Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword
Sharing is the constitutive activity of Web 2.0. But when did ‘sharing’ become the term used to describe the activities that constitute participation in Web 2.0? What does sharing mean in this context? What is its rhetorical force? This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New media & society 2013-03, Vol.15 (2), p.167-182 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 182 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | New media & society |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | John, Nicholas A. |
description | Sharing is the constitutive activity of Web 2.0. But when did ‘sharing’ become the term used to describe the activities that constitute participation in Web 2.0? What does sharing mean in this context? What is its rhetorical force? This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the context of Web 2.0 with three main features: fuzzy objects of sharing; the use of the word ‘share’ with no object at all; and presenting in terms of sharing functions of social network sites that used not to be so described. Following a critique of the use of the notion of sharing by social network sites, the article concludes by suggesting affinities between sharing in Web 2.0 and in other social spheres. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1461444812450684 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1316051743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1461444812450684</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1316051743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f84396187d87bfb9fdc646c46d53a55996e620b1e27233a78d2f5533ab57fa6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHvfoJe1O9jPepPgFBQ9WPC6bZLYfptm62yL9701IT4Knecz83sB7hNwCmwBoPQWhQAhhIBeSKSPOyKhfZZqDPD_p_n5JrlLaMAZK6GJEpu8rF9ftkrq2pp9Y0nzC7ulihRS3GJfYVkiDp45-4fEnxPqaXHjXJLw5zTH5eHpczF6y-dvz6-xhnlXcsH3mjeCFAqNro0tfFr6ulFCVULXkTsqiUKhyVgLmOufcaVPnXspOlVJ7pxwfk7vh7y6G7wOmvd2uU4VN41oMh2SBg2IStOAdyga0iiGliN7u4nrr4tECs3039m83nSUbLMkt0W7CIbZdmP_5X1hBX_k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1316051743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>John, Nicholas A.</creator><creatorcontrib>John, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><description>Sharing is the constitutive activity of Web 2.0. But when did ‘sharing’ become the term used to describe the activities that constitute participation in Web 2.0? What does sharing mean in this context? What is its rhetorical force? This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the context of Web 2.0 with three main features: fuzzy objects of sharing; the use of the word ‘share’ with no object at all; and presenting in terms of sharing functions of social network sites that used not to be so described. Following a critique of the use of the notion of sharing by social network sites, the article concludes by suggesting affinities between sharing in Web 2.0 and in other social spheres.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1461444812450684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Communications technology ; Internet ; Meaning ; New technology ; Rhetoric ; Social networks ; Social participation</subject><ispartof>New media & society, 2013-03, Vol.15 (2), p.167-182</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f84396187d87bfb9fdc646c46d53a55996e620b1e27233a78d2f5533ab57fa6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f84396187d87bfb9fdc646c46d53a55996e620b1e27233a78d2f5533ab57fa6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461444812450684$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444812450684$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>John, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><title>Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword</title><title>New media & society</title><description>Sharing is the constitutive activity of Web 2.0. But when did ‘sharing’ become the term used to describe the activities that constitute participation in Web 2.0? What does sharing mean in this context? What is its rhetorical force? This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the context of Web 2.0 with three main features: fuzzy objects of sharing; the use of the word ‘share’ with no object at all; and presenting in terms of sharing functions of social network sites that used not to be so described. Following a critique of the use of the notion of sharing by social network sites, the article concludes by suggesting affinities between sharing in Web 2.0 and in other social spheres.</description><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social participation</subject><issn>1461-4448</issn><issn>1461-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHvfoJe1O9jPepPgFBQ9WPC6bZLYfptm62yL9701IT4Knecz83sB7hNwCmwBoPQWhQAhhIBeSKSPOyKhfZZqDPD_p_n5JrlLaMAZK6GJEpu8rF9ftkrq2pp9Y0nzC7ulihRS3GJfYVkiDp45-4fEnxPqaXHjXJLw5zTH5eHpczF6y-dvz6-xhnlXcsH3mjeCFAqNro0tfFr6ulFCVULXkTsqiUKhyVgLmOufcaVPnXspOlVJ7pxwfk7vh7y6G7wOmvd2uU4VN41oMh2SBg2IStOAdyga0iiGliN7u4nrr4tECs3039m83nSUbLMkt0W7CIbZdmP_5X1hBX_k</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>John, Nicholas A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword</title><author>John, Nicholas A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f84396187d87bfb9fdc646c46d53a55996e620b1e27233a78d2f5533ab57fa6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social participation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>John, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>New media & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>John, Nicholas A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword</atitle><jtitle>New media & society</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>167-182</pages><issn>1461-4448</issn><eissn>1461-7315</eissn><abstract>Sharing is the constitutive activity of Web 2.0. But when did ‘sharing’ become the term used to describe the activities that constitute participation in Web 2.0? What does sharing mean in this context? What is its rhetorical force? This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the context of Web 2.0 with three main features: fuzzy objects of sharing; the use of the word ‘share’ with no object at all; and presenting in terms of sharing functions of social network sites that used not to be so described. Following a critique of the use of the notion of sharing by social network sites, the article concludes by suggesting affinities between sharing in Web 2.0 and in other social spheres.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1461444812450684</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-4448 |
ispartof | New media & society, 2013-03, Vol.15 (2), p.167-182 |
issn | 1461-4448 1461-7315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1316051743 |
source | Access via SAGE |
subjects | Communications technology Internet Meaning New technology Rhetoric Social networks Social participation |
title | Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A13%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sharing%20and%20Web%202.0:%20The%20emergence%20of%20a%20keyword&rft.jtitle=New%20media%20&%20society&rft.au=John,%20Nicholas%20A.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=167-182&rft.issn=1461-4448&rft.eissn=1461-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1461444812450684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1316051743%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1316051743&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1461444812450684&rfr_iscdi=true |