South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning

► Research investigated values which feed into water planning decisions. ►Findings on the socio-economic impacts of change in water availability indicate resilience. ► Deliberative and visual methods identify societal values for environmental assets. ► Tools evaluated highly for generating dialogue...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2012-12, Vol.474, p.29-37
Hauptverfasser: Mooney, C., Tan, P.-L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue
container_start_page 29
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 474
creator Mooney, C.
Tan, P.-L.
description ► Research investigated values which feed into water planning decisions. ►Findings on the socio-economic impacts of change in water availability indicate resilience. ► Deliberative and visual methods identify societal values for environmental assets. ► Tools evaluated highly for generating dialogue and information exchange. ► SA applying method for identifying preliminary Indigenous cultural water values. The South Australian River Murray is at the end of the Murray–Darling Basin which spans four Australian states, and is reliant on upstream flow. Under the Murray–Darling Basin Agreement, South Australia has an annual entitlement of 1850GL flow. In the recent debilitating drought, the Agreement was put ‘on hold’ while emergency sharing arrangements provided for critical human needs, with meagre supplies for any other consumptive use. The drought also impacted on environmental values already compromised by river regulation and the high levels of water consumption. Conducted during the policy development phase of a second water allocation plan, our research trialled three tools designed to assess economic, social and cultural values for the new plan. The first was a pilot social impact study of effects of changing water availability in the Murraylands. In the second, researchers used a participatory modelling tool conjunctively with multi-criteria analysis to identify community values relevant to the prioritisation of environmental assets in the context of water scarcity. The third tool addressed Indigenous cultural values associated with water. Results of trials demonstrate that identifying public and social values in water require a number of interactive and deliberative tools in order to engage the broad community in water planning. Of the three tools, the most innovative was the second tool as it facilitated deliberation about the relative importance of the environment and helped shift individuals from entrenched interest based positions to consensus on values in wetlands.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291599358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169412002739</els_id><sourcerecordid>1291599358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-26dc3d5b996396253aaa05bb92859e397e2f5d6983140e47b4957692e2da2c683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhesknwI3ZiNqhCvKQCEoW15dgudeQmxU6KuuM3-D2-BFftntnM5tyrmQPAOUY5RphfNnmz2JjQ-ZwgTHJU5AijAzDCVSkyUqLyEIwQIiTDXBTH4CTGBqWhtBiB51k39As4GWIflHfq9_snwle3tgE-DSGozRWcddopD1VroB58PyQOrpUfbISuhV-qT-zKq7Z17ccpOJorH-3Zfo_B-93t281DNn25f7yZTDNFRdVnhBtNDauF4FRwwqhSCrG6FqRiwlJRWjJnhouK4gLZoqwLwUouiCVGEc0rOgYXu95V6D7TJb1cuqitT2fYbogSE4GZEJRtUbZDdehiDHYuV8EtVdhIjOTWn2zk3p_c-pOokMlfyl3vcjb9sXY2yKidbbU1LljdS9O5fxr-AMJXfE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291599358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mooney, C. ; Tan, P.-L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mooney, C. ; Tan, P.-L.</creatorcontrib><description>► Research investigated values which feed into water planning decisions. ►Findings on the socio-economic impacts of change in water availability indicate resilience. ► Deliberative and visual methods identify societal values for environmental assets. ► Tools evaluated highly for generating dialogue and information exchange. ► SA applying method for identifying preliminary Indigenous cultural water values. The South Australian River Murray is at the end of the Murray–Darling Basin which spans four Australian states, and is reliant on upstream flow. Under the Murray–Darling Basin Agreement, South Australia has an annual entitlement of 1850GL flow. In the recent debilitating drought, the Agreement was put ‘on hold’ while emergency sharing arrangements provided for critical human needs, with meagre supplies for any other consumptive use. The drought also impacted on environmental values already compromised by river regulation and the high levels of water consumption. Conducted during the policy development phase of a second water allocation plan, our research trialled three tools designed to assess economic, social and cultural values for the new plan. The first was a pilot social impact study of effects of changing water availability in the Murraylands. In the second, researchers used a participatory modelling tool conjunctively with multi-criteria analysis to identify community values relevant to the prioritisation of environmental assets in the context of water scarcity. The third tool addressed Indigenous cultural values associated with water. Results of trials demonstrate that identifying public and social values in water require a number of interactive and deliberative tools in order to engage the broad community in water planning. Of the three tools, the most innovative was the second tool as it facilitated deliberation about the relative importance of the environment and helped shift individuals from entrenched interest based positions to consensus on values in wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Australian water management ; Basins ; Communities ; Deliberative decision making ; Droughts ; Economics ; Emergencies ; Freshwater ; Hydrology ; Indigenous water values ; Participatory modelling ; Policies ; Rivers ; Water planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2012-12, Vol.474, p.29-37</ispartof><rights>2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-26dc3d5b996396253aaa05bb92859e397e2f5d6983140e47b4957692e2da2c683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-26dc3d5b996396253aaa05bb92859e397e2f5d6983140e47b4957692e2da2c683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mooney, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, P.-L.