Promoting neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke: future directions for rehabilitation clinical trials

The purpose is to establish a theoretical framework by which new interventions for poststroke rehabilitation may be developed incorporating knowledge of neuroplasticity and the critical ingredients of rehabilitation. Large phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are rare in neurorehabilitation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in neurology 2013-02, Vol.26 (1), p.37-42
Hauptverfasser: Bowden, Mark G, Woodbury, Michelle L, Duncan, Pamela W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Current opinion in neurology
container_volume 26
creator Bowden, Mark G
Woodbury, Michelle L
Duncan, Pamela W
description The purpose is to establish a theoretical framework by which new interventions for poststroke rehabilitation may be developed incorporating knowledge of neuroplasticity and the critical ingredients of rehabilitation. Large phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are rare in neurorehabilitation, and the results of those that have been completed are perplexing because the experimental and control treatments were not different when matched for activity level. In addition, the outcome measures used to define treatment effects reflected behavioral endpoints, but did not reveal how neuroplastic mechanisms or other mechanistic factors may have contributed to the treatment response. Knowledge of both the neurophysiologic basis of recovery and key elements of interventions that drive motor learning, such as intensity and task progression, are critical for optimizing future poststroke motor rehabilitation clinical trials. Future neurorehabilitation RCTs require a better understanding of the interaction of interventions and neurophysiological recovery in order to target interventions at specific neurophysiologic substrates, develop a more clear understanding of the impact of intervention parameters (e.g. dose, intensity), and advance discussions regarding optimal ways to partner medical and rehabilitation interventions in order to improve outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835c5ba0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291612144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1291612144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ab67797c3b6198dfb4d6a6f89c564a323ed4c76a154865e3bcbd0abb66c1cb823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkTtPwzAUhS0EoqXwDxDyyJLitxM2VPGSKpUBxBjZjgOGJC62g9R_j1ELAxPTuY9z7h0-AE4xmmNUyYvnxWqONMLUUlJSbrhWaA9MMZO0EJzj_VxTjgrJGZqAoxjfEEIVEfIQTAglnHEupsA9BN_75IYXONgx-HWnYnLGpQ1UQwODNf7Thty0yQYYU_Dv9hK2YxqDhY3L--T8EGHrQza_Ku06l9T3DJrODc6oDqbgVBePwUGbxZ7sdAaebq4fF3fFcnV7v7haFoaUVSqUFlJW0lAtcFU2rWaNUKItK8MFU5RQ2zAjhcKclYJbqo1ukNJaCIONLgmdgfPt3XXwH6ONqe5dNLbr1GD9GGtMKiwwwYz9wyopLQWRPFvZ1mqCjzHYtl4H16uwqTGqv3nUmUf9l0eOne0-jLq3zW_oBwD9Ahg6ik8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1273386275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Promoting neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke: future directions for rehabilitation clinical trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Bowden, Mark G ; Woodbury, Michelle L ; Duncan, Pamela W</creator><contributor>Sacco, RL ; Rundek, T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Mark G ; Woodbury, Michelle L ; Duncan, Pamela W ; Sacco, RL ; Rundek, T</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose is to establish a theoretical framework by which new interventions for poststroke rehabilitation may be developed incorporating knowledge of neuroplasticity and the critical ingredients of rehabilitation. Large phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are rare in neurorehabilitation, and the results of those that have been completed are perplexing because the experimental and control treatments were not different when matched for activity level. In addition, the outcome measures used to define treatment effects reflected behavioral endpoints, but did not reveal how neuroplastic mechanisms or other mechanistic factors may have contributed to the treatment response. Knowledge of both the neurophysiologic basis of recovery and key elements of interventions that drive motor learning, such as intensity and task progression, are critical for optimizing future poststroke motor rehabilitation clinical trials. Future neurorehabilitation RCTs require a better understanding of the interaction of interventions and neurophysiological recovery in order to target interventions at specific neurophysiologic substrates, develop a more clear understanding of the impact of intervention parameters (e.g. dose, intensity), and advance discussions regarding optimal ways to partner medical and rehabilitation interventions in order to improve outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-7540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-6551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835c5ba0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23254556</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods ; Clinical Trials as Topic - trends ; Humans ; Motor skill learning ; Neurology ; Neuronal Plasticity - physiology ; Plasticity ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Rehabilitation ; Reviews ; Stroke ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Current opinion in neurology, 2013-02, Vol.26 (1), p.37-42</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ab67797c3b6198dfb4d6a6f89c564a323ed4c76a154865e3bcbd0abb66c1cb823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23254556$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sacco, RL</contributor><contributor>Rundek, T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Mark G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, Michelle L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Pamela W</creatorcontrib><title>Promoting neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke: future directions for rehabilitation clinical trials</title><title>Current opinion in neurology</title><addtitle>Curr Opin Neurol</addtitle><description>The purpose is to establish a theoretical framework by which new interventions for poststroke