Pharmacokinetic Comparison of an Orally Disintegrating Film Formulation With a Film-Coated Tablet Formulation of Sildenafil in Healthy Korean Subjects: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study

Abstract Background An orally disintegrating film (ODF) formulation of sildenafil was recently developed in Korea. This formulation is expected to enhance dosing convenience and increase patient compliance while yielding pharmacokinetics comparable to those of the conventional film-coated tablet (FC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical therapeutics 2013-03, Vol.35 (3), p.205-214
Hauptverfasser: Roh, Hyerang, BS, Son, Hankil, MS, Lee, Donghwan, MD, Yeon, Kyu Jeong, PhD, Kim, Hyun Soo, MS, Kim, Hohyun, PhD, Park, Kyungsoo, PhD, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 214
container_issue 3
container_start_page 205
container_title Clinical therapeutics
container_volume 35
creator Roh, Hyerang, BS
Son, Hankil, MS
Lee, Donghwan, MD
Yeon, Kyu Jeong, PhD
Kim, Hyun Soo, MS
Kim, Hohyun, PhD
Park, Kyungsoo, PhD, MD
description Abstract Background An orally disintegrating film (ODF) formulation of sildenafil was recently developed in Korea. This formulation is expected to enhance dosing convenience and increase patient compliance while yielding pharmacokinetics comparable to those of the conventional film-coated tablet (FCT) formulation. Objective The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of a newly developed ODF formulation with those of a FCT formulation of sildenafil in healthy Korean male volunteers. Methods This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period crossover study conducted in 2 parts. Eligible subjects were between the ages of 20 and 50 years and within 20% of their ideal weight; subjects were equally divided into parts 1 and 2. Each subject received a single dose of the ODF and FCT formulations of sildenafil orally in a fasted state (part 1, 50 mg; part 2, 100 mg), with a 7-day washout period between the formulations. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours postdosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for sildenafil and its active metabolite ( N -desmethyl sildenafil). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations. Results Among the 120 enrolled subjects (60 subjects for each part), 110 completed the study (part 1, n = 53; part 2, n = 57). In both parts, all the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were included in the range for assumed bioequivalence in sildenafil, yielding 90% CI ratios of 91.07% to 120.67% for AUC0–last and 86.68% to 122.93% for Cmax in part 1, and 101.68% to 114.78% for AUC0–last and 93.76% to 109.76% for Cmax in part 2. In part 1, headache was the most frequently noted AE, occurring in 3 subjects with both the test and the reference formulations. All other AEs occurred in
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.02.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317850507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0149291813000623</els_id><sourcerecordid>1317850507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-2a4882dd6cb0bc3bb67f8b312a635700831a6b1e232f32bb6af569c957b37e0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt1uEzEQhVcIREvhFcASQuIiG_yzv1wgVSmhiEipSBHcWbZ3NnHqtYO9Wym8KK-Dtw2t6BVXluxvzsz4nCR5RfCUYFK8206V0bbfgBdTigmbYjrFuHiUHJOqrFNCsh-Pk2NMsjqlNamOkmchbDHGrM7p0-SIsqwuy7w-Tn5fbITvhHJX2kKvFZq5bie8Ds4i1yJh0dILY_boTIfYENZe9Nqu0VybDs2d7wYTLyL8XfcbJG7u05kTPTToUkgD_T9UlFxp04AVrTZIW3QOwvSbPfriPMRmq0FuQfXhPTpFX4VtXKd_QTNByx3YdCEkmEkUsGsD6ZkLMEE0vQCvXYNm3oXgrsGjVT80--fJk1aYAC8O50nybf7xcnaeLpafPs9OF6nKqqxPqciqijZNoSSWiklZlG0lGaGiYHmJccWIKCQBymjLaHwWbV7Uqs5LyUrAkp0kb291d979HCD0vNNBgTHCghsCJ4yUVY5zXEb09QN06wZv43QjVWc0rwiJVHlLqXEhDy3fed0Jv-cE89F7vuV33vPRe44pj97HypcH_UF20NzV_TU7Am8OgAhKmNYLq3S450oaA3IzwuktB_HjrjV4HpQGq6DRPprDG6f_Y5gPDzRGTse2V7CHcL85D7GAr8aojkklLKa0oIz9AYTL6C0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1319425811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pharmacokinetic Comparison of an Orally Disintegrating Film Formulation With a Film-Coated Tablet Formulation of Sildenafil in Healthy Korean Subjects: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Roh, Hyerang, BS ; Son, Hankil, MS ; Lee, Donghwan, MD ; Yeon, Kyu Jeong, PhD ; Kim, Hyun Soo, MS ; Kim, Hohyun, PhD ; Park, Kyungsoo, PhD, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Roh, Hyerang, BS ; Son, Hankil, MS ; Lee, Donghwan, MD ; Yeon, Kyu Jeong, PhD ; Kim, Hyun Soo, MS ; Kim, Hohyun, PhD ; Park, Kyungsoo, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background An orally disintegrating film (ODF) formulation of sildenafil was recently developed in Korea. This formulation is expected to enhance dosing convenience and increase patient compliance while yielding pharmacokinetics comparable to those of the conventional film-coated tablet (FCT) formulation. Objective The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of a newly developed ODF formulation with those of a FCT formulation of sildenafil in healthy Korean male volunteers. Methods This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period crossover study conducted in 2 parts. Eligible subjects were between the ages of 20 and 50 years and within 20% of their ideal weight; subjects were equally divided into parts 1 and 2. Each subject received a single dose of the ODF and FCT formulations of sildenafil orally in a fasted state (part 1, 50 mg; part 2, 100 mg), with a 7-day washout period between the formulations. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours postdosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for sildenafil and its active metabolite ( N -desmethyl sildenafil). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations. Results Among the 120 enrolled subjects (60 subjects for each part), 110 completed the study (part 1, n = 53; part 2, n = 57). In both parts, all the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were included in the range for assumed bioequivalence in sildenafil, yielding 90% CI ratios of 91.07% to 120.67% for AUC0–last and 86.68% to 122.93% for Cmax in part 1, and 101.68% to 114.78% for AUC0–last and 93.76% to 109.76% for Cmax in part 2. In part 1, headache was the most frequently noted AE, occurring in 3 subjects with both the test and the reference formulations. All other AEs occurred in &lt;3 subjects. In part 2, nasal congestion was the most frequently observed AE (7 with the test formulation and 1 with the reference formulation), followed by abnormal vision (4 with the test formulation and 4 with the reference formulation), headache (4 with the test formulation and 4 with the reference formulation), and rhinorrhea (5 with the test formulation). All other AEs occurred in &lt;3 subjects. Conclusions The study findings suggest that the pharmacokinetics of the ODF formulation of sildenafil do not differ significantly from those of the conventional FCT formulation (50 and 100 mg) in these healthy Korean male subjects. The 2 formulations were well tolerated in both parts of the study, with no serious AEs observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01769638.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.02.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23497759</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bridgewater, NJ: EM Inc USA</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross-Over Studies ; Disease ; Drug dosages ; Drug therapy ; film-coated tablet ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical Education ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; orally disintegrating film ; pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage ; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - adverse effects ; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics ; Piperazines - administration &amp; dosage ; Piperazines - adverse effects ; Piperazines - pharmacokinetics ; Plasma ; Prescription drugs ; Purines - administration &amp; dosage ; Purines - adverse effects ; Purines - pharmacokinetics ; Reference Values ; Republic of Korea ; sildenafil ; Sildenafil Citrate ; Sulfones - administration &amp; dosage ; Sulfones - adverse effects ; Sulfones - pharmacokinetics ; Tablets ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2013-03, Vol.35 (3), p.205-214</ispartof><rights>Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-2a4882dd6cb0bc3bb67f8b312a635700831a6b1e232f32bb6af569c957b37e0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-2a4882dd6cb0bc3bb67f8b312a635700831a6b1e232f32bb6af569c957b37e0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1319425811?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27200311$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497759$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roh, Hyerang, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, Hankil, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Donghwan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeon, Kyu Jeong, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Soo, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hohyun, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyungsoo, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Pharmacokinetic Comparison of an Orally Disintegrating Film Formulation With a Film-Coated Tablet Formulation of Sildenafil in Healthy Korean Subjects: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Background An orally disintegrating film (ODF) formulation of sildenafil was recently developed in Korea. This formulation is expected to enhance dosing convenience and increase patient compliance while yielding pharmacokinetics comparable to those of the conventional film-coated tablet (FCT) formulation. Objective The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of a newly developed ODF formulation with those of a FCT formulation of sildenafil in healthy Korean male volunteers. Methods This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period crossover study conducted in 2 parts. Eligible subjects were between the ages of 20 and 50 years and within 20% of their ideal weight; subjects were equally divided into parts 1 and 2. Each subject received a single dose of the ODF and FCT formulations of sildenafil orally in a fasted state (part 1, 50 mg; part 2, 100 mg), with a 7-day washout period between the formulations. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours postdosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for sildenafil and its active metabolite ( N -desmethyl sildenafil). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations. Results Among the 120 enrolled subjects (60 subjects for each part), 110 completed the study (part 1, n = 53; part 2, n = 57). In both parts, all the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were included in the range for assumed bioequivalence in sildenafil, yielding 90% CI ratios of 91.07% to 120.67% for AUC0–last and 86.68% to 122.93% for Cmax in part 1, and 101.68% to 114.78% for AUC0–last and 93.76% to 109.76% for Cmax in part 2. In part 1, headache was the most frequently noted AE, occurring in 3 subjects with both the test and the reference formulations. All other AEs occurred in &lt;3 subjects. In part 2, nasal congestion was the most frequently observed AE (7 with the test formulation and 1 with the reference formulation), followed by abnormal vision (4 with the test formulation and 4 with the reference formulation), headache (4 with the test formulation and 4 with the reference formulation), and rhinorrhea (5 with the test formulation). All other AEs occurred in &lt;3 subjects. Conclusions The study findings suggest that the pharmacokinetics of the ODF formulation of sildenafil do not differ significantly from those of the conventional FCT formulation (50 and 100 mg) in these healthy Korean male subjects. The 2 formulations were well tolerated in both parts of the study, with no serious AEs observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01769638.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>film-coated tablet</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>orally disintegrating film</subject><subject>pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - adverse effects</subject><subject>Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Piperazines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Piperazines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Piperazines - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>Purines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Purines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Purines - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Republic of Korea</subject><subject>sildenafil</subject><subject>Sildenafil Citrate</subject><subject>Sulfones - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Sulfones - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sulfones - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Tablets</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt1uEzEQhVcIREvhFcASQuIiG_yzv1wgVSmhiEipSBHcWbZ3NnHqtYO9Wym8KK-Dtw2t6BVXluxvzsz4nCR5RfCUYFK8206V0bbfgBdTigmbYjrFuHiUHJOqrFNCsh-Pk2NMsjqlNamOkmchbDHGrM7p0-SIsqwuy7w-Tn5fbITvhHJX2kKvFZq5bie8Ds4i1yJh0dILY_boTIfYENZe9Nqu0VybDs2d7wYTLyL8XfcbJG7u05kTPTToUkgD_T9UlFxp04AVrTZIW3QOwvSbPfriPMRmq0FuQfXhPTpFX4VtXKd_QTNByx3YdCEkmEkUsGsD6ZkLMEE0vQCvXYNm3oXgrsGjVT80--fJk1aYAC8O50nybf7xcnaeLpafPs9OF6nKqqxPqciqijZNoSSWiklZlG0lGaGiYHmJccWIKCQBymjLaHwWbV7Uqs5LyUrAkp0kb291d979HCD0vNNBgTHCghsCJ4yUVY5zXEb09QN06wZv43QjVWc0rwiJVHlLqXEhDy3fed0Jv-cE89F7vuV33vPRe44pj97HypcH_UF20NzV_TU7Am8OgAhKmNYLq3S450oaA3IzwuktB_HjrjV4HpQGq6DRPprDG6f_Y5gPDzRGTse2V7CHcL85D7GAr8aojkklLKa0oIz9AYTL6C0</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Roh, Hyerang, BS</creator><creator>Son, Hankil, MS</creator><creator>Lee, Donghwan, MD</creator><creator>Yeon, Kyu Jeong, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Hyun Soo, MS</creator><creator>Kim, Hohyun, PhD</creator><creator>Park, Kyungsoo, PhD, MD</creator><general>EM Inc USA</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Pharmacokinetic Comparison of an Orally Disintegrating Film Formulation With a Film-Coated Tablet Formulation of Sildenafil in Healthy Korean Subjects: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study</title><author>Roh, Hyerang, BS ; Son, Hankil, MS ; Lee, Donghwan, MD ; Yeon, Kyu Jeong, PhD ; Kim, Hyun Soo, MS ; Kim, Hohyun, PhD ; Park, Kyungsoo, PhD, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-2a4882dd6cb0bc3bb67f8b312a635700831a6b1e232f32bb6af569c957b37e0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>film-coated tablet</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>orally disintegrating film</topic><topic>pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - adverse effects</topic><topic>Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Piperazines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Piperazines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Piperazines - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>Purines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Purines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Purines - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Republic of Korea</topic><topic>sildenafil</topic><topic>Sildenafil Citrate</topic><topic>Sulfones - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Sulfones - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sulfones - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Tablets</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roh, Hyerang, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, Hankil, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Donghwan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeon, Kyu Jeong, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Soo, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hohyun, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyungsoo, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roh, Hyerang, BS</au><au>Son, Hankil, MS</au><au>Lee, Donghwan, MD</au><au>Yeon, Kyu