Identification of Conductive Hearing Loss in Young Infants Using Tympanometry and Wideband Reflectance

OBJECTIVE:The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tympanometry and wideband reflectance (WBR) in detecting conductive hearing loss (CHL) in young infants. METHODS:Type of hearing loss was determined using auditory brainstem response using air- and bone-conducted tone bursts in 84...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ear and hearing 2013-03, Vol.34 (2), p.168-178
Hauptverfasser: Prieve, Beth A, Werff, Kathy R Vander, Preston, Jonathan L, Georgantas, Lea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 2
container_start_page 168
container_title Ear and hearing
container_volume 34
creator Prieve, Beth A
Werff, Kathy R Vander
Preston, Jonathan L
Georgantas, Lea
description OBJECTIVE:The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tympanometry and wideband reflectance (WBR) in detecting conductive hearing loss (CHL) in young infants. METHODS:Type of hearing loss was determined using auditory brainstem response using air- and bone-conducted tone bursts in 84 ears from 70 infants (median age = 10 weeks). Of these 84 ears, 60 are included in the current analysis43 with normal hearing (NH) and 17 with CHL. Tympanometry was measured using probe tone frequencies of 226, 678, and 1000 Hz. Tympanograms were evaluated in two ways(1) Acoustic middle ear admittance (Ya, in millimhos); and (2) two-category classification (normal/abnormal), as described by . Measures of Ya were evaluated in two waysby admittance-magnitude tympanograms and calculated admittance magnitude from subcomponents (conductance and susceptance). WBR was measured in response to a chirp stimulus after probe calibration. WBR was analyzed into thirteen 1/3 octave bands. Tests for statistical differences for two-category classification were analyzed using Chi-squared and Ya, and WBR were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variances. Cohen’s d and likelihood ratios were computed for comparison with statistically significant differences. RESULTS:Ya measured with 678- and 1000 Hz probe tones was significantly different between ears with CHL and NH. Two-category classification of tympanograms using a 1000 Hz probe tone was significantly different between ears with CHL and NH. Neither two-category classification nor Ya was significantly different between ears identified with CHL and NH using a 226 Hz probe tone. WBR was significantly higher in the frequency bands 800 to 2500 Hz and in the frequency band centered at 6300 Hz in infants with CHL. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were greater than 2 for several WBR frequency bands and Ya measured with 1000 Hz probe tones. The results were similar for calculations of Ya from admittance-magnitude and subcomponent tympanograms. Positive likelihood ratios for WBR ranged between 8.1 and 38, and those for Ya using 1000 Hz ranged between 12.5 and 32. CONCLUSIONS:CHL in young infants can be detected well with WBR or tympanometry using probe frequencies of 678 and 1000 Hz.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826fe611
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1312177289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1312177289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-8f43e5f86b18ccfa0e9674414f9377b26eb907b4d30f61ef49d47559c0bee87e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUE1v1DAQtRAV3bb8A4R85JLir9jxsVoKXWklJNRV1ZPlOGNqSOzFdqj235NVS5GYy8ybmfdG8xB6R8klJVp9vNp9uiQ9oRw47Zj0ICl9hVa05V0jpFSv0YpQLRvCCDtFZ6X8IIQyLcUbdMo4k1wQtUJ-M0CswQdna0gRJ4_XKQ6zq-E34BuwOcTveJtKwSHi-zQvaBO9jbXgXTnObg_T3sY0Qc0HbOOA78IA_bH4Bn4EV210cIFOvB0LvH3O52j3-fp2fdNsv37ZrK-2jeMta5vOCw6t72RPO-e8JaClEoIKr7lSPZPQa6J6MXDiJQUv9CBU22pHeoBOAT9HH5509zn9mqFUM4XiYBxthDQXQzllVCnW6WVVPK26vHyXwZt9DpPNB0OJOTpsFofN_w4vtPfPF-Z-guGF9NfSf7qPaayQy89xfoRsHsCO9cGQJbgQsmGLLuELao6tlv8B9x2IGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1312177289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification of Conductive Hearing Loss in Young Infants Using Tympanometry and Wideband Reflectance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Prieve, Beth A ; Werff, Kathy R Vander ; Preston, Jonathan L ; Georgantas, Lea</creator><creatorcontrib>Prieve, Beth A ; Werff, Kathy R Vander ; Preston, Jonathan L ; Georgantas, Lea</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tympanometry and wideband reflectance (WBR) in detecting conductive hearing loss (CHL) in young infants. METHODS:Type of hearing loss was determined using auditory brainstem response using air- and bone-conducted tone bursts in 84 ears from 70 infants (median age = 10 weeks). Of these 84 ears, 60 are included in the current analysis43 with normal hearing (NH) and 17 with CHL. Tympanometry was measured using probe tone frequencies of 226, 678, and 1000 Hz. Tympanograms were evaluated in two ways(1) Acoustic middle ear admittance (Ya, in millimhos); and (2) two-category classification (normal/abnormal), as described by . Measures of Ya were evaluated in two waysby admittance-magnitude tympanograms and calculated admittance magnitude from subcomponents (conductance and susceptance). WBR was measured in response to a chirp stimulus after probe calibration. WBR was analyzed into thirteen 1/3 octave bands. Tests for statistical differences for two-category classification were analyzed using Chi-squared and Ya, and WBR were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variances. Cohen’s d and likelihood ratios were computed for comparison with statistically significant differences. RESULTS:Ya measured with 678- and 1000 Hz probe tones was significantly different between ears with CHL and NH. Two-category classification of tympanograms using a 1000 Hz probe tone was significantly different between ears with CHL and NH. Neither two-category classification nor Ya was significantly different between ears identified with CHL and NH using a 226 Hz probe tone. WBR was significantly higher in the frequency bands 800 to 2500 Hz and in the frequency band centered at 6300 Hz in infants with CHL. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were greater than 2 for several WBR frequency bands and Ya measured with 1000 Hz probe tones. The results were similar for calculations of Ya from admittance-magnitude and subcomponent tympanograms. Positive likelihood ratios for WBR ranged between 8.1 and 38, and those for Ya using 1000 Hz ranged between 12.5 and 32. CONCLUSIONS:CHL in young infants can be detected well with WBR or tympanometry using probe frequencies of 678 and 1000 Hz.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826fe611</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23263407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Acoustic Impedance Tests - methods ; Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem ; Female ; Hearing Loss, Conductive - diagnosis ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Likelihood Functions ; Male ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Ear and hearing, 2013-03, Vol.34 (2), p.168-178</ispartof><rights>2013 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-8f43e5f86b18ccfa0e9674414f9377b26eb907b4d30f61ef49d47559c0bee87e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-8f43e5f86b18ccfa0e9674414f9377b26eb907b4d30f61ef49d47559c0bee87e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23263407$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prieve, Beth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werff, Kathy R Vander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, Jonathan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgantas, Lea</creatorcontrib><title>Identification of Conductive Hearing Loss in Young Infants Using Tympanometry and Wideband Reflectance</title><title>Ear and hearing</title><addtitle>Ear Hear</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tympanometry and wideband reflectance (WBR) in detecting conductive hearing loss (CHL) in young infants. METHODS:Type of hearing loss was determined using auditory brainstem response using air- and bone-conducted tone bursts in 84 ears from 70 infants (median age = 10 weeks). Of these 84 ears, 60 are included in the current analysis43 with normal hearing (NH) and 17 with CHL. Tympanometry was measured using probe tone frequencies of 226, 678, and 1000 Hz. Tympanograms were evaluated in two ways(1) Acoustic middle ear admittance (Ya, in millimhos); and (2) two-category classification (normal/abnormal), as described by . Measures of Ya were evaluated in two waysby admittance-magnitude tympanograms and calculated admittance magnitude from subcomponents (conductance and susceptance). WBR was measured in response to a chirp stimulus after probe calibration. WBR was analyzed into thirteen 1/3 octave bands. Tests for statistical differences for two-category classification were analyzed using Chi-squared and Ya, and WBR were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variances. Cohen’s d and likelihood ratios were computed for comparison with statistically significant differences. RESULTS:Ya measured with 678- and 1000 Hz probe tones was significantly different between ears with CHL and NH. Two-category classification of tympanograms using a 1000 Hz probe tone was significantly different between ears with CHL and NH. Neither two-category classification nor Ya was significantly different between ears identified with CHL and NH using a 226 Hz probe tone. WBR was significantly higher in the frequency bands 800 to 2500 Hz and in the frequency band centered at 6300 Hz in infants with CHL. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were greater than 2 for several WBR frequency bands and Ya measured with 1000 Hz probe tones. The results were similar for calculations of Ya from admittance-magnitude and subcomponent tympanograms. Positive likelihood ratios for WBR ranged between 8.1 and 38, and those for Ya using 1000 Hz ranged between 12.5 and 32. CONCLUSIONS:CHL in young infants can be detected well with WBR or tympanometry using probe frequencies of 678 and 1000 Hz.