Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts
An advisory group constructed from within the community where a program evaluation is conducted can be an invaluable resource to an evaluator, particularly if the evaluator is an outsider and of a different culture. The author identifies useful roles that advisory groups have played in his organizat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New directions for evaluation 2012-12, Vol.2012 (136), p.49-65 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 65 |
---|---|
container_issue | 136 |
container_start_page | 49 |
container_title | New directions for evaluation |
container_volume | 2012 |
creator | Cohen, Barry B. |
description | An advisory group constructed from within the community where a program evaluation is conducted can be an invaluable resource to an evaluator, particularly if the evaluator is an outsider and of a different culture. The author identifies useful roles that advisory groups have played in his organization's evaluations, and explores advisory group selection criteria, processes for identifying, vetting, and recruiting potential members who meet these criteria, and recruitment‐related pitfalls. Shortcomings of advisory groups in these contexts are discussed. The authors examine dos, don'ts, and lessons learned from working effectively with advisory groups in diverse cultural contexts; for example, understanding and appreciating unfamiliar styles of discourse and patterns of interaction and how to adapt to these. Differences in age, gender, position, social status, education, literacy, national origin, dialect, degree of assimilation, political affiliation, clan membership, knowledge of English, and comfort with European‐American manners and customs are all at play. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ev.20033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1322723639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1322723639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-737404382b6e455e0b02d1ea3aef8d6577a8b23a8a4fa818d7a6b61f320598f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctKw0AUBuAgCtYq-AhZujB1LplLlrX0ohTdtNXdMElOZDTN1Jkk2rc32qIgCK7OhY-z-E8QnGM0wAiRK2gHBCFKD4IeZjSOpGCPh12PEhFxQflxcOL9M-qowKwXLId5a7x12_DJ2Wbjw8K6EFpdNro2tvKhqcLctOA8hFlT1o3T5Z5ehpldr5vK1Aa6QVd5t6hqeK_9aXBU6NLD2b72g-VkvBjNovn99GY0nEcZkTGNBBUxiqkkKYeYMUApIjkGTTUUMudMCC1TQrXUcaEllrnQPOW4oASxRBaM9oOL3d2Ns68N-Fqtjc-gLHUFtvEKU0IEoZwm_6M4YVj80MxZ7x0UauPMWrutwkh9hqygVV8hdzTa0TdTwvZPp8arX974Lqhvr92L6p4jmHq4myo-m17fLvBKTegHKQSMAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1322719517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Cohen, Barry B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Barry B.</creatorcontrib><description>An advisory group constructed from within the community where a program evaluation is conducted can be an invaluable resource to an evaluator, particularly if the evaluator is an outsider and of a different culture. The author identifies useful roles that advisory groups have played in his organization's evaluations, and explores advisory group selection criteria, processes for identifying, vetting, and recruiting potential members who meet these criteria, and recruitment‐related pitfalls. Shortcomings of advisory groups in these contexts are discussed. The authors examine dos, don'ts, and lessons learned from working effectively with advisory groups in diverse cultural contexts; for example, understanding and appreciating unfamiliar styles of discourse and patterns of interaction and how to adapt to these. Differences in age, gender, position, social status, education, literacy, national origin, dialect, degree of assimilation, political affiliation, clan membership, knowledge of English, and comfort with European‐American manners and customs are all at play. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-875X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ev.20033</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NDFEF4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Assimilation ; Criteria ; Cultural Groups ; Discourse ; Interaction ; Knowledge ; Membership ; Norms ; Political Affiliation ; Program Evaluation ; Sex Differences ; Sociocultural Factors</subject><ispartof>New directions for evaluation, 2012-12, Vol.2012 (136), p.49-65</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company, and the American Evaluation Association</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-737404382b6e455e0b02d1ea3aef8d6577a8b23a8a4fa818d7a6b61f320598f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-737404382b6e455e0b02d1ea3aef8d6577a8b23a8a4fa818d7a6b61f320598f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fev.20033$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fev.20033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33752,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Barry B.