Patterns of diversity and abundance of fleas and mites in the Neotropics: host-related, parasite-related and environment-related factors
The effects of host‐related, parasite‐related and environmental factors on the diversity and abundance of two ectoparasite taxa, fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera) and mites (Acari: Mesostigmata), parasitic on small mammals (rodents and marsupials), were studied in different localities across Brazil. A s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Medical and veterinary entomology 2013-03, Vol.27 (1), p.49-58 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 58 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 49 |
| container_title | Medical and veterinary entomology |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | LINARDI, P. M. KRASNOV, B. R. |
| description | The effects of host‐related, parasite‐related and environmental factors on the diversity and abundance of two ectoparasite taxa, fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera) and mites (Acari: Mesostigmata), parasitic on small mammals (rodents and marsupials), were studied in different localities across Brazil. A stronger effect of host‐related factors on flea than on mite assemblages, and a stronger effect of environmental factors on mite than on flea assemblages were predicted. In addition, the effects of parasite‐related factors on flea and mite diversity and abundance were predicted to manifest mainly at the scale of infracommunities, whereas the effects of host‐related and environmental factors were predicted to manifest mainly at the scale of component and compound communities. This study found that, in general, diversity and abundance of flea and mite assemblages at two lower hierarchical levels (infracommunities and component communities) were affected by host‐related, parasite‐related and environmental factors, and compound communities were affected mainly by host‐related and environmental factors. The effects of factors differed between fleas and mites: in fleas, community structure and abundance depended on host diversity to a greater extent than in mites. In addition, the effects of factors differed among parasite assemblages harboured by different host species. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01025.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315626003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1315626003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4685-46eb2fe919e2d906b59f48e63e41c1ee6cbcc735ef833a12512d7b7ef20bc19e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCKyBLXDiQYI8Tx0HigEopSKVwgMLNcpyJmiVrL7bT7r4Bj02y2-6BC_hia-b7ZmT9hFDOcj6dV8ucC1lmUPMyB8YhZ5xBmW8ekMWh8ZAsGMg6AyV-HJHjGJeM8aoGeEyOACoOheIL8vuLSQmDi9R3tO1vMMQ-balxLTXN6FrjLM6tbkATd-VVnzDS3tF0jfQSfQp-3dv4ml77mLKAg0nYvqRrE8w0Cu8rOxfdTR-8W6E7kLQzNvkQn5BHnRkiPr27T8i392dfTz9kF5_PP56-vchsIVWZFRIb6LDmNUJbM9mUdVcolAILbjmitI21lSixU0IYDiWHtmoq7IA1dpLECXmxn7sO_teIMelVHy0Og3Hox6i54KUEyZj4NwpKCV4wKCb0-V_o0o_BTR_RvIBKlbwGOVFqT9ngYwzY6XXoVyZsNWd6DlYv9ZyfnvPTc7B6F6zeTOqzuwVjs8L2IN4nOQFv9sBtP-D2vwfrT1dn82vys73fx4Sbg2_CTy0rUZX6--W5vqoL9a5StVbiD-f-wWE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1427851926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of diversity and abundance of fleas and mites in the Neotropics: host-related, parasite-related and environment-related factors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>LINARDI, P. M. ; KRASNOV, B. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>LINARDI, P. M. ; KRASNOV, B. R.</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of host‐related, parasite‐related and environmental factors on the diversity and abundance of two ectoparasite taxa, fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera) and mites (Acari: Mesostigmata), parasitic on small mammals (rodents and marsupials), were studied in different localities across Brazil. A stronger effect of host‐related factors on flea than on mite assemblages, and a stronger effect of environmental factors on mite than on flea assemblages were predicted. In addition, the effects of parasite‐related factors on flea and mite diversity and abundance were predicted to manifest mainly at the scale of infracommunities, whereas the effects of host‐related and environmental factors were predicted to manifest mainly at the scale of component and compound communities. This study found that, in general, diversity and abundance of flea and mite assemblages at two lower hierarchical levels (infracommunities and component communities) were affected by host‐related, parasite‐related and environmental factors, and compound communities were affected mainly by host‐related and environmental factors. The effects of factors differed between fleas and mites: in fleas, community structure and abundance depended on host diversity to a greater extent than in mites. In addition, the effects of factors differed among parasite assemblages harboured by different host species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-283X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01025.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22712481</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Acari ; Animals ; Biota ; Brazil ; fleas ; Host-Parasite Interactions ; Insecta ; latitude ; Marsupialia - parasitology ; Mesostigmata ; mites ; Mites - classification ; Mites - physiology ; Parasites ; Population Density ; Rodentia - parasitology ; Siphonaptera ; Siphonaptera - classification ; Siphonaptera - physiology ; small mammals ; species richness ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Medical and veterinary entomology, 2013-03, Vol.27 (1), p.49-58</ispartof><rights>2012 The Royal Entomological Society</rights><rights>2012 The Royal Entomological Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4685-46eb2fe919e2d906b59f48e63e41c1ee6cbcc735ef833a12512d7b7ef20bc19e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4685-46eb2fe919e2d906b59f48e63e41c1ee6cbcc735ef833a12512d7b7ef20bc19e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2915.2012.01025.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2915.2012.01025.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22712481$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LINARDI, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRASNOV, B. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of diversity and abundance of fleas and mites in the Neotropics: host-related, parasite-related and environment-related factors</title><title>Medical and veterinary entomology</title><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><description>The effects of host‐related, parasite‐related and environmental factors on the diversity and abundance of two ectoparasite taxa, fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera) and mites (Acari: Mesostigmata), parasitic on small mammals (rodents and marsupials), were studied in different localities across Brazil. A stronger effect of host‐related factors on flea than on mite assemblages, and a stronger effect of environmental factors on mite than on flea assemblages were predicted. In addition, the effects of parasite‐related factors on flea and mite diversity and abundance were predicted to manifest mainly at the scale of infracommunities, whereas the effects of host‐related and environmental factors were predicted to manifest mainly at the scale of component and compound communities. This study found that, in general, diversity and abundance of flea and mite assemblages at two lower hierarchical levels (infracommunities and component communities) were affected by host‐related, parasite‐related and environmental factors, and compound communities were affected mainly by host‐related and environmental factors. The effects of factors differed between fleas and mites: in fleas, community structure and abundance depended on host diversity to a greater extent than in mites. In addition, the effects of factors differed among parasite assemblages harboured by different host species.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Acari</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>fleas</subject><subject>Host-Parasite Interactions</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>latitude</subject><subject>Marsupialia - parasitology</subject><subject>Mesostigmata</subject><subject>mites</subject><subject>Mites - classification</subject><subject>Mites - physiology</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Rodentia - parasitology</subject><subject>Siphonaptera</subject><subject>Siphonaptera - classification</subject><subject>Siphonaptera - physiology</subject><subject>small mammals</subject><subject>species richness</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0269-283X</issn><issn>1365-2915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCKyBLXDiQYI8Tx0HigEopSKVwgMLNcpyJmiVrL7bT7r4Bj02y2-6BC_hia-b7ZmT9hFDOcj6dV8ucC1lmUPMyB8YhZ5xBmW8ekMWh8ZAsGMg6AyV-HJHjGJeM8aoGeEyOACoOheIL8vuLSQmDi9R3tO1vMMQ-balxLTXN6FrjLM6tbkATd-VVnzDS3tF0jfQSfQp-3dv4ml77mLKAg0nYvqRrE8w0Cu8rOxfdTR-8W6E7kLQzNvkQn5BHnRkiPr27T8i392dfTz9kF5_PP56-vchsIVWZFRIb6LDmNUJbM9mUdVcolAILbjmitI21lSixU0IYDiWHtmoq7IA1dpLECXmxn7sO_teIMelVHy0Og3Hox6i54KUEyZj4NwpKCV4wKCb0-V_o0o_BTR_RvIBKlbwGOVFqT9ngYwzY6XXoVyZsNWd6DlYv9ZyfnvPTc7B6F6zeTOqzuwVjs8L2IN4nOQFv9sBtP-D2vwfrT1dn82vys73fx4Sbg2_CTy0rUZX6--W5vqoL9a5StVbiD-f-wWE</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>LINARDI, P. M.</creator><creator>KRASNOV, B. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Patterns of diversity and abundance of fleas and mites in the Neotropics: host-related, parasite-related and environment-related factors</title><author>LINARDI, P. M. ; KRASNOV, B. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4685-46eb2fe919e2d906b59f48e63e41c1ee6cbcc735ef833a12512d7b7ef20bc19e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Acari</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>fleas</topic><topic>Host-Parasite Interactions</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>latitude</topic><topic>Marsupialia - parasitology</topic><topic>Mesostigmata</topic><topic>mites</topic><topic>Mites - classification</topic><topic>Mites - physiology</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Rodentia - parasitology</topic><topic>Siphonaptera</topic><topic>Siphonaptera - classification</topic><topic>Siphonaptera - physiology</topic><topic>small mammals</topic><topic>species richness</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LINARDI, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRASNOV, B. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LINARDI, P. M.</au><au>KRASNOV, B. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of diversity and abundance of fleas and mites in the Neotropics: host-related, parasite-related and environment-related factors</atitle><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>49-58</pages><issn>0269-283X</issn><eissn>1365-2915</eissn><abstract>The effects of host‐related, parasite‐related and environmental factors on the diversity and abundance of two ectoparasite taxa, fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera) and mites (Acari: Mesostigmata), parasitic on small mammals (rodents and marsupials), were studied in different localities across Brazil. A stronger effect of host‐related factors on flea than on mite assemblages, and a stronger effect of environmental factors on mite than on flea assemblages were predicted. In addition, the effects of parasite‐related factors on flea and mite diversity and abundance were predicted to manifest mainly at the scale of infracommunities, whereas the effects of host‐related and environmental factors were predicted to manifest mainly at the scale of component and compound communities. This study found that, in general, diversity and abundance of flea and mite assemblages at two lower hierarchical levels (infracommunities and component communities) were affected by host‐related, parasite‐related and environmental factors, and compound communities were affected mainly by host‐related and environmental factors. The effects of factors differed between fleas and mites: in fleas, community structure and abundance depended on host diversity to a greater extent than in mites. In addition, the effects of factors differed among parasite assemblages harboured by different host species.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22712481</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01025.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0269-283X |
| ispartof | Medical and veterinary entomology, 2013-03, Vol.27 (1), p.49-58 |
| issn | 0269-283X 1365-2915 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315626003 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
| subjects | Abundance Acari Animals Biota Brazil fleas Host-Parasite Interactions Insecta latitude Marsupialia - parasitology Mesostigmata mites Mites - classification Mites - physiology Parasites Population Density Rodentia - parasitology Siphonaptera Siphonaptera - classification Siphonaptera - physiology small mammals species richness Studies |
| title | Patterns of diversity and abundance of fleas and mites in the Neotropics: host-related, parasite-related and environment-related factors |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A41%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20diversity%20and%20abundance%20of%20fleas%20and%20mites%20in%20the%20Neotropics:%20host-related,%20parasite-related%20and%20environment-related%20factors&rft.jtitle=Medical%20and%20veterinary%20entomology&rft.au=LINARDI,%20P.%20M.&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=49-58&rft.issn=0269-283X&rft.eissn=1365-2915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01025.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1315626003%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1427851926&rft_id=info:pmid/22712481&rfr_iscdi=true |