommendations published by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) in 2011. They both provide guidelines for the diagnosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. The coexistence of two sets of criteria for the same disorder raises the question of which set of criteria should be preferred. A comparison of the criteria revealed differences in approach, terminology, and use of cognitive markers and biomarkers. Most persons who meet the International Working Group criteria will also meet the NIA–AA criteria and vice versa. However, the NIA–AA criteria allow for a subclassification of persons based on biomarker results within each diagnostic category. Further research is needed to validate the criteria. Modifications are likely to be made before the criteria can be used in daily practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23102126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ageing ; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis ; Alzheimer's disease ; Biological markers ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Coexistence ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; MCI ; Modification ; National Institute on Aging (U.S.) ; Neurology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neuropsychology ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; United States ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia, 2012-11, Vol.8 (6), p.560-563</ispartof><rights>The Alzheimer's Association</rights><rights>2012 The Alzheimer's Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1ef841e958ac46ee218b2a1d06189a7b187394a6856fe2455515de635f1f8acb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1ef841e958ac46ee218b2a1d06189a7b187394a6856fe2455515de635f1f8acb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.jalz.2011.10.008$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.jalz.2011.10.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30977,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23102126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Visser, Pieter Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rossum, Ineke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheltens, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease</title><title>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</title><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement</addtitle><description>Abstract Two sets of research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are now available: those published by an International Working Group in 2007, and the recommendations published by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) in 2011. They both provide guidelines for the diagnosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. The coexistence of two sets of criteria for the same disorder raises the question of which set of criteria should be preferred. A comparison of the criteria revealed differences in approach, terminology, and use of cognitive markers and biomarkers. Most persons who meet the International Working Group criteria will also meet the NIA–AA criteria and vice versa. However, the NIA–AA criteria allow for a subclassification of persons based on biomarker results within each diagnostic category. Further research is needed to validate the criteria. Modifications are likely to be made before the criteria can be used in daily practice.</description><subject>Ageing</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>MCI</subject><subject>Modification</subject><subject>National Institute on Aging (U.S.)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhxQjlx28dhxkpUQUrSCstUKDoCQuFheZ1KcOvbWTkDbU58BTtx4Fh6lT4JD2iI4UHyIo8n3_xPNP0nyEMgcCORP2nkrzdmcEoBYmBNS3kr2gXM647RY3L5-z8leci-ElpCMlMDvJnuUAaFA8_3ky9J1W-l1cDZ1TbqyPXore-2sNOl750-0PU4PvRu2qfI6ftQylbZOX10xKxt63Q89ptGhOo74xfnXypx9RN2hvzj_FtIqBKf0L8Fvk8b59A_sx_daB5QB7yd3GmkCPri8D5J3L56_Xb6crV8frpbVeqY44-UMsCkzwAUvpcpyRArlhkqoSQ7lQhYbKAu2yGRe8rxBmnHOgdeYM95AEyUbdpA8nny33p0OGHrR6aDQGGnRDUEAo4yxMp6bUVrQAoqckptRoDSnWcEhonRClXcheGzE1utO-p0AIsaERSvGhMWY8FiLCUfRo0v_YdNhfS25ijQC1QR81gZ3_2EpqvWHo6P4GGtApiZPJw-M8_-k0YugNFqFtfaoelE7_e9_fPaXXBlttZLmBHcYWjfEHTNxFiJQQcSbcU_HNY3dGSFxiD8B43Tkqw</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Visser, Pieter Jelle</creator><creator>Vos, Stephanie</creator><creator>van Rossum, Ineke</creator><creator>Scheltens, Philip</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease</title><author>Visser, Pieter Jelle ; Vos, Stephanie ; van Rossum, Ineke ; Scheltens, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1ef841e958ac46ee218b2a1d06189a7b187394a6856fe2455515de635f1f8acb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Ageing</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>MCI</topic><topic>Modification</topic><topic>National Institute on Aging (U.S.)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visser, Pieter Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rossum, Ineke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheltens, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visser, Pieter Jelle</au><au>Vos, Stephanie</au><au>van Rossum, Ineke</au><au>Scheltens, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>560</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>560-563</pages><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Abstract Two sets of research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are now available: those published by an International Working Group in 2007, and the recommendations published by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) in 2011. They both provide guidelines for the diagnosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. The coexistence of two sets of criteria for the same disorder raises the question of which set of criteria should be preferred. A comparison of the criteria revealed differences in approach, terminology, and use of cognitive markers and biomarkers. Most persons who meet the International Working Group criteria will also meet the NIA–AA criteria and vice versa. However, the NIA–AA criteria allow for a subclassification of persons based on biomarker results within each diagnostic category. Further research is needed to validate the criteria. Modifications are likely to be made before the criteria can be used in daily practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23102126</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.008</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5260
ispartof Alzheimer's & dementia, 2012-11, Vol.8 (6), p.560-563
issn 1552-5260
1552-5279
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323338888
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE
subjects Ageing
Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis
Alzheimer's disease
Biological markers
Biomarkers
Biomarkers - analysis
Coexistence
Diagnosis
Humans
MCI
Modification
National Institute on Aging (U.S.)
Neurology
Neuropsychological Tests
Neuropsychology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
United States
Working groups
title Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20International%20Working%20Group%20criteria%20and%20National%20Institute%20on%20Aging%E2%80%93Alzheimer%E2%80%99s%20Association%20criteria%20for%20Alzheimer%E2%80%99s%C2%A0disease&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Visser,%20Pieter%20Jelle&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=560&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=560-563&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1122624751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1122624751&rft_id=info:pmid/23102126&rft_els_id=S1552526011030020&rfr_iscdi=true