Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts

An advisory group constructed from within the community where a program evaluation is conducted can be an invaluable resource to an evaluator, particularly if the evaluator is an outsider and of a different culture. The author identifies useful roles that advisory groups have played in his organizat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New directions for evaluation 2012-12, Vol.2012 (136), p.49-65
1. Verfasser: Cohen, Barry B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 136
container_start_page 49
container_title New directions for evaluation
container_volume 2012
creator Cohen, Barry B.
description An advisory group constructed from within the community where a program evaluation is conducted can be an invaluable resource to an evaluator, particularly if the evaluator is an outsider and of a different culture. The author identifies useful roles that advisory groups have played in his organization's evaluations, and explores advisory group selection criteria, processes for identifying, vetting, and recruiting potential members who meet these criteria, and recruitment‐related pitfalls. Shortcomings of advisory groups in these contexts are discussed. The authors examine dos, don'ts, and lessons learned from working effectively with advisory groups in diverse cultural contexts; for example, understanding and appreciating unfamiliar styles of discourse and patterns of interaction and how to adapt to these. Differences in age, gender, position, social status, education, literacy, national origin, dialect, degree of assimilation, political affiliation, clan membership, knowledge of English, and comfort with European‐American manners and customs are all at play. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ev.20033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1322723639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1322723639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-737404382b6e455e0b02d1ea3aef8d6577a8b23a8a4fa818d7a6b61f320598f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctKw0AUBuAgCtYq-AhZujB1LplLlrX0ohTdtNXdMElOZDTN1Jkk2rc32qIgCK7OhY-z-E8QnGM0wAiRK2gHBCFKD4IeZjSOpGCPh12PEhFxQflxcOL9M-qowKwXLId5a7x12_DJ2Wbjw8K6EFpdNro2tvKhqcLctOA8hFlT1o3T5Z5ehpldr5vK1Aa6QVd5t6hqeK_9aXBU6NLD2b72g-VkvBjNovn99GY0nEcZkTGNBBUxiqkkKYeYMUApIjkGTTUUMudMCC1TQrXUcaEllrnQPOW4oASxRBaM9oOL3d2Ns68N-Fqtjc-gLHUFtvEKU0IEoZwm_6M4YVj80MxZ7x0UauPMWrutwkh9hqygVV8hdzTa0TdTwvZPp8arX974Lqhvr92L6p4jmHq4myo-m17fLvBKTegHKQSMAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1322719517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Cohen, Barry B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Barry B.</creatorcontrib><description>An advisory group constructed from within the community where a program evaluation is conducted can be an invaluable resource to an evaluator, particularly if the evaluator is an outsider and of a different culture. The author identifies useful roles that advisory groups have played in his organization's evaluations, and explores advisory group selection criteria, processes for identifying, vetting, and recruiting potential members who meet these criteria, and recruitment‐related pitfalls. Shortcomings of advisory groups in these contexts are discussed. The authors examine dos, don'ts, and lessons learned from working effectively with advisory groups in diverse cultural contexts; for example, understanding and appreciating unfamiliar styles of discourse and patterns of interaction and how to adapt to these. Differences in age, gender, position, social status, education, literacy, national origin, dialect, degree of assimilation, political affiliation, clan membership, knowledge of English, and comfort with European‐American manners and customs are all at play. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-875X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ev.20033</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NDFEF4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Assimilation ; Criteria ; Cultural Groups ; Discourse ; Interaction ; Knowledge ; Membership ; Norms ; Political Affiliation ; Program Evaluation ; Sex Differences ; Sociocultural Factors</subject><ispartof>New directions for evaluation, 2012-12, Vol.2012 (136), p.49-65</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company, and the American Evaluation Association</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-737404382b6e455e0b02d1ea3aef8d6577a8b23a8a4fa818d7a6b61f320598f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-737404382b6e455e0b02d1ea3aef8d6577a8b23a8a4fa818d7a6b61f320598f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fev.20033$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fev.20033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33752,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Barry B.