Predicting readmissions: poor performance of the LACE index in an older UK population
interventions to prevent hospital readmission depend on the identification of patients at risk. The LACE index predicts readmission (and death) and is in clinical use internationally. The LACE index was investigated in an older UK population. randomly selected alive-discharge episodes were reviewed....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Age and ageing 2012-11, Vol.41 (6), p.784-789 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 789 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 784 |
container_title | Age and ageing |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Cotter, Paul E Bhalla, Vikas K Wallis, Stephen J Biram, Richard W S |
description | interventions to prevent hospital readmission depend on the identification of patients at risk. The LACE index predicts readmission (and death) and is in clinical use internationally. The LACE index was investigated in an older UK population.
randomly selected alive-discharge episodes were reviewed. A LACE score was calculated for each patient and assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. A logistic regression model was constructed, compared with the LACE and validated in a separate population.
a total of 507 patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 85 (6.5) years; 17.8% were readmitted and 4.5% died within 30 days. The median LACE score of those readmitted compared with those who were not was 12.5 versus 12 (P = 0.13). The Lace index was only a fair predictor of both 30-day readmission and death with c-statistics of 0.55 and 0.70, respectively. Only the emergency department visit was an independent predictor of readmission, with a c-statistic of 0.61 for readmission. In a validation cohort of 507 cases, the c-statistic of the regression model was 0.57.
the LACE index is a poor tool for predicting 30-day readmission in older UK inpatients. The absence of a simple predictive model may limit the benefit of readmission avoidance strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ageing/afs073 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315886275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A325378433</galeid><sourcerecordid>A325378433</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-62936db8ca0c3b0fa5ab223ad7fe6b6f9730e842fa6d85d91c7d67b5a7cdc7d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhq0KBFvKsdfKEhcuKf5IbKe31QraipXooXu2HHu8BGXtYCcS_fe4ChSpFy7zIT3zamZehD5T8pWSll-ZPfRhf2V8JpJ_QCtaC1UxxesjtCKEsIpI1p6ijzk_lJY2lJ2gU8ZEXROpVmj3K4Hr7VQ0cALjDn3OfQz5Gx5jTHiE5GM6mGABR4-ne8Db9eYa98HBU4nYBBwHBwnvbsvEOA9mKuOf0LE3Q4bzl3yGdjfXvzc_qu3d95-b9baytainSrCWC9cpa4jlHfGmMR1j3DjpQXTCt5ITUDXzRjjVuJZa6YTsGiOtK2XLz9Dlojum-DhDnnTZ38IwmABxzppy2iglmGzeRxmjlEvO5PsoLU9uWyFYQS_-Qx_inEK5eREUkjaiUNVC7c0Aug82hgmeJhuHAfagy0s2d3rNWcOlqjl_422KOSfwekz9waQ_mhL913W9uK4X1wv_5WWLuTuA-0e_2syfAewBp4Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221167156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting readmissions: poor performance of the LACE index in an older UK population</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cotter, Paul E ; Bhalla, Vikas K ; Wallis, Stephen J ; Biram, Richard W S</creator><creatorcontrib>Cotter, Paul E ; Bhalla, Vikas K ; Wallis, Stephen J ; Biram, Richard W S</creatorcontrib><description>interventions to prevent hospital readmission depend on the identification of patients at risk. The LACE index predicts readmission (and death) and is in clinical use internationally. The LACE index was investigated in an older UK population.
randomly selected alive-discharge episodes were reviewed. A LACE score was calculated for each patient and assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. A logistic regression model was constructed, compared with the LACE and validated in a separate population.
a total of 507 patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 85 (6.5) years; 17.8% were readmitted and 4.5% died within 30 days. The median LACE score of those readmitted compared with those who were not was 12.5 versus 12 (P = 0.13). The Lace index was only a fair predictor of both 30-day readmission and death with c-statistics of 0.55 and 0.70, respectively. Only the emergency department visit was an independent predictor of readmission, with a c-statistic of 0.61 for readmission. In a validation cohort of 507 cases, the c-statistic of the regression model was 0.57.
the LACE index is a poor tool for predicting 30-day readmission in older UK inpatients. The absence of a simple predictive model may limit the benefit of readmission avoidance strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afs073</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22644078</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Admission and discharge ; Aged ; Aged patients ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Care and treatment ; Company business management ; Death ; Elderly patients ; Forecasting ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Geriatric nursing ; Hospital admission and discharge ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Identification ; Logistic Models ; Management ; Medical examination ; Models, Statistical ; Older people ; Patient admissions ; Patient Discharge - economics ; Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Discharge - trends ; Patient Readmission - economics ; Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Readmission - trends ; Predictions ; Readmission ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Factors ; State Medicine - economics ; State Medicine - statistics & numerical data ; United Kingdom ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2012-11, Vol.41 (6), p.784-789</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Nov 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-62936db8ca0c3b0fa5ab223ad7fe6b6f9730e842fa6d85d91c7d67b5a7cdc7d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-62936db8ca0c3b0fa5ab223ad7fe6b6f9730e842fa6d85d91c7d67b5a7cdc7d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644078$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cotter, Paul E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhalla, Vikas K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biram, Richard W S</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting readmissions: poor performance of the LACE index in an older UK population</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>interventions to prevent hospital readmission depend on the identification of patients at risk. The LACE index predicts readmission (and death) and is in clinical use internationally. The LACE index was investigated in an older UK population.
