Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytic variant: a proposal of a new variant giving a critical diagnostic pitfall in diagnosing renal oncocytic tumors
In chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC), two forms of typical and eosinophilic variants have been reported to date. We have previously reported a new variant of chromophobe RCC, namely an oncocytic variant. However, little is known on the histological features of this variant. In this article, we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical molecular morphology 2013-03, Vol.46 (1), p.49-55 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 55 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 49 |
container_title | Medical molecular morphology |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Kuroda, Naoto Tanaka, Azusa Yamaguchi, Tadanori Kasahara, Kotaro Naruse, Keishi Yamada, Yosuke Hatanaka, Kanako Shinohara, Nobuo Nagashima, Yoji Mikami, Shuji Oya, Mototsugu Hamashima, Takeru Michal, Michal Hes, Ondrej |
description | In chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC), two forms of typical and eosinophilic variants have been reported to date. We have previously reported a new variant of chromophobe RCC, namely an oncocytic variant. However, little is known on the histological features of this variant. In this article, we report such five cases. Macroscopically, the tumor was well demarcated, but unencapsulated. The cut surface of the tumor showed brown in color, but neither hemorrhage nor necrosis was seen. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of predominant tubular configuration with or without various proportion of solid-sheet pattern. In one tumor, tumor cells microscopically invaded branches of renal vein. In addition, the constituting cells were characterized by the oncocytic cytoplasm, trivial to minimal variation in tumor size, indistinct to slightly distinct cell border, centrally located round nuclei and the absence of perinuclear halo. These characteristics entirely resembled renal oncocytoma. However, neoplastic cells immunohistochemically showed the diffuse and strong labeling for cytokeratin 7 and mitochondrial antigen in all cases. In addition, in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study the loss of more than four chromosomes among chromosomes 7, 10, 13, 17 and 21 was confirmed in all tumors and the diagnosis of chromophobe RCC was rendered. In conclusion, we propose a new variant, namely an oncocytic variant, of chromophobe RCC morphologically resembling renal oncocytoma and biologically showing characteristics of chromophobe RCC, and this recognition is practically crucial in the differential diagnosis from renal oncocytoma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00795-012-0007-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1318097272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1318097272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-54c04ac3af4e67abf7b7020e53f29c3d05838c5f35fe9181da375287dd3bcc5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctOxSAQhonReH8AN6aJGxdWuZQDdWdOvCUmbnRNKKVHjIUKrcZX8WmdWo8aEzcDzHzzD_AjtEfwMcFYnCQIJc8xoTmGbS5W0CaRM5yToixXv_cSb6CtlB4xZmJG-TraoIwxKYTcRO_zhxja0D2EymbRev2UGfsEQUfjfGj1URa8CeatdyZ70dFp359mOuti6EICOjRw8vZ1WcwW7sX5BSRNdNAESO30woc0KnSubzTIO7_Mjuw092dOP7Qhph20Bmyyu1_rNrq_OL-bX-U3t5fX87Ob3BQl6XNeGFxow3RT2JnQVSMqgSm2nDW0NKzGXDJpeMN4Y0siSa2Z4FSKumaVMdywbXQ46cKbngebetW6NH6C9jYMSRFGJC4FFRTQgz_oYxgiXP6TEoLJmSRAkYkyMaQUbaO66Fod3xTBajROTcYpME6NxikBPftfykPV2vq7Y-kUAHQCEpT8wsZfo_9V_QD7jKXq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1317738681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytic variant: a proposal of a new variant giving a critical diagnostic pitfall in diagnosing renal oncocytic tumors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Kuroda, Naoto ; Tanaka, Azusa ; Yamaguchi, Tadanori ; Kasahara, Kotaro ; Naruse, Keishi ; Yamada, Yosuke ; Hatanaka, Kanako ; Shinohara, Nobuo ; Nagashima, Yoji ; Mikami, Shuji ; Oya, Mototsugu ; Hamashima, Takeru ; Michal, Michal ; Hes, Ondrej</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuroda, Naoto ; Tanaka, Azusa ; Yamaguchi, Tadanori ; Kasahara, Kotaro ; Naruse, Keishi ; Yamada, Yosuke ; Hatanaka, Kanako ; Shinohara, Nobuo ; Nagashima, Yoji ; Mikami, Shuji ; Oya, Mototsugu ; Hamashima, Takeru ; Michal, Michal ; Hes, Ondrej</creatorcontrib><description>In chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC), two forms of typical and eosinophilic variants have been reported to date. We have previously reported a new variant of chromophobe RCC, namely an oncocytic variant. However, little is known on the histological features of this variant. In this article, we report such five cases. Macroscopically, the tumor was well demarcated, but unencapsulated. The cut surface of the tumor showed brown in color, but neither hemorrhage nor necrosis was seen. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of predominant tubular configuration with or without various proportion of solid-sheet pattern. In one tumor, tumor cells microscopically invaded branches of renal vein. In addition, the constituting cells were characterized by the oncocytic cytoplasm, trivial to minimal variation in tumor size, indistinct to slightly distinct cell border, centrally located round nuclei and the absence of perinuclear halo. These characteristics entirely resembled renal oncocytoma. However, neoplastic cells immunohistochemically showed the diffuse and strong labeling for cytokeratin 7 and mitochondrial antigen in all cases. In addition, in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study the loss of more than four chromosomes among chromosomes 7, 10, 13, 17 and 21 was confirmed in all tumors and the diagnosis of chromophobe RCC was rendered. In conclusion, we propose a new variant, namely an oncocytic variant, of chromophobe RCC morphologically resembling renal oncocytoma and biologically showing characteristics of chromophobe RCC, and this recognition is practically crucial in the differential diagnosis from renal oncocytoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1860-1480</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1860-1499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00795-012-0007-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23338778</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MELMEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Adenoma, Oxyphilic - diagnosis ; Adenoma, Oxyphilic - pathology ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anatomy ; Autoantigens ; Cancer ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - classification ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology ; Chromosomes ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Histology ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Keratin-7 ; Kidney Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mitochondria ; Molecular Medicine ; Original Paper ; Pathology ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Medical molecular morphology, 2013-03, Vol.46 (1), p.49-55</ispartof><rights>The Japanese Society for Clinical Molecular Morphology 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-54c04ac3af4e67abf7b7020e53f29c3d05838c5f35fe9181da375287dd3bcc5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-54c04ac3af4e67abf7b7020e53f29c3d05838c5f35fe9181da375287dd3bcc5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00795-012-0007-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00795-012-0007-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23338778$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuroda, Naoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Azusa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Tadanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Kotaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naruse, Keishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatanaka, Kanako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinohara, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagashima, Yoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Shuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oya, Mototsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamashima, Takeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michal, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hes, Ondrej</creatorcontrib><title>Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytic variant: a proposal of a new variant giving a critical diagnostic pitfall in diagnosing renal oncocytic tumors</title><title>Medical molecular morphology</title><addtitle>Med Mol Morphol</addtitle><addtitle>Med Mol Morphol</addtitle><description>In chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC), two forms of typical and eosinophilic variants have been reported to date. We have previously reported a new variant of chromophobe RCC, namely an oncocytic variant. However, little is known on the histological features of this variant. In this article, we report such five cases. Macroscopically, the tumor was well demarcated, but unencapsulated. The cut surface of the tumor showed brown in color, but neither hemorrhage nor necrosis was seen. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of predominant tubular configuration with or without various proportion of solid-sheet pattern. In one tumor, tumor cells microscopically invaded branches of renal vein. In addition, the constituting cells were characterized by the oncocytic cytoplasm, trivial to minimal variation in tumor size, indistinct to slightly distinct cell border, centrally located round nuclei and the absence of perinuclear halo. These characteristics entirely resembled renal oncocytoma. However, neoplastic cells immunohistochemically showed the diffuse and strong labeling for cytokeratin 7 and mitochondrial antigen in all cases. In addition, in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study the loss of more than four chromosomes among chromosomes 7, 10, 13, 17 and 21 was confirmed in all tumors and the diagnosis of chromophobe RCC was rendered. In conclusion, we propose a new variant, namely an oncocytic variant, of chromophobe RCC morphologically resembling renal oncocytoma and biologically showing characteristics of chromophobe RCC, and this recognition is practically crucial in the differential diagnosis from renal oncocytoma.</description><subject>Adenoma, Oxyphilic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenoma, Oxyphilic - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Autoantigens</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - classification</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Keratin-7</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mitochondria</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1860-1480</issn><issn>1860-1499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctOxSAQhonReH8AN6aJGxdWuZQDdWdOvCUmbnRNKKVHjIUKrcZX8WmdWo8aEzcDzHzzD_AjtEfwMcFYnCQIJc8xoTmGbS5W0CaRM5yToixXv_cSb6CtlB4xZmJG-TraoIwxKYTcRO_zhxja0D2EymbRev2UGfsEQUfjfGj1URa8CeatdyZ70dFp359mOuti6EICOjRw8vZ1WcwW7sX5BSRNdNAESO30woc0KnSubzTIO7_Mjuw092dOP7Qhph20Bmyyu1_rNrq_OL-bX-U3t5fX87Ob3BQl6XNeGFxow3RT2JnQVSMqgSm2nDW0NKzGXDJpeMN4Y0siSa2Z4FSKumaVMdywbXQ46cKbngebetW6NH6C9jYMSRFGJC4FFRTQgz_oYxgiXP6TEoLJmSRAkYkyMaQUbaO66Fod3xTBajROTcYpME6NxikBPftfykPV2vq7Y-kUAHQCEpT8wsZfo_9V_QD7jKXq</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Kuroda, Naoto</creator><creator>Tanaka, Azusa</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Tadanori</creator><creator>Kasahara, Kotaro</creator><creator>Naruse, Keishi</creator><creator>Yamada, Yosuke</creator><creator>Hatanaka, Kanako</creator><creator>Shinohara, Nobuo</creator><creator>Nagashima, Yoji</creator><creator>Mikami, Shuji</creator><creator>Oya, Mototsugu</creator><creator>Hamashima, Takeru</creator><creator>Michal, Michal</creator><creator>Hes, Ondrej</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytic variant: a proposal of a new variant giving a critical diagnostic pitfall in diagnosing renal oncocytic tumors</title><author>Kuroda, Naoto ; Tanaka, Azusa ; Yamaguchi, Tadanori ; Kasahara, Kotaro ; Naruse, Keishi ; Yamada, Yosuke ; Hatanaka, Kanako ; Shinohara, Nobuo ; Nagashima, Yoji ; Mikami, Shuji ; Oya, Mototsugu ; Hamashima, Takeru ; Michal, Michal ; Hes, Ondrej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-54c04ac3af4e67abf7b7020e53f29c3d05838c5f35fe9181da375287dd3bcc5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adenoma, Oxyphilic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenoma, Oxyphilic - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Autoantigens</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - classification</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Keratin-7</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mitochondria</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuroda, Naoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Azusa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Tadanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Kotaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naruse, Keishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatanaka, Kanako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinohara, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagashima, Yoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Shuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oya, Mototsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamashima, Takeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michal, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hes, Ondrej</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical molecular morphology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuroda, Naoto</au><au>Tanaka, Azusa</au><au>Yamaguchi, Tadanori</au><au>Kasahara, Kotaro</au><au>Naruse, Keishi</au><au>Yamada, Yosuke</au><au>Hatanaka, Kanako</au><au>Shinohara, Nobuo</au><au>Nagashima, Yoji</au><au>Mikami, Shuji</au><au>Oya, Mototsugu</au><au>Hamashima, Takeru</au><au>Michal, Michal</au><au>Hes, Ondrej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytic variant: a proposal of a new variant giving a critical diagnostic pitfall in diagnosing renal oncocytic tumors</atitle><jtitle>Medical molecular morphology</jtitle><stitle>Med Mol Morphol</stitle><addtitle>Med Mol Morphol</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>49-55</pages><issn>1860-1480</issn><eissn>1860-1499</eissn><coden>MELMEJ</coden><abstract>In chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC), two forms of typical and eosinophilic variants have been reported to date. We have previously reported a new variant of chromophobe RCC, namely an oncocytic variant. However, little is known on the histological features of this variant. In this article, we report such five cases. Macroscopically, the tumor was well demarcated, but unencapsulated. The cut surface of the tumor showed brown in color, but neither hemorrhage nor necrosis was seen. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of predominant tubular configuration with or without various proportion of solid-sheet pattern. In one tumor, tumor cells microscopically invaded branches of renal vein. In addition, the constituting cells were characterized by the oncocytic cytoplasm, trivial to minimal variation in tumor size, indistinct to slightly distinct cell border, centrally located round nuclei and the absence of perinuclear halo. These characteristics entirely resembled renal oncocytoma. However, neoplastic cells immunohistochemically showed the diffuse and strong labeling for cytokeratin 7 and mitochondrial antigen in all cases. In addition, in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study the loss of more than four chromosomes among chromosomes 7, 10, 13, 17 and 21 was confirmed in all tumors and the diagnosis of chromophobe RCC was rendered. In conclusion, we propose a new variant, namely an oncocytic variant, of chromophobe RCC morphologically resembling renal oncocytoma and biologically showing characteristics of chromophobe RCC, and this recognition is practically crucial in the differential diagnosis from renal oncocytoma.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>23338778</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00795-012-0007-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1860-1480 |
ispartof | Medical molecular morphology, 2013-03, Vol.46 (1), p.49-55 |
issn | 1860-1480 1860-1499 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1318097272 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Complete Journals |
subjects | Adenoma, Oxyphilic - diagnosis Adenoma, Oxyphilic - pathology Aged Aged, 80 and over Anatomy Autoantigens Cancer Carcinoma, Renal Cell - classification Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnosis Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology Chromosomes Diagnosis, Differential Female Histology Humans Immunohistochemistry In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence Keratin-7 Kidney Neoplasms - diagnosis Kidney Neoplasms - pathology Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mitochondria Molecular Medicine Original Paper Pathology Tumors |
title | Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytic variant: a proposal of a new variant giving a critical diagnostic pitfall in diagnosing renal oncocytic tumors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A10%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chromophobe%20renal%20cell%20carcinoma,%20oncocytic%20variant:%20a%20proposal%20of%20a%20new%20variant%20giving%20a%20critical%20diagnostic%20pitfall%20in%20diagnosing%20renal%20oncocytic%20tumors&rft.jtitle=Medical%20molecular%20morphology&rft.au=Kuroda,%20Naoto&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=49-55&rft.issn=1860-1480&rft.eissn=1860-1499&rft.coden=MELMEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00795-012-0007-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1318097272%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1317738681&rft_id=info:pmid/23338778&rfr_iscdi=true |