Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study
Background: Existing data on the functional impact of amblyopia are conflicting. The functional impact of amblyopia is a critical component of the viability and effectiveness of childhood vision screening programmes and treatment regimes. Design: Prospective longitudinal birth cohort (the Dunedin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2013-03, Vol.41 (2), p.127-134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 134 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Wilson, Graham A Welch, David |
description | Background: Existing data on the functional impact of amblyopia are conflicting. The functional impact of amblyopia is a critical component of the viability and effectiveness of childhood vision screening programmes and treatment regimes.
Design: Prospective longitudinal birth cohort (the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study).
Participants: One thousand thirty‐seven children born in Dunedin, New Zealand, between April 1972 and March 1973, assessed from ages 3 to 32 years.
Methods: Comparison of study members with no amblyopia, recovered amblyopia, possible amblyopia or amblyopia according to both classic (6/12 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye, or a two‐line or greater differential between the visual acuity in both eyes) and modern (6/9 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye) definitions of amblyopia.
Main Outcome Measures: Childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem and adult socioeconomic status (assessed by occupation, education, reading ability and income).
Results: There was no evidence of poorer motor development, lower self‐esteem or reduced adult socioeconomic status in study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia when compared with those with no amblyopia.
Conclusions: Amblyopia or having recovered amblyopia does not functionally impact on childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem or adult socioeconomic status within this cohort. The wide range of visual deficits and adaptations that are known to occur in amblyopic vision do not translate into important ‘real life’ outcomes for the study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia. The age‐related cumulative lifetime risk of bilateral visual impairment in amblyopia will be assessed in future studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02842.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1318093988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1318093988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4852-227a9955469022d39ed0e06c62beec3f4ce3b45fc83a470d896233c0635a3a023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhiNERUvhFZAlNmyS-p5kgRCd6U2a0gVFLC2Pc8J4cJw0TsrM29fpTGfRFd74yP7-c_uTBBGckXjO1hnhnKYlzklGMaEZpgWn2eZNcnL4eLuPJcf8OHkfwhpjLCiT75JjSnNCc5mfJA_zFgLSzdJt285qtNKPgDSqR28G23rtkG06bYZv6NL6yvo_AdV926BhBWg-eohP6HZ0g61sMLZz1ut-i65Bu2GFtK_QHB7BtV0DfkA_h7HafkiOau0CfNzfp8mvy4v72XW6uLu6mX1fpIYXgqaxRV2WQnBZYkorVkKFAUsj6RLAsJobYEsualMwzXNcFaWkjBksmdBMY8pOky-7vF3fPowQBtXEFsE57aEdgyKMFLhkZVFE9PMrdN2OfRz-mcqFEESWkSp2lOnbEHqoVdfbJo6rCFaTLWqtpo2raftqskU926I2UfppX2BcNlAdhC8-RODrDvhnHWz_O7GaXdxNUdSnO70NA2wOet3_VTF7LtTvH1fqfMEWt_eYqXP2BOaiqds</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1317555169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Wilson, Graham A ; Welch, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Graham A ; Welch, David</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Existing data on the functional impact of amblyopia are conflicting. The functional impact of amblyopia is a critical component of the viability and effectiveness of childhood vision screening programmes and treatment regimes.
Design: Prospective longitudinal birth cohort (the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study).
Participants: One thousand thirty‐seven children born in Dunedin, New Zealand, between April 1972 and March 1973, assessed from ages 3 to 32 years.
Methods: Comparison of study members with no amblyopia, recovered amblyopia, possible amblyopia or amblyopia according to both classic (6/12 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye, or a two‐line or greater differential between the visual acuity in both eyes) and modern (6/9 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye) definitions of amblyopia.
Main Outcome Measures: Childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem and adult socioeconomic status (assessed by occupation, education, reading ability and income).
Results: There was no evidence of poorer motor development, lower self‐esteem or reduced adult socioeconomic status in study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia when compared with those with no amblyopia.
Conclusions: Amblyopia or having recovered amblyopia does not functionally impact on childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem or adult socioeconomic status within this cohort. The wide range of visual deficits and adaptations that are known to occur in amblyopic vision do not translate into important ‘real life’ outcomes for the study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia. The age‐related cumulative lifetime risk of bilateral visual impairment in amblyopia will be assessed in future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-6404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02842.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22712767</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescent Development ; Adult ; amblyopia ; Amblyopia - epidemiology ; Amblyopia - physiopathology ; Amblyopia - psychology ; Child ; Child Development ; Child, Preschool ; Children & youth ; Contingent Negative Variation ; Educational Status ; epidemiology ; Eyes & eyesight ; Female ; functional impact ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Self Concept ; Self esteem ; Social Class ; Socioeconomic factors ; Vision Screening ; Visual Acuity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2013-03, Vol.41 (2), p.127-134</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2012 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2012 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.</rights><rights>Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2013 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4852-227a9955469022d39ed0e06c62beec3f4ce3b45fc83a470d896233c0635a3a023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4852-227a9955469022d39ed0e06c62beec3f4ce3b45fc83a470d896233c0635a3a023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2012.02842.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1442-9071.2012.02842.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22712767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Graham A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, David</creatorcontrib><title>Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study</title><title>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background: Existing data on the functional impact of amblyopia are conflicting. The functional impact of amblyopia is a critical component of the viability and effectiveness of childhood vision screening programmes and treatment regimes.
Design: Prospective longitudinal birth cohort (the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study).
