Risk attitude, beliefs, and information in a Corruption Game – An experimental analysis
► Experiment on corruption as a multi player coordination game. ► Participants can coordinate either towards corrupt or honest behavior. ► Risk attitudes concerning punishment in case of detection fail to explain behavior. ► Beliefs concerning the honesty of other participants predict the observed b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic psychology 2013-02, Vol.34 (1), p.46-60 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 60 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 46 |
container_title | Journal of economic psychology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Berninghaus, Siegfried K. Haller, Sven Krüger, Tyll Neumann, Thomas Schosser, Stephan Vogt, Bodo |
description | ► Experiment on corruption as a multi player coordination game. ► Participants can coordinate either towards corrupt or honest behavior. ► Risk attitudes concerning punishment in case of detection fail to explain behavior. ► Beliefs concerning the honesty of other participants predict the observed behavior. ► Increasing uncertainty by reducing transparency of others’ honesty reduces corruption.
For our experiment on corruption, we designed a coordination game to model the influence of risk attitudes, beliefs, and information on behavioral choices and determined the equilibria. We observed that the risk attitude of the participant failed to explain their choices between corrupt and non-corrupt behavior. Instead, their beliefs appeared to be a better predictor of whether or not they would opt for the corrupt alternative. Furthermore, varying the quantity of information available to the players (modeled by changing the degree of uncertainty) provided additional insight into the players’ propensity to engage in corrupt behavior. The experimental results show that a higher degree of uncertainty in the informational setting reduces corruption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317585735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167487012001419</els_id><sourcerecordid>2884771841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-d4d8a9707a4fee801935d26432ceb94bc336df2fb672b5120efe76bf71fa51ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVpoJu0L9CToARyiB2NLEs29BKWNC0EAiE59CRkeQRyvZYj2aW55R36hn2Saruhhx56mhn4_hnpI-Q9sBIYyIuhHALOJWfAS4CSMfGKbKBRvFAK2tdkkyFViEaxN-Q4pYExBqxWG_L1zqdv1CyLX9Yez2mHo0eXzqmZeuonF-LOLD5MuaeGbkOM6_xnvjY7pL-ef9LLieKPGaPf4bSYMQfN-JR8ekuOnBkTvnupJ-Th09X99nNxc3v9ZXt5U1jRtkvRi74xrWLKCIfYMGiruudSVNxi14rOVpXsHXedVLyrgTN0qGTnFDhTgzXVCTk77J1jeFwxLXrnk8VxNBOGNWmoQNVNrao6ox_-QYewxvzeTPFGCM4a2WaKHygbQ0oRnZ7z50x80sD03rYe9N623tvWADrbzqHTl9UmWTO6aCbr098kl41Usq4y9_HAYVby3WPUyXqcLPY-ol10H_z_zvwGuyyVxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1284420869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk attitude, beliefs, and information in a Corruption Game – An experimental analysis</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Berninghaus, Siegfried K. ; Haller, Sven ; Krüger, Tyll ; Neumann, Thomas ; Schosser, Stephan ; Vogt, Bodo</creator><creatorcontrib>Berninghaus, Siegfried K. ; Haller, Sven ; Krüger, Tyll ; Neumann, Thomas ; Schosser, Stephan ; Vogt, Bodo</creatorcontrib><description>► Experiment on corruption as a multi player coordination game. ► Participants can coordinate either towards corrupt or honest behavior. ► Risk attitudes concerning punishment in case of detection fail to explain behavior. ► Beliefs concerning the honesty of other participants predict the observed behavior. ► Increasing uncertainty by reducing transparency of others’ honesty reduces corruption.
For our experiment on corruption, we designed a coordination game to model the influence of risk attitudes, beliefs, and information on behavioral choices and determined the equilibria. We observed that the risk attitude of the participant failed to explain their choices between corrupt and non-corrupt behavior. Instead, their beliefs appeared to be a better predictor of whether or not they would opt for the corrupt alternative. Furthermore, varying the quantity of information available to the players (modeled by changing the degree of uncertainty) provided additional insight into the players’ propensity to engage in corrupt behavior. The experimental results show that a higher degree of uncertainty in the informational setting reduces corruption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEPSDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Belief & doubt ; Beliefs ; Biological and medical sciences ; Corruption ; Economic behaviour ; Economic psychology ; Economic theory ; Experiment ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Game theory ; Information analysis ; JEL classification: D73, K42, C91, C92 ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; PsycINFO classification: 4270 ; Risk attitude ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; Studies ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic psychology, 2013-02, Vol.34 (1), p.46-60</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Feb 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-d4d8a9707a4fee801935d26432ceb94bc336df2fb672b5120efe76bf71fa51ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-d4d8a9707a4fee801935d26432ceb94bc336df2fb672b5120efe76bf71fa51ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26867653$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berninghaus, Siegfried K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüger, Tyll</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schosser, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Bodo</creatorcontrib><title>Risk attitude, beliefs, and information in a Corruption Game – An experimental analysis</title><title>Journal of economic psychology</title><description>► Experiment on corruption as a multi player coordination game. ► Participants can coordinate either towards corrupt or honest behavior. ► Risk attitudes concerning punishment in case of detection fail to explain behavior. ► Beliefs concerning the honesty of other participants predict the observed behavior. ► Increasing uncertainty by reducing transparency of others’ honesty reduces corruption.
