Exon-level array CGH in a large clinical cohort demonstrates increased sensitivity of diagnostic testing for Mendelian disorders
Mendelian disorders are most commonly caused by mutations identifiable by DNA sequencing. Exonic deletions and duplications can go undetected by sequencing, and their frequency in most Mendelian disorders is unknown. We designed an array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) test with probes in ex...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genetics in medicine 2012-06, Vol.14 (6), p.594-603 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 603 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 594 |
container_title | Genetics in medicine |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Aradhya, Swaroop Lewis, Rachel Bonaga, Tahrra Nwokekeh, Nnenna Stafford, Amanda Boggs, Barbara Hruska, Kathleen Smaoui, Nizar Compton, John G. Richard, Gabriele Suchy, Sharon |
description | Mendelian disorders are most commonly caused by mutations identifiable by DNA sequencing. Exonic deletions and duplications can go undetected by sequencing, and their frequency in most Mendelian disorders is unknown.
We designed an array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) test with probes in exonic regions of 589 genes. Targeted testing was performed for 219 genes in 3,018 patients. We demonstrate for the first time the utility of exon-level array CGH in a large clinical cohort by testing for 136 autosomal dominant, 53 autosomal recessive, and 30 X-linked disorders.
Overall, 98 deletions and two duplications were identified in 53 genes, corresponding to a detection rate of 3.3%. Approximately 40% of positive findings were deletions of only one or two exons. A high frequency of deletions was observed for several autosomal dominant disorders, with a detection rate of 2.9%. For autosomal recessive disorders, array CGH was usually performed after a single mutation was identified by sequencing. Among 138 individuals tested for recessive disorders, 10.1% had intragenic deletions. For X-linked disorders, 3.5% of 313 patients carried a deletion or duplication.
Our results demonstrate that exon-level array CGH provides a robust option for intragenic copy number analysis and should routinely supplement sequence analysis for Mendelian disorders.
Genet Med 2012:14(6):594–603 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/gim.2011.65 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291618642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1098360021022644</els_id><sourcerecordid>2887712291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-953045ed9c6c501193bd53eeb1f17f50006bd37dd7b1c5ed32449349cb80a0323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0UFvFCEUB3BiNLZWT94NiRcTnfUBM8zM0Wxqa1LjRc-EgTcjDQMV2I1786PLZqsmpidI-PF4jz8hLxlsGIjh_eLWDQfGNrJ7RM5ZJ6ABIeXjuodxaIQEOCPPcr4FYL3g8JSccS4GPgA_J78uf8bQeNyjpzolfaDbq2vqAtXU67QgNd4FZ7SnJn6PqVCLawy5JF0wV2cS6oyWZgzZFbd35UDjTK3TS4i5OEOrKy4sdI6JfsZg0TsdKsgxWUz5OXkya5_xxf16Qb59vPy6vW5uvlx92n64aUzbQ2nGOlbboR2NNF0ddhST7QTixGbWzx0AyMmK3tp-YqY6wdt2FO1opgE0CC4uyJtT3bsUf-xqT2p12aD3OmDcZcX4yCQbZHukr_-jt3GXQu1O8WHoe8arrertSZkUc044q7vkVp0OioE6BqNqMOoYjJJd1a_ua-6mFe1f-yeJCt6dQK5HYcH079GH63UnjvXP9q7ybBwGg9YlNEXZ6B689xudJ6qZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2887712291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exon-level array CGH in a large clinical cohort demonstrates increased sensitivity of diagnostic testing for Mendelian disorders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Aradhya, Swaroop ; Lewis, Rachel ; Bonaga, Tahrra ; Nwokekeh, Nnenna ; Stafford, Amanda ; Boggs, Barbara ; Hruska, Kathleen ; Smaoui, Nizar ; Compton, John G. ; Richard, Gabriele ; Suchy, Sharon</creator><creatorcontrib>Aradhya, Swaroop ; Lewis, Rachel ; Bonaga, Tahrra ; Nwokekeh, Nnenna ; Stafford, Amanda ; Boggs, Barbara ; Hruska, Kathleen ; Smaoui, Nizar ; Compton, John G. ; Richard, Gabriele ; Suchy, Sharon</creatorcontrib><description>Mendelian disorders are most commonly caused by mutations identifiable by DNA sequencing. Exonic deletions and duplications can go undetected by sequencing, and their frequency in most Mendelian disorders is unknown.
We designed an array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) test with probes in exonic regions of 589 genes. Targeted testing was performed for 219 genes in 3,018 patients. We demonstrate for the first time the utility of exon-level array CGH in a large clinical cohort by testing for 136 autosomal dominant, 53 autosomal recessive, and 30 X-linked disorders.
Overall, 98 deletions and two duplications were identified in 53 genes, corresponding to a detection rate of 3.3%. Approximately 40% of positive findings were deletions of only one or two exons. A high frequency of deletions was observed for several autosomal dominant disorders, with a detection rate of 2.9%. For autosomal recessive disorders, array CGH was usually performed after a single mutation was identified by sequencing. Among 138 individuals tested for recessive disorders, 10.1% had intragenic deletions. For X-linked disorders, 3.5% of 313 patients carried a deletion or duplication.
Our results demonstrate that exon-level array CGH provides a robust option for intragenic copy number analysis and should routinely supplement sequence analysis for Mendelian disorders.
Genet Med 2012:14(6):594–603</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3600</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/gim.2011.65</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22382802</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>631/1647/2217/2136 ; 631/208/2489/144 ; 631/208/737/1505 ; 692/700/139 ; array CGH ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Comparative Genomic Hybridization - methods ; copy number ; deletion ; DNA probes ; DNA sequencing ; duplication ; exon ; Exons ; Exons - genetics ; Female ; Gene Deletion ; Gene Dosage ; Gene Duplication ; Genetic Diseases, Inborn - diagnosis ; Genetic Diseases, X-Linked - diagnosis ; genomics ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Laboratory Medicine ; Male ; Mendelian ; Mendelian Randomization Analysis ; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques - methods ; Mutation ; Mutation - genetics ; original-research-article ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods ; X chromosome</subject><ispartof>Genetics in medicine, 2012-06, Vol.14 (6), p.594-603</ispartof><rights>2012 The Author(s)</rights><rights>American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2012</rights><rights>American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2012.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-953045ed9c6c501193bd53eeb1f17f50006bd37dd7b1c5ed32449349cb80a0323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-953045ed9c6c501193bd53eeb1f17f50006bd37dd7b1c5ed32449349cb80a0323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2887712291?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22382802$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aradhya, Swaroop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonaga, Tahrra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwokekeh, Nnenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hruska, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smaoui, Nizar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Compton, John G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suchy, Sharon</creatorcontrib><title>Exon-level array CGH in a large clinical cohort demonstrates increased sensitivity of diagnostic testing for Mendelian disorders</title><title>Genetics in medicine</title><addtitle>Genet Med</addtitle><addtitle>Genet Med</addtitle><description>Mendelian disorders are most commonly caused by mutations identifiable by DNA sequencing. Exonic deletions and duplications can go undetected by sequencing, and their frequency in most Mendelian disorders is unknown.
We designed an array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) test with probes in exonic regions of 589 genes. Targeted testing was performed for 219 genes in 3,018 patients. We demonstrate for the first time the utility of exon-level array CGH in a large clinical cohort by testing for 136 autosomal dominant, 53 autosomal recessive, and 30 X-linked disorders.
Overall, 98 deletions and two duplications were identified in 53 genes, corresponding to a detection rate of 3.3%. Approximately 40% of positive findings were deletions of only one or two exons. A high frequency of deletions was observed for several autosomal dominant disorders, with a detection rate of 2.9%. For autosomal recessive disorders, array CGH was usually performed after a single mutation was identified by sequencing. Among 138 individuals tested for recessive disorders, 10.1% had intragenic deletions. For X-linked disorders, 3.5% of 313 patients carried a deletion or duplication.
