The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases
Although human thinking is often biased, some individuals are less susceptible to biases than others. These individual differences have been at the forefront of thinking research for more than a decade. We organize the literature in three key accounts (storage, monitoring, and inhibition failure) an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trends in cognitive sciences 2013-04, Vol.17 (4), p.172-178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 178 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 172 |
container_title | Trends in cognitive sciences |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | De Neys, Wim Bonnefon, Jean-François |
description | Although human thinking is often biased, some individuals are less susceptible to biases than others. These individual differences have been at the forefront of thinking research for more than a decade. We organize the literature in three key accounts (storage, monitoring, and inhibition failure) and propose that a critical but overlooked question concerns the time point at which individual variance arises: do biased and unbiased reasoners take different paths early on in the reasoning process or is the observed variance late to arise? We discuss how this focus on the ‘whens’ suggests that individual differences in thinking biases are less profound than traditionally assumed, in the sense that they might typically arise at a later stage of the reasoning process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1322730433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364661313000405</els_id><sourcerecordid>1322730433</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-3a9285a79c40025b65e4686561adb388206a93ccabef07542100f78103ee64933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhyMEoqXwAhxQLkhcEsZ_YicSQqoqoIhKPVAkbpbjTFhvs07xJEV762PA6_VJ6rALlThwssf6fjPWN1n2nEHJgKnX63LyjkoOTJTASwD2IDtktW4KAfrrw3QXShZKMXGQPSFaJ6DSWj3ODriQDWjOD7NPFyvMb29-_lht6fbmV25Dtysx_K7HPveh89e-m-2Qd77vMWJwSOk5n1Y-XPrwLW-9JaSn2aPeDoTP9udR9uX9u4uT0-Ls_MPHk-OzwknJpkLYhteV1Y2TALxqVYVS1apSzHatqGsOyjbCOdtiD7qSnAH0umYgEJVshDjKXu36XsXx-4w0mY0nh8NgA44zGSY41wKkWFC-Q10ciSL25ir6jY1bw8AsEs3aLBLNItEAN8lRCr3Y95_bDXZ_I3-sJeDlHrDk7NBHG5yne05zkE2lEvdmx2Gyce0xGnJ-sdf5iG4y3ej__4-3_8Td4INPEy9xi7Qe5xiSZ8MMpYD5vKx72TYTACChEnfmZKZn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1322730433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>De Neys, Wim ; Bonnefon, Jean-François</creator><creatorcontrib>De Neys, Wim ; Bonnefon, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><description>Although human thinking is often biased, some individuals are less susceptible to biases than others. These individual differences have been at the forefront of thinking research for more than a decade. We organize the literature in three key accounts (storage, monitoring, and inhibition failure) and propose that a critical but overlooked question concerns the time point at which individual variance arises: do biased and unbiased reasoners take different paths early on in the reasoning process or is the observed variance late to arise? We discuss how this focus on the ‘whens’ suggests that individual differences in thinking biases are less profound than traditionally assumed, in the sense that they might typically arise at a later stage of the reasoning process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-6613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-307X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23490722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human Development ; Humans ; Individuality ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Logic ; Memory ; Neurology ; Problem Solving ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reasoning. Problem solving ; Thinking</subject><ispartof>Trends in cognitive sciences, 2013-04, Vol.17 (4), p.172-178</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-3a9285a79c40025b65e4686561adb388206a93ccabef07542100f78103ee64933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-3a9285a79c40025b65e4686561adb388206a93ccabef07542100f78103ee64933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27204956$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23490722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Neys, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnefon, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><title>The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases</title><title>Trends in cognitive sciences</title><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><description>Although human thinking is often biased, some individuals are less susceptible to biases than others. These individual differences have been at the forefront of thinking research for more than a decade. We organize the literature in three key accounts (storage, monitoring, and inhibition failure) and propose that a critical but overlooked question concerns the time point at which individual variance arises: do biased and unbiased reasoners take different paths early on in the reasoning process or is the observed variance late to arise? We discuss how this focus on the ‘whens’ suggests that individual differences in thinking biases are less profound than traditionally assumed, in the sense that they might typically arise at a later stage of the reasoning process.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human Development</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reasoning. Problem solving</subject><subject>Thinking</subject><issn>1364-6613</issn><issn>1879-307X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhyMEoqXwAhxQLkhcEsZ_YicSQqoqoIhKPVAkbpbjTFhvs07xJEV762PA6_VJ6rALlThwssf6fjPWN1n2nEHJgKnX63LyjkoOTJTASwD2IDtktW4KAfrrw3QXShZKMXGQPSFaJ6DSWj3ODriQDWjOD7NPFyvMb29-_lht6fbmV25Dtysx_K7HPveh89e-m-2Qd77vMWJwSOk5n1Y-XPrwLW-9JaSn2aPeDoTP9udR9uX9u4uT0-Ls_MPHk-OzwknJpkLYhteV1Y2TALxqVYVS1apSzHatqGsOyjbCOdtiD7qSnAH0umYgEJVshDjKXu36XsXx-4w0mY0nh8NgA44zGSY41wKkWFC-Q10ciSL25ir6jY1bw8AsEs3aLBLNItEAN8lRCr3Y95_bDXZ_I3-sJeDlHrDk7NBHG5yne05zkE2lEvdmx2Gyce0xGnJ-sdf5iG4y3ej__4-3_8Td4INPEy9xi7Qe5xiSZ8MMpYD5vKx72TYTACChEnfmZKZn</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>De Neys, Wim</creator><creator>Bonnefon, Jean-François</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases</title><author>De Neys, Wim ; Bonnefon, Jean-François</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-3a9285a79c40025b65e4686561adb388206a93ccabef07542100f78103ee64933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human Development</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reasoning. Problem solving</topic><topic>Thinking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Neys, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnefon, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Neys, Wim</au><au>Bonnefon, Jean-François</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases</atitle><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>172-178</pages><issn>1364-6613</issn><eissn>1879-307X</eissn><abstract>Although human thinking is often biased, some individuals are less susceptible to biases than others. These individual differences have been at the forefront of thinking research for more than a decade. We organize the literature in three key accounts (storage, monitoring, and inhibition failure) and propose that a critical but overlooked question concerns the time point at which individual variance arises: do biased and unbiased reasoners take different paths early on in the reasoning process or is the observed variance late to arise? We discuss how this focus on the ‘whens’ suggests that individual differences in thinking biases are less profound than traditionally assumed, in the sense that they might typically arise at a later stage of the reasoning process.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23490722</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-6613 |
ispartof | Trends in cognitive sciences, 2013-04, Vol.17 (4), p.172-178 |
issn | 1364-6613 1879-307X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1322730433 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cognition. Intelligence Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Development Humans Individuality Inhibition (Psychology) Logic Memory Neurology Problem Solving Psychiatry Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reasoning. Problem solving Thinking |
title | The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A47%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%98whys%E2%80%99%20and%20%E2%80%98whens%E2%80%99%20of%20individual%20differences%20in%20thinking%20biases&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20cognitive%20sciences&rft.au=De%20Neys,%20Wim&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=172-178&rft.issn=1364-6613&rft.eissn=1879-307X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1322730433%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1322730433&rft_id=info:pmid/23490722&rft_els_id=S1364661313000405&rfr_iscdi=true |