Jeong, PhD</au><au>Kim, Hyun Soo, MS</au><au>Kim, Hohyun, PhD</au><au>Park, Kyungsoo, PhD, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pharmacokinetic Comparison of an Orally Disintegrating Film Formulation With a Film-Coated Tablet Formulation of Sildenafil in Healthy Korean Subjects: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>205-214</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background An orally disintegrating film (ODF) formulation of sildenafil was recently developed in Korea. This formulation is expected to enhance dosing convenience and increase patient compliance while yielding pharmacokinetics comparable to those of the conventional film-coated tablet (FCT) formulation. Objective The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of a newly developed ODF formulation with those of a FCT formulation of sildenafil in healthy Korean male volunteers. Methods This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period crossover study conducted in 2 parts. Eligible subjects were between the ages of 20 and 50 years and within 20% of their ideal weight; subjects were equally divided into parts 1 and 2. Each subject received a single dose of the ODF and FCT formulations of sildenafil orally in a fasted state (part 1, 50 mg; part 2, 100 mg), with a 7-day washout period between the formulations. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours postdosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for sildenafil and its active metabolite ( N -desmethyl sildenafil). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations. Results Among the 120 enrolled subjects (60 subjects for each part), 110 completed the study (part 1, n = 53; part 2, n = 57). In both parts, all the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were included in the range for assumed bioequivalence in sildenafil, yielding 90% CI ratios of 91.07% to 120.67% for AUC0–last and 86.68% to 122.93% for Cmax in part 1, and 101.68% to 114.78% for AUC0–last and 93.76% to 109.76% for Cmax in part 2. In part 1, headache was the most frequently noted AE, occurring in 3 subjects with both the test and the reference formulations. All other AEs occurred in &lt;3 subjects. In part 2, nasal congestion was the most frequently observed AE (7 with the test formulation and 1 with the reference formulation), followed by abnormal vision (4 with the test formulation and 4 with the reference formulation), headache (4 with the test formulation and 4 with the reference formulation), and rhinorrhea (5 with the test formulation). All other AEs occurred in &lt;3 subjects. Conclusions The study findings suggest that the pharmacokinetics of the ODF formulation of sildenafil do not differ significantly from those of the conventional FCT formulation (50 and 100 mg) in these healthy Korean male subjects. The 2 formulations were well tolerated in both parts of the study, with no serious AEs observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01769638.</abstract><cop>Bridgewater, NJ</cop><pub>EM Inc USA</pub><pmid>23497759</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.02.006</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-2918
ispartof Clinical therapeutics, 2013-03, Vol.35 (3), p.205-214
issn 0149-2918
1879-114X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317850507
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Administration, Oral
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cross-Over Studies
Disease
Drug dosages
Drug therapy
film-coated tablet
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
Medical Education
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
orally disintegrating film
pharmacokinetics
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - administration & dosage
Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - adverse effects
Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics
Piperazines - administration & dosage
Piperazines - adverse effects
Piperazines - pharmacokinetics
Plasma
Prescription drugs
Purines - administration & dosage
Purines - adverse effects
Purines - pharmacokinetics
Reference Values
Republic of Korea
sildenafil
Sildenafil Citrate
Sulfones - administration & dosage
Sulfones - adverse effects
Sulfones - pharmacokinetics
Tablets
Young Adult
title Pharmacokinetic Comparison of an Orally Disintegrating Film Formulation With a Film-Coated Tablet Formulation of Sildenafil in Healthy Korean Subjects: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A45%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacokinetic%20Comparison%20of%20an%20Orally%20Disintegrating%20Film%20Formulation%20With%20a%20Film-Coated%20Tablet%20Formulation%20of%20Sildenafil%20in%20Healthy%20Korean%20Subjects:%20A%20Randomized,%20Open-Label,%20Single-Dose,%202-Period%20Crossover%20Study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Roh,%20Hyerang,%20BS&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=205-214&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.02.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1317850507%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1319425811&rft_id=info:pmid/23497759&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0149291813000623&rfr_iscdi=true