</creatorcontrib><title>South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>► Research investigated values which feed into water planning decisions. ►Findings on the socio-economic impacts of change in water availability indicate resilience. ► Deliberative and visual methods identify societal values for environmental assets. ► Tools evaluated highly for generating dialogue and information exchange. ► SA applying method for identifying preliminary Indigenous cultural water values. The South Australian River Murray is at the end of the Murray–Darling Basin which spans four Australian states, and is reliant on upstream flow. Under the Murray–Darling Basin Agreement, South Australia has an annual entitlement of 1850GL flow. In the recent debilitating drought, the Agreement was put ‘on hold’ while emergency sharing arrangements provided for critical human needs, with meagre supplies for any other consumptive use. The drought also impacted on environmental values already compromised by river regulation and the high levels of water consumption. Conducted during the policy development phase of a second water allocation plan, our research trialled three tools designed to assess economic, social and cultural values for the new plan. The first was a pilot social impact study of effects of changing water availability in the Murraylands. In the second, researchers used a participatory modelling tool conjunctively with multi-criteria analysis to identify community values relevant to the prioritisation of environmental assets in the context of water scarcity. The third tool addressed Indigenous cultural values associated with water. Results of trials demonstrate that identifying public and social values in water require a number of interactive and deliberative tools in order to engage the broad community in water planning. Of the three tools, the most innovative was the second tool as it facilitated deliberation about the relative importance of the environment and helped shift individuals from entrenched interest based positions to consensus on values in wetlands.</description><subject>Australian water management</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Deliberative decision making</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Indigenous water values</subject><subject>Participatory modelling</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Water planning</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhesknwI3ZiNqhCvKQCEoW15dgudeQmxU6KuuM3-D2-BFftntnM5tyrmQPAOUY5RphfNnmz2JjQ-ZwgTHJU5AijAzDCVSkyUqLyEIwQIiTDXBTH4CTGBqWhtBiB51k39As4GWIflHfq9_snwle3tgE-DSGozRWcddopD1VroB58PyQOrpUfbISuhV-qT-zKq7Z17ccpOJorH-3Zfo_B-93t281DNn25f7yZTDNFRdVnhBtNDauF4FRwwqhSCrG6FqRiwlJRWjJnhouK4gLZoqwLwUouiCVGEc0rOgYXu95V6D7TJb1cuqitT2fYbogSE4GZEJRtUbZDdehiDHYuV8EtVdhIjOTWn2zk3p_c-pOokMlfyl3vcjb9sXY2yKidbbU1LljdS9O5fxr-AMJXfE0</recordid><startdate>20121212</startdate><enddate>20121212</enddate><creator>Mooney, C.</creator><creator>Tan, P.-L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121212</creationdate><title>South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning</title><author>Mooney, C. ; Tan, P.-L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-26dc3d5b996396253aaa05bb92859e397e2f5d6983140e47b4957692e2da2c683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Australian water management</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Deliberative decision making</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Indigenous water values</topic><topic>Participatory modelling</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Water planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mooney, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, P.-L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mooney, C.</au><au>Tan, P.-L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2012-12-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>474</volume><spage>29</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>29-37</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><abstract>► Research investigated values which feed into water planning decisions. ►Findings on the socio-economic impacts of change in water availability indicate resilience. ► Deliberative and visual methods identify societal values for environmental assets. ► Tools evaluated highly for generating dialogue and information exchange. ► SA applying method for identifying preliminary Indigenous cultural water values. The South Australian River Murray is at the end of the Murray–Darling Basin which spans four Australian states, and is reliant on upstream flow. Under the Murray–Darling Basin Agreement, South Australia has an annual entitlement of 1850GL flow. In the recent debilitating drought, the Agreement was put ‘on hold’ while emergency sharing arrangements provided for critical human needs, with meagre supplies for any other consumptive use. The drought also impacted on environmental values already compromised by river regulation and the high levels of water consumption. Conducted during the policy development phase of a second water allocation plan, our research trialled three tools designed to assess economic, social and cultural values for the new plan. The first was a pilot social impact study of effects of changing water availability in the Murraylands. In the second, researchers used a participatory modelling tool conjunctively with multi-criteria analysis to identify community values relevant to the prioritisation of environmental assets in the context of water scarcity. The third tool addressed Indigenous cultural values associated with water. Results of trials demonstrate that identifying public and social values in water require a number of interactive and deliberative tools in order to engage the broad community in water planning. Of the three tools, the most innovative was the second tool as it facilitated deliberation about the relative importance of the environment and helped shift individuals from entrenched interest based positions to consensus on values in wetlands.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2012-12, Vol.474, p.29-37
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291599358
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Australian water management
Basins
Communities
Deliberative decision making
Droughts
Economics
Emergencies
Freshwater
Hydrology
Indigenous water values
Participatory modelling
Policies
Rivers
Water planning
title South Australia’s River Murray: Social and cultural values in water planning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=South%20Australia%E2%80%99s%20River%20Murray:%20Social%20and%20cultural%20values%20in%20water%20planning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Mooney,%20C.&rft.date=2012-12-12&rft.volume=474&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=29-37&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1291599358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291599358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169412002739&rfr_iscdi=true