The “Ethics Rupture” Summit, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, October 25–28, 2012
This report explains the background of the “Ethics Rupture” Summit held in New Brunswick, Canada, October 2012, focusing on the disconnect between research-ethics policies and the nature and purpose of social-science research—an unintended “rupture” in ethics governance. Ethics is about human relati...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of empirical research on human research ethics 2013-02, Vol.8 (1), p.3-7 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 7 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | Journal of empirical research on human research ethics |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | van den Hoonaard, Will C. |
| description | This report explains the background of the “Ethics Rupture” Summit held in New Brunswick, Canada, October 2012, focusing on the disconnect between research-ethics policies and the nature and purpose of social-science research—an unintended “rupture” in ethics governance. Ethics is about human relationships, and the governance of ethics must reflect that fact rather than function as a bureaucratic, self-legitimating system of control. The themes that emerged from the Summit point to: structural problems with the current system; an undermining of the original, historical mission of some social-science disciplines; a discomfort with new methodologies; ethics committees and the well-being and education of social-science students; the possibilities of reform and renewal; and the next steps. Finally, the report refers in broad outlines to a “New Brunswick Declaration,” which is currently being considered by participants of the Summit. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317405951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1525_jer.2013.8.1.3</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-c1573285ec08a9bb78c9a0a4bff00266f69a8cce75fcd18533b137ee9ef013f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9O20AQxlcVqAHaa4_VSr0gYbv7x7teH0sEBQkRqU0vvazW6zE4je101xbilnfgCi-XJ-lGCRFCqjjNSPObb775EPpESUIFE19n4BJGKE9UQhP-Dh1QIWTMpEj3dn0qR-jQ-xkhqeA0fY9GjKdKSCkP0O_pLeDV8vGsv62txz-GRT84WC2f8M-haeo-wucOSnC17bs2wtdwh0_d0Pq72v6J8Ni0pjQRnoRpAQ4zsVo-MBXhYIl9QPuVmXv4uK1H6Nf52XR8EV9Nvl-Ov13Flueijy0VGWdKgCXK5EWRKZsbYtKiqghhUlYyN8payERlS6oE5wXlGUAOVfi7yvgROt7oLlz3dwDf66b2FuZz00I3eE05zVIickED-uUVOusG1wZ3gWKpkLmUayrZUNZ13juo9MLVjXH3mhK9Tl2H1PU6da001TwsfN7KDkUD5Q5_jjkAJxvAmxt4cfN_clt65vvOvXX8H5MNmPc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1324569661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The “Ethics Rupture” Summit, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, October 25–28, 2012</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>van den Hoonaard, Will C.</creator><creatorcontrib>van den Hoonaard, Will C.</creatorcontrib><description>This report explains the background of the “Ethics Rupture” Summit held in New Brunswick, Canada, October 2012, focusing on the disconnect between research-ethics policies and the nature and purpose of social-science research—an unintended “rupture” in ethics governance. Ethics is about human relationships, and the governance of ethics must reflect that fact rather than function as a bureaucratic, self-legitimating system of control. The themes that emerged from the Summit point to: structural problems with the current system; an undermining of the original, historical mission of some social-science disciplines; a discomfort with new methodologies; ethics committees and the well-being and education of social-science students; the possibilities of reform and renewal; and the next steps. Finally, the report refers in broad outlines to a “New Brunswick Declaration,” which is currently being considered by participants of the Summit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-2646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-2654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23485666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; Congresses as Topic ; Ethical codes ; Ethical epistemology ; Ethical instruction ; Ethics ; Ethics committees ; Ethics Committees, Research ; Ethics, Research ; Humans ; New Brunswick ; Policy ; Research Design ; Research ethics ; Research methods ; Research universities ; Social ethics ; Social research ; Social sciences ; Social Sciences - education ; Social Sciences - ethics ; Special Report ; Summit conferences</subject><ispartof>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 2013-02, Vol.8 (1), p.3-7</ispartof><rights>2013 by Joan Sieber</rights><rights>2013 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Feb 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-c1573285ec08a9bb78c9a0a4bff00266f69a8cce75fcd18533b137ee9ef013f73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23485666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van den Hoonaard, Will C.</creatorcontrib><title>The “Ethics Rupture” Summit, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, October 25–28, 2012</title><title>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</title><addtitle>J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics</addtitle><description>This report explains the background of the “Ethics Rupture” Summit held in New Brunswick, Canada, October 2012, focusing on the disconnect between research-ethics policies and the nature and purpose of social-science research—an unintended “rupture” in ethics governance. Ethics is about human relationships, and the governance of ethics must reflect that fact rather than function as a bureaucratic, self-legitimating system of control. The themes that emerged from the Summit point to: structural problems with the current system; an undermining of the original, historical mission of some social-science disciplines; a discomfort with new methodologies; ethics committees and the well-being and education of social-science students; the possibilities of reform and renewal; and the next steps. Finally, the report refers in broad outlines to a “New Brunswick Declaration,” which is currently being considered by participants of the Summit.