Participants: One thousand thirty‐seven children born in Dunedin, New Zealand, between April 1972 and March 1973, assessed from ages 3 to 32 years.
Methods: Comparison of study members with no amblyopia, recovered amblyopia, possible amblyopia or amblyopia according to both classic (6/12 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye, or a two‐line or greater differential between the visual acuity in both eyes) and modern (6/9 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye) definitions of amblyopia.
Main Outcome Measures: Childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem and adult socioeconomic status (assessed by occupation, education, reading ability and income).
Results: There was no evidence of poorer motor development, lower self‐esteem or reduced adult socioeconomic status in study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia when compared with those with no amblyopia.
Conclusions: Amblyopia or having recovered amblyopia does not functionally impact on childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem or adult socioeconomic status within this cohort. The wide range of visual deficits and adaptations that are known to occur in amblyopic vision do not translate into important ‘real life’ outcomes for the study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia. The age‐related cumulative lifetime risk of bilateral visual impairment in amblyopia will be assessed in future studies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescent Development</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>amblyopia</subject><subject>Amblyopia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Amblyopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Amblyopia - psychology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Contingent Negative Variation</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Eyes & eyesight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>functional impact</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Self esteem</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Vision Screening</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1442-6404</issn><issn>1442-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhiNERUvhFZAlNmyS-p5kgRCd6U2a0gVFLC2Pc8J4cJw0TsrM29fpTGfRFd74yP7-c_uTBBGckXjO1hnhnKYlzklGMaEZpgWn2eZNcnL4eLuPJcf8OHkfwhpjLCiT75JjSnNCc5mfJA_zFgLSzdJt285qtNKPgDSqR28G23rtkG06bYZv6NL6yvo_AdV926BhBWg-eohP6HZ0g61sMLZz1ut-i65Bu2GFtK_QHB7BtV0DfkA_h7HafkiOau0CfNzfp8mvy4v72XW6uLu6mX1fpIYXgqaxRV2WQnBZYkorVkKFAUsj6RLAsJobYEsualMwzXNcFaWkjBksmdBMY8pOky-7vF3fPowQBtXEFsE57aEdgyKMFLhkZVFE9PMrdN2OfRz-mcqFEESWkSp2lOnbEHqoVdfbJo6rCFaTLWqtpo2raftqskU926I2UfppX2BcNlAdhC8-RODrDvhnHWz_O7GaXdxNUdSnO70NA2wOet3_VTF7LtTvH1fqfMEWt_eYqXP2BOaiqds</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Wilson, Graham A</creator><creator>Welch, David</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study</title><author>Wilson, Graham A ; Welch, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4852-227a9955469022d39ed0e06c62beec3f4ce3b45fc83a470d896233c0635a3a023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescent Development</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>amblyopia</topic><topic>Amblyopia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Amblyopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Amblyopia - psychology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Contingent Negative Variation</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Eyes & eyesight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>functional impact</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Self esteem</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Vision Screening</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Graham A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Graham A</au><au>Welch, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical & experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>127-134</pages><issn>1442-6404</issn><eissn>1442-9071</eissn><abstract>Background: Existing data on the functional impact of amblyopia are conflicting. The functional impact of amblyopia is a critical component of the viability and effectiveness of childhood vision screening programmes and treatment regimes.
Design: Prospective longitudinal birth cohort (the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study).
Participants: One thousand thirty‐seven children born in Dunedin, New Zealand, between April 1972 and March 1973, assessed from ages 3 to 32 years.
Methods: Comparison of study members with no amblyopia, recovered amblyopia, possible amblyopia or amblyopia according to both classic (6/12 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye, or a two‐line or greater differential between the visual acuity in both eyes) and modern (6/9 visual acuity or worse in at least one eye) definitions of amblyopia.
Main Outcome Measures: Childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem and adult socioeconomic status (assessed by occupation, education, reading ability and income).
Results: There was no evidence of poorer motor development, lower self‐esteem or reduced adult socioeconomic status in study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia when compared with those with no amblyopia.
Conclusions: Amblyopia or having recovered amblyopia does not functionally impact on childhood motor development, teenage self‐esteem or adult socioeconomic status within this cohort. The wide range of visual deficits and adaptations that are known to occur in amblyopic vision do not translate into important ‘real life’ outcomes for the study members with amblyopia or recovered amblyopia. The age‐related cumulative lifetime risk of bilateral visual impairment in amblyopia will be assessed in future studies.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>22712767</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02842.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1442-6404 |
ispartof | Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2013-03, Vol.41 (2), p.127-134 |
issn | 1442-6404 1442-9071 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1318093988 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescent Development Adult amblyopia Amblyopia - epidemiology Amblyopia - physiopathology Amblyopia - psychology Child Child Development Child, Preschool Children & youth Contingent Negative Variation Educational Status epidemiology Eyes & eyesight Female functional impact Humans Longitudinal Studies Male Prospective Studies Quality of Life Self Concept Self esteem Social Class Socioeconomic factors Vision Screening Visual Acuity Young Adult |
title | Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A06%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20amblyopia%20have%20a%20functional%20impact?%20Findings%20from%20the%20Dunedin%20Multidisciplinary%20Health%20and%20Development%20Study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20&%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Wilson,%20Graham%20A&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=127-134&rft.issn=1442-6404&rft.eissn=1442-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02842.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1318093988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1317555169&rft_id=info:pmid/22712767&rfr_iscdi=true |