Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?
This article examines models for the organisation of defence at the highest level and considers their suitability to operate in the contemporary strategic environment. We characterise the contemporary environment and test against this characterisation a separated model for strategic-level defence or...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Defence studies 2012-12, Vol.12 (4), p.503-522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 522 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 503 |
container_title | Defence studies |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Lawrence, Tony Jermalavičius, Tomas |
description | This article examines models for the organisation of defence at the highest level and considers their suitability to operate in the contemporary strategic environment. We characterise the contemporary environment and test against this characterisation a separated model for strategic-level defence organisation, which contains distinct political strategic and military strategic structures and functions, and an integrated model in which these structures and functions have been brought together. From this analysis, and by drawing on the experiences of the commercial sector, we conclude that in matching the environment, an integrated model offers considerably more and clearer advantages than a separated one. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14702436.2012.745963 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315598220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2863557821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-3fd7bf2ff7ff7cf5246c98c2705c29bad488e0549d6f12390830d2c9d02ca17c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxU1Jock236AHQS-5eKN_tqVcQrpJuoWFFJKehSKPdhVsyZHkXfLtY3fbSw-FgZnD7z1m5hXFF4KXBAt8SXiDKWf1kmJClw2vZM0-FKek4ayUtRQn0zwh5cx8Ks5SesGYYiHq02K4dxnZENHPMQ4hwRVahwN63IWxa1HeAVq77Q4i2sAeuoSCRbdgwRtA3wA9xK32LkGLnP8Nr4LP0A8h6viGHnPUGbbOoDu_dzH4Hny-_lx8tLpLcP6nL4pf93dPq3W5efj-Y3WzKQ0VLJfMts2zpdY2UxlbUV4bKQxtcGWofNYtFwJwxWVbW0KZxILhlhrZYmo0aQxbFBdH3yGG1xFSVr1LBrpOewhjUoSRqpKCUjyhX_9BX8IY_bSdIrQWgomazxQ_UiaGlCJYNUTXT4cqgtUcg_obg5pjUMcYJtn1Ueb89OZeH0LsWpX1WxeijdoblxT7r8M7B6aN4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1268838640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Lawrence, Tony ; Jermalavičius, Tomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Tony ; Jermalavičius, Tomas</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines models for the organisation of defence at the highest level and considers their suitability to operate in the contemporary strategic environment. We characterise the contemporary environment and test against this characterisation a separated model for strategic-level defence organisation, which contains distinct political strategic and military strategic structures and functions, and an integrated model in which these structures and functions have been brought together. From this analysis, and by drawing on the experiences of the commercial sector, we conclude that in matching the environment, an integrated model offers considerably more and clearer advantages than a separated one. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9698</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14702436.2012.745963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Armed forces ; Defense Policy ; Military Strategy ; Organizations ; Politics</subject><ispartof>Defence studies, 2012-12, Vol.12 (4), p.503-522</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-3fd7bf2ff7ff7cf5246c98c2705c29bad488e0549d6f12390830d2c9d02ca17c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jermalavičius, Tomas</creatorcontrib><title>Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?</title><title>Defence studies</title><description>This article examines models for the organisation of defence at the highest level and considers their suitability to operate in the contemporary strategic environment. We characterise the contemporary environment and test against this characterisation a separated model for strategic-level defence organisation, which contains distinct political strategic and military strategic structures and functions, and an integrated model in which these structures and functions have been brought together. From this analysis, and by drawing on the experiences of the commercial sector, we conclude that in matching the environment, an integrated model offers considerably more and clearer advantages than a separated one. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Defense Policy</subject><subject>Military Strategy</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>1470-2436</issn><issn>1743-9698</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxU1Jock236AHQS-5eKN_tqVcQrpJuoWFFJKehSKPdhVsyZHkXfLtY3fbSw-FgZnD7z1m5hXFF4KXBAt8SXiDKWf1kmJClw2vZM0-FKek4ayUtRQn0zwh5cx8Ks5SesGYYiHq02K4dxnZENHPMQ4hwRVahwN63IWxa1HeAVq77Q4i2sAeuoSCRbdgwRtA3wA9xK32LkGLnP8Nr4LP0A8h6viGHnPUGbbOoDu_dzH4Hny-_lx8tLpLcP6nL4pf93dPq3W5efj-Y3WzKQ0VLJfMts2zpdY2UxlbUV4bKQxtcGWofNYtFwJwxWVbW0KZxILhlhrZYmo0aQxbFBdH3yGG1xFSVr1LBrpOewhjUoSRqpKCUjyhX_9BX8IY_bSdIrQWgomazxQ_UiaGlCJYNUTXT4cqgtUcg_obg5pjUMcYJtn1Ueb89OZeH0LsWpX1WxeijdoblxT7r8M7B6aN4Q</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Lawrence, Tony</creator><creator>Jermalavičius, Tomas</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?</title><author>Lawrence, Tony ; Jermalavičius, Tomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-3fd7bf2ff7ff7cf5246c98c2705c29bad488e0549d6f12390830d2c9d02ca17c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Defense Policy</topic><topic>Military Strategy</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jermalavičius, Tomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Defence studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawrence, Tony</au><au>Jermalavičius, Tomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?</atitle><jtitle>Defence studies</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>503-522</pages><issn>1470-2436</issn><eissn>1743-9698</eissn><abstract>This article examines models for the organisation of defence at the highest level and considers their suitability to operate in the contemporary strategic environment. We characterise the contemporary environment and test against this characterisation a separated model for strategic-level defence organisation, which contains distinct political strategic and military strategic structures and functions, and an integrated model in which these structures and functions have been brought together. From this analysis, and by drawing on the experiences of the commercial sector, we conclude that in matching the environment, an integrated model offers considerably more and clearer advantages than a separated one. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/14702436.2012.745963</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-2436 |
ispartof | Defence studies, 2012-12, Vol.12 (4), p.503-522 |
issn | 1470-2436 1743-9698 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315598220 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Armed forces Defense Policy Military Strategy Organizations Politics |
title | Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T11%3A33%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fit%20for%20Purpose:%20How%20Should%20the%20Higher%20Levels%20of%20Defence%20Be%20Organised%20in%20the%20Contemporary%20Strategic%20Environment?&rft.jtitle=Defence%20studies&rft.au=Lawrence,%20Tony&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=503-522&rft.issn=1470-2436&rft.eissn=1743-9698&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14702436.2012.745963&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2863557821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1268838640&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |