Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics

The existence of majority of bacteria in biofilm mode makes it difficult to eradicate them as antibiotics at much higher concentrations than the MICs are required to destroy these bacteria. This study investigated the effect of different classes of antibiotics on different phases of biofilm formed b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of antibiotics 2013-02, Vol.66 (2), p.61-66
Hauptverfasser: Singla, Saloni, Harjai, Kusum, Chhibber, Sanjay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 66
container_issue 2
container_start_page 61
container_title Journal of antibiotics
container_volume 66
creator Singla, Saloni
Harjai, Kusum
Chhibber, Sanjay
description The existence of majority of bacteria in biofilm mode makes it difficult to eradicate them as antibiotics at much higher concentrations than the MICs are required to destroy these bacteria. This study investigated the effect of different classes of antibiotics on different phases of biofilm formed by Klebsiella pneumoniae . The organism was grown in different phases relevant to biofilm formation: planktonic cells at mid-log phase, planktonic cells at stationary phase, adherent monolayers and mature biofilms and their susceptibility to different classes of antibiotics was assessed. The results showed that planktonic organisms were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and piperacillin, and their MBC values were same or eight times higher than their corresponding MICs. MBC of ciprofloxacin and amikacin was found to be four and eight times higher for monolayer than planktonic cells. On the other hand, MBC of piperacillin was >1024 μg ml −1 . K. pneumoniae in a biofilm growth mode was more resistant to antibiotics than all other modes. The effect of amikacin and ciprofloxacin on young and older biofilms, at the highest achievable serum concentrations, was also examined. It was observed that amikacin at a concentration of 40 μg ml −1 was able to eradicate the young biofilms; however, with increase in the age of the biofilm, it became completely ineffective. Calcofluor staining suggested increased production of exopolysaccharide in older biofilm compared with younger biofim that might be responsible for the increased resistance of older biofilm of K. pneumoniae to antibiotics.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/ja.2012.101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1313424443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1313424443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3c0e024d1f63ed978ae30c0f3afc11b16aac2b98cba18f8b2e00103839a1e4263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEFP3DAQha0K1N3SnnpHkbgglWxnbG_iHNGKFsRKPbQ9R453DF4lcbCTw_57HC2tEOJkz_jzezOPsa8IKwShvu_1igPyVOAHtkSlMEdZVCdsCcAxV4rDgn2KcQ8gSlGqj2zBBRZKglgy-j1FQ8PoGte68ZB5m-2ctRSoH7PhUUeKc69x3rq2m6_3LTXRUdvqbOhp6nzvNGWjz8bHQPTqt-5nVT86Ez-zU6vbSF9ezjP298fNn81tvv31825zvc3NGmHMhQECLndoC0G7qlSaBBiwQluD2GChteFNpUyjUVnVcAKYIxCVRpK8EGfs8qg7BP80URzrzqX10qw9-SnWKFBILqUUCb14g-79FPo0XY2lKteiwEom6tuRMsHHGMjWQ3CdDocaoZ6t672u5_RTgYk-f9Gcmo52_9l_cSfg6gjE9NQ_UHhl-o7eM-F4jog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787536194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Singla, Saloni ; Harjai, Kusum ; Chhibber, Sanjay</creator><creatorcontrib>Singla, Saloni ; Harjai, Kusum ; Chhibber, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><description>The existence of majority of bacteria in biofilm mode makes it difficult to eradicate them as antibiotics at much higher concentrations than the MICs are required to destroy these bacteria. This study investigated the effect of different classes of antibiotics on different phases of biofilm formed by Klebsiella pneumoniae . The organism was grown in different phases relevant to biofilm formation: planktonic cells at mid-log phase, planktonic cells at stationary phase, adherent monolayers and mature biofilms and their susceptibility to different classes of antibiotics was assessed. The results showed that planktonic organisms were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and piperacillin, and their MBC values were same or eight times higher than their corresponding MICs. MBC of ciprofloxacin and amikacin was found to be four and eight times higher for monolayer than planktonic cells. On the other hand, MBC of piperacillin was &gt;1024 μg ml −1 . K. pneumoniae in a biofilm growth mode was more resistant to antibiotics than all other modes. The effect of amikacin and ciprofloxacin on young and older biofilms, at the highest achievable serum concentrations, was also examined. It was observed that amikacin at a concentration of 40 μg ml −1 was able to eradicate the young biofilms; however, with increase in the age of the biofilm, it became completely ineffective. Calcofluor