The WISER metadatabase: the key to more than 100 ecological datasets from European rivers, lakes and coastal waters
In ecological sciences, the role of metadata (i.e. key information about a dataset) to make existing datasets visible and discoverable has become increasingly important. Within the EU-funded WISER project (Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery), we desi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2013-03, Vol.704 (1), p.29-38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 38 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 704 |
creator | Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid Moe, S. Jannicke Dudley, Bernard Strackbein, Jörg Vogl, Robert |
description | In ecological sciences, the role of metadata (i.e. key information about a dataset) to make existing datasets visible and discoverable has become increasingly important. Within the EU-funded WISER project (Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery), we designed a metadatabase to allow scientists to find the optimal data for their analyses. An online questionnaire helped to collect metadata from the data providers and an online query tool (
http://www.wiser.eu/results/meta-database/
) facilitated data evaluation. The WISER metadatabase currently holds information on 114 datasets (22 river, 71 lake, 1 general freshwater and 20 coastal/transitional datasets), which also can be accessed by external scientists. We evaluate if generally used metadata standards (e.g. Darwin Core, ISO 19115, CSDGM, EML) are suitable for such specific purposes as WISER and suggest at least the linkage with standard metadata fields. Furthermore, we discuss whether the simple metadata documentation is enough for others to reuse a dataset and why there is still reluctance to publish both metadata and primary research data (i.e. time and financial constraints, misuse of data, abandoning intellectual property rights). We emphasise that metadata publication has major advantages as it makes datasets detectable by other scientists and generally makes a scientist’s work more visible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-012-1295-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291618527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A337718691</galeid><sourcerecordid>A337718691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6bff13d6b50952efa184060821be94a3fc9ba6f8e4220d43d1e64acdc56449883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVFr1TAUx4soeJ1-AN8CvijYmZM2aerbGNd5YSBsEx_DaXpy7dY21yRV9-2XS31wguQh5OT3O_mTUxSvgZ8C582HCLyRvOQgShCtLNWTYgOyqUoJ0DwtNpyDLjVI_bx4EeMtz04r-KaIN9-Jfdtdb6_YRAl7TNhhpI8s5fod3bPk2eQD5TPOLD_FyPrR7weLIzvSkVJkLviJbZfgD5SpMPykEN-zEe8oMpx7Zj3GlIVfmPLNy-KZwzHSqz_7SfH10_bm_HN5-eVid352WdpayVSqzjmoetVJ3kpBDkHXXHEtoKO2xsrZtkPlNNVC8L6ueiBVo-2tVHXdal2dFG_XvofgfywUk5mGaGkccSa_RJM_ChRoKZqMvvkHvfVLmHO6TGnJGxD1seHpSu1xJDPMzqeANq-epsH6mdyQ62dV1TSgVQtZePdIyEyi32mPS4xmd331mIWVtcHHGMiZQxgmDPcGuDnO2KwzNnnGx-jSqOyI1YmZnfcU_or9X-kBlgKm3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1285071248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The WISER metadatabase: the key to more than 100 ecological datasets from European rivers, lakes and coastal waters</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid ; Moe, S. Jannicke ; Dudley, Bernard ; Strackbein, Jörg ; Vogl, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid ; Moe, S. Jannicke ; Dudley, Bernard ; Strackbein, Jörg ; Vogl, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>In ecological sciences, the role of metadata (i.e. key information about a dataset) to make existing datasets visible and discoverable has become increasingly important. Within the EU-funded WISER project (Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery), we designed a metadatabase to allow scientists to find the optimal data for their analyses. An online questionnaire helped to collect metadata from the data providers and an online query tool (
http://www.wiser.eu/results/meta-database/
) facilitated data evaluation. The WISER metadatabase currently holds information on 114 datasets (22 river, 71 lake, 1 general freshwater and 20 coastal/transitional datasets), which also can be accessed by external scientists. We evaluate if generally used metadata standards (e.g. Darwin Core, ISO 19115, CSDGM, EML) are suitable for such specific purposes as WISER and suggest at least the linkage with standard metadata fields. Furthermore, we discuss whether the simple metadata documentation is enough for others to reuse a dataset and why there is still reluctance to publish both metadata and primary research data (i.e. time and financial constraints, misuse of data, abandoning intellectual property rights). We emphasise that metadata publication has major advantages as it makes datasets detectable by other scientists and generally makes a scientist’s work more visible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1295-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Coastal waters ; Coasts ; Ecology ; Freshwater ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater lakes ; Lakes ; Life Sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Property rights ; Rivers ; Scientists ; Water Bodies in Europe ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2013-03, Vol.704 (1), p.29-38</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6bff13d6b50952efa184060821be94a3fc9ba6f8e4220d43d1e64acdc56449883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6bff13d6b50952efa184060821be94a3fc9ba6f8e4220d43d1e64acdc56449883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-012-1295-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-012-1295-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moe, S. Jannicke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudley, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strackbein, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogl, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>The WISER metadatabase: the key to more than 100 ecological datasets from European rivers, lakes and coastal waters</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>In ecological sciences, the role of metadata (i.e. key information about a dataset) to make existing datasets visible and discoverable has become increasingly important. Within the EU-funded WISER project (Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery), we designed a metadatabase to allow scientists to find the optimal data for their analyses. An online questionnaire helped to collect metadata from the data providers and an online query tool (
