Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword

Sharing is the constitutive activity of Web 2.0. But when did ‘sharing’ become the term used to describe the activities that constitute participation in Web 2.0? What does sharing mean in this context? What is its rhetorical force? This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New media & society 2013-03, Vol.15 (2), p.167-182
1. Verfasser: John, Nicholas A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 182
container_issue 2
container_start_page 167
container_title New media & society
container_volume 15
creator John, Nicholas A.
description Sharing is the constitutive activity of Web 2.0. But when did ‘sharing’ become the term used to describe the activities that constitute participation in Web 2.0? What does sharing mean in this context? What is its rhetorical force? This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the context of Web 2.0 with three main features: fuzzy objects of sharing; the use of the word ‘share’ with no object at all; and presenting in terms of sharing functions of social network sites that used not to be so described. Following a critique of the use of the notion of sharing by social network sites, the article concludes by suggesting affinities between sharing in Web 2.0 and in other social spheres.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1461444812450684
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1316051743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1461444812450684</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1316051743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f84396187d87bfb9fdc646c46d53a55996e620b1e27233a78d2f5533ab57fa6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHvfoJe1O9jPepPgFBQ9WPC6bZLYfptm62yL9701IT4Knecz83sB7hNwCmwBoPQWhQAhhIBeSKSPOyKhfZZqDPD_p_n5JrlLaMAZK6GJEpu8rF9ftkrq2pp9Y0nzC7ulihRS3GJfYVkiDp45-4fEnxPqaXHjXJLw5zTH5eHpczF6y-dvz6-xhnlXcsH3mjeCFAqNro0tfFr6ulFCVULXkTsqiUKhyVgLmOufcaVPnXspOlVJ7pxwfk7vh7y6G7wOmvd2uU4VN41oMh2SBg2IStOAdyga0iiGliN7u4nrr4tECs3039m83nSUbLMkt0W7CIbZdmP_5X1hBX_k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1316051743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>John, Nicholas A.</creator><creatorcontrib>John, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><description>Sharing is the constitutive activity of Web 2.0. But when did ‘sharing’ become the term used to describe the activities that constitute participation in Web 2.0? What does sharing mean in this context? What is its rhetorical force? This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the context of Web 2.0 with three main features: fuzzy objects of sharing; the use of the word ‘share’ with no object at all; and presenting in terms of sharing functions of social network sites that used not to be so described. Following a critique of the use of the notion of sharing by social network sites, the article concludes by suggesting affinities between sharing in Web 2.0 and in other social spheres.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1461444812450684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Communications technology ; Internet ; Meaning ; New technology ; Rhetoric ; Social networks ; Social participation</subject><ispartof>New media &amp; society, 2013-03, Vol.15 (2), p.167-182</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f84396187d87bfb9fdc646c46d53a55996e620b1e27233a78d2f5533ab57fa6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f84396187d87bfb9fdc646c46d53a55996e620b1e27233a78d2f5533ab57fa6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461444812450684$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444812450684$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>John, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><title>Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword</title><title>New media &amp; society</title><description>Sharing is the constitutive activity of Web 2.0. But when did ‘sharing’ become the term used to describe the activities that constitute participation in Web 2.0? What does sharing mean in this context? What is its rhetorical force? This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the context of Web 2.0 with three main features: fuzzy objects of sharing; the use of the word ‘share’ with no object at all; and presenting in terms of sharing functions of social network sites that used not to be so described. Following a critique of the use of the notion of sharing by social network sites, the article concludes by suggesting affinities between sharing in Web 2.0 and in other social spheres.</description><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social participation</subject><issn>1461-4448</issn><issn>1461-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHvfoJe1O9jPepPgFBQ9WPC6bZLYfptm62yL9701IT4Knecz83sB7hNwCmwBoPQWhQAhhIBeSKSPOyKhfZZqDPD_p_n5JrlLaMAZK6GJEpu8rF9ftkrq2pp9Y0nzC7ulihRS3GJfYVkiDp45-4fEnxPqaXHjXJLw5zTH5eHpczF6y-dvz6-xhnlXcsH3mjeCFAqNro0tfFr6ulFCVULXkTsqiUKhyVgLmOufcaVPnXspOlVJ7pxwfk7vh7y6G7wOmvd2uU4VN41oMh2SBg2IStOAdyga0iiGliN7u4nrr4tECs3039m83nSUbLMkt0W7CIbZdmP_5X1hBX_k</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>John, Nicholas A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword</title><author>John, Nicholas A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f84396187d87bfb9fdc646c46d53a55996e620b1e27233a78d2f5533ab57fa6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social participation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>John, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>John, Nicholas A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword</atitle><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>167-182</pages><issn>1461-4448</issn><eissn>1461-7315</eissn><abstract>Sharing is the constitutive activity of Web 2.0. But when did ‘sharing’ become the term used to describe the activities that constitute participation in Web 2.0? What does sharing mean in this context? What is its rhetorical force? This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the context of Web 2.0 with three main features: fuzzy objects of sharing; the use of the word ‘share’ with no object at all; and presenting in terms of sharing functions of social network sites that used not to be so described. Following a critique of the use of the notion of sharing by social network sites, the article concludes by suggesting affinities between sharing in Web 2.0 and in other social spheres.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1461444812450684</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-4448
ispartof New media & society, 2013-03, Vol.15 (2), p.167-182
issn 1461-4448
1461-7315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1316051743
source Access via SAGE
subjects Communications technology
Internet
Meaning
New technology
Rhetoric
Social networks
Social participation
title Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A13%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sharing%20and%20Web%202.0:%20The%20emergence%20of%20a%20keyword&rft.jtitle=New%20media%20&%20society&rft.au=John,%20Nicholas%20A.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=167-182&rft.issn=1461-4448&rft.eissn=1461-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1461444812450684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1316051743%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1316051743&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1461444812450684&rfr_iscdi=true