Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics
The existence of majority of bacteria in biofilm mode makes it difficult to eradicate them as antibiotics at much higher concentrations than the MICs are required to destroy these bacteria. This study investigated the effect of different classes of antibiotics on different phases of biofilm formed b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of antibiotics 2013-02, Vol.66 (2), p.61-66 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 66 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 61 |
container_title | Journal of antibiotics |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Singla, Saloni Harjai, Kusum Chhibber, Sanjay |
description | The existence of majority of bacteria in biofilm mode makes it difficult to eradicate them as antibiotics at much higher concentrations than the MICs are required to destroy these bacteria. This study investigated the effect of different classes of antibiotics on different phases of biofilm formed by
Klebsiella pneumoniae
. The organism was grown in different phases relevant to biofilm formation: planktonic cells at mid-log phase, planktonic cells at stationary phase, adherent monolayers and mature biofilms and their susceptibility to different classes of antibiotics was assessed. The results showed that planktonic organisms were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and piperacillin, and their MBC values were same or eight times higher than their corresponding MICs. MBC of ciprofloxacin and amikacin was found to be four and eight times higher for monolayer than planktonic cells. On the other hand, MBC of piperacillin was >1024 μg ml
−1
.
K. pneumoniae
in a biofilm growth mode was more resistant to antibiotics than all other modes. The effect of amikacin and ciprofloxacin on young and older biofilms, at the highest achievable serum concentrations, was also examined. It was observed that amikacin at a concentration of 40 μg ml
−1
was able to eradicate the young biofilms; however, with increase in the age of the biofilm, it became completely ineffective. Calcofluor staining suggested increased production of exopolysaccharide in older biofilm compared with younger biofim that might be responsible for the increased resistance of older biofilm of
K. pneumoniae
to antibiotics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/ja.2012.101 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1313424443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1313424443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3c0e024d1f63ed978ae30c0f3afc11b16aac2b98cba18f8b2e00103839a1e4263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEFP3DAQha0K1N3SnnpHkbgglWxnbG_iHNGKFsRKPbQ9R453DF4lcbCTw_57HC2tEOJkz_jzezOPsa8IKwShvu_1igPyVOAHtkSlMEdZVCdsCcAxV4rDgn2KcQ8gSlGqj2zBBRZKglgy-j1FQ8PoGte68ZB5m-2ctRSoH7PhUUeKc69x3rq2m6_3LTXRUdvqbOhp6nzvNGWjz8bHQPTqt-5nVT86Ez-zU6vbSF9ezjP298fNn81tvv31825zvc3NGmHMhQECLndoC0G7qlSaBBiwQluD2GChteFNpUyjUVnVcAKYIxCVRpK8EGfs8qg7BP80URzrzqX10qw9-SnWKFBILqUUCb14g-79FPo0XY2lKteiwEom6tuRMsHHGMjWQ3CdDocaoZ6t672u5_RTgYk-f9Gcmo52_9l_cSfg6gjE9NQ_UHhl-o7eM-F4jog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787536194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Singla, Saloni ; Harjai, Kusum ; Chhibber, Sanjay</creator><creatorcontrib>Singla, Saloni ; Harjai, Kusum ; Chhibber, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><description>The existence of majority of bacteria in biofilm mode makes it difficult to eradicate them as antibiotics at much higher concentrations than the MICs are required to destroy these bacteria. This study investigated the effect of different classes of antibiotics on different phases of biofilm formed by
Klebsiella pneumoniae
. The organism was grown in different phases relevant to biofilm formation: planktonic cells at mid-log phase, planktonic cells at stationary phase, adherent monolayers and mature biofilms and their susceptibility to different classes of antibiotics was assessed. The results showed that planktonic organisms were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and piperacillin, and their MBC values were same or eight times higher than their corresponding MICs. MBC of ciprofloxacin and amikacin was found to be four and eight times higher for monolayer than planktonic cells. On the other hand, MBC of piperacillin was >1024 μg ml
−1
.