</creatorcontrib><title>Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts</title><title>New directions for evaluation</title><addtitle>New Directions for Evaluation</addtitle><description>An advisory group constructed from within the community where a program evaluation is conducted can be an invaluable resource to an evaluator, particularly if the evaluator is an outsider and of a different culture. The author identifies useful roles that advisory groups have played in his organization's evaluations, and explores advisory group selection criteria, processes for identifying, vetting, and recruiting potential members who meet these criteria, and recruitment‐related pitfalls. Shortcomings of advisory groups in these contexts are discussed. The authors examine dos, don'ts, and lessons learned from working effectively with advisory groups in diverse cultural contexts; for example, understanding and appreciating unfamiliar styles of discourse and patterns of interaction and how to adapt to these. Differences in age, gender, position, social status, education, literacy, national origin, dialect, degree of assimilation, political affiliation, clan membership, knowledge of English, and comfort with European‐American manners and customs are all at play. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Assimilation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Cultural Groups</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Membership</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Political Affiliation</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Sociocultural Factors</subject><issn>1097-6736</issn><issn>1534-875X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ctKw0AUBuAgCtYq-AhZujB1LplLlrX0ohTdtNXdMElOZDTN1Jkk2rc32qIgCK7OhY-z-E8QnGM0wAiRK2gHBCFKD4IeZjSOpGCPh12PEhFxQflxcOL9M-qowKwXLId5a7x12_DJ2Wbjw8K6EFpdNro2tvKhqcLctOA8hFlT1o3T5Z5ehpldr5vK1Aa6QVd5t6hqeK_9aXBU6NLD2b72g-VkvBjNovn99GY0nEcZkTGNBBUxiqkkKYeYMUApIjkGTTUUMudMCC1TQrXUcaEllrnQPOW4oASxRBaM9oOL3d2Ns68N-Fqtjc-gLHUFtvEKU0IEoZwm_6M4YVj80MxZ7x0UauPMWrutwkh9hqygVV8hdzTa0TdTwvZPp8arX974Lqhvr92L6p4jmHq4myo-m17fLvBKTegHKQSMAQ</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Cohen, Barry B.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts</title><author>Cohen, Barry B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-737404382b6e455e0b02d1ea3aef8d6577a8b23a8a4fa818d7a6b61f320598f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Assimilation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Cultural Groups</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Membership</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Political Affiliation</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Sociocultural Factors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Barry B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>New directions for evaluation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Barry B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts</atitle><jtitle>New directions for evaluation</jtitle><addtitle>New Directions for Evaluation</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><issue>136</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>49-65</pages><issn>1097-6736</issn><eissn>1534-875X</eissn><coden>NDFEF4</coden><abstract>An advisory group constructed from within the community where a program evaluation is conducted can be an invaluable resource to an evaluator, particularly if the evaluator is an outsider and of a different culture. The author identifies useful roles that advisory groups have played in his organization's evaluations, and explores advisory group selection criteria, processes for identifying, vetting, and recruiting potential members who meet these criteria, and recruitment‐related pitfalls. Shortcomings of advisory groups in these contexts are discussed. The authors examine dos, don'ts, and lessons learned from working effectively with advisory groups in diverse cultural contexts; for example, understanding and appreciating unfamiliar styles of discourse and patterns of interaction and how to adapt to these. Differences in age, gender, position, social status, education, literacy, national origin, dialect, degree of assimilation, political affiliation, clan membership, knowledge of English, and comfort with European‐American manners and customs are all at play. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/ev.20033</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1097-6736
ispartof New directions for evaluation, 2012-12, Vol.2012 (136), p.49-65
issn 1097-6736
1534-875X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1322723639
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Education Source; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Age Differences
Assimilation
Criteria
Cultural Groups
Discourse
Interaction
Knowledge
Membership
Norms
Political Affiliation
Program Evaluation
Sex Differences
Sociocultural Factors
title Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A22%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advisory%20groups%20for%20evaluations%20in%20diverse%20cultural%20groups,%20communities,%20and%20contexts&rft.jtitle=New%20directions%20for%20evaluation&rft.au=Cohen,%20Barry%20B.&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=2012&rft.issue=136&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=49-65&rft.issn=1097-6736&rft.eissn=1534-875X&rft.coden=NDFEF4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ev.20033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1322723639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1322719517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true