A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management

► We develop a framework for interdisciplinary research management. ► The framework allows for planning, monitoring, evaluation and scientific discussion. ► External management functions are key challenges. ► Resources allow context-specific and effective interdisciplinary management. With project-b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research policy 2013-02, Vol.42 (1), p.261-272
Hauptverfasser: König, Bettina, Diehl, Katharina, Tscherning, Karen, Helming, Katharina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 272
container_issue 1
container_start_page 261
container_title Research policy
container_volume 42
creator König, Bettina
Diehl, Katharina
Tscherning, Karen
Helming, Katharina
description ► We develop a framework for interdisciplinary research management. ► The framework allows for planning, monitoring, evaluation and scientific discussion. ► External management functions are key challenges. ► Resources allow context-specific and effective interdisciplinary management. With project-based research becoming a major form of research organisation, coordination and management has become an important task in interdisciplinary research collaborations and a key determinant of their success. Yet little theory-based information is available regarding the decisive determinants of project management success and the functions it needs to fulfil. Based on the assumption that such projects are temporary organisations, we have adapted the Competing Values Framework (Quinn, 1988; Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1983), taken from the literature on organisation management, making it usable for project managers in interdisciplinary research projects. Via a case study from a European Integrated Project, we have developed four essential management fields, relating them to the existing literature on management of inter- and transdisciplinary research projects. Our resulting Interdisciplinary Research Management Framework makes coordinator functions explicit and plausible, while also being generic, in that specific coordination duties can be attributed to functions relatively independent of project topic. The framework can facilitate the structured planning, conducting and evaluating of management activities for large interdisciplinary projects. It can be a practical tool for project leaders and scientific administrators, but may also help to facilitate further academic discussion on interdisciplinary research management. The production of results dependent on information transfers between project consortia and target arenas (e.g. the science–policy interface) remains a major challenge. In any case, a “re-invention of the wheel” process, in the sense of personal and project-specific learning, still seems to be somewhat necessary for organising context-specific, temporary interdisciplinary research programmes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315706363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048733312001436</els_id><sourcerecordid>1315706363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-e1dd3ea0618eade71186829e58737a932901a1581b77c0646aa33e9cf2e201123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1PwzAQxS0EEqXwHzBEYmFJuLMTO1mQqoovqRILzJZxLsUlH8VOQPz3uCoTA0y3_N7dvfcYO0fIEFBebTJPYTu0GQfkGRQZgDxgMyyVSJXkxSGbAeRlqoQQx-wkhA0AYA7VjC0WSeNNR5-Df0uawSdh9JMdJ-_6deL6kXztgnXb1vXGfyXxDhlvX5PO9GZNHfXjKTtqTBvo7GfO2fPtzdPyPl093j0sF6vUFgLGlLCuBRmQWJKpSSGWsuQVFfFJZSrBK0CDRYkvSlmQuTRGCKpswym6Qi7m7HK_d-uH94nCqLv4GbWt6WmYgkaBhQIppPgf5YqDknleRfTiF7oZJt9HI5HiIi85L_NI5XvK-iEET43eetfFQDSC3lWgN3pfgd5VoKHQsYIou97LKOby4cjrGCX1lmrnyY66HtzfC74BhjuP4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1223482284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>König, Bettina ; Diehl, Katharina ; Tscherning, Karen ; Helming, Katharina</creator><creatorcontrib>König, Bettina ; Diehl, Katharina ; Tscherning, Karen ; Helming, Katharina</creatorcontrib><description>► We develop a framework for interdisciplinary research management. ► The framework allows for planning, monitoring, evaluation and scientific discussion. ► External management functions are key challenges. ► Resources allow context-specific and effective interdisciplinary management. With project-based research becoming a major form of research organisation, coordination and management has become an important task in interdisciplinary research collaborations and a key determinant of their success. Yet little theory-based information is available regarding the decisive determinants of project management success and the functions it needs to fulfil. Based on the assumption that such projects are temporary organisations, we have adapted the Competing Values Framework (Quinn, 1988; Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1983), taken from the literature on organisation management, making it usable for project managers in interdisciplinary research projects. Via a case study from a European Integrated Project, we have developed four essential management fields, relating them to the existing literature on management of inter- and transdisciplinary research projects. Our resulting Interdisciplinary Research Management Framework makes coordinator functions explicit and plausible, while also being generic, in that specific coordination duties can be attributed to functions relatively independent of project topic. The framework can facilitate the structured planning, conducting and evaluating of management activities for large interdisciplinary projects. It can be a practical tool for project leaders and scientific administrators, but may also help to facilitate further academic discussion on interdisciplinary research management. The production of results dependent on information transfers between project consortia and target arenas (e.g. the science–policy interface) remains a major challenge. In any case, a “re-invention of the wheel” process, in the sense of personal and project-specific learning, still seems to be somewhat necessary for organising context-specific, temporary interdisciplinary research programmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-7333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REPYBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Consortia ; Coordination ; Determinants ; Impact assessment ; Innovation ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Interdisciplinary projects ; Interdisciplinary research ; Learning ; Management ; Management functions ; Management theory ; Project management ; Public administration ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research management ; Research programmes ; Research projects ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Tasks</subject><ispartof>Research policy, 2013-02, Vol.42 (1), p.261-272</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Feb 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-e1dd3ea0618eade71186829e58737a932901a1581b77c0646aa33e9cf2e201123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-e1dd3ea0618eade71186829e58737a932901a1581b77c0646aa33e9cf2e201123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733312001436$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>König, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diehl, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tscherning, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helming, Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management</title><title>Research policy</title><description>► We develop a framework for interdisciplinary research management. ► The framework allows for planning, monitoring, evaluation and scientific discussion. ► External management functions are key challenges. ► Resources allow context-specific and effective