Intermittent theta burst stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex of subacute ischemic stroke patients: A pilot study
Abstract Background We demonstrated that prolonged transcranial magnetic intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS, 1200 pulses/session = iTBS1200) produces longer-lasting facilitation in corticospinal excitability than ordinary form of iTBS in healthy subjects. Objective Here we show the safety an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain stimulation 2013-03, Vol.6 (2), p.166-174 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 174 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | Brain stimulation |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Hsu, Ya-Fang Huang, Ying-Zu Lin, Yung-Yang Tang, Chih-Wei Liao, Kwong-Kum Lee, Po-Lei Tsai, Yun-An Cheng, Hsien-Lin Cheng, Henrich Chern, Chang-Ming Lee, I-Hui |
description | Abstract Background We demonstrated that prolonged transcranial magnetic intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS, 1200 pulses/session = iTBS1200) produces longer-lasting facilitation in corticospinal excitability than ordinary form of iTBS in healthy subjects. Objective Here we show the safety and small-scale efficacy of iTBS1200 over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) in subacute stroke patients. Methods Twelve patients with first-time, subacute ischemic stroke of the middle cerebral artery were randomized into two groups that received 10 daily-sessions of either iTBS1200 or sham stimulation ( n = 6/group) over ipsilesional M1 hand region in addition to medical and rehabilitation treatments. The primary outcome measures were safety and tolerability. The secondary outcome measures included the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Test (UE-FMT), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), active motor thresholds (aMTs)/motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the extensor carpi radialis (ECR), and magnetoencephalography on post-intervention day 1 and post-stroke day 60. Results iTBS or sham stimulation was well tolerated by all patients without seizures or significant adverse effects. Compared with the matched controls, the iTBS group showed measurable improvements in the NIHSS and the proximal UE-FMT scores on post-intervention day 1 and post-stroke day 60. Nevertheless, the hand ARAT scores, aMT and MEPs from the paretic ECR were not different between groups. Post-movement beta synchronization increased over iTBS-conditioned M1 on post-intervention day 1 in testable patients. Conclusions Repetitive sessions of iTBS1200 over ipsilesional M1 of subacute stroke patients are safe and the potential benefits encourage a larger trial to determine the efficacy in stroke patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT-01323881). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317847971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1935861X1200071X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1317847971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-43d4b82e6be97772f6f9b1c02669379d31e7ac3176b8845ad7c57c533b6a9e653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctq3TAUNKWlSdN-QDdFy27sSrYsWS0UQugjEOgiKWQnZPmY6Ma2XD1C76q_3mPubRZZFASSYGbOmZmieMtoxSgTH3ZVH2JVU1ZXlFeUymfFKeukKLls-XN8q6YtO8FuT4pXMe4obZXq5MvipK5Fq2jNTos_l0uCMLuUYEkk3UEypM8hJhKTm_NkkvML8Q8QiFujmyDi30xkDW42YU9mn3wg1ocEv4kfScy9sTkBcdHewews6gR_D2RFJRwRP5JzsrrJbwPysH9dvBjNFOHN8T4rfn79cnPxvbz68e3y4vyqtFzyVPJm4H1Xg-hBSSnrUYyqZ5bWQqhGqqFhII1tmBR91_HWDNK2eJqmF0aBaJuz4v1Bdw3-V4aY9IwbwjSZBXyOmiG341JJhlB2gNrgYwww6qNZzajectc7jbnrLXdNucbckfPuKJ_7GYZHxr-gEfDpAAA0-eAg6GgxDwuDC2CTHrz7r_znJ2w7ucVZM93DHuLO54CloAsdkaOvt-K33llNkc5um78v66ta</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1317847971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intermittent theta burst stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex of subacute ischemic stroke patients: A pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hsu, Ya-Fang ; Huang, Ying-Zu ; Lin, Yung-Yang ; Tang, Chih-Wei ; Liao, Kwong-Kum ; Lee, Po-Lei ; Tsai, Yun-An ; Cheng, Hsien-Lin ; Cheng, Henrich ; Chern, Chang-Ming ; Lee, I-Hui</creator><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Ya-Fang ; Huang, Ying-Zu ; Lin, Yung-Yang ; Tang, Chih-Wei ; Liao, Kwong-Kum ; Lee, Po-Lei ; Tsai, Yun-An ; Cheng, Hsien-Lin ; Cheng, Henrich ; Chern, Chang-Ming ; Lee, I-Hui</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background We demonstrated that prolonged transcranial magnetic intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS, 1200 pulses/session = iTBS1200) produces longer-lasting facilitation in corticospinal excitability than ordinary form of iTBS in healthy subjects. Objective Here we show the safety and small-scale efficacy of iTBS1200 over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) in subacute stroke patients. Methods Twelve patients with first-time, subacute ischemic stroke of the middle cerebral artery were randomized into two groups that received 10 daily-sessions of either iTBS1200 or sham stimulation ( n = 6/group) over ipsilesional M1 hand region in addition to medical and rehabilitation treatments. The primary outcome measures were safety and tolerability. The secondary outcome measures included the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Test (UE-FMT), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), active motor thresholds (aMTs)/motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the extensor carpi radialis (ECR), and magnetoencephalography on post-intervention day 1 and post-stroke day 60. Results iTBS or sham stimulation was well tolerated by all patients without seizures or significant adverse effects. Compared with the matched controls, the iTBS group showed measurable improvements in the NIHSS and the proximal UE-FMT scores on post-intervention day 1 and post-stroke day 60. Nevertheless, the hand ARAT scores, aMT and MEPs from the paretic ECR were not different between groups. Post-movement beta synchronization increased over iTBS-conditioned M1 on post-intervention day 1 in testable patients. Conclusions Repetitive sessions of iTBS1200 over ipsilesional M1 of subacute stroke patients are safe and the potential benefits encourage a larger trial to determine the efficacy in stroke patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT-01323881).