The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases

Although human thinking is often biased, some individuals are less susceptible to biases than others. These individual differences have been at the forefront of thinking research for more than a decade. We organize the literature in three key accounts (storage, monitoring, and inhibition failure) an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trends in cognitive sciences 2013-04, Vol.17 (4), p.172-178
Hauptverfasser: De Neys, Wim, Bonnefon, Jean-François
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 4
container_start_page 172
container_title Trends in cognitive sciences
container_volume 17
creator De Neys, Wim
Bonnefon, Jean-François
description Although human thinking is often biased, some individuals are less susceptible to biases than others. These individual differences have been at the forefront of thinking research for more than a decade. We organize the literature in three key accounts (storage, monitoring, and inhibition failure) and propose that a critical but overlooked question concerns the time point at which individual variance arises: do biased and unbiased reasoners take different paths early on in the reasoning process or is the observed variance late to arise? We discuss how this focus on the ‘whens’ suggests that individual differences in thinking biases are less profound than traditionally assumed, in the sense that they might typically arise at a later stage of the reasoning process.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1322730433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364661313000405</els_id><sourcerecordid>1322730433</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-3a9285a79c40025b65e4686561adb388206a93ccabef07542100f78103ee64933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhyMEoqXwAhxQLkhcEsZ_YicSQqoqoIhKPVAkbpbjTFhvs07xJEV762PA6_VJ6rALlThwssf6fjPWN1n2nEHJgKnX63LyjkoOTJTASwD2IDtktW4KAfrrw3QXShZKMXGQPSFaJ6DSWj3ODriQDWjOD7NPFyvMb29-_lht6fbmV25Dtysx_K7HPveh89e-m-2Qd77vMWJwSOk5n1Y-XPrwLW-9JaSn2aPeDoTP9udR9uX9u4uT0-Ls_MPHk-OzwknJpkLYhteV1Y2TALxqVYVS1apSzHatqGsOyjbCOdtiD7qSnAH0umYgEJVshDjKXu36XsXx-4w0mY0nh8NgA44zGSY41wKkWFC-Q10ciSL25ir6jY1bw8AsEs3aLBLNItEAN8lRCr3Y95_bDXZ_I3-sJeDlHrDk7NBHG5yne05zkE2lEvdmx2Gyce0xGnJ-sdf5iG4y3ej__4-3_8Td4INPEy9xi7Qe5xiSZ8MMpYD5vKx72TYTACChEnfmZKZn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1322730433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>De Neys, Wim ; Bonnefon, Jean-François</creator><creatorcontrib>De Neys, Wim ; Bonnefon, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><description>Although human thinking is often biased, some individuals are less susceptible to biases than others. These individual differences have been at the forefront of thinking research for more than a decade. We organize the literature in three key accounts (storage, monitoring, and inhibition failure) and propose that a critical but overlooked question concerns the time point at which individual variance arises: do biased and unbiased reasoners take different paths early on in the reasoning process or is the observed variance late to arise? We discuss how this focus on the ‘whens’ suggests that individual differences in thinking biases are less profound than traditionally assumed, in the sense that they might typically arise at a later stage of the reasoning process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-6613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-307X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23490722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human Development ; Humans ; Individuality ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Logic ; Memory ; Neurology ; Problem Solving ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reasoning. Problem solving ; Thinking</subject><ispartof>Trends in cognitive sciences, 2013-04, Vol.17 (4), p.172-178</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-3a9285a79c40025b65e4686561adb388206a93ccabef07542100f78103ee64933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-3a9285a79c40025b65e4686561adb388206a93ccabef07542100f78103ee64933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27204956$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23490722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Neys, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnefon, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><title>The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases</title><title>Trends in cognitive sciences</title><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><description>Although human thinking is often biased, some individuals are less susceptible to biases than others. These individual differences have been at the forefront of thinking research for more than a decade. We organize the literature in three key accounts (storage, monitoring, and inhibition failure) and propose that a critical but overlooked question concerns the time point at which individual variance arises: do biased and unbiased reasoners take different paths early on in the reasoning process or is the observed variance late to arise? We discuss how this focus on the ‘whens’ suggests that individual differences in thinking biases are less profound than traditionally assumed, in the sense that they might typically arise at a later stage of the reasoning process.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human Development</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reasoning. Problem solving</subject><subject>Thinking</subject><issn>1364-6613</issn><issn>1879-307X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhyMEoqXwAhxQLkhcEsZ_YicSQqoqoIhKPVAkbpbjTFhvs07xJEV762PA6_VJ6rALlThwssf6fjPWN1n2nEHJgKnX63LyjkoOTJTASwD2IDtktW4KAfrrw3QXShZKMXGQPSFaJ6DSWj3ODriQDWjOD7NPFyvMb29-_lht6fbmV25Dtysx_K7HPveh89e-m-2Qd77vMWJwSOk5n1Y-XPrwLW-9JaSn2aPeDoTP9udR9uX9u4uT0-Ls_MPHk-OzwknJpkLYhteV1Y2TALxqVYVS1apSzHatqGsOyjbCOdtiD7qSnAH0umYgEJVshDjKXu36XsXx-4w0mY0nh8NgA44zGSY41wKkWFC-Q10ciSL25ir6jY1bw8AsEs3aLBLNItEAN8lRCr3Y95_bDXZ_I3-sJeDlHrDk7NBHG5yne05zkE2lEvdmx2Gyce0xGnJ-sdf5iG4y3ej__4-3_8Td4INPEy9xi7Qe5xiSZ8MMpYD5vKx72TYTACChEnfmZKZn</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>De Neys, Wim</creator><creator>Bonnefon, Jean-François</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases</title><author>De Neys, Wim ; Bonnefon, Jean-François</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-3a9285a79c40025b65e4686561adb388206a93ccabef07542100f78103ee64933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human Development</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reasoning. Problem solving</topic><topic>Thinking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Neys, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnefon, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Neys, Wim</au><au>Bonnefon, Jean-François</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases</atitle><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>172-178</pages><issn>1364-6613</issn><eissn>1879-307X</eissn><abstract>Although human thinking is often biased, some individuals are less susceptible to biases than others. These individual differences have been at the forefront of thinking research for more than a decade. We organize the literature in three key accounts (storage, monitoring, and inhibition failure) and propose that a critical but overlooked question concerns the time point at which individual variance arises: do biased and unbiased reasoners take different paths early on in the reasoning process or is the observed variance late to arise? We discuss how this focus on the ‘whens’ suggests that individual differences in thinking biases are less profound than traditionally assumed, in the sense that they might typically arise at a later stage of the reasoning process.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23490722</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-6613
ispartof Trends in cognitive sciences, 2013-04, Vol.17 (4), p.172-178
issn 1364-6613
1879-307X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1322730433
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cognition. Intelligence
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human Development
Humans
Individuality
Inhibition (Psychology)
Logic
Memory
Neurology
Problem Solving
Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reasoning. Problem solving
Thinking
title The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A47%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%98whys%E2%80%99%20and%20%E2%80%98whens%E2%80%99%20of%20individual%20differences%20in%20thinking%20biases&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20cognitive%20sciences&rft.au=De%20Neys,%20Wim&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=172-178&rft.issn=1364-6613&rft.eissn=1879-307X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1322730433%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1322730433&rft_id=info:pmid/23490722&rft_els_id=S1364661313000405&rfr_iscdi=true