Our results demonstrate that exon-level array CGH provides a robust option for intragenic copy number analysis and should routinely supplement sequence analysis for Mendelian disorders.
Genet Med 2012:14(6):594–603</description><subject>631/1647/2217/2136</subject><subject>631/208/2489/144</subject><subject>631/208/737/1505</subject><subject>692/700/139</subject><subject>array CGH</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Comparative Genomic Hybridization - methods</subject><subject>copy number</subject><subject>deletion</subject><subject>DNA probes</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>duplication</subject><subject>exon</subject><subject>Exons</subject><subject>Exons - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene Deletion</subject><subject>Gene Dosage</subject><subject>Gene Duplication</subject><subject>Genetic Diseases, Inborn - diagnosis</subject><subject>Genetic Diseases, X-Linked - diagnosis</subject><subject>genomics</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mendelian</subject><subject>Mendelian Randomization Analysis</subject><subject>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Mutation - genetics</subject><subject>original-research-article</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods</subject><subject>X chromosome</subject><issn>1098-3600</issn><issn>1530-0366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0UFvFCEUB3BiNLZWT94NiRcTnfUBM8zM0Wxqa1LjRc-EgTcjDQMV2I1786PLZqsmpidI-PF4jz8hLxlsGIjh_eLWDQfGNrJ7RM5ZJ6ABIeXjuodxaIQEOCPPcr4FYL3g8JSccS4GPgA_J78uf8bQeNyjpzolfaDbq2vqAtXU67QgNd4FZ7SnJn6PqVCLawy5JF0wV2cS6oyWZgzZFbd35UDjTK3TS4i5OEOrKy4sdI6JfsZg0TsdKsgxWUz5OXkya5_xxf16Qb59vPy6vW5uvlx92n64aUzbQ2nGOlbboR2NNF0ddhST7QTixGbWzx0AyMmK3tp-YqY6wdt2FO1opgE0CC4uyJtT3bsUf-xqT2p12aD3OmDcZcX4yCQbZHukr_-jt3GXQu1O8WHoe8arrertSZkUc044q7vkVp0OioE6BqNqMOoYjJJd1a_ua-6mFe1f-yeJCt6dQK5HYcH079GH63UnjvXP9q7ybBwGg9YlNEXZ6B689xudJ6qZ</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Aradhya, Swaroop</creator><creator>Lewis, Rachel</creator><creator>Bonaga, Tahrra</creator><creator>Nwokekeh, Nnenna</creator><creator>Stafford, Amanda</creator><creator>Boggs, Barbara</creator><creator>Hruska, Kathleen</creator><creator>Smaoui, Nizar</creator><creator>Compton, John G.</creator><creator>Richard, Gabriele</creator><creator>Suchy, Sharon</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Exon-level array CGH in a large clinical cohort demonstrates increased sensitivity of diagnostic testing for Mendelian disorders</title><author>Aradhya, Swaroop ; Lewis, Rachel ; Bonaga, Tahrra ; Nwokekeh, Nnenna ; Stafford, Amanda ; Boggs, Barbara ; Hruska, Kathleen ; Smaoui, Nizar ; Compton, John G. ; Richard, Gabriele ; Suchy, Sharon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-953045ed9c6c501193bd53eeb1f17f50006bd37dd7b1c5ed32449349cb80a0323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>631/1647/2217/2136</topic><topic>631/208/2489/144</topic><topic>631/208/737/1505</topic><topic>692/700/139</topic><topic>array CGH</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Comparative Genomic Hybridization - methods</topic><topic>copy number</topic><topic>deletion</topic><topic>DNA probes</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>duplication</topic><topic>exon</topic><topic>Exons</topic><topic>Exons - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene Deletion</topic><topic>Gene Dosage</topic><topic>Gene Duplication</topic><topic>Genetic Diseases, Inborn - diagnosis</topic><topic>Genetic Diseases, X-Linked - diagnosis</topic><topic>genomics</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mendelian</topic><topic>Mendelian Randomization Analysis</topic><topic>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Mutation - genetics</topic><topic>original-research-article</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods</topic><topic>X chromosome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aradhya, Swaroop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonaga, Tahrra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwokekeh, Nnenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hruska, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smaoui, Nizar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Compton, John G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suchy, Sharon</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Genetics in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aradhya, Swaroop</au><au>Lewis, Rachel</au><au>Bonaga, Tahrra</au><au>Nwokekeh, Nnenna</au><au>Stafford, Amanda</au><au>Boggs, Barbara</au><au>Hruska, Kathleen</au><au>Smaoui, Nizar</au><au>Compton, John G.