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-861X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-4754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22659021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Brain Ischemia - physiopathology ; Brain Ischemia - rehabilitation ; Brain Mapping ; Double-Blind Method ; Electric Stimulation ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Magnectoencephalography (MEG) ; Magnetoencephalography ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motor ; Motor Cortex - physiopathology ; Neurology ; Pilot Projects ; Plasticity ; Stroke ; Stroke - physiopathology ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Theta burst stimulation (TBS) ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Brain stimulation, 2013-03, Vol.6 (2), p.166-174</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-43d4b82e6be97772f6f9b1c02669379d31e7ac3176b8845ad7c57c533b6a9e653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-43d4b82e6be97772f6f9b1c02669379d31e7ac3176b8845ad7c57c533b6a9e653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22659021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Ya-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ying-Zu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yung-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chih-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Kwong-Kum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Po-Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Yun-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Hsien-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Henrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chern, Chang-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, I-Hui</creatorcontrib><title>Intermittent theta burst stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex of subacute ischemic stroke patients: A pilot study</title><title>Brain stimulation</title><addtitle>Brain Stimul</addtitle><description>Abstract Background We demonstrated that prolonged transcranial magnetic intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS, 1200 pulses/session = iTBS1200) produces longer-lasting facilitation in corticospinal excitability than ordinary form of iTBS in healthy subjects. Objective Here we show the safety and small-scale efficacy of iTBS1200 over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) in subacute stroke patients. Methods Twelve patients with first-time, subacute ischemic stroke of the middle cerebral artery were randomized into two groups that received 10 daily-sessions of either iTBS1200 or sham stimulation ( n = 6/group) over ipsilesional M1 hand region in addition to medical and rehabilitation treatments. The primary outcome measures were safety and tolerability. The secondary outcome measures included the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Test (UE-FMT), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), active motor thresholds (aMTs)/motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the extensor carpi radialis (ECR), and magnetoencephalography on post-intervention day 1 and post-stroke day 60. Results iTBS or sham stimulation was well tolerated by all patients without seizures or significant adverse effects. Compared with the matched controls, the iTBS group showed measurable improvements in the NIHSS and the proximal UE-FMT scores on post-intervention day 1 and post-stroke day 60. Nevertheless, the hand ARAT scores, aMT and MEPs from the paretic ECR were not different between groups. Post-movement beta synchronization increased over iTBS-conditioned M1 on post-intervention day 1 in testable patients. Conclusions Repetitive sessions of iTBS1200 over ipsilesional M1 of subacute stroke patients are safe and the potential benefits encourage a larger trial to determine the efficacy in stroke patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT-01323881).</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnectoencephalography (MEG)</subject><subject>Magnetoencephalography</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Theta burst stimulation (TBS)</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1935-861X</issn><issn>1876-4754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctq3TAUNKWlSdN-QDdFy27sSrYsWS0UQugjEOgiKWQnZPmY6Ma2XD1C76q_3mPubRZZFASSYGbOmZmieMtoxSgTH3ZVH2JVU1ZXlFeUymfFKeukKLls-XN8q6YtO8FuT4pXMe4obZXq5MvipK5Fq2jNTos_l0uCMLuUYEkk3UEypM8hJhKTm_NkkvML8Q8QiFujmyDi30xkDW42YU9mn3wg1ocEv4kfScy9sTkBcdHewews6gR_D2RFJRwRP5JzsrrJbwPysH9dvBjNFOHN8T4rfn79cnPxvbz68e3y4vyqtFzyVPJm4H1Xg-hBSSnrUYyqZ5bWQqhGqqFhII1tmBR91_HWDNK2eJqmF0aBaJuz4v1Bdw3-V4aY9IwbwjSZBXyOmiG341JJhlB2gNrgYwww6qNZzajectc7jbnrLXdNucbckfPuKJ_7GYZHxr-gEfDpAAA0-eAg6GgxDwuDC2CTHrz7r_znJ2w7ucVZM93DHuLO54CloAsdkaOvt-K33llNkc5um78v66ta</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Hsu, Ya-Fang</creator><creator>Huang, Ying-Zu</creator><creator>Lin, Yung-Yang</creator><creator>Tang, Chih-Wei</creator><creator>Liao, Kwong-Kum</creator><creator>Lee, Po-Lei</creator><creator>Tsai, Yun-An</creator><creator>Cheng, Hsien-Lin</creator><creator>Cheng, Henrich</creator><creator>Chern, Chang-Ming</creator><creator>Lee, I-Hui</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Intermittent