Correlation between skin prick test and MAST-immunoblot results in patients with chronic rhinitis

The most reliable method for confirming the causative allergens of allergic rhinitis is the skin prick test, followed by the multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST), which reportedly has acceptable sensitivity and specificity. This study was designed to confirm whether a novel MAST-immunoblot ass...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology 2013-03, Vol.31 (1), p.20-25
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Young Ha, Yu, Byung Jae, Kim, Woo Jin, Kim, Ju Eun, Lee, Guen-Ho, Lee, Kyeong-Ah, Cho, Jin Hee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology
container_volume 31
creator Kim, Young Ha
Yu, Byung Jae
Kim, Woo Jin
Kim, Ju Eun
Lee, Guen-Ho
Lee, Kyeong-Ah
Cho, Jin Hee
description The most reliable method for confirming the causative allergens of allergic rhinitis is the skin prick test, followed by the multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST), which reportedly has acceptable sensitivity and specificity. This study was designed to confirm whether a novel MAST-immunoblot assay can reliably diagnose allergic rhinitis. A retrospective chart review was conducted of chronic rhinitis patients who visited Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital between January 2010 and June 2011. In total, 193 subjects (111 male, 82 female) were included, with a mean age of 30.08 years (range 6-77). The skin prick test detected 132 subjects as having one or more positive responses to allergens, and MAST detected 105 subjects as having one or more positive response. The sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of the MAST assay were 63.16%, 65.57%, and 63.92%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and efficacy for common allergens were not high enough for MAST to replace skin prick test in detecting causative allergens. When correlation was defined as a difference between the classes of MAST and SPT of less than 2, the correlation rates for Dermatophagoides farina and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus were 65.80% and 59.07%, respectively. The correlation between MAST and the skin prick test is not sufficiently strong to use MAST as a diagnostic test to confirm the causative allergen in allergic rhinitis. Further studies to confirm the reliability of MAST should be conducted.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1319182092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1319182092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p169t-856990495de4823ea54475a1fccc183eb30cc3bb5dea55879eef0374bd5d176c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtrwzAQhHVoaUKav1AEvfRi0MOyrGMIfUFKD02hNyPLG6LEllJJJvTfVyHppXvZhf1mGOYKTQlloqil_JqgeYw7kqeitBblDZowLqjkikyRXvoQoNfJeodbSEcAh-PeOnwI1uxxgpiwdh1-W3ysCzsMo_Nt7xMOEMc-RXwisxpcvo82bbHZBu-swWFrnU023qLrje4jzC97hj6fHtfLl2L1_vy6XKyKA61UKmpRKUVKJTooa8ZBi7KUQtONMYbWHFpOjOFtm_9aiFoqgA3hsmw70VFZGT5DD2ffQ_DfY47dDDYa6HvtwI-xoZwqWjOiWEbv_6E7PwaX050oWTImiMjU3YUa2wG6Jhcy6PDT_JXHfwEYNWtS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1317422505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation between skin prick test and MAST-immunoblot results in patients with chronic rhinitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kim, Young Ha ; Yu, Byung Jae ; Kim, Woo Jin ; Kim, Ju Eun ; Lee, Guen-Ho ; Lee, Kyeong-Ah ; Cho, Jin Hee</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Ha ; Yu, Byung Jae ; Kim, Woo Jin ; Kim, Ju Eun ; Lee, Guen-Ho ; Lee, Kyeong-Ah ; Cho, Jin Hee</creatorcontrib><description>The most reliable method for confirming the causative allergens of allergic rhinitis is the skin prick test, followed by the multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST), which reportedly has acceptable sensitivity and specificity. This study was designed to confirm whether a novel MAST-immunoblot assay can reliably diagnose allergic rhinitis. A retrospective chart review was conducted of chronic rhinitis patients who visited Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital between January 2010 and June 2011. In total, 193 subjects (111 male, 82 female) were included, with a mean age of 30.08 years (range 6-77). The skin prick test detected 132 subjects as having one or more positive responses to allergens, and MAST detected 105 subjects as having one or more positive response. The sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of the MAST assay were 63.16%, 65.57%, and 63.92%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and efficacy for common allergens were not high enough for MAST to replace skin prick test in detecting causative allergens. When correlation was defined as a difference between the classes of MAST and SPT of less than 2, the correlation rates for Dermatophagoides farina and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus were 65.80% and 59.07%, respectively. The correlation between MAST and the skin prick test is not sufficiently strong to use MAST as a diagnostic test to confirm the causative allergen in allergic rhinitis. Further studies to confirm the reliability of MAST should be conducted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0125-877X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23517390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thailand: The Allergy and Immunology Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Allergens - immunology ; Animals ; Blotting, Western - methods ; Child ; Chronic Disease ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin E - immunology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Rhinitis - diagnosis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Skin Tests - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology, 2013-03, Vol.31 (1), p.20-25</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Allergy and Immunology Society of Thailand Mar 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23517390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Byung Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Woo Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ju Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Guen-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyeong-Ah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jin Hee</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation between skin prick test and MAST-immunoblot results in patients with chronic rhinitis</title><title>Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology</title><addtitle>Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol</addtitle><description>The most reliable method for confirming the causative allergens of allergic rhinitis is the skin prick test, followed by the multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST), which reportedly has acceptable sensitivity and specificity. This study was designed to confirm whether a novel MAST-immunoblot assay can reliably diagnose allergic rhinitis. A retrospective chart review was conducted of chronic rhinitis patients who visited Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital between January 2010 and June 2011. In total, 193 subjects (111 male, 82 female) were included, with a mean age of 30.08 years (range 6-77). The skin prick test detected 132 subjects as having one or more positive responses to allergens, and MAST detected 105 subjects as having one or more positive response. The sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of the MAST assay were 63.16%, 65.57%, and 63.92%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and efficacy for common allergens were not high enough for MAST to replace skin prick test in detecting causative allergens. When correlation was defined as a difference between the classes of MAST and SPT of less than 2, the correlation rates for Dermatophagoides farina and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus were 65.80% and 59.07%, respectively. The correlation between MAST and the skin prick test is not sufficiently strong to use MAST as a diagnostic test to confirm the causative allergen in allergic rhinitis. Further studies to confirm the reliability of MAST should be conducted.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Allergens - immunology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blotting, Western - methods</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin E - immunology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rhinitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Skin Tests - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0125-877X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtrwzAQhHVoaUKav1AEvfRi0MOyrGMIfUFKD02hNyPLG6LEllJJJvTfVyHppXvZhf1mGOYKTQlloqil_JqgeYw7kqeitBblDZowLqjkikyRXvoQoNfJeodbSEcAh-PeOnwI1uxxgpiwdh1-W3ysCzsMo_Nt7xMOEMc-RXwisxpcvo82bbHZBu-swWFrnU023qLrje4jzC97hj6fHtfLl2L1_vy6XKyKA61UKmpRKUVKJTooa8ZBi7KUQtONMYbWHFpOjOFtm_9aiFoqgA3hsmw70VFZGT5DD2ffQ_DfY47dDDYa6HvtwI-xoZwqWjOiWEbv_6E7PwaX050oWTImiMjU3YUa2wG6Jhcy6PDT_JXHfwEYNWtS</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Kim, Young Ha</creator><creator>Yu, Byung Jae</creator><creator>Kim, Woo Jin</creator><creator>Kim, Ju Eun</creator><creator>Lee, Guen-Ho</creator><creator>Lee, Kyeong-Ah</creator><creator>Cho, Jin Hee</creator><general>The Allergy and Immunology Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Correlation between skin prick test and MAST-immunoblot results in patients with chronic rhinitis</title><author>Kim, Young Ha ; Yu, Byung Jae ; Kim, Woo Jin ; Kim, Ju Eun ; Lee, Guen-Ho ; Lee, Kyeong-Ah ; Cho, Jin Hee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p169t-856990495de4823ea54475a1fccc183eb30cc3bb5dea55879eef0374bd5d176c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Allergens - immunology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blotting, Western - methods</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin E - immunology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rhinitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Skin Tests - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Byung Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Woo Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ju Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Guen-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyeong-Ah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jin Hee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>East &amp; South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Young Ha</au><au>Yu, Byung Jae</au><au>Kim, Woo Jin</au><au>Kim, Ju Eun</au><au>Lee, Guen-Ho</au><au>Lee, Kyeong-Ah</au><au>Cho, Jin Hee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation between skin prick test and MAST-immunoblot results in patients with chronic rhinitis</atitle><jtitle>Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>20-25</pages><issn>0125-877X</issn><abstract>The most reliable method for confirming the causative allergens of allergic rhinitis is the skin prick test, followed by the multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST), which reportedly has acceptable sensitivity and specificity. This study was designed to confirm whether a novel MAST-immunoblot assay can reliably diagnose allergic rhinitis. A retrospective chart review was conducted of chronic rhinitis patients who visited Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital between January 2010 and June 2011. In total, 193 subjects (111 male, 82 female) were included, with a mean age of 30.08 years (range 6-77). The skin prick test detected 132 subjects as having one or more positive responses to allergens, and MAST detected 105 subjects as having one or more positive response. The sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of the MAST assay were 63.16%, 65.57%, and 63.92%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and efficacy for common allergens were not high enough for MAST to replace skin prick test in detecting causative allergens. When correlation was defined as a difference between the classes of MAST and SPT of less than 2, the correlation rates for Dermatophagoides farina and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus were 65.80% and 59.07%, respectively. The correlation between MAST and the skin prick test is not sufficiently strong to use MAST as a diagnostic test to confirm the causative allergen in allergic rhinitis. Further studies to confirm the reliability of MAST should be conducted.</abstract><cop>Thailand</cop><pub>The Allergy and Immunology Society</pub><pmid>23517390</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0125-877X
ispartof Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology, 2013-03, Vol.31 (1), p.20-25
issn 0125-877X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1319182092
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Allergens - immunology
Animals
Blotting, Western - methods
Child
Chronic Disease
Female
Humans
Immunoglobulin E - immunology
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Rhinitis - diagnosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Skin Tests - methods
Young Adult
title Correlation between skin prick test and MAST-immunoblot results in patients with chronic rhinitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T02%3A50%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20between%20skin%20prick%20test%20and%20MAST-immunoblot%20results%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20rhinitis&rft.jtitle=Asian%20Pacific%20journal%20of%20allergy%20and%20immunology&rft.au=Kim,%20Young%20Ha&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=20-25&rft.issn=0125-877X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1319182092%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1317422505&rft_id=info:pmid/23517390&rfr_iscdi=true