</au><au>Richard, Gabriele</au><au>Suchy, Sharon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exon-level array CGH in a large clinical cohort demonstrates increased sensitivity of diagnostic testing for Mendelian disorders</atitle><jtitle>Genetics in medicine</jtitle><stitle>Genet Med</stitle><addtitle>Genet Med</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>594</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>594-603</pages><issn>1098-3600</issn><eissn>1530-0366</eissn><abstract>Mendelian disorders are most commonly caused by mutations identifiable by DNA sequencing. Exonic deletions and duplications can go undetected by sequencing, and their frequency in most Mendelian disorders is unknown.
We designed an array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) test with probes in exonic regions of 589 genes. Targeted testing was performed for 219 genes in 3,018 patients. We demonstrate for the first time the utility of exon-level array CGH in a large clinical cohort by testing for 136 autosomal dominant, 53 autosomal recessive, and 30 X-linked disorders.
Overall, 98 deletions and two duplications were identified in 53 genes, corresponding to a detection rate of 3.3%. Approximately 40% of positive findings were deletions of only one or two exons. A high frequency of deletions was observed for several autosomal dominant disorders, with a detection rate of 2.9%. For autosomal recessive disorders, array CGH was usually performed after a single mutation was identified by sequencing. Among 138 individuals tested for recessive disorders, 10.1% had intragenic deletions. For X-linked disorders, 3.5% of 313 patients carried a deletion or duplication.
Our results demonstrate that exon-level array CGH provides a robust option for intragenic copy number analysis and should routinely supplement sequence analysis for Mendelian disorders.
Genet Med 2012:14(6):594–603</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22382802</pmid><doi>10.1038/gim.2011.65</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-3600 |
ispartof | Genetics in medicine, 2012-06, Vol.14 (6), p.594-603 |
issn | 1098-3600 1530-0366 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291618642 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 631/1647/2217/2136 631/208/2489/144 631/208/737/1505 692/700/139 array CGH Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Comparative Genomic Hybridization - methods copy number deletion DNA probes DNA sequencing duplication exon Exons Exons - genetics Female Gene Deletion Gene Dosage Gene Duplication Genetic Diseases, Inborn - diagnosis Genetic Diseases, X-Linked - diagnosis genomics Human Genetics Humans Laboratory Medicine Male Mendelian Mendelian Randomization Analysis Molecular Diagnostic Techniques - methods Mutation Mutation - genetics original-research-article Sensitivity and Specificity Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods X chromosome |
title | Exon-level array CGH in a large clinical cohort demonstrates increased sensitivity of diagnostic testing for Mendelian disorders |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A34%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exon-level%20array%20CGH%20in%20a%20large%20clinical%20cohort%20demonstrates%20increased%20sensitivity%20of%20diagnostic%20testing%20for%20Mendelian%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Genetics%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Aradhya,%20Swaroop&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=594&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=594-603&rft.issn=1098-3600&rft.eissn=1530-0366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/gim.2011.65&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2887712291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2887712291&rft_id=info:pmid/22382802&rft_els_id=S1098360021022644&rfr_iscdi=true |