theta burst stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex of subacute ischemic stroke patients: A pilot study</title><author>Hsu, Ya-Fang ; Huang, Ying-Zu ; Lin, Yung-Yang ; Tang, Chih-Wei ; Liao, Kwong-Kum ; Lee, Po-Lei ; Tsai, Yun-An ; Cheng, Hsien-Lin ; Cheng, Henrich ; Chern, Chang-Ming ; Lee, I-Hui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-43d4b82e6be97772f6f9b1c02669379d31e7ac3176b8845ad7c57c533b6a9e653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnectoencephalography (MEG)</topic><topic>Magnetoencephalography</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Theta burst stimulation (TBS)</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Ya-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ying-Zu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yung-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chih-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Kwong-Kum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Po-Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Yun-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Hsien-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Henrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chern, Chang-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, I-Hui</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain stimulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hsu, Ya-Fang</au><au>Huang, Ying-Zu</au><au>Lin, Yung-Yang</au><au>Tang, Chih-Wei</au><au>Liao, Kwong-Kum</au><au>Lee, Po-Lei</au><au>Tsai, Yun-An</au><au>Cheng, Hsien-Lin</au><au>Cheng, Henrich</au><au>Chern, Chang-Ming</au><au>Lee, I-Hui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intermittent theta burst stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex of subacute ischemic stroke patients: A pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Brain stimulation</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Stimul</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>166-174</pages><issn>1935-861X</issn><eissn>1876-4754</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background We demonstrated that prolonged transcranial magnetic intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS, 1200 pulses/session = iTBS1200) produces longer-lasting facilitation in corticospinal excitability than ordinary form of iTBS in healthy subjects. Objective Here we show the safety and small-scale efficacy of iTBS1200 over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) in subacute stroke patients. Methods Twelve patients with first-time, subacute ischemic stroke of the middle cerebral artery were randomized into two groups that received 10 daily-sessions of either iTBS1200 or sham stimulation ( n = 6/group) over ipsilesional M1 hand region in addition to medical and rehabilitation treatments. The primary outcome measures were safety and tolerability. The secondary outcome measures included the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Test (UE-FMT), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), active motor thresholds (aMTs)/motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the extensor carpi radialis (ECR), and magnetoencephalography on post-intervention day 1 and post-stroke day 60. Results iTBS or sham stimulation was well tolerated by all patients without seizures or significant adverse effects. Compared with the matched controls, the iTBS group showed measurable improvements in the NIHSS and the proximal UE-FMT scores on post-intervention day 1 and post-stroke day 60. Nevertheless, the hand ARAT scores, aMT and MEPs from the paretic ECR were not different between groups. Post-movement beta synchronization increased over iTBS-conditioned M1 on post-intervention day 1 in testable patients. Conclusions Repetitive sessions of iTBS1200 over ipsilesional M1 of subacute stroke patients are safe and the potential benefits encourage a larger trial to determine the efficacy in stroke patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT-01323881).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22659021</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.007</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1935-861X |
ispartof | Brain stimulation, 2013-03, Vol.6 (2), p.166-174 |
issn | 1935-861X 1876-4754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317847971 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aged Brain Ischemia - physiopathology Brain Ischemia - rehabilitation Brain Mapping Double-Blind Method Electric Stimulation Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology Female Humans Magnectoencephalography (MEG) Magnetoencephalography Male Middle Aged Motor Motor Cortex - physiopathology Neurology Pilot Projects Plasticity Stroke Stroke - physiopathology Stroke Rehabilitation Theta burst stimulation (TBS) Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods Treatment Outcome |
title | Intermittent theta burst stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex of subacute ischemic stroke patients: A pilot study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T12%3A56%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intermittent%20theta%20burst%20stimulation%20over%20ipsilesional%20primary%20motor%20cortex%20of%20subacute%20ischemic%20stroke%20patients:%20A%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Brain%20stimulation&rft.au=Hsu,%20Ya-Fang&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=166-174&rft.issn=1935-861X&rft.eissn=1876-4754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1317847971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1317847971&rft_id=info:pmid/22659021&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1935861X1200071X&rfr_iscdi=true |