Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
The determination that sexual harassment constituted "discrimination based on sex" under Title VII was first made by the lower federal courts, not Congress. Drawing from the literature on policy diffusion, this article examines the adoption of hostile work environment standards across the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Political research quarterly 2012-12, Vol.65 (4), p.784-798 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 798 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 784 |
container_title | Political research quarterly |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Moyer, Laura P. Tankersley, Holley |
description | The determination that sexual harassment constituted "discrimination based on sex" under Title VII was first made by the lower federal courts, not Congress. Drawing from the literature on policy diffusion, this article examines the adoption of hostile work environment standards across the U.S. Courts of Appeals in the absence of controlling Supreme Court precedent. The results bolster recent findings about the influence of female judges on their male colleagues and suggest that in addition to siding with female plaintiffs, female judges also helped to shape legal rules that promoted gender equality in the workplace. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1065912911411097 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1316053152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41759314</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1065912911411097</sage_id><sourcerecordid>41759314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-98ad4374c28e3b2eec670c76ec2e819c4b736ec5de2253d4b632eb80a74615083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctLAzEQxhdR8Hn3IgS8eNmayXuPUh9VBAUVvC1pdqpb2qQmu6L_vSkVEUH0NK_ffDDzFcU-0AGA1sdAlayAVQACgFZ6rdiCipuSafG4nvM8LpfzzWI7pSmlwEDIreL2qm9a19oZufQ-vNquDZ5Y35A7fOtzd2SjTWmOviOnwXWx9UhaT7pnJA-DuwEZhj52iYQJOVks0M7SbrExyQH3PuNO8XB-dj8cldc3F5fDk-vSCU67sjK2EVwLxwzyMUN0SlOnFTqGBionxprnQjbImOSNGCvOcGyo1UKBpIbvFEcr3UUMLz2mrp63yeFsZj2GPtXAQVHJQbL_oNJokb_1N8oMV1wZJjJ6-AOd5l_4fPOSEpJzpXSm6IpyMaQUcVIvYju38b0GWi-Nq38al1fK1UqyT_hN9Hf-YMVPUxfil74ALSsOgn8AgoCd3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1284533667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Moyer, Laura P. ; Tankersley, Holley</creator><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Laura P. ; Tankersley, Holley</creatorcontrib><description>The determination that sexual harassment constituted "discrimination based on sex" under Title VII was first made by the lower federal courts, not Congress. Drawing from the literature on policy diffusion, this article examines the adoption of hostile work environment standards across the U.S. Courts of Appeals in the absence of controlling Supreme Court precedent. The results bolster recent findings about the influence of female judges on their male colleagues and suggest that in addition to siding with female plaintiffs, female judges also helped to shape legal rules that promoted gender equality in the workplace.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-274X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1065912911411097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Appeals ; Appellate courts ; Courts ; Discrimination ; Employment discrimination ; Equality ; Federal court decisions ; Females ; Gender discrimination ; Harassment ; Innovation adoption ; Innovation diffusion ; Innovations ; Judges ; Litigation ; Males ; Plaintiffs ; Political research ; Sex ; Sex discrimination ; Sexual Harassment ; Supreme court ; Supreme Court decisions ; Supreme Courts ; U.S.A ; Women ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Political research quarterly, 2012-12, Vol.65 (4), p.784-798</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 The University of Utah</rights><rights>2012 University of Utah</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-98ad4374c28e3b2eec670c76ec2e819c4b736ec5de2253d4b632eb80a74615083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-98ad4374c28e3b2eec670c76ec2e819c4b736ec5de2253d4b632eb80a74615083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41759314$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41759314$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12845,21819,27865,27866,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Laura P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tankersley, Holley</creatorcontrib><title>Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals</title><title>Political research quarterly</title><description>The determination that sexual harassment constituted "discrimination based on sex" under Title VII was first made by the lower federal courts, not Congress. Drawing from the literature on policy diffusion, this article examines the adoption of hostile work environment standards across the U.S. Courts of Appeals in the absence of controlling Supreme Court precedent. The results bolster recent findings about the influence of female judges on their male colleagues and suggest that in addition to siding with female plaintiffs, female judges also helped to shape legal rules that promoted gender equality in the workplace.