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Congresses as Topic</subject><subject>Ethical codes</subject><subject>Ethical epistemology</subject><subject>Ethical instruction</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics committees</subject><subject>Ethics Committees, Research</subject><subject>Ethics, Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>New Brunswick</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Research universities</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Social Sciences - education</subject><subject>Social Sciences - ethics</subject><subject>Special Report</subject><subject>Summit conferences</subject><issn>1556-2646</issn><issn>1556-2654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9O20AQxlcVqAHaa4_VSr0gYbv7x7teH0sEBQkRqU0vvazW6zE4je101xbilnfgCi-XJ-lGCRFCqjjNSPObb775EPpESUIFE19n4BJGKE9UQhP-Dh1QIWTMpEj3dn0qR-jQ-xkhqeA0fY9GjKdKSCkP0O_pLeDV8vGsv62txz-GRT84WC2f8M-haeo-wucOSnC17bs2wtdwh0_d0Pq72v6J8Ni0pjQRnoRpAQ4zsVo-MBXhYIl9QPuVmXv4uK1H6Nf52XR8EV9Nvl-Ov13Flueijy0VGWdKgCXK5EWRKZsbYtKiqghhUlYyN8payERlS6oE5wXlGUAOVfi7yvgROt7oLlz3dwDf66b2FuZz00I3eE05zVIickED-uUVOusG1wZ3gWKpkLmUayrZUNZ13juo9MLVjXH3mhK9Tl2H1PU6da001TwsfN7KDkUD5Q5_jjkAJxvAmxt4cfN_clt65vvOvXX8H5MNmPc</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>van den Hoonaard, Will C.</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>The “Ethics Rupture” Summit, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, October 25–28, 2012</title><author>van den Hoonaard, Will C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-c1573285ec08a9bb78c9a0a4bff00266f69a8cce75fcd18533b137ee9ef013f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Congresses as Topic</topic><topic>Ethical codes</topic><topic>Ethical epistemology</topic><topic>Ethical instruction</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics committees</topic><topic>Ethics Committees, Research</topic><topic>Ethics, Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>New Brunswick</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Research universities</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Social Sciences - education</topic><topic>Social Sciences - ethics</topic><topic>Special Report</topic><topic>Summit conferences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van den Hoonaard, Will C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van den Hoonaard, Will C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The “Ethics Rupture” Summit, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, October 25–28, 2012</atitle><jtitle>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</jtitle><addtitle>J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>3-7</pages><issn>1556-2646</issn><eissn>1556-2654</eissn><abstract>This report explains the background of the “Ethics Rupture” Summit held in New Brunswick, Canada, October 2012, focusing on the disconnect between research-ethics policies and the nature and purpose of social-science research—an unintended “rupture” in ethics governance. Ethics is about human relationships, and the governance of ethics must reflect that fact rather than function as a bureaucratic, self-legitimating system of control. The themes that emerged from the Summit point to: structural problems with the current system; an undermining of the original, historical mission of some social-science disciplines; a discomfort with new methodologies; ethics committees and the well-being and education of social-science students; the possibilities of reform and renewal; and the next steps. Finally, the report refers in broad outlines to a “New Brunswick Declaration,” which is currently being considered by participants of the Summit.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><pmid>23485666</pmid><doi>10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1556-2646 |
| ispartof | Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 2013-02, Vol.8 (1), p.3-7 |
| issn | 1556-2646 1556-2654 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317405951 |
| source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Bioethics Congresses as Topic Ethical codes Ethical epistemology Ethical instruction Ethics Ethics committees Ethics Committees, Research Ethics, Research Humans New Brunswick Policy Research Design Research ethics Research methods Research universities Social ethics Social research Social sciences Social Sciences - education Social Sciences - ethics Special Report Summit conferences |
| title | The “Ethics Rupture” Summit, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, October 25–28, 2012 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A38%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%9CEthics%20Rupture%E2%80%9D%20Summit,%20Fredericton,%20New%20Brunswick,%20Canada,%20October%2025%E2%80%9328,%202012&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20empirical%20research%20on%20human%20research%20ethics&rft.au=van%20den%20Hoonaard,%20Will%20C.&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=3-7&rft.issn=1556-2646&rft.eissn=1556-2654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1324569661&rft_id=info:pmid/23485666&rft_jstor_id=10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3&rft_sage_id=10.1525_jer.2013.8.1.3&rfr_iscdi=true |