Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease
Abstract Two sets of research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are now available: those published by an International Working Group in 2007, and the recommendations published by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) in 2011. They both provide guidelines for the dia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alzheimer's & dementia 2012-11, Vol.8 (6), p.560-563 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 563 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 560 |
container_title | Alzheimer's & dementia |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Visser, Pieter Jelle Vos, Stephanie van Rossum, Ineke Scheltens, Philip |
description | Abstract Two sets of research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are now available: those published by an International Working Group in 2007, and the recommendations published by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) in 2011. They both provide guidelines for the diagnosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. The coexistence of two sets of criteria for the same disorder raises the question of which set of criteria should be preferred. A comparison of the criteria revealed differences in approach, terminology, and use of cognitive markers and biomarkers. Most persons who meet the International Working Group criteria will also meet the NIA–AA criteria and vice versa. However, the NIA–AA criteria allow for a subclassification of persons based on biomarker results within each diagnostic category. Further research is needed to validate the criteria. Modifications are likely to be made before the criteria can be used in daily practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323338888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1552526011030020</els_id><sourcerecordid>1122624751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1ef841e958ac46ee218b2a1d06189a7b187394a6856fe2455515de635f1f8acb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhxQjlx28dhxkpUQUrSCstUKDoCQuFheZ1KcOvbWTkDbU58BTtx4Fh6lT4JD2iI4UHyIo8n3_xPNP0nyEMgcCORP2nkrzdmcEoBYmBNS3kr2gXM647RY3L5-z8leci-ElpCMlMDvJnuUAaFA8_3ky9J1W-l1cDZ1TbqyPXore-2sNOl750-0PU4PvRu2qfI6ftQylbZOX10xKxt63Q89ptGhOo74xfnXypx9RN2hvzj_FtIqBKf0L8Fvk8b59A_sx_daB5QB7yd3GmkCPri8D5J3L56_Xb6crV8frpbVeqY44-UMsCkzwAUvpcpyRArlhkqoSQ7lQhYbKAu2yGRe8rxBmnHOgdeYM95AEyUbdpA8nny33p0OGHrR6aDQGGnRDUEAo4yxMp6bUVrQAoqckptRoDSnWcEhonRClXcheGzE1utO-p0AIsaERSvGhMWY8FiLCUfRo0v_YdNhfS25ijQC1QR81gZ3_2EpqvWHo6P4GGtApiZPJw-M8_-k0YugNFqFtfaoelE7_e9_fPaXXBlttZLmBHcYWjfEHTNxFiJQQcSbcU_HNY3dGSFxiD8B43Tkqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1122624751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Visser, Pieter Jelle ; Vos, Stephanie ; van Rossum, Ineke ; Scheltens, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Visser, Pieter Jelle ; Vos, Stephanie ; van Rossum, Ineke ; Scheltens, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Two sets of research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are now available: those published by an International Working Group in 2007, and the recommendations published by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) in 2011. They both provide guidelines for the diagnosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. The coexistence of two sets of criteria for the same disorder raises the question of which set of criteria should be preferred. A comparison of the criteria revealed differences in approach, terminology, and use of cognitive markers and biomarkers. Most persons who meet the International Working Group criteria will also meet the NIA–AA criteria and vice versa. However, the NIA–AA criteria allow for a subclassification of persons based on biomarker results within each diagnostic category. Further research is needed to validate the criteria. Modifications are likely to be made before the criteria can be used in daily practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23102126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ageing ; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis ; Alzheimer's disease ; Biological markers ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Coexistence ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; MCI ; Modification ; National Institute on Aging (U.S.) ; Neurology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neuropsychology ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; United States ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>Alzheimer's & dementia, 2012-11, Vol.8 (6), p.560-563</ispartof><rights>The Alzheimer's Association</rights><rights>2012 The Alzheimer's Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1ef841e958ac46ee218b2a1d06189a7b187394a6856fe2455515de635f1f8acb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1ef841e958ac46ee218b2a1d06189a7b187394a6856fe2455515de635f1f8acb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.jalz.2011.10.008$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.jalz.2011.10.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30977,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23102126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Visser, Pieter Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rossum, Ineke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheltens, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease</title><title>Alzheimer's & dementia</title><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement</addtitle><description>Abstract Two sets of research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are now available: those published by an International Working Group in 2007, and the recommendations published by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) in 2011. They both provide guidelines for the diagnosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. The coexistence of two sets of criteria for the same disorder raises the question of which set of criteria should be preferred. A comparison of the criteria revealed differences in approach, terminology, and use of cognitive markers and biomarkers. Most persons who meet the International Working Group criteria will also meet the NIA–AA criteria and vice versa. However, the NIA–AA criteria allow for a subclassification of persons based on biomarker results within each diagnostic category. Further research is needed to validate the criteria. Modifications are likely to be made before the criteria can be used in daily practice.</description><subject>Ageing</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>MCI</subject><subject>Modification</subject><subject>National Institute on Aging (U.S.)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhxQjlx28dhxkpUQUrSCstUKDoCQuFheZ1KcOvbWTkDbU58BTtx4Fh6lT4JD2iI4UHyIo8n3_xPNP0nyEMgcCORP2nkrzdmcEoBYmBNS3kr2gXM647RY3L5-z8leci-ElpCMlMDvJnuUAaFA8_3ky9J1W-l1cDZ1TbqyPXore-2sNOl750-0PU4PvRu2qfI6ftQylbZOX10xKxt63Q89ptGhOo74xfnXypx9RN2hvzj_FtIqBKf0L8Fvk8b59A_sx_daB5QB7yd3GmkCPri8D5J3L56_Xb6crV8frpbVeqY44-UMsCkzwAUvpcpyRArlhkqoSQ7lQhYbKAu2yGRe8rxBmnHOgdeYM95AEyUbdpA8nny33p0OGHrR6aDQGGnRDUEAo4yxMp6bUVrQAoqckptRoDSnWcEhonRClXcheGzE1utO-p0AIsaERSvGhMWY8FiLCUfRo0v_YdNhfS25ijQC1QR81gZ3_2EpqvWHo6P4GGtApiZPJw-M8_-k0YugNFqFtfaoelE7_e9_fPaXXBlttZLmBHcYWjfEHTNxFiJQQcSbcU_HNY3dGSFxiD8B43Tkqw</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Visser, Pieter Jelle</creator><creator>Vos, Stephanie</creator><creator>van Rossum, Ineke</creator><creator>Scheltens, Philip</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease</title><author>Visser, Pieter Jelle ; Vos, Stephanie ; van Rossum, Ineke ; Scheltens, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5358-1ef841e958ac46ee218b2a1d06189a7b187394a6856fe2455515de635f1f8acb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Ageing</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>MCI</topic><topic>Modification</topic><topic>National Institute on Aging (U.S.)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visser, Pieter Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rossum, Ineke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheltens, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's & dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visser, Pieter Jelle</au><au>Vos, Stephanie</au><au>van Rossum, Ineke</au><au>Scheltens, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's & dementia</jtitle><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>560</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>560-563</pages><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Abstract Two sets of research criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are now available: those published by an International Working Group in 2007, and the recommendations published by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) in 2011. They both provide guidelines for the diagnosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. The coexistence of two sets of criteria for the same disorder raises the question of which set of criteria should be preferred. A comparison of the criteria revealed differences in approach, terminology, and use of cognitive markers and biomarkers. Most persons who meet the International Working Group criteria will also meet the NIA–AA criteria and vice versa. However, the NIA–AA criteria allow for a subclassification of persons based on biomarker results within each diagnostic category. Further research is needed to validate the criteria. Modifications are likely to be made before the criteria can be used in daily practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23102126</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.008</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1552-5260 |
ispartof | Alzheimer's & dementia, 2012-11, Vol.8 (6), p.560-563 |
issn | 1552-5260 1552-5279 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323338888 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE |
subjects | Ageing Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis Alzheimer's disease Biological markers Biomarkers Biomarkers - analysis Coexistence Diagnosis Humans MCI Modification National Institute on Aging (U.S.) Neurology Neuropsychological Tests Neuropsychology Practice Guidelines as Topic United States Working groups |
title | Comparison of International Working Group criteria and National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for Alzheimer’s disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20International%20Working%20Group%20criteria%20and%20National%20Institute%20on%20Aging%E2%80%93Alzheimer%E2%80%99s%20Association%20criteria%20for%20Alzheimer%E2%80%99s%C2%A0disease&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Visser,%20Pieter%20Jelle&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=560&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=560-563&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1122624751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1122624751&rft_id=info:pmid/23102126&rft_els_id=S1552526011030020&rfr_iscdi=true |