</creatorcontrib><title>Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts</title><title>New directions for evaluation</title><addtitle>New Directions for Evaluation</addtitle><description>An advisory group constructed from within the community where a program evaluation is conducted can be an invaluable resource to an evaluator, particularly if the evaluator is an outsider and of a different culture. The author identifies useful roles that advisory groups have played in his organization's evaluations, and explores advisory group selection criteria, processes for identifying, vetting, and recruiting potential members who meet these criteria, and recruitment‐related pitfalls. Shortcomings of advisory groups in these contexts are discussed. The authors examine dos, don'ts, and lessons learned from working effectively with advisory groups in diverse cultural contexts; for example, understanding and appreciating unfamiliar styles of discourse and patterns of interaction and how to adapt to these. Differences in age, gender, position, social status, education, literacy, national origin, dialect, degree of assimilation, political affiliation, clan membership, knowledge of English, and comfort with European‐American manners and customs are all at play. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Assimilation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Cultural Groups</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Membership</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Political Affiliation</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Sociocultural Factors</subject><issn>1097-6736</issn><issn>1534-875X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ctKw0AUBuAgCtYq-AhZujB1LplLlrX0ohTdtNXdMElOZDTN1Jkk2rc32qIgCK7OhY-z-E8QnGM0wAiRK2gHBCFKD4IeZjSOpGCPh12PEhFxQflxcOL9M-qowKwXLId5a7x12_DJ2Wbjw8K6EFpdNro2tvKhqcLctOA8hFlT1o3T5Z5ehpldr5vK1Aa6QVd5t6hqeK_9aXBU6NLD2b72g-VkvBjNovn99GY0nEcZkTGNBBUxiqkkKYeYMUApIjkGTTUUMudMCC1TQrXUcaEllrnQPOW4oASxRBaM9oOL3d2Ns68N-Fqtjc-gLHUFtvEKU0IEoZwm_6M4YVj80MxZ7x0UauPMWrutwkh9hqygVV8hdzTa0TdTwvZPp8arX974Lqhvr92L6p4jmHq4myo-m17fLvBKTegHKQSMAQ</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Cohen, Barry B.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts</title><author>Cohen, Barry B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2843-737404382b6e455e0b02d1ea3aef8d6577a8b23a8a4fa818d7a6b61f320598f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Assimilation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Cultural Groups</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Membership</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Political Affiliation</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Sociocultural Factors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Barry B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>New directions for evaluation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Barry B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts</atitle><jtitle>New directions for evaluation</jtitle><addtitle>New Directions for Evaluation</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><issue>136</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>49-65</pages><issn>1097-6736</issn><eissn>1534-875X</eissn><coden>NDFEF4</coden><abstract>An advisory group constructed from within the community where a program evaluation is conducted can be an invaluable resource to an evaluator, particularly if the evaluator is an outsider and of a different culture. The author identifies useful roles that advisory groups have played in his organization's evaluations, and explores advisory group selection criteria, processes for identifying, vetting, and recruiting potential members who meet these criteria, and recruitment‐related pitfalls. Shortcomings of advisory groups in these contexts are discussed. The authors examine dos, don'ts, and lessons learned from working effectively with advisory groups in diverse cultural contexts; for example, understanding and appreciating unfamiliar styles of discourse and patterns of interaction and how to adapt to these. Differences in age, gender, position, social status, education, literacy, national origin, dialect, degree of assimilation, political affiliation, clan membership, knowledge of English, and comfort with European‐American manners and customs are all at play. ©Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/ev.20033</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1097-6736 |
ispartof | New directions for evaluation, 2012-12, Vol.2012 (136), p.49-65 |
issn | 1097-6736 1534-875X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1322723639 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Education Source; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Age Differences Assimilation Criteria Cultural Groups Discourse Interaction Knowledge Membership Norms Political Affiliation Program Evaluation Sex Differences Sociocultural Factors |
title | Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A22%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advisory%20groups%20for%20evaluations%20in%20diverse%20cultural%20groups,%20communities,%20and%20contexts&rft.jtitle=New%20directions%20for%20evaluation&rft.au=Cohen,%20Barry%20B.&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=2012&rft.issue=136&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=49-65&rft.issn=1097-6736&rft.eissn=1534-875X&rft.coden=NDFEF4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ev.20033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1322723639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1322719517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |