Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study

Background:  Existing data on the functional impact of amblyopia are conflicting. The functional impact of amblyopia is a critical component of the viability and effectiveness of childhood vision screening programmes and treatment regimes. Design:  Prospective longitudinal birth cohort (the Dunedin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2013-03, Vol.41 (2), p.127-134
Hauptverfasser: Wilson, Graham A, Welch, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue 2
container_start_page 127
container_title Clinical & experimental ophthalmology
container_volume 41
creator Wilson, Graham A
Welch, David
description Background:  Existing data on the functional impact of amblyopia are conflicting. The functional impact of amblyopia is a critical component of the viability and effectiveness of childhood vision screening programmes and treatment regimes. Design:  Prospective longitudinal birth cohort (the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study). Participants:  One thousand thirty‐seven children born in Dunedin, New Zealand, between April 1972 and March 1973, assessed from ages 3 to 32 years. Methods:  Comparison of study members with no amblyopia, recovered amblyopia, possible amblyopia or amblyopia according to both classic (6/12 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye, or a two‐line or greater differential between the visual acuity in both eyes) and modern (6/9 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye) definitions of amblyopia. Main Outcome Measures:  Childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem and adult socioeconomic status (assessed by occupation, education, reading ability and income). Results:  There was no evidence of poorer motor development, lower self‐esteem or reduced adult socioeconomic status in study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia when compared with those with no amblyopia. Conclusions:  Amblyopia or having recovered amblyopia does not functionally impact on childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem or adult socioeconomic status within this cohort. The wide range of visual deficits and adaptations that are known to occur in amblyopic vision do not translate into important ‘real life’ outcomes for the study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia. The age‐related cumulative lifetime risk of bilateral visual impairment in amblyopia will be assessed in future studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02842.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1318093988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1318093988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4852-227a9955469022d39ed0e06c62beec3f4ce3b45fc83a470d896233c0635a3a023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhiNERUvhFZAlNmyS-p5kgRCd6U2a0gVFLC2Pc8J4cJw0TsrM29fpTGfRFd74yP7-c_uTBBGckXjO1hnhnKYlzklGMaEZpgWn2eZNcnL4eLuPJcf8OHkfwhpjLCiT75JjSnNCc5mfJA_zFgLSzdJt285qtNKPgDSqR28G23rtkG06bYZv6NL6yvo_AdV926BhBWg-eohP6HZ0g61sMLZz1ut-i65Bu2GFtK_QHB7BtV0DfkA_h7HafkiOau0CfNzfp8mvy4v72XW6uLu6mX1fpIYXgqaxRV2WQnBZYkorVkKFAUsj6RLAsJobYEsualMwzXNcFaWkjBksmdBMY8pOky-7vF3fPowQBtXEFsE57aEdgyKMFLhkZVFE9PMrdN2OfRz-mcqFEESWkSp2lOnbEHqoVdfbJo6rCFaTLWqtpo2raftqskU926I2UfppX2BcNlAdhC8-RODrDvhnHWz_O7GaXdxNUdSnO70NA2wOet3_VTF7LtTvH1fqfMEWt_eYqXP2BOaiqds</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1317555169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Wilson, Graham A ; Welch, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Graham A ; Welch, David</creatorcontrib><description>Background:  Existing data on the functional impact of amblyopia are conflicting. The functional impact of amblyopia is a critical component of the viability and effectiveness of childhood vision screening programmes and treatment regimes. Design:  Prospective longitudinal birth cohort (the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study). Participants:  One thousand thirty‐seven children born in Dunedin, New Zealand, between April 1972 and March 1973, assessed from ages 3 to 32 years. Methods:  Comparison of study members with no amblyopia, recovered amblyopia, possible amblyopia or amblyopia according to both classic (6/12 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye, or a two‐line or greater differential between the visual acuity in both eyes) and modern (6/9 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye) definitions of amblyopia. Main Outcome Measures:  Childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem and adult socioeconomic status (assessed by occupation, education, reading ability and income). Results:  There was no evidence of poorer motor development, lower self‐esteem or reduced adult socioeconomic status in study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia when compared with those with no amblyopia. Conclusions:  Amblyopia or having recovered amblyopia does not functionally impact on childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem or adult socioeconomic status within this cohort. The wide range of visual deficits and adaptations that are known to occur in amblyopic vision do not translate into important ‘real life’ outcomes for the study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia. The age‐related cumulative lifetime risk of bilateral visual impairment in amblyopia will be assessed in future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-6404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02842.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22712767</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescent Development ; Adult ; amblyopia ; Amblyopia - epidemiology ; Amblyopia - physiopathology ; Amblyopia - psychology ; Child ; Child Development ; Child, Preschool ; Children &amp; youth ; Contingent Negative Variation ; Educational Status ; epidemiology ; Eyes &amp; eyesight ; Female ; functional impact ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Self Concept ; Self esteem ; Social Class ; Socioeconomic factors ; Vision Screening ; Visual Acuity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology, 2013-03, Vol.41 (2), p.127-134</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2012 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2012 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.</rights><rights>Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2013 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4852-227a9955469022d39ed0e06c62beec3f4ce3b45fc83a470d896233c0635a3a023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4852-227a9955469022d39ed0e06c62beec3f4ce3b45fc83a470d896233c0635a3a023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2012.02842.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2012.02842.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22712767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Graham A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, David</creatorcontrib><title>Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study</title><title>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background:  Existing data on the functional impact of amblyopia are conflicting. The functional impact of amblyopia is a critical component of the viability and effectiveness of childhood vision screening programmes and treatment regimes. Design:  Prospective longitudinal birth cohort (the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study). Participants:  One thousand thirty‐seven children born in Dunedin, New Zealand, between April 1972 and March 1973, assessed from ages 3 to 32 years. Methods:  Comparison of study members with no amblyopia, recovered amblyopia, possible amblyopia or amblyopia according to both classic (6/12 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye, or a two‐line or greater differential between the visual acuity in both eyes) and modern (6/9 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye) definitions of amblyopia. Main Outcome Measures:  Childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem and adult socioeconomic status (assessed by occupation, education, reading ability and income). Results:  There was no evidence of poorer motor development, lower self‐esteem or reduced adult socioeconomic status in study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia when compared with those with no amblyopia. Conclusions:  Amblyopia or having recovered amblyopia does not functionally impact on childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem or adult socioeconomic status within this cohort. The wide range of visual deficits and adaptations that are known to occur in amblyopic vision do not translate into important ‘real life’ outcomes for the study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia. The age‐related cumulative lifetime risk of bilateral visual impairment in amblyopia will be assessed in future studies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescent Development</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>amblyopia</subject><subject>Amblyopia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Amblyopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Amblyopia - psychology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Contingent Negative Variation</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Eyes &amp; eyesight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>functional impact</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Self esteem</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Vision Screening</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1442-6404</issn><issn>1442-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhiNERUvhFZAlNmyS-p5kgRCd6U2a0gVFLC2Pc8J4cJw0TsrM29fpTGfRFd74yP7-c_uTBBGckXjO1hnhnKYlzklGMaEZpgWn2eZNcnL4eLuPJcf8OHkfwhpjLCiT75JjSnNCc5mfJA_zFgLSzdJt285qtNKPgDSqR28G23rtkG06bYZv6NL6yvo_AdV926BhBWg-eohP6HZ0g61sMLZz1ut-i65Bu2GFtK_QHB7BtV0DfkA_h7HafkiOau0CfNzfp8mvy4v72XW6uLu6mX1fpIYXgqaxRV2WQnBZYkorVkKFAUsj6RLAsJobYEsualMwzXNcFaWkjBksmdBMY8pOky-7vF3fPowQBtXEFsE57aEdgyKMFLhkZVFE9PMrdN2OfRz-mcqFEESWkSp2lOnbEHqoVdfbJo6rCFaTLWqtpo2raftqskU926I2UfppX2BcNlAdhC8-RODrDvhnHWz_O7GaXdxNUdSnO70NA2wOet3_VTF7LtTvH1fqfMEWt_eYqXP2BOaiqds</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Wilson, Graham A</creator><creator>Welch, David</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study</title><author>Wilson, Graham A ; Welch, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4852-227a9955469022d39ed0e06c62beec3f4ce3b45fc83a470d896233c0635a3a023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescent Development</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>amblyopia</topic><topic>Amblyopia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Amblyopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Amblyopia - psychology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Contingent Negative Variation</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Eyes &amp; eyesight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>functional impact</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Self esteem</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Vision Screening</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Graham A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Graham A</au><au>Welch, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>127-134</pages><issn>1442-6404</issn><eissn>1442-9071</eissn><abstract>Background:  Existing data on the functional impact of amblyopia are conflicting. The functional impact of amblyopia is a critical component of the viability and effectiveness of childhood vision screening programmes and treatment regimes. Design:  Prospective longitudinal birth cohort (the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study). Participants:  One thousand thirty‐seven children born in Dunedin, New Zealand, between April 1972 and March 1973, assessed from ages 3 to 32 years. Methods:  Comparison of study members with no amblyopia, recovered amblyopia, possible amblyopia or amblyopia according to both classic (6/12 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye, or a two‐line or greater differential between the visual acuity in both eyes) and modern (6/9 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye) definitions of amblyopia. Main Outcome Measures:  Childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem and adult socioeconomic status (assessed by occupation, education, reading ability and income). Results:  There was no evidence of poorer motor development, lower self‐esteem or reduced adult socioeconomic status in study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia when compared with those with no amblyopia. Conclusions:  Amblyopia or having recovered amblyopia does not functionally impact on childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem or adult socioeconomic status within this cohort. The wide range of visual deficits and adaptations that are known to occur in amblyopic vision do not translate into important ‘real life’ outcomes for the study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia. The age‐related cumulative lifetime risk of bilateral visual impairment in amblyopia will be assessed in future studies.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>22712767</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02842.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1442-6404
ispartof Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2013-03, Vol.41 (2), p.127-134
issn 1442-6404
1442-9071
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1318093988
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adolescent Development
Adult
amblyopia
Amblyopia - epidemiology
Amblyopia - physiopathology
Amblyopia - psychology
Child
Child Development
Child, Preschool
Children & youth
Contingent Negative Variation
Educational Status
epidemiology
Eyes & eyesight
Female
functional impact
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Self Concept
Self esteem
Social Class
Socioeconomic factors
Vision Screening
Visual Acuity
Young Adult
title Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A06%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20amblyopia%20have%20a%20functional%20impact?%20Findings%20from%20the%20Dunedin%20Multidisciplinary%20Health%20and%20Development%20Study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20&%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Wilson,%20Graham%20A&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=127-134&rft.issn=1442-6404&rft.eissn=1442-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02842.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1318093988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1317555169&rft_id=info:pmid/22712767&rfr_iscdi=true