Discordance between cancer prevalence and training: a need for an increase in oncology education
The impact of cancer on healthcare is increasing. Therefore, it is key that all doctors receive oncology training. This study surveyed UK undergraduate medical schools to determine the extent of oncology training provided by their curricula. Data on foundation year (FY) and core medical training (CM...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical medicine (London, England) England), 2013-02, Vol.13 (1), p.50-56 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 56 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 50 |
| container_title | Clinical medicine (London, England) |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Payne, Sarah Burke, Danny Mansi, Janine Jones, Alison Norton, Alison Joffe, Johnathan Cunningham, David McVie, Gordon Agarwal, Roshan |
| description | The impact of cancer on healthcare is increasing. Therefore, it is key that all doctors receive oncology training. This study surveyed UK undergraduate medical schools to determine the extent of oncology training provided by their curricula. Data on foundation year (FY) and core medical training (CMT) programmes were obtained and analysed for the proportion of oncology posts. Of the responding medical schools, five (36%) had a defined period dedicated to oncology (mean 2 weeks). Four foundation schools were in London, with 10,094 FY posts in 1699 programmes. Of these, 1.5% of post and 8.7% of programmes were in oncology. For CMT offered by the London deanery specialty schools, 11% of CMT post and 48% of programmes included oncology. Oncology was included in 11% posts and 48% programmes offered by the London Deanery specialty schools. Our results show that |
| doi_str_mv | 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-1-50 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1316053595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1470211824020566</els_id><sourcerecordid>2908406341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3ac19ec193ef78d3fb0c0f2f0c74785214c36032f20e294da9449c8400f5bb9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFTEQhYMozjj6D0QCIrjpMc_ujgtBxicMuNF1TFcqQ4a-yTXpHpl_b9p7feDCRcgJ5ztFpYqQx5ydD2PPX8Ac0w59hJjwnMuOd5rdIadcDbJTo5F3f2rWCc7HE_Kg1mvGuFamv09OhFSDaPKUfH0TK-TiXQKkEy7fEROF7VXovuCNm3FzXPJ0KS6mmK5eUkcToqchl2bQmKCgq9gEzQnynK9uKfoV3BJzekjuBTdXfHS8z8iXd28_X3zoLj-9_3jx-rIDLfulkw64wXYkhmH0MkwMWBCBwaCGUQuuQPZMiiAYCqO8M0oZGBVjQU-TAXlGnh_q7kv-tmJd7K79DOfZJcxrtVzynmmpjW7o03_Q67yW1LrbKNUbOYihUepAQcm1Fgx2X-LOlVvLmd02YP_eQEtabjVrsSfH4uvUzN-hXyNvwLMj4Cq4OZQ27Fj_cP2ojDK8ca8OHLap3UQstkLcluFjQVisz_H_nfwA9vyn_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1314693727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discordance between cancer prevalence and training: a need for an increase in oncology education</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Payne, Sarah ; Burke, Danny ; Mansi, Janine ; Jones, Alison ; Norton, Alison ; Joffe, Johnathan ; Cunningham, David ; McVie, Gordon ; Agarwal, Roshan</creator><creatorcontrib>Payne, Sarah ; Burke, Danny ; Mansi, Janine ; Jones, Alison ; Norton, Alison ; Joffe, Johnathan ; Cunningham, David ; McVie, Gordon ; Agarwal, Roshan</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of cancer on healthcare is increasing. Therefore, it is key that all doctors receive oncology training. This study surveyed UK undergraduate medical schools to determine the extent of oncology training provided by their curricula. Data on foundation year (FY) and core medical training (CMT) programmes were obtained and analysed for the proportion of oncology posts. Of the responding medical schools, five (36%) had a defined period dedicated to oncology (mean 2 weeks). Four foundation schools were in London, with 10,094 FY posts in 1699 programmes. Of these, 1.5% of post and 8.7% of programmes were in oncology. For CMT offered by the London deanery specialty schools, 11% of CMT post and 48% of programmes included oncology. Oncology was included in 11% posts and 48% programmes offered by the London Deanery specialty schools. Our results show that <50% of junior doctors receive dedicated undergraduate or postgraduate oncology training. An increase in oncology training is therefore urgently required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2118</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-1-50</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23472496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; clinical oncology ; core medical training ; Education, Medical - statistics & numerical data ; Educational Measurement ; Epidemiology ; foundation programme ; General aspects ; Humans ; medical oncology ; Medical Oncology - education ; Medical sciences ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; specialist trainee ; Specialization - trends ; Teaching - standards ; Teaching - trends ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Clinical medicine (London, England), 2013-02, Vol.13 (1), p.50-56</ispartof><rights>2013 © 2013 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Limited on behalf of the Royal College of Physicians.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Royal College of Physicians Feb 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3ac19ec193ef78d3fb0c0f2f0c74785214c36032f20e294da9449c8400f5bb9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3ac19ec193ef78d3fb0c0f2f0c74785214c36032f20e294da9449c8400f5bb9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26849491$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23472496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payne, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansi, Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joffe, Johnathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McVie, Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Roshan</creatorcontrib><title>Discordance between cancer prevalence and training: a need for an increase in oncology education</title><title>Clinical medicine (London, England)</title><addtitle>Clin Med (Lond)</addtitle><description>The impact of cancer on healthcare is increasing. Therefore, it is key that all doctors receive oncology training. This study surveyed UK undergraduate medical schools to determine the extent of oncology training provided by their curricula. Data on foundation year (FY) and core medical training (CMT) programmes were obtained and analysed for the proportion of oncology posts. Of the responding medical schools, five (36%) had a defined period dedicated to oncology (mean 2 weeks). Four foundation schools were in London, with 10,094 FY posts in 1699 programmes. Of these, 1.5% of post and 8.7% of programmes were in oncology. For CMT offered by the London deanery specialty schools, 11% of CMT post and 48% of programmes included oncology. Oncology was included in 11% posts and 48% programmes offered by the London Deanery specialty schools. Our results show that <50% of junior doctors receive dedicated undergraduate or postgraduate oncology training. An increase in oncology training is therefore urgently required.