Kelvin Probe Force Microscopic Imaging of the Energy Barrier and Energetically Favorable Offset of Interfaces in Double-Junction Organic Solar Cells

A double-junction polymer solar cell (PSC) has attracted extensive attention as a promising approach to increasing efficiency. Tunneling/recombination interlayers between subcells play a critical role in double-junction PSCs. Interlayers include electron-transport layers (ETLs) such as Nb2O5, ZnO, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACS applied materials & interfaces 2013-02, Vol.5 (4), p.1279-1286
Hauptverfasser: Siddiki, Mahbube K, Venkatesan, Swaminathan, Galipeau, David, Qiao, Qiquan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1286
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1279
container_title ACS applied materials & interfaces
container_volume 5
creator Siddiki, Mahbube K
Venkatesan, Swaminathan
Galipeau, David
Qiao, Qiquan
description A double-junction polymer solar cell (PSC) has attracted extensive attention as a promising approach to increasing efficiency. Tunneling/recombination interlayers between subcells play a critical role in double-junction PSCs. Interlayers include electron-transport layers (ETLs) such as Nb2O5, ZnO, and TiO x and hole-transport layers (HTLs) including PEDOT:PSS. These materials have all been used as interlayer materials, but it remains unclear which one is better than the other. Kelvin probe force microscopy (KFM) was used to identify the energy barrier and energetically favorable energy offset at the interfaces of acceptor–ETL (e.g., PCBM–Nb2O5, PCBM–ZnO, and PCBM–TiO x ) and donor–HTL (e.g., MDMO-PPV/PEDOT:PSS). Here the interface refers to the junction of two materials, formed by drop-casting one on top of other. The interface is buried and is therefore not accessible to the KFM probe. The energy barrier for electron transport from PCBM to ETL was found at ∼0.20, ∼0.12, and ∼0.012 eV at the PCBM–Nb2O5, PCBM–ZnO, and PCBM–TiO x interfaces, respectively. Hole transport from the donor polymer to PEDOT:PSS was found to be energetically favorable with an energy offset of ∼0.14 eV to facilitate hole transport. The thickness independences of the energy barrier and energetically favorable energy offset at the interfaces of acceptor–ETL and donor–HTL were also observed. This work will provide guidance for researchers to identify and select appropriate materials as interlayers in double-junction PSCs.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/am302235w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1313416141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1313416141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a315t-cf258b5614c4904762cd62ca9c75337f9719d710f3563a046142e72c95c7c2613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkctu2zAQRYkgQZ5d9AcKbgo0CyV8StaydezWecAF2q6FMT10GUikQ0oJ_B_94NJw4lUWxBAzZ-4lZwj5yNkVZ4JfQyeZEFK_HJBTXitVjIQWh_u7UifkLKVHxkopmD4mJ0KKUa2FPCX_7rB9dp7-jGGBdBqiQfrgTAzJhLUzdNbByvkVDZb2f5FOPMbVhn6DGB1GCn65S2HvDLTthk7hOURYtEjn1ibst40z32O0YDDR7HQThlwubgdvehc8nccV-Oz0K7QQ6RjbNl2QIwttwg-v8Zz8mU5-j38U9_Pvs_HX-wIk131hrNCjhS65MqpmqiqFWeYDtam0lJWtK14vK86s1KUEpjIosBKm1qYyouTynHzZ6a5jeBow9U3nkskvAI9hSA2XXCqe27bo5Q7djiZFtM06ug7ipuGs2S6h2S8hs59eZYdFh8s9-Tb1DHzeAWBS8xiG6PMv3xH6Dx9JjcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1313416141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kelvin Probe Force Microscopic Imaging of the Energy Barrier and Energetically Favorable Offset of Interfaces in Double-Junction Organic Solar Cells</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Siddiki, Mahbube K ; Venkatesan, Swaminathan ; Galipeau, David ; Qiao, Qiquan</creator><creatorcontrib>Siddiki, Mahbube K ; Venkatesan, Swaminathan ; Galipeau, David ; Qiao, Qiquan</creatorcontrib><description>A double-junction polymer solar cell (PSC) has attracted extensive attention as a promising approach to increasing efficiency. Tunneling/recombination interlayers between subcells play a critical role in double-junction PSCs. Interlayers include electron-transport layers (ETLs) such as Nb2O5, ZnO, and TiO x and hole-transport layers (HTLs) including PEDOT:PSS. These materials have all been used as interlayer materials, but it remains unclear which one is better than the other. Kelvin probe force microscopy (KFM) was used to identify the energy barrier and energetically favorable energy offset at the interfaces of acceptor–ETL (e.g., PCBM–Nb2O5, PCBM–ZnO, and PCBM–TiO x ) and donor–HTL (e.g., MDMO-PPV/PEDOT:PSS). Here the interface refers to the junction of two materials, formed by drop-casting one on top of other. The interface is buried and is therefore not accessible to the KFM probe. The energy barrier for electron transport from PCBM to ETL was found at ∼0.20, ∼0.12, and ∼0.012 eV at the PCBM–Nb2O5, PCBM–ZnO, and PCBM–TiO x interfaces, respectively. Hole transport from the donor polymer to PEDOT:PSS was found to be energetically favorable with an energy offset of ∼0.14 eV to facilitate hole transport. The thickness independences of the energy barrier and energetically favorable energy offset at the interfaces of acceptor–ETL and donor–HTL were also observed. This work will provide guidance for researchers to identify and select appropriate materials as interlayers in double-junction PSCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-8244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8252</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/am302235w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23289523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>ACS applied materials &amp; interfaces, 2013-02, Vol.5 (4), p.1279-1286</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a315t-cf258b5614c4904762cd62ca9c75337f9719d710f3563a046142e72c95c7c2613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a315t-cf258b5614c4904762cd62ca9c75337f9719d710f3563a046142e72c95c7c2613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/am302235w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/am302235w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2756,27067,27915,27916,56729,56779</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23289523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siddiki, Mahbube K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatesan, Swaminathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galipeau, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Qiquan</creatorcontrib><title>Kelvin Probe Force Microscopic Imaging of the Energy Barrier and Energetically Favorable Offset of Interfaces in Double-Junction Organic Solar Cells</title><title>ACS applied materials &amp; interfaces</title><addtitle>ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces</addtitle><description>A double-junction polymer solar cell (PSC) has attracted extensive attention as a promising approach to increasing efficiency. Tunneling/recombination interlayers between subcells play a critical role in double-junction PSCs. Interlayers include electron-transport layers (ETLs) such as Nb2O5, ZnO, and TiO x and hole-transport layers (HTLs) including PEDOT:PSS. These materials have all been used as interlayer materials, but it remains unclear which one is better than the other. Kelvin probe force microscopy (KFM) was used to identify the energy barrier and energetically favorable energy offset at the interfaces of acceptor–ETL (e.g., PCBM–Nb2O5, PCBM–ZnO, and PCBM–TiO x ) and donor–HTL (e.g., MDMO-PPV/PEDOT:PSS). Here the interface refers to the junction of two materials, formed by drop-casting one on top of other. The interface is buried and is therefore not accessible to the KFM probe. The energy barrier for electron transport from PCBM to ETL was found at ∼0.20, ∼0.12, and ∼0.012 eV at the PCBM–Nb2O5, PCBM–ZnO, and PCBM–TiO x interfaces, respectively. Hole transport from the donor polymer to PEDOT:PSS was found to be energetically favorable with an energy offset of ∼0.14 eV to facilitate hole transport. The thickness independences of the energy barrier and energetically favorable energy offset at the interfaces of acceptor–ETL and donor–HTL were also observed. This work will provide guidance for researchers to identify and select appropriate materials as interlayers in double-junction PSCs.</description><issn>1944-8244</issn><issn>1944-8252</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkctu2zAQRYkgQZ5d9AcKbgo0CyV8StaydezWecAF2q6FMT10GUikQ0oJ_B_94NJw4lUWxBAzZ-4lZwj5yNkVZ4JfQyeZEFK_HJBTXitVjIQWh_u7UifkLKVHxkopmD4mJ0KKUa2FPCX_7rB9dp7-jGGBdBqiQfrgTAzJhLUzdNbByvkVDZb2f5FOPMbVhn6DGB1GCn65S2HvDLTthk7hOURYtEjn1ibst40z32O0YDDR7HQThlwubgdvehc8nccV-Oz0K7QQ6RjbNl2QIwttwg-v8Zz8mU5-j38U9_Pvs_HX-wIk131hrNCjhS65MqpmqiqFWeYDtam0lJWtK14vK86s1KUEpjIosBKm1qYyouTynHzZ6a5jeBow9U3nkskvAI9hSA2XXCqe27bo5Q7djiZFtM06ug7ipuGs2S6h2S8hs59eZYdFh8s9-Tb1DHzeAWBS8xiG6PMv3xH6Dx9JjcI</recordid><startdate>20130227</startdate><enddate>20130227</enddate><creator>Siddiki, Mahbube K</creator><creator>Venkatesan, Swaminathan</creator><creator>Galipeau, David</creator><creator>Qiao, Qiquan</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130227</creationdate><title>Kelvin Probe Force Microscopic Imaging of the Energy Barrier and Energetically Favorable Offset of Interfaces in Double-Junction Organic Solar Cells</title><author>Siddiki, Mahbube K ; Venkatesan, Swaminathan ; Galipeau, David ; Qiao, Qiquan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a315t-cf258b5614c4904762cd62ca9c75337f9719d710f3563a046142e72c95c7c2613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siddiki, Mahbube K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatesan, Swaminathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galipeau, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Qiquan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ACS applied materials &amp; interfaces</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siddiki, Mahbube K</au><au>Venkatesan, Swaminathan</au><au>Galipeau, David</au><au>Qiao, Qiquan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kelvin Probe Force Microscopic Imaging of the Energy Barrier and Energetically Favorable Offset of Interfaces in Double-Junction Organic Solar Cells</atitle><jtitle>ACS applied materials &amp; interfaces</jtitle><addtitle>ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces</addtitle><date>2013-02-27</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1279</spage><epage>1286</epage><pages>1279-1286</pages><issn>1944-8244</issn><eissn>1944-8252</eissn><abstract>A double-junction polymer solar cell (PSC) has attracted extensive attention as a promising approach to increasing efficiency. Tunneling/recombination interlayers between subcells play a critical role in double-junction PSCs. Interlayers include electron-transport layers (ETLs) such as Nb2O5, ZnO, and TiO x and hole-transport layers (HTLs) including PEDOT:PSS. These materials have all been used as interlayer materials, but it remains unclear which one is better than the other. Kelvin probe force microscopy (KFM) was used to identify the energy barrier and energetically favorable energy offset at the interfaces of acceptor–ETL (e.g., PCBM–Nb2O5, PCBM–ZnO, and PCBM–TiO x ) and donor–HTL (e.g., MDMO-PPV/PEDOT:PSS). Here the interface refers to the junction of two materials, formed by drop-casting one on top of other. The interface is buried and is therefore not accessible to the KFM probe. The energy barrier for electron transport from PCBM to ETL was found at ∼0.20, ∼0.12, and ∼0.012 eV at the PCBM–Nb2O5, PCBM–ZnO, and PCBM–TiO x interfaces, respectively. Hole transport from the donor polymer to PEDOT:PSS was found to be energetically favorable with an energy offset of ∼0.14 eV to facilitate hole transport. The thickness independences of the energy barrier and energetically favorable energy offset at the interfaces of acceptor–ETL and donor–HTL were also observed. This work will provide guidance for researchers to identify and select appropriate materials as interlayers in double-junction PSCs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>23289523</pmid><doi>10.1021/am302235w</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1944-8244
ispartof ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2013-02, Vol.5 (4), p.1279-1286
issn 1944-8244
1944-8252
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1313416141
source ACS Publications
title Kelvin Probe Force Microscopic Imaging of the Energy Barrier and Energetically Favorable Offset of Interfaces in Double-Junction Organic Solar Cells
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A58%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kelvin%20Probe%20Force%20Microscopic%20Imaging%20of%20the%20Energy%20Barrier%20and%20Energetically%20Favorable%20Offset%20of%20Interfaces%20in%20Double-Junction%20Organic%20Solar%20Cells&rft.jtitle=ACS%20applied%20materials%20&%20interfaces&rft.au=Siddiki,%20Mahbube%20K&rft.date=2013-02-27&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1279&rft.epage=1286&rft.pages=1279-1286&rft.issn=1944-8244&rft.eissn=1944-8252&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/am302235w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1313416141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1313416141&rft_id=info:pmid/23289523&rfr_iscdi=true