http://www.wiser.eu/results/meta-database/
) facilitated data evaluation. The WISER metadatabase currently holds information on 114 datasets (22 river, 71 lake, 1 general freshwater and 20 coastal/transitional datasets), which also can be accessed by external scientists. We evaluate if generally used metadata standards (e.g. Darwin Core, ISO 19115, CSDGM, EML) are suitable for such specific purposes as WISER and suggest at least the linkage with standard metadata fields. Furthermore, we discuss whether the simple metadata documentation is enough for others to reuse a dataset and why there is still reluctance to publish both metadata and primary research data (i.e. time and financial constraints, misuse of data, abandoning intellectual property rights). We emphasise that metadata publication has major advantages as it makes datasets detectable by other scientists and generally makes a scientist’s work more visible.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coastal waters</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater lakes</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Water Bodies in Europe</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVFr1TAUx4soeJ1-AN8CvijYmZM2aerbGNd5YSBsEx_DaXpy7dY21yRV9-2XS31wguQh5OT3O_mTUxSvgZ8C582HCLyRvOQgShCtLNWTYgOyqUoJ0DwtNpyDLjVI_bx4EeMtz04r-KaIN9-Jfdtdb6_YRAl7TNhhpI8s5fod3bPk2eQD5TPOLD_FyPrR7weLIzvSkVJkLviJbZfgD5SpMPykEN-zEe8oMpx7Zj3GlIVfmPLNy-KZwzHSqz_7SfH10_bm_HN5-eVid352WdpayVSqzjmoetVJ3kpBDkHXXHEtoKO2xsrZtkPlNNVC8L6ueiBVo-2tVHXdal2dFG_XvofgfywUk5mGaGkccSa_RJM_ChRoKZqMvvkHvfVLmHO6TGnJGxD1seHpSu1xJDPMzqeANq-epsH6mdyQ62dV1TSgVQtZePdIyEyi32mPS4xmd331mIWVtcHHGMiZQxgmDPcGuDnO2KwzNnnGx-jSqOyI1YmZnfcU_or9X-kBlgKm3g</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid</creator><creator>Moe, S. Jannicke</creator><creator>Dudley, Bernard</creator><creator>Strackbein, Jörg</creator><creator>Vogl, Robert</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>H97</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>The WISER metadatabase: the key to more than 100 ecological datasets from European rivers, lakes and coastal waters</title><author>Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid ; Moe, S. Jannicke ; Dudley, Bernard ; Strackbein, Jörg ; Vogl, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6bff13d6b50952efa184060821be94a3fc9ba6f8e4220d43d1e64acdc56449883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coastal waters</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater lakes</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Water Bodies in Europe</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moe, S. Jannicke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudley, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strackbein, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogl, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid</au><au>Moe, S. Jannicke</au><au>Dudley, Bernard</au><au>Strackbein, Jörg</au><au>Vogl, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The WISER metadatabase: the key to more than 100 ecological datasets from European rivers, lakes and coastal waters</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>704</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>29-38</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>In ecological sciences, the role of metadata (i.e. key information about a dataset) to make existing datasets visible and discoverable has become increasingly important. Within the EU-funded WISER project (Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery), we designed a metadatabase to allow scientists to find the optimal data for their analyses. An online questionnaire helped to collect metadata from the data providers and an online query tool (
http://www.wiser.eu/results/meta-database/
) facilitated data evaluation. The WISER metadatabase currently holds information on 114 datasets (22 river, 71 lake, 1 general freshwater and 20 coastal/transitional datasets), which also can be accessed by external scientists. We evaluate if generally used metadata standards (e.g. Darwin Core, ISO 19115, CSDGM, EML) are suitable for such specific purposes as WISER and suggest at least the linkage with standard metadata fields. Furthermore, we discuss whether the simple metadata documentation is enough for others to reuse a dataset and why there is still reluctance to publish both metadata and primary research data (i.e. time and financial constraints, misuse of data, abandoning intellectual property rights). We emphasise that metadata publication has major advantages as it makes datasets detectable by other scientists and generally makes a scientist’s work more visible.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-012-1295-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2013-03, Vol.704 (1), p.29-38 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291618527 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Analysis Biomedical and Life Sciences Coastal waters Coasts Ecology Freshwater Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater lakes Lakes Life Sciences Meta-analysis Property rights Rivers Scientists Water Bodies in Europe Zoology |
title | The WISER metadatabase: the key to more than 100 ecological datasets from European rivers, lakes and coastal waters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A28%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20WISER%20metadatabase:%20the%20key%20to%20more%20than%20100%20ecological%20datasets%20from%20European%20rivers,%20lakes%20and%20coastal%20waters&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Schmidt-Kloiber,%20Astrid&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=704&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=29-38&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-012-1295-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA337718691%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1285071248&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A337718691&rfr_iscdi=true |