randomly selected alive-discharge episodes were reviewed. A LACE score was calculated for each patient and assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. A logistic regression model was constructed, compared with the LACE and validated in a separate population.
a total of 507 patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 85 (6.5) years; 17.8% were readmitted and 4.5% died within 30 days. The median LACE score of those readmitted compared with those who were not was 12.5 versus 12 (P = 0.13). The Lace index was only a fair predictor of both 30-day readmission and death with c-statistics of 0.55 and 0.70, respectively. Only the emergency department visit was an independent predictor of readmission, with a c-statistic of 0.61 for readmission. In a validation cohort of 507 cases, the c-statistic of the regression model was 0.57.
the LACE index is a poor tool for predicting 30-day readmission in older UK inpatients. The absence of a simple predictive model may limit the benefit of readmission avoidance strategies.</description><subject>Admission and discharge</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged patients</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Elderly patients</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Geriatric nursing</subject><subject>Hospital admission and discharge</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - economics</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - trends</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - economics</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - trends</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Readmission</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>State Medicine - economics</subject><subject>State Medicine - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhq0KBFvKsdfKEhcuKf5IbKe31QraipXooXu2HHu8BGXtYCcS_fe4ChSpFy7zIT3zamZehD5T8pWSll-ZPfRhf2V8JpJ_QCtaC1UxxesjtCKEsIpI1p6ijzk_lJY2lJ2gU8ZEXROpVmj3K4Hr7VQ0cALjDn3OfQz5Gx5jTHiE5GM6mGABR4-ne8Db9eYa98HBU4nYBBwHBwnvbsvEOA9mKuOf0LE3Q4bzl3yGdjfXvzc_qu3d95-b9baytainSrCWC9cpa4jlHfGmMR1j3DjpQXTCt5ITUDXzRjjVuJZa6YTsGiOtK2XLz9Dlojum-DhDnnTZ38IwmABxzppy2iglmGzeRxmjlEvO5PsoLU9uWyFYQS_-Qx_inEK5eREUkjaiUNVC7c0Aug82hgmeJhuHAfagy0s2d3rNWcOlqjl_422KOSfwekz9waQ_mhL913W9uK4X1wv_5WWLuTuA-0e_2syfAewBp4Y</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Cotter, Paul E</creator><creator>Bhalla, Vikas K</creator><creator>Wallis, Stephen J</creator><creator>Biram, Richard W S</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Predicting readmissions: poor performance of the LACE index in an older UK population</title><author>Cotter, Paul E ; Bhalla, Vikas K ; Wallis, Stephen J ; Biram, Richard W S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-62936db8ca0c3b0fa5ab223ad7fe6b6f9730e842fa6d85d91c7d67b5a7cdc7d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Admission and discharge</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged patients</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Elderly patients</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Geriatric nursing</topic><topic>Hospital admission and discharge</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - economics</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - trends</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - economics</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - trends</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Readmission</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>State Medicine - economics</topic><topic>State Medicine - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cotter, Paul E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhalla, Vikas K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biram, Richard W S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cotter, Paul E</au><au>Bhalla, Vikas K</au><au>Wallis, Stephen J</au><au>Biram, Richard W S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting readmissions: poor performance of the LACE index in an older UK population</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>784</spage><epage>789</epage><pages>784-789</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><coden>AANGAH</coden><abstract>interventions to prevent hospital readmission depend on the identification of patients at risk. The LACE index predicts readmission (and death) and is in clinical use internationally. The LACE index was investigated in an older UK population.
randomly selected alive-discharge episodes were reviewed. A LACE score was calculated for each patient and assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. A logistic regression model was constructed, compared with the LACE and validated in a separate population.
a total of 507 patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 85 (6.5) years; 17.8% were readmitted and 4.5% died within 30 days. The median LACE score of those readmitted compared with those who were not was 12.5 versus 12 (P = 0.13). The Lace index was only a fair predictor of both 30-day readmission and death with c-statistics of 0.55 and 0.70, respectively. Only the emergency department visit was an independent predictor of readmission, with a c-statistic of 0.61 for readmission. In a validation cohort of 507 cases, the c-statistic of the regression model was 0.57.
the LACE index is a poor tool for predicting 30-day readmission in older UK inpatients. The absence of a simple predictive model may limit the benefit of readmission avoidance strategies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>22644078</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afs073</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-0729 |
ispartof | Age and ageing, 2012-11, Vol.41 (6), p.784-789 |
issn | 0002-0729 1468-2834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315886275 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Admission and discharge Aged Aged patients Aged, 80 and over Aging Care and treatment Company business management Death Elderly patients Forecasting Geriatric Assessment - methods Geriatric nursing Hospital admission and discharge Hospital Mortality Hospitals Humans Identification Logistic Models Management Medical examination Models, Statistical Older people Patient admissions Patient Discharge - economics Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data Patient Discharge - trends Patient Readmission - economics Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data Patient Readmission - trends Predictions Readmission Reproducibility of Results Risk Factors State Medicine - economics State Medicine - statistics & numerical data United Kingdom Validation |
title | Predicting readmissions: poor performance of the LACE index in an older UK population |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A11%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20readmissions:%20poor%20performance%20of%20the%20LACE%20index%20in%20an%20older%20UK%20population&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Cotter,%20Paul%20E&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=784&rft.epage=789&rft.pages=784-789&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft.coden=AANGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afs073&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA325378433%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221167156&rft_id=info:pmid/22644078&rft_galeid=A325378433&rfr_iscdi=true |