rehabilitation may be developed incorporating knowledge of neuroplasticity and the critical ingredients of rehabilitation. Large phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are rare in neurorehabilitation, and the results of those that have been completed are perplexing because the experimental and control treatments were not different when matched for activity level. In addition, the outcome measures used to define treatment effects reflected behavioral endpoints, but did not reveal how neuroplastic mechanisms or other mechanistic factors may have contributed to the treatment response. Knowledge of both the neurophysiologic basis of recovery and key elements of interventions that drive motor learning, such as intensity and task progression, are critical for optimizing future poststroke motor rehabilitation clinical trials. Future neurorehabilitation RCTs require a better understanding of the interaction of interventions and neurophysiological recovery in order to target interventions at specific neurophysiologic substrates, develop a more clear understanding of the impact of intervention parameters (e.g. dose, intensity), and advance discussions regarding optimal ways to partner medical and rehabilitation interventions in order to improve outcomes.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Motor skill learning</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuronal Plasticity - physiology</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1350-7540</issn><issn>1473-6551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkTtPwzAUhS0EoqXwDxDyyJLitxM2VPGSKpUBxBjZjgOGJC62g9R_j1ELAxPTuY9z7h0-AE4xmmNUyYvnxWqONMLUUlJSbrhWaA9MMZO0EJzj_VxTjgrJGZqAoxjfEEIVEfIQTAglnHEupsA9BN_75IYXONgx-HWnYnLGpQ1UQwODNf7Thty0yQYYU_Dv9hK2YxqDhY3L--T8EGHrQza_Ku06l9T3DJrODc6oDqbgVBePwUGbxZ7sdAaebq4fF3fFcnV7v7haFoaUVSqUFlJW0lAtcFU2rWaNUKItK8MFU5RQ2zAjhcKclYJbqo1ukNJaCIONLgmdgfPt3XXwH6ONqe5dNLbr1GD9GGtMKiwwwYz9wyopLQWRPFvZ1mqCjzHYtl4H16uwqTGqv3nUmUf9l0eOne0-jLq3zW_oBwD9Ahg6ik8</recordid><startdate>201302</startdate><enddate>201302</enddate><creator>Bowden, Mark G</creator><creator>Woodbury, Michelle L</creator><creator>Duncan, Pamela W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201302</creationdate><title>Promoting neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke: future directions for rehabilitation clinical trials</title><author>Bowden, Mark G ; Woodbury, Michelle L ; Duncan, Pamela W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-ab67797c3b6198dfb4d6a6f89c564a323ed4c76a154865e3bcbd0abb66c1cb823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Motor skill learning</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuronal Plasticity - physiology</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Mark G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, Michelle L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Pamela W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bowden, Mark G</au><au>Woodbury, Michelle L</au><au>Duncan, Pamela W</au><au>Sacco, RL</au><au>Rundek, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Promoting neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke: future directions for rehabilitation clinical trials</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Opin Neurol</addtitle><date>2013-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>37-42</pages><issn>1350-7540</issn><eissn>1473-6551</eissn><abstract>The purpose is to establish a theoretical framework by which new interventions for poststroke rehabilitation may be developed incorporating knowledge of neuroplasticity and the critical ingredients of rehabilitation. Large phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are rare in neurorehabilitation, and the results of those that have been completed are perplexing because the experimental and control treatments were not different when matched for activity level. In addition, the outcome measures used to define treatment effects reflected behavioral endpoints, but did not reveal how neuroplastic mechanisms or other mechanistic factors may have contributed to the treatment response. Knowledge of both the neurophysiologic basis of recovery and key elements of interventions that drive motor learning, such as intensity and task progression, are critical for optimizing future poststroke motor rehabilitation clinical trials. Future neurorehabilitation RCTs require a better understanding of the interaction of interventions and neurophysiological recovery in order to target interventions at specific neurophysiologic substrates, develop a more clear understanding of the impact of intervention parameters (e.g. dose, intensity), and advance discussions regarding optimal ways to partner medical and rehabilitation interventions in order to improve outcomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>23254556</pmid><doi>10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835c5ba0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-7540
ispartof Current opinion in neurology, 2013-02, Vol.26 (1), p.37-42
issn 1350-7540
1473-6551
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291612144
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Clinical trials
Clinical Trials as Topic - methods
Clinical Trials as Topic - trends
Humans
Motor skill learning
Neurology
Neuronal Plasticity - physiology
Plasticity
Recovery of Function - physiology
Rehabilitation
Reviews
Stroke
Stroke Rehabilitation
Treatment Outcome
title Promoting neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke: future directions for rehabilitation clinical trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A19%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Promoting%20neuroplasticity%20and%20recovery%20after%20stroke:%20future%20directions%20for%20rehabilitation%20clinical%20trials&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20neurology&rft.au=Bowden,%20Mark%20G&rft.date=2013-02&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=37-42&rft.issn=1350-7540&rft.eissn=1473-6551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835c5ba0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1291612144%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1273386275&rft_id=info:pmid/23254556&rfr_iscdi=true