interdisciplinary management. With project-based research becoming a major form of research organisation, coordination and management has become an important task in interdisciplinary research collaborations and a key determinant of their success. Yet little theory-based information is available regarding the decisive determinants of project management success and the functions it needs to fulfil. Based on the assumption that such projects are temporary organisations, we have adapted the Competing Values Framework (Quinn, 1988; Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1983), taken from the literature on organisation management, making it usable for project managers in interdisciplinary research projects. Via a case study from a European Integrated Project, we have developed four essential management fields, relating them to the existing literature on management of inter- and transdisciplinary research projects. Our resulting Interdisciplinary Research Management Framework makes coordinator functions explicit and plausible, while also being generic, in that specific coordination duties can be attributed to functions relatively independent of project topic. The framework can facilitate the structured planning, conducting and evaluating of management activities for large interdisciplinary projects. It can be a practical tool for project leaders and scientific administrators, but may also help to facilitate further academic discussion on interdisciplinary research management. The production of results dependent on information transfers between project consortia and target arenas (e.g. the science–policy interface) remains a major challenge. In any case, a “re-invention of the wheel” process, in the sense of personal and project-specific learning, still seems to be somewhat necessary for organising context-specific, temporary interdisciplinary research programmes.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Determinants</subject><subject>Impact assessment</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary projects</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary research</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management functions</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research management</subject><subject>Research programmes</subject><subject>Research projects</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><issn>0048-7333</issn><issn>1873-7625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkb1PwzAQxS0EEqXwHzBEYmFJuLMTO1mQqoovqRILzJZxLsUlH8VOQPz3uCoTA0y3_N7dvfcYO0fIEFBebTJPYTu0GQfkGRQZgDxgMyyVSJXkxSGbAeRlqoQQx-wkhA0AYA7VjC0WSeNNR5-Df0uawSdh9JMdJ-_6deL6kXztgnXb1vXGfyXxDhlvX5PO9GZNHfXjKTtqTBvo7GfO2fPtzdPyPl093j0sF6vUFgLGlLCuBRmQWJKpSSGWsuQVFfFJZSrBK0CDRYkvSlmQuTRGCKpswym6Qi7m7HK_d-uH94nCqLv4GbWt6WmYgkaBhQIppPgf5YqDknleRfTiF7oZJt9HI5HiIi85L_NI5XvK-iEET43eetfFQDSC3lWgN3pfgd5VoKHQsYIou97LKOby4cjrGCX1lmrnyY66HtzfC74BhjuP4w</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>König, Bettina</creator><creator>Diehl, Katharina</creator><creator>Tscherning, Karen</creator><creator>Helming, Katharina</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management</title><author>König, Bettina ; Diehl, Katharina ; Tscherning, Karen ; Helming, Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-e1dd3ea0618eade71186829e58737a932901a1581b77c0646aa33e9cf2e201123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Determinants</topic><topic>Impact assessment</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary projects</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary research</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management functions</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research management</topic><topic>Research programmes</topic><topic>Research projects</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>König, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diehl, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tscherning, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helming, Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>König, Bettina</au><au>Diehl, Katharina</au><au>Tscherning, Karen</au><au>Helming, Katharina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management</atitle><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>261-272</pages><issn>0048-7333</issn><eissn>1873-7625</eissn><coden>REPYBP</coden><abstract>► We develop a framework for interdisciplinary research management. ► The framework allows for planning, monitoring, evaluation and scientific discussion. ► External management functions are key challenges. ► Resources allow context-specific and effective interdisciplinary management. With project-based research becoming a major form of research organisation, coordination and management has become an important task in interdisciplinary research collaborations and a key determinant of their success. Yet little theory-based information is available regarding the decisive determinants of project management success and the functions it needs to fulfil. Based on the assumption that such projects are temporary organisations, we have adapted the Competing Values Framework (Quinn, 1988; Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1983), taken from the literature on organisation management, making it usable for project managers in interdisciplinary research projects. Via a case study from a European Integrated Project, we have developed four essential management fields, relating them to the existing literature on management of inter- and transdisciplinary research projects. Our resulting Interdisciplinary Research Management Framework makes coordinator functions explicit and plausible, while also being generic, in that specific coordination duties can be attributed to functions relatively independent of project topic. The framework can facilitate the structured planning, conducting and evaluating of management activities for large interdisciplinary projects. It can be a practical tool for project leaders and scientific administrators, but may also help to facilitate further academic discussion on interdisciplinary research management. The production of results dependent on information transfers between project consortia and target arenas (e.g. the science–policy interface) remains a major challenge. In any case, a “re-invention of the wheel” process, in the sense of personal and project-specific learning, still seems to be somewhat necessary for organising context-specific, temporary interdisciplinary research programmes.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.006</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-7333
ispartof Research policy, 2013-02, Vol.42 (1), p.261-272
issn 0048-7333
1873-7625
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315706363
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Collaboration
Consortia
Coordination
Determinants
Impact assessment
Innovation
Interdisciplinary aspects
Interdisciplinary projects
Interdisciplinary research
Learning
Management
Management functions
Management theory
Project management
Public administration
R&D
Research & development
Research management
Research programmes
Research projects
Studies
Sustainability
Tasks
title A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T07%3A14%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20framework%20for%20structuring%20interdisciplinary%20research%20management&rft.jtitle=Research%20policy&rft.au=K%C3%B6nig,%20Bettina&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=261-272&rft.issn=0048-7333&rft.eissn=1873-7625&rft.coden=REPYBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1315706363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1223482284&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0048733312001436&rfr_iscdi=true