Throughput Comparisons of 32/64APSK Schemes Based on Mutual Information Considering Cubic Metric

This paper presents comprehensive comparisons of the achievable throughput between the 32-/64-ary amplitude and phase shift keying (APSK) and cross 32QAM/square 64QAM schemes based on mutual information (MI) considering the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the modulated signal. As a PAPR criter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEICE Transactions on Communications 2012/12/01, Vol.E95.B(12), pp.3719-3727
Hauptverfasser: KOBAYASHI, Reo, KAWAMURA, Teruo, MIKI, Nobuhiko, SAWAHASHI, Mamoru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3727
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3719
container_title IEICE Transactions on Communications
container_volume E95.B
creator KOBAYASHI, Reo
KAWAMURA, Teruo
MIKI, Nobuhiko
SAWAHASHI, Mamoru
description This paper presents comprehensive comparisons of the achievable throughput between the 32-/64-ary amplitude and phase shift keying (APSK) and cross 32QAM/square 64QAM schemes based on mutual information (MI) considering the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the modulated signal. As a PAPR criterion, we use a cubic metric (CM) that directly corresponds to the transmission back-off of a power amplifier. In the analysis, we present the best ring ratio for the 32 or 64APSK scheme from the viewpoint of minimizing the required received signal-to-noise power ratio (SNR) considering the CM that achieves the peak throughput, i.e., maximum error-free transmission rate. We show that the required received SNR considering the CM at the peak throughput is minimized with the number of rings of M =3 and 4 for 32-ary APSK and 64-asry APSK, respectively. Then, we show with the best ring ratios that the (4, 12, 16) 32APSK scheme with M =3 achieves a lower required received SNR considering the CM compared to that for the cross 32QAM scheme. Similarly, we show that the (4, 12, 20, 28) 64APSK scheme with M =4 achieves almost the same required received SNR considering the CM as that for the square 64QAM scheme.
doi_str_mv 10.1587/transcom.E95.B.3719
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315671126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1315671126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3bd7927da0d48539df1c0e807190c4a01f8acdc0590e3fada670f6e16e335d2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMlOwzAQQC0EEmX5Ai4-cknxxHGWI41YyiKQWs7GtSetURIX2znw9wQVEOI00ui9keYRcgZsCqIsLqJXfdCum15VYjqb8gKqPTKBIhMJ8EzskwmrIE9KAfkhOQrhjTEoU0gn5HW58W5Yb7ZDpLXrtsrb4PpAXUN5epFnl8-Le7rQG-ww0JkKaKjr6eMQB9XSed8436lox1U9Wtagt_2a1sPKavqI0Vt9Qg4a1QY8_Z7H5OX6alnfJg9PN_P68iHRWZHGhK9MUaWFUcxkpeCVaUAzLNn4CdOZYtCUShvNRMWQN8qovGBNjpAj58KkK35Mznd3t969Dxii7GzQ2LaqRzcECRxEXgCk-YjyHaq9C8FjI7fedsp_SGDyq6f86SnHnnImv3qO1t3OegtRrfHXUT5a3eJ_B9I_8i-kN8pL7PknzG-GrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1315671126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Throughput Comparisons of 32/64APSK Schemes Based on Mutual Information Considering Cubic Metric</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>KOBAYASHI, Reo ; KAWAMURA, Teruo ; MIKI, Nobuhiko ; SAWAHASHI, Mamoru</creator><creatorcontrib>KOBAYASHI, Reo ; KAWAMURA, Teruo ; MIKI, Nobuhiko ; SAWAHASHI, Mamoru</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents comprehensive comparisons of the achievable throughput between the 32-/64-ary amplitude and phase shift keying (APSK) and cross 32QAM/square 64QAM schemes based on mutual information (MI) considering the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the modulated signal. As a PAPR criterion, we use a cubic metric (CM) that directly corresponds to the transmission back-off of a power amplifier. In the analysis, we present the best ring ratio for the 32 or 64APSK scheme from the viewpoint of minimizing the required received signal-to-noise power ratio (SNR) considering the CM that achieves the peak throughput, i.e., maximum error-free transmission rate. We show that the required received SNR considering the CM at the peak throughput is minimized with the number of rings of M =3 and 4 for 32-ary APSK and 64-asry APSK, respectively. Then, we show with the best ring ratios that the (4, 12, 16) 32APSK scheme with M =3 achieves a lower required received SNR considering the CM compared to that for the cross 32QAM scheme. Similarly, we show that the (4, 12, 20, 28) 64APSK scheme with M =4 achieves almost the same required received SNR considering the CM as that for the square 64QAM scheme.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0916-8516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-1345</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1587/transcom.E95.B.3719</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers</publisher><subject>Amplitudes ; APSK ; Criteria ; cubic metric ; mutual information ; Phase shift keying ; Power amplifiers ; Signal to noise ratio ; throughput</subject><ispartof>IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2012/12/01, Vol.E95.B(12), pp.3719-3727</ispartof><rights>2012 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3bd7927da0d48539df1c0e807190c4a01f8acdc0590e3fada670f6e16e335d2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3bd7927da0d48539df1c0e807190c4a01f8acdc0590e3fada670f6e16e335d2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KOBAYASHI, Reo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAWAMURA, Teruo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKI, Nobuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAWAHASHI, Mamoru</creatorcontrib><title>Throughput Comparisons of 32/64APSK Schemes Based on Mutual Information Considering Cubic Metric</title><title>IEICE Transactions on Communications</title><addtitle>IEICE Trans. Commun.