Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

The determination that sexual harassment constituted "discrimination based on sex" under Title VII was first made by the lower federal courts, not Congress. Drawing from the literature on policy diffusion, this article examines the adoption of hostile work environment standards across the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Political research quarterly 2012-12, Vol.65 (4), p.784-798
Hauptverfasser: Moyer, Laura P., Tankersley, Holley
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 798
container_issue 4
container_start_page 784
container_title Political research quarterly
container_volume 65
creator Moyer, Laura P.
Tankersley, Holley
description The determination that sexual harassment constituted "discrimination based on sex" under Title VII was first made by the lower federal courts, not Congress. Drawing from the literature on policy diffusion, this article examines the adoption of hostile work environment standards across the U.S. Courts of Appeals in the absence of controlling Supreme Court precedent. The results bolster recent findings about the influence of female judges on their male colleagues and suggest that in addition to siding with female plaintiffs, female judges also helped to shape legal rules that promoted gender equality in the workplace.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1065912911411097
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1316053152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41759314</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1065912911411097</sage_id><sourcerecordid>41759314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-98ad4374c28e3b2eec670c76ec2e819c4b736ec5de2253d4b632eb80a74615083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctLAzEQxhdR8Hn3IgS8eNmayXuPUh9VBAUVvC1pdqpb2qQmu6L_vSkVEUH0NK_ffDDzFcU-0AGA1sdAlayAVQACgFZ6rdiCipuSafG4nvM8LpfzzWI7pSmlwEDIreL2qm9a19oZufQ-vNquDZ5Y35A7fOtzd2SjTWmOviOnwXWx9UhaT7pnJA-DuwEZhj52iYQJOVks0M7SbrExyQH3PuNO8XB-dj8cldc3F5fDk-vSCU67sjK2EVwLxwzyMUN0SlOnFTqGBionxprnQjbImOSNGCvOcGyo1UKBpIbvFEcr3UUMLz2mrp63yeFsZj2GPtXAQVHJQbL_oNJokb_1N8oMV1wZJjJ6-AOd5l_4fPOSEpJzpXSm6IpyMaQUcVIvYju38b0GWi-Nq38al1fK1UqyT_hN9Hf-YMVPUxfil74ALSsOgn8AgoCd3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1284533667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Moyer, Laura P. ; Tankersley, Holley</creator><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Laura P. ; Tankersley, Holley</creatorcontrib><description>The determination that sexual harassment constituted "discrimination based on sex" under Title VII was first made by the lower federal courts, not Congress. Drawing from the literature on policy diffusion, this article examines the adoption of hostile work environment standards across the U.S. Courts of Appeals in the absence of controlling Supreme Court precedent. The results bolster recent findings about the influence of female judges on their male colleagues and suggest that in addition to siding with female plaintiffs, female judges also helped to shape legal rules that promoted gender equality in the workplace.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-274X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1065912911411097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Appeals ; Appellate courts ; Courts ; Discrimination ; Employment discrimination ; Equality ; Federal court decisions ; Females ; Gender discrimination ; Harassment ; Innovation adoption ; Innovation diffusion ; Innovations ; Judges ; Litigation ; Males ; Plaintiffs ; Political research ; Sex ; Sex discrimination ; Sexual Harassment ; Supreme court ; Supreme Court decisions ; Supreme Courts ; U.S.A ; Women ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Political research quarterly, 2012-12, Vol.65 (4), p.784-798</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 The University of Utah</rights><rights>2012 University of Utah</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-98ad4374c28e3b2eec670c76ec2e819c4b736ec5de2253d4b632eb80a74615083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-98ad4374c28e3b2eec670c76ec2e819c4b736ec5de2253d4b632eb80a74615083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41759314$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41759314$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12845,21819,27865,27866,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Laura P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tankersley, Holley</creatorcontrib><title>Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals</title><title>Political research quarterly</title><description>The determination that sexual harassment constituted "discrimination based on sex" under Title VII was first made by the lower federal courts, not Congress. Drawing from the literature on policy diffusion, this article examines the adoption of hostile work environment standards across the U.S. Courts of Appeals in the absence of controlling Supreme Court precedent. The results bolster recent findings about the influence of female judges on their male colleagues and suggest that in addition to siding with female plaintiffs, female judges also helped to shape legal rules that promoted gender equality in the workplace.