</description><subject>Acoustic Impedance Tests - methods</subject><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Conductive - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0196-0202</issn><issn>1538-4667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUE1v1DAQtRAV3bb8A4R85JLir9jxsVoKXWklJNRV1ZPlOGNqSOzFdqj235NVS5GYy8ybmfdG8xB6R8klJVp9vNp9uiQ9oRw47Zj0ICl9hVa05V0jpFSv0YpQLRvCCDtFZ6X8IIQyLcUbdMo4k1wQtUJ-M0CswQdna0gRJ4_XKQ6zq-E34BuwOcTveJtKwSHi-zQvaBO9jbXgXTnObg_T3sY0Qc0HbOOA78IA_bH4Bn4EV210cIFOvB0LvH3O52j3-fp2fdNsv37ZrK-2jeMta5vOCw6t72RPO-e8JaClEoIKr7lSPZPQa6J6MXDiJQUv9CBU22pHeoBOAT9HH5509zn9mqFUM4XiYBxthDQXQzllVCnW6WVVPK26vHyXwZt9DpPNB0OJOTpsFofN_w4vtPfPF-Z-guGF9NfSf7qPaayQy89xfoRsHsCO9cGQJbgQsmGLLuELao6tlv8B9x2IGQ</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Prieve, Beth A</creator><creator>Werff, Kathy R Vander</creator><creator>Preston, Jonathan L</creator><creator>Georgantas, Lea</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Identification of Conductive Hearing Loss in Young Infants Using Tympanometry and Wideband Reflectance</title><author>Prieve, Beth A ; Werff, Kathy R Vander ; Preston, Jonathan L ; Georgantas, Lea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-8f43e5f86b18ccfa0e9674414f9377b26eb907b4d30f61ef49d47559c0bee87e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Impedance Tests - methods</topic><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Conductive - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prieve, Beth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werff, Kathy R Vander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, Jonathan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgantas, Lea</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ear and hearing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prieve, Beth A</au><au>Werff, Kathy R Vander</au><au>Preston, Jonathan L</au><au>Georgantas, Lea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification of Conductive Hearing Loss in Young Infants Using Tympanometry and Wideband Reflectance</atitle><jtitle>Ear and hearing</jtitle><addtitle>Ear Hear</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>168-178</pages><issn>0196-0202</issn><eissn>1538-4667</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tympanometry and wideband reflectance (WBR) in detecting conductive hearing loss (CHL) in young infants. METHODS:Type of hearing loss was determined using auditory brainstem response using air- and bone-conducted tone bursts in 84 ears from 70 infants (median age = 10 weeks). Of these 84 ears, 60 are included in the current analysis43 with normal hearing (NH) and 17 with CHL. Tympanometry was measured using probe tone frequencies of 226, 678, and 1000 Hz. Tympanograms were evaluated in two ways(1) Acoustic middle ear admittance (Ya, in millimhos); and (2) two-category classification (normal/abnormal), as described by . Measures of Ya were evaluated in two waysby admittance-magnitude tympanograms and calculated admittance magnitude from subcomponents (conductance and susceptance). WBR was measured in response to a chirp stimulus after probe calibration. WBR was analyzed into thirteen 1/3 octave bands. Tests for statistical differences for two-category classification were analyzed using Chi-squared and Ya, and WBR were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variances. Cohen’s d and likelihood ratios were computed for comparison with statistically significant differences. RESULTS:Ya measured with 678- and 1000 Hz probe tones was significantly different between ears with CHL and NH. Two-category classification of tympanograms using a 1000 Hz probe tone was significantly different between ears with CHL and NH. Neither two-category classification nor Ya was significantly different between ears identified with CHL and NH using a 226 Hz probe tone. WBR was significantly higher in the frequency bands 800 to 2500 Hz and in the frequency band centered at 6300 Hz in infants with CHL. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were greater than 2 for several WBR frequency bands and Ya measured with 1000 Hz probe tones. The results were similar for calculations of Ya from admittance-magnitude and subcomponent tympanograms. Positive likelihood ratios for WBR ranged between 8.1 and 38, and those for Ya using 1000 Hz ranged between 12.5 and 32. CONCLUSIONS:CHL in young infants can be detected well with WBR or tympanometry using probe frequencies of 678 and 1000 Hz.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>23263407</pmid><doi>10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826fe611</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0202
ispartof Ear and hearing, 2013-03, Vol.34 (2), p.168-178
issn 0196-0202
1538-4667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1312177289
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Acoustic Impedance Tests - methods
Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
Female
Hearing Loss, Conductive - diagnosis
Hearing Tests
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Likelihood Functions
Male
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Identification of Conductive Hearing Loss in Young Infants Using Tympanometry and Wideband Reflectance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T02%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20of%20Conductive%20Hearing%20Loss%20in%20Young%20Infants%20Using%20Tympanometry%20and%20Wideband%20Reflectance&rft.jtitle=Ear%20and%20hearing&rft.au=Prieve,%20Beth%20A&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=168-178&rft.issn=0196-0202&rft.eissn=1538-4667&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826fe611&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1312177289%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1312177289&rft_id=info:pmid/23263407&rfr_iscdi=true