The evolution of a philosophy and practice of evaluation advice

Advice regarding evaluation can be solicited, given, and used in a variety of informal to formal practices, which can range from unstructured to highly structured. Gathering input into an evaluation is intended to include other perspectives and voices into a process so that the evaluation is cocreat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New directions for evaluation 2012-12, Vol.2012 (136), p.67-76
Hauptverfasser: Compton, Donald W., Baizerman, Michael L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 136
container_start_page 67
container_title New directions for evaluation
container_volume 2012
creator Compton, Donald W.
Baizerman, Michael L.
description Advice regarding evaluation can be solicited, given, and used in a variety of informal to formal practices, which can range from unstructured to highly structured. Gathering input into an evaluation is intended to include other perspectives and voices into a process so that the evaluation is cocreated with others to enhance its rigor, relevance, and utility. In evaluation practice, the advice system should be integrated within a model of evaluation practice and should be a component of effectively managing one or more evaluation studies. The authors draw on a combined 40‐year career in evaluation and in advice giving to review their increasingly sophisticated advice‐system practice. This history is mined for some real‐world problems encountered and how these were addressed. Finally, the article provides suggestions on how an evaluator can include soliciting advice to create a shared understanding necessary for good evaluation practice. This we call the evaluation facilitator. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ev.20034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1322723640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1322723640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2844-5f8592393f1d69b4f1e12b9ccfd61aa528118690e8a5f81da8da2431d97b0c013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV8Cfk6CV1Zz-y2ZNIqa1Y1EP9uC3bzS6Npt2YTaL996atiAiCpxlmHubwDkKngAeAMTm37YBgTNke6gGnLE4Ff97veixFnAiaHKKjEF5wRwXwHrqYLWxkW180de5XkXeRjspFXvjgy8U60qssKitt6tzYzdK2umj0luqs7YbH6MDpItiTr9pHD1ej2XAST-_G18PLaWxIyljMXcoloZI6yBI5Zw4skLk0xmUJaM1JCpAmEttUdxQynWaaMAqZFHNsMNA-OtvdLSv_1thQq2UejC0KvbK-CQooIYLQhOH_UZCc_KCm8iFU1qmyype6WivAahOnsq3axtnReEff88Ku_3Rq9PjL56G2H99eV6-qe4Pg6ul2rOQ9Hd5MBChGPwEkDILH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1322719520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The evolution of a philosophy and practice of evaluation advice</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Compton, Donald W. ; Baizerman, Michael L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Compton, Donald W. ; Baizerman, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><description>Advice regarding evaluation can be solicited, given, and used in a variety of informal to formal practices, which can range from unstructured to highly structured. Gathering input into an evaluation is intended to include other perspectives and voices into a process so that the evaluation is cocreated with others to enhance its rigor, relevance, and utility. In evaluation practice, the advice system should be integrated within a model of evaluation practice and should be a component of effectively managing one or more evaluation studies. The authors draw on a combined 40‐year career in evaluation and in advice giving to review their increasingly sophisticated advice‐system practice. This history is mined for some real‐world problems encountered and how these were addressed. Finally, the article provides suggestions on how an evaluator can include soliciting advice to create a shared understanding necessary for good evaluation practice. This we call the evaluation facilitator. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-875X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ev.20034</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NDFEF4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Careers ; Philosophy</subject><ispartof>New directions for evaluation, 2012-12, Vol.2012 (136), p.67-76</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company, and the American Evaluation Association</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2844-5f8592393f1d69b4f1e12b9ccfd61aa528118690e8a5f81da8da2431d97b0c013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2844-5f8592393f1d69b4f1e12b9ccfd61aa528118690e8a5f81da8da2431d97b0c013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fev.20034$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fev.20034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33775,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Compton, Donald W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baizerman, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><title>The evolution of a philosophy and practice of evaluation advice</title><title>New directions for evaluation</title><addtitle>New Directions for Evaluation</addtitle><description>Advice regarding evaluation can be solicited, given, and used in a variety of informal to formal practices, which can range from unstructured to highly structured. Gathering input into an evaluation is intended to include other perspectives and voices into a process so that the evaluation is cocreated with others to enhance its rigor, relevance, and utility. In evaluation practice, the advice system should be integrated within a model of evaluation practice and should be a component of effectively managing one or more evaluation studies. The authors draw on a combined 40‐year career in evaluation and in advice giving to review their increasingly sophisticated advice‐system practice. This history is mined for some real‐world problems encountered and how these were addressed. Finally, the article provides suggestions on how an evaluator can include soliciting advice to create a shared understanding necessary for good evaluation practice. This we call the evaluation facilitator. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</description><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><issn>1097-6736</issn><issn>1534-875X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV8Cfk6CV1Zz-y2ZNIqa1Y1EP9uC3bzS6Npt2YTaL996atiAiCpxlmHubwDkKngAeAMTm37YBgTNke6gGnLE4Ff97veixFnAiaHKKjEF5wRwXwHrqYLWxkW180de5XkXeRjspFXvjgy8U60qssKitt6tzYzdK2umj0luqs7YbH6MDpItiTr9pHD1ej2XAST-_G18PLaWxIyljMXcoloZI6yBI5Zw4skLk0xmUJaM1JCpAmEttUdxQynWaaMAqZFHNsMNA-OtvdLSv_1thQq2UejC0KvbK-CQooIYLQhOH_UZCc_KCm8iFU1qmyype6WivAahOnsq3axtnReEff88Ku_3Rq9PjL56G2H99eV6-qe4Pg6ul2rOQ9Hd5MBChGPwEkDILH</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Compton, Donald W.</creator><creator>Baizerman, Michael L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>The evolution of a philosophy and practice of evaluation advice</title><author>Compton, Donald W. ; Baizerman, Michael L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2844-5f8592393f1d69b4f1e12b9ccfd61aa528118690e8a5f81da8da2431d97b0c013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Compton, Donald W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baizerman, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>New directions for evaluation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Compton, Donald W.</au><au>Baizerman, Michael L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The evolution of a philosophy and practice of evaluation advice</atitle><jtitle>New directions for evaluation</jtitle><addtitle>New Directions for Evaluation</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><issue>136</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>67-76</pages><issn>1097-6736</issn><eissn>1534-875X</eissn><coden>NDFEF4</coden><abstract>Advice regarding evaluation can be solicited, given, and used in a variety of informal to formal practices, which can range from unstructured to highly structured. Gathering input into an evaluation is intended to include other perspectives and voices into a process so that the evaluation is cocreated with others to enhance its rigor, relevance, and utility. In evaluation practice, the advice system should be integrated within a model of evaluation practice and should be a component of effectively managing one or more evaluation studies. The authors draw on a combined 40‐year career in evaluation and in advice giving to review their increasingly sophisticated advice‐system practice. This history is mined for some real‐world problems encountered and how these were addressed. Finally, the article provides suggestions on how an evaluator can include soliciting advice to create a shared understanding necessary for good evaluation practice. This we call the evaluation facilitator. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/ev.20034</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1097-6736
ispartof New directions for evaluation, 2012-12, Vol.2012 (136), p.67-76
issn 1097-6736
1534-875X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1322723640
source Wiley Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Careers
Philosophy
title The evolution of a philosophy and practice of evaluation advice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A44%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20evolution%20of%20a%20philosophy%20and%20practice%20of%20evaluation%20advice&rft.jtitle=New%20directions%20for%20evaluation&rft.au=Compton,%20Donald%20W.&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=2012&rft.issue=136&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=67-76&rft.issn=1097-6736&rft.eissn=1534-875X&rft.coden=NDFEF4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ev.20034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1322723640%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1322719520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true