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>clinical oncology</subject><subject>core medical training</subject><subject>Education, Medical - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>foundation programme</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>medical oncology</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - education</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>specialist trainee</subject><subject>Specialization - trends</subject><subject>Teaching - standards</subject><subject>Teaching - trends</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1470-2118</issn><issn>1473-4893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuLFTEQhYMozjj6D0QCIrjpMc_ujgtBxicMuNF1TFcqQ4a-yTXpHpl_b9p7feDCRcgJ5ztFpYqQx5ydD2PPX8Ac0w59hJjwnMuOd5rdIadcDbJTo5F3f2rWCc7HE_Kg1mvGuFamv09OhFSDaPKUfH0TK-TiXQKkEy7fEROF7VXovuCNm3FzXPJ0KS6mmK5eUkcToqchl2bQmKCgq9gEzQnynK9uKfoV3BJzekjuBTdXfHS8z8iXd28_X3zoLj-9_3jx-rIDLfulkw64wXYkhmH0MkwMWBCBwaCGUQuuQPZMiiAYCqO8M0oZGBVjQU-TAXlGnh_q7kv-tmJd7K79DOfZJcxrtVzynmmpjW7o03_Q67yW1LrbKNUbOYihUepAQcm1Fgx2X-LOlVvLmd02YP_eQEtabjVrsSfH4uvUzN-hXyNvwLMj4Cq4OZQ27Fj_cP2ojDK8ca8OHLap3UQstkLcluFjQVisz_H_nfwA9vyn_Q</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Payne, Sarah</creator><creator>Burke, Danny</creator><creator>Mansi, Janine</creator><creator>Jones, Alison</creator><creator>Norton, Alison</creator><creator>Joffe, Johnathan</creator><creator>Cunningham, David</creator><creator>McVie, Gordon</creator><creator>Agarwal, Roshan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Royal College of Physicians</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Discordance between cancer prevalence and training: a need for an increase in oncology education</title><author>Payne, Sarah ; Burke, Danny ; Mansi, Janine ; Jones, Alison ; Norton, Alison ; Joffe, Johnathan ; Cunningham, David ; McVie, Gordon ; Agarwal, Roshan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3ac19ec193ef78d3fb0c0f2f0c74785214c36032f20e294da9449c8400f5bb9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>clinical oncology</topic><topic>core medical training</topic><topic>Education, Medical - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>foundation programme</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>medical oncology</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - education</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>specialist trainee</topic><topic>Specialization - trends</topic><topic>Teaching - standards</topic><topic>Teaching - trends</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payne, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansi, Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joffe, Johnathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McVie, Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Roshan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical medicine (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payne, Sarah</au><au>Burke, Danny</au><au>Mansi, Janine</au><au>Jones, Alison</au><au>Norton, Alison</au><au>Joffe, Johnathan</au><au>Cunningham, David</au><au>McVie, Gordon</au><au>Agarwal, Roshan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discordance between cancer prevalence and training: a need for an increase in oncology education</atitle><jtitle>Clinical medicine (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Med (Lond)</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>50</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>50-56</pages><issn>1470-2118</issn><eissn>1473-4893</eissn><abstract>The impact of cancer on healthcare is increasing. Therefore, it is key that all doctors receive oncology training. This study surveyed UK undergraduate medical schools to determine the extent of oncology training provided by their curricula. Data on foundation year (FY) and core medical training (CMT) programmes were obtained and analysed for the proportion of oncology posts. Of the responding medical schools, five (36%) had a defined period dedicated to oncology (mean 2 weeks). Four foundation schools were in London, with 10,094 FY posts in 1699 programmes. Of these, 1.5% of post and 8.7% of programmes were in oncology. For CMT offered by the London deanery specialty schools, 11% of CMT post and 48% of programmes included oncology. Oncology was included in 11% posts and 48% programmes offered by the London Deanery specialty schools. Our results show that <50% of junior doctors receive dedicated undergraduate or postgraduate oncology training. An increase in oncology training is therefore urgently required.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23472496</pmid><doi>10.7861/clinmedicine.13-1-50</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1470-2118 |
| ispartof | Clinical medicine (London, England), 2013-02, Vol.13 (1), p.50-56 |
| issn | 1470-2118 1473-4893 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1316053595 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences clinical oncology core medical training Education, Medical - statistics & numerical data Educational Measurement Epidemiology foundation programme General aspects Humans medical oncology Medical Oncology - education Medical sciences Neoplasms - epidemiology Neoplasms - prevention & control Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine specialist trainee Specialization - trends Teaching - standards Teaching - trends United Kingdom |
| title | Discordance between cancer prevalence and training: a need for an increase in oncology education |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T22%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discordance%20between%20cancer%20prevalence%20and%20training:%20a%20need%20for%20an%20increase%20in%20oncology%20education&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20medicine%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Payne,%20Sarah&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=50-56&rft.issn=1470-2118&rft.eissn=1473-4893&rft_id=info:doi/10.7861/clinmedicine.13-1-50&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2908406341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1314693727&rft_id=info:pmid/23472496&rft_els_id=S1470211824020566&rfr_iscdi=true |