staining suggested increased production of exopolysaccharide in older biofilm compared with younger biofim that might be responsible for the increased resistance of older biofilm of K. pneumoniae to antibiotics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1881-1469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/ja.2012.101</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23168403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/326/22/1290 ; 631/326/41/1969/2038 ; 631/326/46 ; Amikacin - pharmacology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotics ; Bacteriology ; Biofilms ; Biofilms - drug effects ; Biofilms - growth &amp; development ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bioorganic Chemistry ; Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology ; Culture Media ; Klebsiella pneumoniae - drug effects ; Klebsiella pneumoniae - physiology ; Life Sciences ; Medicinal Chemistry ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Microbiology ; Organic Chemistry ; original-article ; Piperacillin - pharmacology ; Plankton</subject><ispartof>Journal of antibiotics, 2013-02, Vol.66 (2), p.61-66</ispartof><rights>Japan Antibiotics Research Association 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3c0e024d1f63ed978ae30c0f3afc11b16aac2b98cba18f8b2e00103839a1e4263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3c0e024d1f63ed978ae30c0f3afc11b16aac2b98cba18f8b2e00103839a1e4263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23168403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singla, Saloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harjai, Kusum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chhibber, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><title>Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics</title><title>Journal of antibiotics</title><addtitle>J Antibiot</addtitle><addtitle>J Antibiot (Tokyo)</addtitle><description>The existence of majority of bacteria in biofilm mode makes it difficult to eradicate them as antibiotics at much higher concentrations than the MICs are required to destroy these bacteria. This study investigated the effect of different classes of antibiotics on different phases of biofilm formed by Klebsiella pneumoniae . The organism was grown in different phases relevant to biofilm formation: planktonic cells at mid-log phase, planktonic cells at stationary phase, adherent monolayers and mature biofilms and their susceptibility to different classes of antibiotics was assessed. The results showed that planktonic organisms were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and piperacillin, and their MBC values were same or eight times higher than their corresponding MICs. MBC of ciprofloxacin and amikacin was found to be four and eight times higher for monolayer than planktonic cells. On the other hand, MBC of piperacillin was &gt;1024 μg ml −1 . K. pneumoniae in a biofilm growth mode was more resistant to antibiotics than all other modes. The effect of amikacin and ciprofloxacin on young and older biofilms, at the highest achievable serum concentrations, was also examined. It was observed that amikacin at a concentration of 40 μg ml −1 was able to eradicate the young biofilms; however, with increase in the age of the biofilm, it became completely ineffective. Calcofluor staining suggested increased production of exopolysaccharide in older biofilm compared with younger biofim that might be responsible for the increased resistance of older biofilm of K. pneumoniae to antibiotics.</description><subject>631/326/22/1290</subject><subject>631/326/41/1969/2038</subject><subject>631/326/46</subject><subject>Amikacin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biofilms - drug effects</subject><subject>Biofilms - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bioorganic Chemistry</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Klebsiella pneumoniae - drug effects</subject><subject>Klebsiella pneumoniae - physiology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medicinal Chemistry</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Organic Chemistry</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Piperacillin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><issn>0021-8820</issn><issn>1881-1469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEFP3DAQha0K1N3SnnpHkbgglWxnbG_iHNGKFsRKPbQ9R453DF4lcbCTw_57HC2tEOJkz_jzezOPsa8IKwShvu_1igPyVOAHtkSlMEdZVCdsCcAxV4rDgn2KcQ8gSlGqj2zBBRZKglgy-j1FQ8PoGte68ZB5m-2ctRSoH7PhUUeKc69x3rq2m6_3LTXRUdvqbOhp6nzvNGWjz8bHQPTqt-5nVT86Ez-zU6vbSF9ezjP298fNn81tvv31825zvc3NGmHMhQECLndoC0G7qlSaBBiwQluD2GChteFNpUyjUVnVcAKYIxCVRpK8EGfs8qg7BP80URzrzqX10qw9-SnWKFBILqUUCb14g-79FPo0XY2lKteiwEom6tuRMsHHGMjWQ3CdDocaoZ6t672u5_RTgYk-f9Gcmo52_9l_cSfg6gjE9NQ_UHhl-o7eM-F4jog</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Singla, Saloni</creator><creator>Harjai, Kusum</creator><creator>Chhibber, Sanjay</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics</title><author>Singla, Saloni ; Harjai, Kusum ; Chhibber, Sanjay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3c0e024d1f63ed978ae30c0f3afc11b16aac2b98cba18f8b2e00103839a1e4263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>631/326/22/1290</topic><topic>631/326/41/1969/2038</topic><topic>631/326/46</topic><topic>Amikacin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biofilms - drug effects</topic><topic>Biofilms - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bioorganic Chemistry</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Klebsiella pneumoniae - drug effects</topic><topic>Klebsiella pneumoniae - physiology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medicinal Chemistry</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Organic Chemistry</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Piperacillin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singla, Saloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harjai, Kusum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chhibber, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antibiotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singla, Saloni</au><au>Harjai, Kusum</au><au>Chhibber, Sanjay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antibiotics</jtitle><stitle>J Antibiot</stitle><addtitle>J Antibiot (Tokyo)</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>61-66</pages><issn>0021-8820</issn><eissn>1881-1469</eissn><abstract>The existence of majority of bacteria in biofilm mode makes it difficult to eradicate them as antibiotics at much higher concentrations than the MICs are required to destroy these bacteria. This study investigated the effect of different classes of antibiotics on different phases of biofilm formed by Klebsiella pneumoniae . The organism was grown in different phases relevant to biofilm formation: planktonic cells at mid-log phase, planktonic cells at stationary phase, adherent monolayers and mature biofilms and their susceptibility to different classes of antibiotics was assessed. The results showed that planktonic organisms were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and piperacillin, and their MBC values were same or eight times higher than their corresponding MICs. MBC of ciprofloxacin and amikacin was found to be four and eight times higher for monolayer than planktonic cells. On the other hand, MBC of piperacillin was &gt;1024 μg ml −1 . K. pneumoniae in a biofilm growth mode was more resistant to antibiotics than all other modes. The effect of amikacin and ciprofloxacin on young and older biofilms, at the highest achievable serum concentrations, was also examined. It was observed that amikacin at a concentration of 40 μg ml −1 was able to eradicate the young biofilms; however, with increase in the age of the biofilm, it became completely ineffective. Calcofluor staining suggested increased production of exopolysaccharide in older biofilm compared with younger biofim that might be responsible for the increased resistance of older biofilm of K. pneumoniae to antibiotics.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>23168403</pmid><doi>10.1038/ja.2012.101</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8820
ispartof Journal of antibiotics, 2013-02, Vol.66 (2), p.61-66
issn 0021-8820
1881-1469
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1313424443
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 631/326/22/1290
631/326/41/1969/2038
631/326/46
Amikacin - pharmacology
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Antibiotics
Bacteriology
Biofilms
Biofilms - drug effects
Biofilms - growth & development
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Bioorganic Chemistry
Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology
Culture Media
Klebsiella pneumoniae - drug effects
Klebsiella pneumoniae - physiology
Life Sciences
Medicinal Chemistry
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Microbiology
Organic Chemistry
original-article
Piperacillin - pharmacology
Plankton
title Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A28%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Susceptibility%20of%20different%20phases%20of%20biofilm%20of%20Klebsiella%20pneumoniae%20to%20three%20different%20antibiotics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antibiotics&rft.au=Singla,%20Saloni&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=61-66&rft.issn=0021-8820&rft.eissn=1881-1469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/ja.2012.101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1313424443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787536194&rft_id=info:pmid/23168403&rfr_iscdi=true