Convergent systems vs. incremental stability
Two similar stability notions are considered; one is the long established notion of convergent systems, the other is the younger notion of incremental stability. Both notions require that any two solutions of a system converge to each other. Yet these stability concepts are different, in the sense t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Systems & control letters 2013-03, Vol.62 (3), p.277-285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 277 |
container_title | Systems & control letters |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Rüffer, Björn S. van de Wouw, Nathan Mueller, Markus |
description | Two similar stability notions are considered; one is the long established notion of convergent systems, the other is the younger notion of incremental stability. Both notions require that any two solutions of a system converge to each other. Yet these stability concepts are different, in the sense that none implies the other, as is shown in this paper using two examples. It is shown under what additional assumptions one property indeed implies the other. Furthermore, this paper contains necessary and sufficient characterizations of both properties in terms of Lyapunov functions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.sysconle.2012.11.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323225122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167691112002393</els_id><sourcerecordid>1323225122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-3182b39bc23bf5c2c9e46ebeec526c64ac98ebccf8f76bcf9196bfd1b2f695f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QWbpwhlzk05mslOKLyi46T5Mbm8kZR41SQv990aqa1cXDud8cD_GboFXwEE9bKt4jDiNPVWCg6gAKg71GZtB24iy0bU6Z7NcbEqlAS7ZVYxbzrngUs7Y_XIaDxQ-aUxFxiQaYnGIVeFHDDTktOuLmDrre5-O1-zCdX2km987Z-uX5_XyrVx9vL4vn1YlykWdSgmtsFJbFNK6GgVqWiiyRFgLhWrRoW7JIrrWNcqi06CVdRuwwildOzlndyfsLkxfe4rJDD4i9X030rSPBqSQQtQgRK6qUxXDFGMgZ3bBD104GuDmx47Zmj875seOATDZTh4-noaU_zh4CiaipxFp4wNhMpvJ_4f4BvWEcqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1323225122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Convergent systems vs. incremental stability</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rüffer, Björn S. ; van de Wouw, Nathan ; Mueller, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Rüffer, Björn S. ; van de Wouw, Nathan ; Mueller, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>Two similar stability notions are considered; one is the long established notion of convergent systems, the other is the younger notion of incremental stability. Both notions require that any two solutions of a system converge to each other. Yet these stability concepts are different, in the sense that none implies the other, as is shown in this paper using two examples. It is shown under what additional assumptions one property indeed implies the other. Furthermore, this paper contains necessary and sufficient characterizations of both properties in terms of Lyapunov functions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6911</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7956</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2012.11.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Control systems ; Convergent systems ; Converse Lyapunov result ; Incremental stability ; Lyapunov functions ; Stability ; Time-varying nonlinear systems</subject><ispartof>Systems & control letters, 2013-03, Vol.62 (3), p.277-285</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-3182b39bc23bf5c2c9e46ebeec526c64ac98ebccf8f76bcf9196bfd1b2f695f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-3182b39bc23bf5c2c9e46ebeec526c64ac98ebccf8f76bcf9196bfd1b2f695f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2012.11.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rüffer, Björn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Wouw, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>Convergent systems vs. incremental stability</title><title>Systems & control letters</title><description>Two similar stability notions are considered; one is the long established notion of convergent systems, the other is the younger notion of incremental stability. Both notions require that any two solutions of a system converge to each other. Yet these stability concepts are different, in the sense that none implies the other, as is shown in this paper using two examples. It is shown under what additional assumptions one property indeed implies the other. Furthermore, this paper contains necessary and sufficient characterizations of both properties in terms of Lyapunov functions.</description><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Convergent systems</subject><subject>Converse Lyapunov result</subject><subject>Incremental stability</subject><subject>Lyapunov functions</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Time-varying nonlinear systems</subject><issn>0167-6911</issn><issn>1872-7956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QWbpwhlzk05mslOKLyi46T5Mbm8kZR41SQv990aqa1cXDud8cD_GboFXwEE9bKt4jDiNPVWCg6gAKg71GZtB24iy0bU6Z7NcbEqlAS7ZVYxbzrngUs7Y_XIaDxQ-aUxFxiQaYnGIVeFHDDTktOuLmDrre5-O1-zCdX2km987Z-uX5_XyrVx9vL4vn1YlykWdSgmtsFJbFNK6GgVqWiiyRFgLhWrRoW7JIrrWNcqi06CVdRuwwildOzlndyfsLkxfe4rJDD4i9X030rSPBqSQQtQgRK6qUxXDFGMgZ3bBD104GuDmx47Zmj875seOATDZTh4-noaU_zh4CiaipxFp4wNhMpvJ_4f4BvWEcqg</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Rüffer, Björn S.</creator><creator>van de Wouw, Nathan</creator><creator>Mueller, Markus</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Convergent systems vs. incremental stability</title><author>Rüffer, Björn S. ; van de Wouw, Nathan ; Mueller, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-3182b39bc23bf5c2c9e46ebeec526c64ac98ebccf8f76bcf9196bfd1b2f695f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Convergent systems</topic><topic>Converse Lyapunov result</topic><topic>Incremental stability</topic><topic>Lyapunov functions</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Time-varying nonlinear systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rüffer, Björn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Wouw, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Systems & control letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rüffer, Björn S.</au><au>van de Wouw, Nathan</au><au>Mueller, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Convergent systems vs. incremental stability</atitle><jtitle>Systems & control letters</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>277-285</pages><issn>0167-6911</issn><eissn>1872-7956</eissn><abstract>Two similar stability notions are considered; one is the long established notion of convergent systems, the other is the younger notion of incremental stability. Both notions require that any two solutions of a system converge to each other. Yet these stability concepts are different, in the sense that none implies the other, as is shown in this paper using two examples. It is shown under what additional assumptions one property indeed implies the other. Furthermore, this paper contains necessary and sufficient characterizations of both properties in terms of Lyapunov functions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.sysconle.2012.11.015</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6911 |
ispartof | Systems & control letters, 2013-03, Vol.62 (3), p.277-285 |
issn | 0167-6911 1872-7956 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1323225122 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Control systems Convergent systems Converse Lyapunov result Incremental stability Lyapunov functions Stability Time-varying nonlinear systems |
title | Convergent systems vs. incremental stability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A05%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Convergent%20systems%20vs.%20incremental%20stability&rft.jtitle=Systems%20&%20control%20letters&rft.au=R%C3%BCffer,%20Bj%C3%B6rn%20S.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=277-285&rft.issn=0167-6911&rft.eissn=1872-7956&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sysconle.2012.11.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1323225122%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1323225122&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167691112002393&rfr_iscdi=true |