K. pneumoniae
in a biofilm growth mode was more resistant to antibiotics than all other modes. The effect of amikacin and ciprofloxacin on young and older biofilms, at the highest achievable serum concentrations, was also examined. It was observed that amikacin at a concentration of 40 μg ml
−1
was able to eradicate the young biofilms; however, with increase in the age of the biofilm, it became completely ineffective. Calcofluor staining suggested increased production of exopolysaccharide in older biofilm compared with younger biofim that might be responsible for the increased resistance of older biofilm of
K. pneumoniae
to antibiotics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1881-1469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/ja.2012.101</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23168403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/326/22/1290 ; 631/326/41/1969/2038 ; 631/326/46 ; Amikacin - pharmacology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotics ; Bacteriology ; Biofilms ; Biofilms - drug effects ; Biofilms - growth & development ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bioorganic Chemistry ; Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology ; Culture Media ; Klebsiella pneumoniae - drug effects ; Klebsiella pneumoniae - physiology ; Life Sciences ; Medicinal Chemistry ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Microbiology ; Organic Chemistry ; original-article ; Piperacillin - pharmacology ; Plankton</subject><ispartof>Journal of antibiotics, 2013-02, Vol.66 (2), p.61-66</ispartof><rights>Japan Antibiotics Research Association 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3c0e024d1f63ed978ae30c0f3afc11b16aac2b98cba18f8b2e00103839a1e4263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3c0e024d1f63ed978ae30c0f3afc11b16aac2b98cba18f8b2e00103839a1e4263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23168403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singla, Saloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harjai, Kusum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chhibber, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><title>Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics</title><title>Journal of antibiotics</title><addtitle>J Antibiot</addtitle><addtitle>J Antibiot (Tokyo)</addtitle><description>The existence of majority of bacteria in biofilm mode makes it difficult to eradicate them as antibiotics at much higher concentrations than the MICs are required to destroy these bacteria. This study investigated the effect of different classes of antibiotics on different phases of biofilm formed by
Klebsiella pneumoniae
. The organism was grown in different phases relevant to biofilm formation: planktonic cells at mid-log phase, planktonic cells at stationary phase, adherent monolayers and mature biofilms and their susceptibility to different classes of antibiotics was assessed. The results showed that planktonic organisms were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and piperacillin, and their MBC values were same or eight times higher than their corresponding MICs. MBC of ciprofloxacin and amikacin was found to be four and eight times higher for monolayer than planktonic cells. On the other hand, MBC of piperacillin was >1024 μg ml
−1
.
K. pneumoniae
in a biofilm growth mode was more resistant to antibiotics than all other modes. The effect of amikacin and ciprofloxacin on young and older biofilms, at the highest achievable serum concentrations, was also examined. It was observed that amikacin at a concentration of 40 μg ml
−1
was able to eradicate the young biofilms; however, with increase in the age of the biofilm, it became completely ineffective. Calcofluor staining suggested increased production of exopolysaccharide in older biofilm compared with younger biofim that might be responsible for the increased resistance of older biofilm of
K. pneumoniae
to antibiotics.</description><subject>631/326/22/1290</subject><subject>631/326/41/1969/2038</subject><subject>631/326/46</subject><subject>Amikacin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biofilms - drug effects</subject><subject>Biofilms - growth & development</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bioorganic Chemistry</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Klebsiella pneumoniae - drug effects</subject><subject>Klebsiella pneumoniae - physiology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medicinal Chemistry</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Organic Chemistry</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Piperacillin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><issn>0021-8820</issn><issn>1881-1469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEFP3DAQha0K1N3SnnpHkbgglWxnbG_iHNGKFsRKPbQ9R453DF4lcbCTw_57HC2tEOJkz_jzezOPsa8IKwShvu_1igPyVOAHtkSlMEdZVCdsCcAxV4rDgn2KcQ8gSlGqj2zBBRZKglgy-j1FQ8PoGte68ZB5m-2ctRSoH7PhUUeKc69x3rq2m6_3LTXRUdvqbOhp6nzvNGWjz8bHQPTqt-5nVT86Ez-zU6vbSF9ezjP298fNn81tvv31825zvc3NGmHMhQECLndoC0G7qlSaBBiwQluD2GChteFNpUyjUVnVcAKYIxCVRpK8EGfs8qg7BP80URzrzqX10qw9-SnWKFBILqUUCb14g-79FPo0XY2lKteiwEom6tuRMsHHGMjWQ3CdDocaoZ6t672u5_RTgYk-f9Gcmo52_9l_cSfg6gjE9NQ_UHhl-o7eM-F4jog</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Singla, Saloni</creator><creator>Harjai, Kusum</creator><creator>Chhibber, Sanjay</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics</title><author>Singla, Saloni ; Harjai, Kusum ; Chhibber, Sanjay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3c0e024d1f63ed978ae30c0f3afc11b16aac2b98cba18f8b2e00103839a1e4263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>631/326/22/1290</topic><topic>631/326/41/1969/2038</topic><topic>631/326/46</topic><topic>Amikacin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biofilms - drug effects</topic><topic>Biofilms - growth & development</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bioorganic Chemistry</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Klebsiella pneumoniae - drug effects</topic><topic>Klebsiella pneumoniae - physiology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medicinal Chemistry</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Organic Chemistry</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Piperacillin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singla, Saloni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harjai, Kusum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chhibber, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antibiotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singla, Saloni</au><au>Harjai, Kusum</au><au>Chhibber, Sanjay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antibiotics</jtitle><stitle>J Antibiot</stitle><addtitle>J Antibiot (Tokyo)</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>61-66</pages><issn>0021-8820</issn><eissn>1881-1469</eissn><abstract>The existence of majority of bacteria in biofilm mode makes it difficult to eradicate them as antibiotics at much higher concentrations than the MICs are required to destroy these bacteria. This study investigated the effect of different classes of antibiotics on different phases of biofilm formed by
Klebsiella pneumoniae
. The organism was grown in different phases relevant to biofilm formation: planktonic cells at mid-log phase, planktonic cells at stationary phase, adherent monolayers and mature biofilms and their susceptibility to different classes of antibiotics was assessed. The results showed that planktonic organisms were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and piperacillin, and their MBC values were same or eight times higher than their corresponding MICs. MBC of ciprofloxacin and amikacin was found to be four and eight times higher for monolayer than planktonic cells. On the other hand, MBC of piperacillin was >1024 μg ml
−1
.
K. pneumoniae
in a biofilm growth mode was more resistant to antibiotics than all other modes. The effect of amikacin and ciprofloxacin on young and older biofilms, at the highest achievable serum concentrations, was also examined. It was observed that amikacin at a concentration of 40 μg ml
−1
was able to eradicate the young biofilms; however, with increase in the age of the biofilm, it became completely ineffective. Calcofluor staining suggested increased production of exopolysaccharide in older biofilm compared with younger biofim that might be responsible for the increased resistance of older biofilm of
K. pneumoniae
to antibiotics.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>23168403</pmid><doi>10.1038/ja.2012.101</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8820 |
ispartof | Journal of antibiotics, 2013-02, Vol.66 (2), p.61-66 |
issn | 0021-8820 1881-1469 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1313424443 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 631/326/22/1290 631/326/41/1969/2038 631/326/46 Amikacin - pharmacology Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Antibiotics Bacteriology Biofilms Biofilms - drug effects Biofilms - growth & development Biomedical and Life Sciences Bioorganic Chemistry Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology Culture Media Klebsiella pneumoniae - drug effects Klebsiella pneumoniae - physiology Life Sciences Medicinal Chemistry Microbial Sensitivity Tests Microbiology Organic Chemistry original-article Piperacillin - pharmacology Plankton |
title | Susceptibility of different phases of biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae to three different antibiotics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A28%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Susceptibility%20of%20different%20phases%20of%20biofilm%20of%20Klebsiella%20pneumoniae%20to%20three%20different%20antibiotics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antibiotics&rft.au=Singla,%20Saloni&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=61-66&rft.issn=0021-8820&rft.eissn=1881-1469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/ja.2012.101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1313424443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787536194&rft_id=info:pmid/23168403&rfr_iscdi=true |