</addtitle><description>This paper presents comprehensive comparisons of the achievable throughput between the 32-/64-ary amplitude and phase shift keying (APSK) and cross 32QAM/square 64QAM schemes based on mutual information (MI) considering the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the modulated signal. As a PAPR criterion, we use a cubic metric (CM) that directly corresponds to the transmission back-off of a power amplifier. In the analysis, we present the best ring ratio for the 32 or 64APSK scheme from the viewpoint of minimizing the required received signal-to-noise power ratio (SNR) considering the CM that achieves the peak throughput, i.e., maximum error-free transmission rate. We show that the required received SNR considering the CM at the peak throughput is minimized with the number of rings of M =3 and 4 for 32-ary APSK and 64-asry APSK, respectively. Then, we show with the best ring ratios that the (4, 12, 16) 32APSK scheme with M =3 achieves a lower required received SNR considering the CM compared to that for the cross 32QAM scheme. Similarly, we show that the (4, 12, 20, 28) 64APSK scheme with M =4 achieves almost the same required received SNR considering the CM as that for the square 64QAM scheme.</description><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>APSK</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>cubic metric</subject><subject>mutual information</subject><subject>Phase shift keying</subject><subject>Power amplifiers</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>throughput</subject><issn>0916-8516</issn><issn>1745-1345</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMlOwzAQQC0EEmX5Ai4-cknxxHGWI41YyiKQWs7GtSetURIX2znw9wQVEOI00ui9keYRcgZsCqIsLqJXfdCum15VYjqb8gKqPTKBIhMJ8EzskwmrIE9KAfkhOQrhjTEoU0gn5HW58W5Yb7ZDpLXrtsrb4PpAXUN5epFnl8-Le7rQG-ww0JkKaKjr6eMQB9XSed8436lox1U9Wtagt_2a1sPKavqI0Vt9Qg4a1QY8_Z7H5OX6alnfJg9PN_P68iHRWZHGhK9MUaWFUcxkpeCVaUAzLNn4CdOZYtCUShvNRMWQN8qovGBNjpAj58KkK35Mznd3t969Dxii7GzQ2LaqRzcECRxEXgCk-YjyHaq9C8FjI7fedsp_SGDyq6f86SnHnnImv3qO1t3OegtRrfHXUT5a3eJ_B9I_8i-kN8pL7PknzG-GrQ</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>KOBAYASHI, Reo</creator><creator>KAWAMURA, Teruo</creator><creator>MIKI, Nobuhiko</creator><creator>SAWAHASHI, Mamoru</creator><general>The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Throughput Comparisons of 32/64APSK Schemes Based on Mutual Information Considering Cubic Metric</title><author>KOBAYASHI, Reo ; KAWAMURA, Teruo ; MIKI, Nobuhiko ; SAWAHASHI, Mamoru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3bd7927da0d48539df1c0e807190c4a01f8acdc0590e3fada670f6e16e335d2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>APSK</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>cubic metric</topic><topic>mutual information</topic><topic>Phase shift keying</topic><topic>Power amplifiers</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>throughput</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KOBAYASHI, Reo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAWAMURA, Teruo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKI, Nobuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAWAHASHI, Mamoru</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEICE Transactions on Communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KOBAYASHI, Reo</au><au>KAWAMURA, Teruo</au><au>MIKI, Nobuhiko</au><au>SAWAHASHI, Mamoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Throughput Comparisons of 32/64APSK Schemes Based on Mutual Information Considering Cubic Metric</atitle><jtitle>IEICE Transactions on Communications</jtitle><addtitle>IEICE Trans. Commun.</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>E95.B</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3719</spage><epage>3727</epage><pages>3719-3727</pages><issn>0916-8516</issn><eissn>1745-1345</eissn><abstract>This paper presents comprehensive comparisons of the achievable throughput between the 32-/64-ary amplitude and phase shift keying (APSK) and cross 32QAM/square 64QAM schemes based on mutual information (MI) considering the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the modulated signal. As a PAPR criterion, we use a cubic metric (CM) that directly corresponds to the transmission back-off of a power amplifier. In the analysis, we present the best ring ratio for the 32 or 64APSK scheme from the viewpoint of minimizing the required received signal-to-noise power ratio (SNR) considering the CM that achieves the peak throughput, i.e., maximum error-free transmission rate. We show that the required received SNR considering the CM at the peak throughput is minimized with the number of rings of M =3 and 4 for 32-ary APSK and 64-asry APSK, respectively. Then, we show with the best ring ratios that the (4, 12, 16) 32APSK scheme with M =3 achieves a lower required received SNR considering the CM compared to that for the cross 32QAM scheme. Similarly, we show that the (4, 12, 20, 28) 64APSK scheme with M =4 achieves almost the same required received SNR considering the CM as that for the square 64QAM scheme.</abstract><pub>The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers</pub><doi>10.1587/transcom.E95.B.3719</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0916-8516
ispartof IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2012/12/01, Vol.E95.B(12), pp.3719-3727
issn 0916-8516
1745-1345
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315671126
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Amplitudes
APSK
Criteria
cubic metric
mutual information
Phase shift keying
Power amplifiers
Signal to noise ratio
throughput
title Throughput Comparisons of 32/64APSK Schemes Based on Mutual Information Considering Cubic Metric
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A45%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Throughput%20Comparisons%20of%2032/64APSK%20Schemes%20Based%20on%20Mutual%20Information%20Considering%20Cubic%20Metric&rft.jtitle=IEICE%20Transactions%20on%20Communications&rft.au=KOBAYASHI,%20Reo&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=E95.B&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3719&rft.epage=3727&rft.pages=3719-3727&rft.issn=0916-8516&rft.eissn=1745-1345&rft_id=info:doi/10.1587/transcom.E95.B.3719&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1315671126%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1315671126&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true