Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?

This article examines models for the organisation of defence at the highest level and considers their suitability to operate in the contemporary strategic environment. We characterise the contemporary environment and test against this characterisation a separated model for strategic-level defence or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Defence studies 2012-12, Vol.12 (4), p.503-522
Hauptverfasser: Lawrence, Tony, Jermalavičius, Tomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 522
container_issue 4
container_start_page 503
container_title Defence studies
container_volume 12
creator Lawrence, Tony
Jermalavičius, Tomas
description This article examines models for the organisation of defence at the highest level and considers their suitability to operate in the contemporary strategic environment. We characterise the contemporary environment and test against this characterisation a separated model for strategic-level defence organisation, which contains distinct political strategic and military strategic structures and functions, and an integrated model in which these structures and functions have been brought together. From this analysis, and by drawing on the experiences of the commercial sector, we conclude that in matching the environment, an integrated model offers considerably more and clearer advantages than a separated one. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14702436.2012.745963
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315598220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2863557821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-3fd7bf2ff7ff7cf5246c98c2705c29bad488e0549d6f12390830d2c9d02ca17c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxU1Jock236AHQS-5eKN_tqVcQrpJuoWFFJKehSKPdhVsyZHkXfLtY3fbSw-FgZnD7z1m5hXFF4KXBAt8SXiDKWf1kmJClw2vZM0-FKek4ayUtRQn0zwh5cx8Ks5SesGYYiHq02K4dxnZENHPMQ4hwRVahwN63IWxa1HeAVq77Q4i2sAeuoSCRbdgwRtA3wA9xK32LkGLnP8Nr4LP0A8h6viGHnPUGbbOoDu_dzH4Hny-_lx8tLpLcP6nL4pf93dPq3W5efj-Y3WzKQ0VLJfMts2zpdY2UxlbUV4bKQxtcGWofNYtFwJwxWVbW0KZxILhlhrZYmo0aQxbFBdH3yGG1xFSVr1LBrpOewhjUoSRqpKCUjyhX_9BX8IY_bSdIrQWgomazxQ_UiaGlCJYNUTXT4cqgtUcg_obg5pjUMcYJtn1Ueb89OZeH0LsWpX1WxeijdoblxT7r8M7B6aN4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1268838640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Lawrence, Tony ; Jermalavičius, Tomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Tony ; Jermalavičius, Tomas</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines models for the organisation of defence at the highest level and considers their suitability to operate in the contemporary strategic environment. We characterise the contemporary environment and test against this characterisation a separated model for strategic-level defence organisation, which contains distinct political strategic and military strategic structures and functions, and an integrated model in which these structures and functions have been brought together. From this analysis, and by drawing on the experiences of the commercial sector, we conclude that in matching the environment, an integrated model offers considerably more and clearer advantages than a separated one. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9698</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14702436.2012.745963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Armed forces ; Defense Policy ; Military Strategy ; Organizations ; Politics</subject><ispartof>Defence studies, 2012-12, Vol.12 (4), p.503-522</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-3fd7bf2ff7ff7cf5246c98c2705c29bad488e0549d6f12390830d2c9d02ca17c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jermalavičius, Tomas</creatorcontrib><title>Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?</title><title>Defence studies</title><description>This article examines models for the organisation of defence at the highest level and considers their suitability to operate in the contemporary strategic environment. We characterise the contemporary environment and test against this characterisation a separated model for strategic-level defence organisation, which contains distinct political strategic and military strategic structures and functions, and an integrated model in which these structures and functions have been brought together. From this analysis, and by drawing on the experiences of the commercial sector, we conclude that in matching the environment, an integrated model offers considerably more and clearer advantages than a separated one. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Defense Policy</subject><subject>Military Strategy</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>1470-2436</issn><issn>1743-9698</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxU1Jock236AHQS-5eKN_tqVcQrpJuoWFFJKehSKPdhVsyZHkXfLtY3fbSw-FgZnD7z1m5hXFF4KXBAt8SXiDKWf1kmJClw2vZM0-FKek4ayUtRQn0zwh5cx8Ks5SesGYYiHq02K4dxnZENHPMQ4hwRVahwN63IWxa1HeAVq77Q4i2sAeuoSCRbdgwRtA3wA9xK32LkGLnP8Nr4LP0A8h6viGHnPUGbbOoDu_dzH4Hny-_lx8tLpLcP6nL4pf93dPq3W5efj-Y3WzKQ0VLJfMts2zpdY2UxlbUV4bKQxtcGWofNYtFwJwxWVbW0KZxILhlhrZYmo0aQxbFBdH3yGG1xFSVr1LBrpOewhjUoSRqpKCUjyhX_9BX8IY_bSdIrQWgomazxQ_UiaGlCJYNUTXT4cqgtUcg_obg5pjUMcYJtn1Ueb89OZeH0LsWpX1WxeijdoblxT7r8M7B6aN4Q</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Lawrence, Tony</creator><creator>Jermalavičius, Tomas</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?</title><author>Lawrence, Tony ; Jermalavičius, Tomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-3fd7bf2ff7ff7cf5246c98c2705c29bad488e0549d6f12390830d2c9d02ca17c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Defense Policy</topic><topic>Military Strategy</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jermalavičius, Tomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Defence studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawrence, Tony</au><au>Jermalavičius, Tomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?</atitle><jtitle>Defence studies</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>503-522</pages><issn>1470-2436</issn><eissn>1743-9698</eissn><abstract>This article examines models for the organisation of defence at the highest level and considers their suitability to operate in the contemporary strategic environment. We characterise the contemporary environment and test against this characterisation a separated model for strategic-level defence organisation, which contains distinct political strategic and military strategic structures and functions, and an integrated model in which these structures and functions have been brought together. From this analysis, and by drawing on the experiences of the commercial sector, we conclude that in matching the environment, an integrated model offers considerably more and clearer advantages than a separated one. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/14702436.2012.745963</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-2436
ispartof Defence studies, 2012-12, Vol.12 (4), p.503-522
issn 1470-2436
1743-9698
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315598220
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Armed forces
Defense Policy
Military Strategy
Organizations
Politics
title Fit for Purpose: How Should the Higher Levels of Defence Be Organised in the Contemporary Strategic Environment?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T11%3A33%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fit%20for%20Purpose:%20How%20Should%20the%20Higher%20Levels%20of%20Defence%20Be%20Organised%20in%20the%20Contemporary%20Strategic%20Environment?&rft.jtitle=Defence%20studies&rft.au=Lawrence,%20Tony&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=503-522&rft.issn=1470-2436&rft.eissn=1743-9698&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14702436.2012.745963&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2863557821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1268838640&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true