South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning
► Research investigated values which feed into water planning decisions. ►Findings on the socio-economic impacts of change in water availability indicate resilience. ► Deliberative and visual methods identify societal values for environmental assets. ► Tools evaluated highly for generating dialogue...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2012-12, Vol.474, p.29-37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 37 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 474 |
creator | Mooney, C. Tan, P.-L. |
description | ► Research investigated values which feed into water planning decisions. ►Findings on the socio-economic impacts of change in water availability indicate resilience. ► Deliberative and visual methods identify societal values for environmental assets. ► Tools evaluated highly for generating dialogue and information exchange. ► SA applying method for identifying preliminary Indigenous cultural water values.
The South Australian River Murray is at the end of the Murray–Darling Basin which spans four Australian states, and is reliant on upstream flow. Under the Murray–Darling Basin Agreement, South Australia has an annual entitlement of 1850GL flow. In the recent debilitating drought, the Agreement was put ‘on hold’ while emergency sharing arrangements provided for critical human needs, with meagre supplies for any other consumptive use. The drought also impacted on environmental values already compromised by river regulation and the high levels of water consumption. Conducted during the policy development phase of a second water allocation plan, our research trialled three tools designed to assess economic, social and cultural values for the new plan. The first was a pilot social impact study of effects of changing water availability in the Murraylands. In the second, researchers used a participatory modelling tool conjunctively with multi-criteria analysis to identify community values relevant to the prioritisation of environmental assets in the context of water scarcity. The third tool addressed Indigenous cultural values associated with water. Results of trials demonstrate that identifying public and social values in water require a number of interactive and deliberative tools in order to engage the broad community in water planning. Of the three tools, the most innovative was the second tool as it facilitated deliberation about the relative importance of the environment and helped shift individuals from entrenched interest based positions to consensus on values in wetlands. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291599358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169412002739</els_id><sourcerecordid>1291599358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-26dc3d5b996396253aaa05bb92859e397e2f5d6983140e47b4957692e2da2c683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhesknwI3ZiNqhCvKQCEoW15dgudeQmxU6KuuM3-D2-BFftntnM5tyrmQPAOUY5RphfNnmz2JjQ-ZwgTHJU5AijAzDCVSkyUqLyEIwQIiTDXBTH4CTGBqWhtBiB51k39As4GWIflHfq9_snwle3tgE-DSGozRWcddopD1VroB58PyQOrpUfbISuhV-qT-zKq7Z17ccpOJorH-3Zfo_B-93t281DNn25f7yZTDNFRdVnhBtNDauF4FRwwqhSCrG6FqRiwlJRWjJnhouK4gLZoqwLwUouiCVGEc0rOgYXu95V6D7TJb1cuqitT2fYbogSE4GZEJRtUbZDdehiDHYuV8EtVdhIjOTWn2zk3p_c-pOokMlfyl3vcjb9sXY2yKidbbU1LljdS9O5fxr-AMJXfE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291599358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mooney, C. ; Tan, P.-L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mooney, C. ; Tan, P.-L.</creatorcontrib><description>► Research investigated values which feed into water planning decisions. ►Findings on the socio-economic impacts of change in water availability indicate resilience. ► Deliberative and visual methods identify societal values for environmental assets. ► Tools evaluated highly for generating dialogue and information exchange. ► SA applying method for identifying preliminary Indigenous cultural water values.
The South Australian River Murray is at the end of the Murray–Darling Basin which spans four Australian states, and is reliant on upstream flow. Under the Murray–Darling Basin Agreement, South Australia has an annual entitlement of 1850GL flow. In the recent debilitating drought, the Agreement was put ‘on hold’ while emergency sharing arrangements provided for critical human needs, with meagre supplies for any other consumptive use. The drought also impacted on environmental values already compromised by river regulation and the high levels of water consumption. Conducted during the policy development phase of a second water allocation plan, our research trialled three tools designed to assess economic, social and cultural values for the new plan. The first was a pilot social impact study of effects of changing water availability in the Murraylands. In the second, researchers used a participatory modelling tool conjunctively with multi-criteria analysis to identify community values relevant to the prioritisation of environmental assets in the context of water scarcity. The third tool addressed Indigenous cultural values associated with water. Results of trials demonstrate that identifying public and social values in water require a number of interactive and deliberative tools in order to engage the broad community in water planning. Of the three tools, the most innovative was the second tool as it facilitated deliberation about the relative importance of the environment and helped shift individuals from entrenched interest based positions to consensus on values in wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Australian water management ; Basins ; Communities ; Deliberative decision making ; Droughts ; Economics ; Emergencies ; Freshwater ; Hydrology ; Indigenous water values ; Participatory modelling ; Policies ; Rivers ; Water planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2012-12, Vol.474, p.29-37</ispartof><rights>2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-26dc3d5b996396253aaa05bb92859e397e2f5d6983140e47b4957692e2da2c683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-26dc3d5b996396253aaa05bb92859e397e2f5d6983140e47b4957692e2da2c683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mooney, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, P.-L.</creatorcontrib><title>South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>► Research investigated values which feed into water planning decisions. ►Findings on the socio-economic impacts of change in water availability indicate resilience. ► Deliberative and visual methods identify societal values for environmental assets. ► Tools evaluated highly for generating dialogue and information exchange. ► SA applying method for identifying preliminary Indigenous cultural water values.
The South Australian River Murray is at the end of the Murray–Darling Basin which spans four Australian states, and is reliant on upstream flow. Under the Murray–Darling Basin Agreement, South Australia has an annual entitlement of 1850GL flow. In the recent debilitating drought, the Agreement was put ‘on hold’ while emergency sharing arrangements provided for critical human needs, with meagre supplies for any other consumptive use. The drought also impacted on environmental values already compromised by river regulation and the high levels of water consumption. Conducted during the policy development phase of a second water allocation plan, our research trialled three tools designed to assess economic, social and cultural values for the new plan. The first was a pilot social impact study of effects of changing water availability in the Murraylands. In the second, researchers used a participatory modelling tool conjunctively with multi-criteria analysis to identify community values relevant to the prioritisation of environmental assets in the context of water scarcity. The third tool addressed Indigenous cultural values associated with water. Results of trials demonstrate that identifying public and social values in water require a number of interactive and deliberative tools in order to engage the broad community in water planning. Of the three tools, the most innovative was the second tool as it facilitated deliberation about the relative importance of the environment and helped shift individuals from entrenched interest based positions to consensus on values in wetlands.</description><subject>Australian water management</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Deliberative decision making</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Indigenous water values</subject><subject>Participatory modelling</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Water planning</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhesknwI3ZiNqhCvKQCEoW15dgudeQmxU6KuuM3-D2-BFftntnM5tyrmQPAOUY5RphfNnmz2JjQ-ZwgTHJU5AijAzDCVSkyUqLyEIwQIiTDXBTH4CTGBqWhtBiB51k39As4GWIflHfq9_snwle3tgE-DSGozRWcddopD1VroB58PyQOrpUfbISuhV-qT-zKq7Z17ccpOJorH-3Zfo_B-93t281DNn25f7yZTDNFRdVnhBtNDauF4FRwwqhSCrG6FqRiwlJRWjJnhouK4gLZoqwLwUouiCVGEc0rOgYXu95V6D7TJb1cuqitT2fYbogSE4GZEJRtUbZDdehiDHYuV8EtVdhIjOTWn2zk3p_c-pOokMlfyl3vcjb9sXY2yKidbbU1LljdS9O5fxr-AMJXfE0</recordid><startdate>20121212</startdate><enddate>20121212</enddate><creator>Mooney, C.</creator><creator>Tan, P.-L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121212</creationdate><title>South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning</title><author>Mooney, C. ; Tan, P.-L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-26dc3d5b996396253aaa05bb92859e397e2f5d6983140e47b4957692e2da2c683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Australian water management</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Deliberative decision making</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Indigenous water values</topic><topic>Participatory modelling</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Water planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mooney, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, P.-L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mooney, C.</au><au>Tan, P.-L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2012-12-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>474</volume><spage>29</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>29-37</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><abstract>► Research investigated values which feed into water planning decisions. ►Findings on the socio-economic impacts of change in water availability indicate resilience. ► Deliberative and visual methods identify societal values for environmental assets. ► Tools evaluated highly for generating dialogue and information exchange. ► SA applying method for identifying preliminary Indigenous cultural water values.
The South Australian River Murray is at the end of the Murray–Darling Basin which spans four Australian states, and is reliant on upstream flow. Under the Murray–Darling Basin Agreement, South Australia has an annual entitlement of 1850GL flow. In the recent debilitating drought, the Agreement was put ‘on hold’ while emergency sharing arrangements provided for critical human needs, with meagre supplies for any other consumptive use. The drought also impacted on environmental values already compromised by river regulation and the high levels of water consumption. Conducted during the policy development phase of a second water allocation plan, our research trialled three tools designed to assess economic, social and cultural values for the new plan. The first was a pilot social impact study of effects of changing water availability in the Murraylands. In the second, researchers used a participatory modelling tool conjunctively with multi-criteria analysis to identify community values relevant to the prioritisation of environmental assets in the context of water scarcity. The third tool addressed Indigenous cultural values associated with water. Results of trials demonstrate that identifying public and social values in water require a number of interactive and deliberative tools in order to engage the broad community in water planning. Of the three tools, the most innovative was the second tool as it facilitated deliberation about the relative importance of the environment and helped shift individuals from entrenched interest based positions to consensus on values in wetlands.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1694 |
ispartof | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2012-12, Vol.474, p.29-37 |
issn | 0022-1694 1879-2707 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291599358 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Australian water management Basins Communities Deliberative decision making Droughts Economics Emergencies Freshwater Hydrology Indigenous water values Participatory modelling Policies Rivers Water planning |
title | South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=South%20Australia%E2%80%99s%20River%20Murray:%20Social%20and%20cultural%20values%20in%20water%20planning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Mooney,%20C.&rft.date=2012-12-12&rft.volume=474&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=29-37&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1291599358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291599358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169412002739&rfr_iscdi=true |