</description><subject>Appeals</subject><subject>Appellate courts</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Employment discrimination</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender discrimination</subject><subject>Harassment</subject><subject>Innovation adoption</subject><subject>Innovation diffusion</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Political research</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex discrimination</subject><subject>Sexual Harassment</subject><subject>Supreme court</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>Supreme Courts</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>1065-9129</issn><issn>1938-274X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctLAzEQxhdR8Hn3IgS8eNmayXuPUh9VBAUVvC1pdqpb2qQmu6L_vSkVEUH0NK_ffDDzFcU-0AGA1sdAlayAVQACgFZ6rdiCipuSafG4nvM8LpfzzWI7pSmlwEDIreL2qm9a19oZufQ-vNquDZ5Y35A7fOtzd2SjTWmOviOnwXWx9UhaT7pnJA-DuwEZhj52iYQJOVks0M7SbrExyQH3PuNO8XB-dj8cldc3F5fDk-vSCU67sjK2EVwLxwzyMUN0SlOnFTqGBionxprnQjbImOSNGCvOcGyo1UKBpIbvFEcr3UUMLz2mrp63yeFsZj2GPtXAQVHJQbL_oNJokb_1N8oMV1wZJjJ6-AOd5l_4fPOSEpJzpXSm6IpyMaQUcVIvYju38b0GWi-Nq38al1fK1UqyT_hN9Hf-YMVPUxfil74ALSsOgn8AgoCd3w</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Moyer, Laura P.</creator><creator>Tankersley, Holley</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals</title><author>Moyer, Laura P. ; Tankersley, Holley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-98ad4374c28e3b2eec670c76ec2e819c4b736ec5de2253d4b632eb80a74615083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Appeals</topic><topic>Appellate courts</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Employment discrimination</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender discrimination</topic><topic>Harassment</topic><topic>Innovation adoption</topic><topic>Innovation diffusion</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Political research</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex discrimination</topic><topic>Sexual Harassment</topic><topic>Supreme court</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>Supreme Courts</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Laura P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tankersley, Holley</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Political research quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moyer, Laura P.</au><au>Tankersley, Holley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals</atitle><jtitle>Political research quarterly</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>784</spage><epage>798</epage><pages>784-798</pages><issn>1065-9129</issn><eissn>1938-274X</eissn><abstract>The determination that sexual harassment constituted "discrimination based on sex" under Title VII was first made by the lower federal courts, not Congress. Drawing from the literature on policy diffusion, this article examines the adoption of hostile work environment standards across the U.S. Courts of Appeals in the absence of controlling Supreme Court precedent. The results bolster recent findings about the influence of female judges on their male colleagues and suggest that in addition to siding with female plaintiffs, female judges also helped to shape legal rules that promoted gender equality in the workplace.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1065912911411097</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1065-9129 |
ispartof | Political research quarterly, 2012-12, Vol.65 (4), p.784-798 |
issn | 1065-9129 1938-274X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1316053152 |
source | Access via SAGE; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Appeals Appellate courts Courts Discrimination Employment discrimination Equality Federal court decisions Females Gender discrimination Harassment Innovation adoption Innovation diffusion Innovations Judges Litigation Males Plaintiffs Political research Sex Sex discrimination Sexual Harassment Supreme court Supreme Court decisions Supreme Courts U.S.A Women Workplaces |
title | Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A29%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Judicial%20Innovation%20and%20Sexual%20Harassment%20Doctrine%20in%20the%20U.S.%20Courts%20of%20Appeals&rft.jtitle=Political%20research%20quarterly&rft.au=Moyer,%20Laura%20P.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=784&rft.epage=798&rft.pages=784-798&rft.issn=1065-9129&rft.eissn=1938-274X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1065912911411097&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41759314%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1284533667&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41759314&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1065912911411097&rfr_iscdi=true |