</description><subject>Appeals</subject><subject>Appellate courts</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Employment discrimination</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender discrimination</subject><subject>Harassment</subject><subject>Innovation adoption</subject><subject>Innovation diffusion</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Political research</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex discrimination</subject><subject>Sexual Harassment</subject><subject>Supreme court</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>Supreme Courts</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>1065-9129</issn><issn>1938-274X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctLAzEQxhdR8Hn3IgS8eNmayXuPUh9VBAUVvC1pdqpb2qQmu6L_vSkVEUH0NK_ffDDzFcU-0AGA1sdAlayAVQACgFZ6rdiCipuSafG4nvM8LpfzzWI7pSmlwEDIreL2qm9a19oZufQ-vNquDZ5Y35A7fOtzd2SjTWmOviOnwXWx9UhaT7pnJA-DuwEZhj52iYQJOVks0M7SbrExyQH3PuNO8XB-dj8cldc3F5fDk-vSCU67sjK2EVwLxwzyMUN0SlOnFTqGBionxprnQjbImOSNGCvOcGyo1UKBpIbvFEcr3UUMLz2mrp63yeFsZj2GPtXAQVHJQbL_oNJokb_1N8oMV1wZJjJ6-AOd5l_4fPOSEpJzpXSm6IpyMaQUcVIvYju38b0GWi-Nq38al1fK1UqyT_hN9Hf-YMVPUxfil74ALSsOgn8AgoCd3w</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Moyer, Laura P.</creator><creator>Tankersley, Holley</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals</title><author>Moyer, Laura P. ; Tankersley, Holley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-98ad4374c28e3b2eec670c76ec2e819c4b736ec5de2253d4b632eb80a74615083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Appeals</topic><topic>Appellate courts</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Employment discrimination</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender discrimination</topic><topic>Harassment</topic><topic>Innovation adoption</topic><topic>Innovation diffusion</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Political research</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex discrimination</topic><topic>Sexual Harassment</topic><topic>Supreme court</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>Supreme Courts</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Laura P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tankersley, Holley</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Political research quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moyer, Laura P.</au><au>Tankersley, Holley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals</atitle><jtitle>Political research quarterly</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>784</spage><epage>798</epage><pages>784-798</pages><issn>1065-9129</issn><eissn>1938-274X</eissn><abstract>The determination that sexual harassment constituted "discrimination based on sex" under Title VII was first made by the lower federal courts, not Congress. Drawing from the literature on policy diffusion, this article examines the adoption of hostile work environment standards across the U.S. Courts of Appeals in the absence of controlling Supreme Court precedent. The results bolster recent findings about the influence of female judges on their male colleagues and suggest that in addition to siding with female plaintiffs, female judges also helped to shape legal rules that promoted gender equality in the workplace.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1065912911411097</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1065-9129
ispartof Political research quarterly, 2012-12, Vol.65 (4), p.784-798
issn 1065-9129
1938-274X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1316053152
source Access via SAGE; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Appeals
Appellate courts
Courts
Discrimination
Employment discrimination
Equality
Federal court decisions
Females
Gender discrimination
Harassment
Innovation adoption
Innovation diffusion
Innovations
Judges
Litigation
Males
Plaintiffs
Political research
Sex
Sex discrimination
Sexual Harassment
Supreme court
Supreme Court decisions
Supreme Courts
U.S.A
Women
Workplaces
title Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A29%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Judicial%20Innovation%20and%20Sexual%20Harassment%20Doctrine%20in%20the%20U.S.%20Courts%20of%20Appeals&rft.jtitle=Political%20research%20quarterly&rft.au=Moyer,%20Laura%20P.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=784&rft.epage=798&rft.pages=784-798&rft.issn=1065-9129&rft.eissn=1938-274X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1065912911411097&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41759314%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1284533667&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41759314&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1065912911411097&rfr_iscdi=true