For our experiment on corruption, we designed a coordination game to model the influence of risk attitudes, beliefs, and information on behavioral choices and determined the equilibria. We observed that the risk attitude of the participant failed to explain their choices between corrupt and non-corrupt behavior. Instead, their beliefs appeared to be a better predictor of whether or not they would opt for the corrupt alternative. Furthermore, varying the quantity of information available to the players (modeled by changing the degree of uncertainty) provided additional insight into the players’ propensity to engage in corrupt behavior. The experimental results show that a higher degree of uncertainty in the informational setting reduces corruption.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Belief & doubt</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Economic behaviour</subject><subject>Economic psychology</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Experiment</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Information analysis</subject><subject>JEL classification: D73, K42, C91, C92</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>PsycINFO classification: 4270</subject><subject>Risk attitude</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0167-4870</issn><issn>1872-7719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVpoJu0L9CToARyiB2NLEs29BKWNC0EAiE59CRkeQRyvZYj2aW55R36hn2Saruhhx56mhn4_hnpI-Q9sBIYyIuhHALOJWfAS4CSMfGKbKBRvFAK2tdkkyFViEaxN-Q4pYExBqxWG_L1zqdv1CyLX9Yez2mHo0eXzqmZeuonF-LOLD5MuaeGbkOM6_xnvjY7pL-ef9LLieKPGaPf4bSYMQfN-JR8ekuOnBkTvnupJ-Th09X99nNxc3v9ZXt5U1jRtkvRi74xrWLKCIfYMGiruudSVNxi14rOVpXsHXedVLyrgTN0qGTnFDhTgzXVCTk77J1jeFwxLXrnk8VxNBOGNWmoQNVNrao6ox_-QYewxvzeTPFGCM4a2WaKHygbQ0oRnZ7z50x80sD03rYe9N623tvWADrbzqHTl9UmWTO6aCbr098kl41Usq4y9_HAYVby3WPUyXqcLPY-ol10H_z_zvwGuyyVxA</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Berninghaus, Siegfried K.</creator><creator>Haller, Sven</creator><creator>Krüger, Tyll</creator><creator>Neumann, Thomas</creator><creator>Schosser, Stephan</creator><creator>Vogt, Bodo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Risk attitude, beliefs, and information in a Corruption Game – An experimental analysis</title><author>Berninghaus, Siegfried K. ; Haller, Sven ; Krüger, Tyll ; Neumann, Thomas ; Schosser, Stephan ; Vogt, Bodo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-d4d8a9707a4fee801935d26432ceb94bc336df2fb672b5120efe76bf71fa51ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Belief & doubt</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Economic behaviour</topic><topic>Economic psychology</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Experiment</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Information analysis</topic><topic>JEL classification: D73, K42, C91, C92</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>PsycINFO classification: 4270</topic><topic>Risk attitude</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berninghaus, Siegfried K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüger, Tyll</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schosser, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Bodo</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berninghaus, Siegfried K.</au><au>Haller, Sven</au><au>Krüger, Tyll</au><au>Neumann, Thomas</au><au>Schosser, Stephan</au><au>Vogt, Bodo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk attitude, beliefs, and information in a Corruption Game – An experimental analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic psychology</jtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>46-60</pages><issn>0167-4870</issn><eissn>1872-7719</eissn><coden>JEPSDN</coden><abstract>► Experiment on corruption as a multi player coordination game. ► Participants can coordinate either towards corrupt or honest behavior. ► Risk attitudes concerning punishment in case of detection fail to explain behavior. ► Beliefs concerning the honesty of other participants predict the observed behavior. ► Increasing uncertainty by reducing transparency of others’ honesty reduces corruption.
For our experiment on corruption, we designed a coordination game to model the influence of risk attitudes, beliefs, and information on behavioral choices and determined the equilibria. We observed that the risk attitude of the participant failed to explain their choices between corrupt and non-corrupt behavior. Instead, their beliefs appeared to be a better predictor of whether or not they would opt for the corrupt alternative. Furthermore, varying the quantity of information available to the players (modeled by changing the degree of uncertainty) provided additional insight into the players’ propensity to engage in corrupt behavior. The experimental results show that a higher degree of uncertainty in the informational setting reduces corruption.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.004</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4870 |
ispartof | Journal of economic psychology, 2013-02, Vol.34 (1), p.46-60 |
issn | 0167-4870 1872-7719 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317585735 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Behavior Belief & doubt Beliefs Biological and medical sciences Corruption Economic behaviour Economic psychology Economic theory Experiment Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Game theory Information analysis JEL classification: D73, K42, C91, C92 Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology PsycINFO classification: 4270 Risk attitude Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social psychology Studies Uncertainty |
title | Risk attitude, beliefs, and information in a Corruption Game – An experimental analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A55%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20attitude,%20beliefs,%20and%20information%20in%20a%20Corruption%20Game%20%E2%80%93%20An%20experimental%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20psychology&rft.au=Berninghaus,%20Siegfried%20K.&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=46-60&rft.issn=0167-4870&rft.eissn=1872-7719&rft.coden=JEPSDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2884771841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1284420869&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167487012001419&rfr_iscdi=true |