Minimally invasive hip surgery: the approach did not make the difference
Background We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery was superior to conventional surgery for total hip arthroplasty procedure. Purpose To compare the results of total hip replacement (THR) made by minimally invasive lateral approach with the results of THR made by conventional lateral approac...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology 2013, Vol.23 (1), p.47-52 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 52 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 47 |
| container_title | European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Varela-Egocheaga, J. R. Suárez-Suárez, M. A. Fernández-Villán, M. González-Sastre, V. Varela-Gómez, J. R. Murcia-Mazón, A. |
| description | Background
We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery was superior to conventional surgery for total hip arthroplasty procedure.
Purpose
To compare the results of total hip replacement (THR) made by minimally invasive lateral approach with the results of THR made by conventional lateral approach.
Materials and methods
Prospective, randomized trial. Fifty patients were selected and then divided into two groups based on utilized approach.
Data collected
Perioperative bleeding, postoperative pain, time of recovery, components orientation, complications and functional results. Five-year follow-up.
Results
No differences were found in blood loss, postoperative pain, surgical time, components orientation, rate of complications or functional result. Minimally invasive lateral approach produced faster recovery with less hospital stay and earlier walking start.
Conclusion
Our results suggested that minimally invasive lateral approach has not provided significant benefits over conventional lateral approach for the implantation of a total hip arthroplasty. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00590-011-0917-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1288315084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2837216217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2874-d5abc23c800f941db602884b806cf00d373e1e69f0a86391e172c9c0b2c145b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBcJePGyOpNkd7PepKgVKl70HLLZrN26HzXpFvrvTV0_QPA0gXnyzstDyCnCJQKkVx4gziACxAgyTCOxR8YoOIsQErkf3gnnkYQkHpEj75cAGGcYH5IR4wKZgHRMZo9VWzW6rre0ajfaVxtLF9WK-t69Wre9puuFpXq1cp02C1pUBW27NW30m_3cFFVZWmdbY4_JQalrb0--5oS83N0-T2fR_On-YXozjwyTqYiKWOeGcSMBykxgkSfApBR5aGlKgIKn3KJNshK0THiGFlNmMgM5MyjiXPIJuRhyQ6X33vq1aipvbF3r1na9VxjiOMYgRUDP_6DLrndtaKeY5CnDhGEaKBwo4zrvnS3VygUjbqsQ1E6zGjSroFntNKtd8tlXcp83tvj58e01AGwAfFi1weTv6f9TPwBw_4WJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2837216217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimally invasive hip surgery: the approach did not make the difference</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Varela-Egocheaga, J. R. ; Suárez-Suárez, M. A. ; Fernández-Villán, M. ; González-Sastre, V. ; Varela-Gómez, J. R. ; Murcia-Mazón, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Varela-Egocheaga, J. R. ; Suárez-Suárez, M. A. ; Fernández-Villán, M. ; González-Sastre, V. ; Varela-Gómez, J. R. ; Murcia-Mazón, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery was superior to conventional surgery for total hip arthroplasty procedure.
Purpose
To compare the results of total hip replacement (THR) made by minimally invasive lateral approach with the results of THR made by conventional lateral approach.
Materials and methods
Prospective, randomized trial. Fifty patients were selected and then divided into two groups based on utilized approach.
Data collected
Perioperative bleeding, postoperative pain, time of recovery, components orientation, complications and functional results. Five-year follow-up.
Results
No differences were found in blood loss, postoperative pain, surgical time, components orientation, rate of complications or functional result. Minimally invasive lateral approach produced faster recovery with less hospital stay and earlier walking start.
Conclusion
Our results suggested that minimally invasive lateral approach has not provided significant benefits over conventional lateral approach for the implantation of a total hip arthroplasty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1633-8065</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00590-011-0917-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23412407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Operative Time ; Original Article ; Pain, Postoperative - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Traumatic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology, 2013, Vol.23 (1), p.47-52</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2874-d5abc23c800f941db602884b806cf00d373e1e69f0a86391e172c9c0b2c145b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2874-d5abc23c800f941db602884b806cf00d373e1e69f0a86391e172c9c0b2c145b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00590-011-0917-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00590-011-0917-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23412407$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Varela-Egocheaga, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-Suárez, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Villán, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Sastre, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varela-Gómez, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murcia-Mazón, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Minimally invasive hip surgery: the approach did not make the difference</title><title>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><description>Background
We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery was superior to conventional surgery for total hip arthroplasty procedure.
Purpose
To compare the results of total hip replacement (THR) made by minimally invasive lateral approach with the results of THR made by conventional lateral approach.
Materials and methods
Prospective, randomized trial. Fifty patients were selected and then divided into two groups based on utilized approach.
Data collected
Perioperative bleeding, postoperative pain, time of recovery, components orientation, complications and functional results. Five-year follow-up.
Results
No differences were found in blood loss, postoperative pain, surgical time, components orientation, rate of complications or functional result. Minimally invasive lateral approach produced faster recovery with less hospital stay and earlier walking start.
Conclusion
Our results suggested that minimally invasive lateral approach has not provided significant benefits over conventional lateral approach for the implantation of a total hip arthroplasty.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1633-8065</issn><issn>1432-1068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBcJePGyOpNkd7PepKgVKl70HLLZrN26HzXpFvrvTV0_QPA0gXnyzstDyCnCJQKkVx4gziACxAgyTCOxR8YoOIsQErkf3gnnkYQkHpEj75cAGGcYH5IR4wKZgHRMZo9VWzW6rre0ajfaVxtLF9WK-t69Wre9puuFpXq1cp02C1pUBW27NW30m_3cFFVZWmdbY4_JQalrb0--5oS83N0-T2fR_On-YXozjwyTqYiKWOeGcSMBykxgkSfApBR5aGlKgIKn3KJNshK0THiGFlNmMgM5MyjiXPIJuRhyQ6X33vq1aipvbF3r1na9VxjiOMYgRUDP_6DLrndtaKeY5CnDhGEaKBwo4zrvnS3VygUjbqsQ1E6zGjSroFntNKtd8tlXcp83tvj58e01AGwAfFi1weTv6f9TPwBw_4WJ</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Varela-Egocheaga, J. R.</creator><creator>Suárez-Suárez, M. A.</creator><creator>Fernández-Villán, M.</creator><creator>González-Sastre, V.</creator><creator>Varela-Gómez, J. R.</creator><creator>Murcia-Mazón, A.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Minimally invasive hip surgery: the approach did not make the difference</title><author>Varela-Egocheaga, J. R. ; Suárez-Suárez, M. A. ; Fernández-Villán, M. ; González-Sastre, V. ; Varela-Gómez, J. R. ; Murcia-Mazón, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2874-d5abc23c800f941db602884b806cf00d373e1e69f0a86391e172c9c0b2c145b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Varela-Egocheaga, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-Suárez, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Villán, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Sastre, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varela-Gómez, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murcia-Mazón, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Varela-Egocheaga, J. R.</au><au>Suárez-Suárez, M. A.</au><au>Fernández-Villán, M.</au><au>González-Sastre, V.</au><au>Varela-Gómez, J. R.</au><au>Murcia-Mazón, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimally invasive hip surgery: the approach did not make the difference</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>47-52</pages><issn>1633-8065</issn><eissn>1432-1068</eissn><abstract>Background
We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery was superior to conventional surgery for total hip arthroplasty procedure.
Purpose
To compare the results of total hip replacement (THR) made by minimally invasive lateral approach with the results of THR made by conventional lateral approach.
Materials and methods
Prospective, randomized trial. Fifty patients were selected and then divided into two groups based on utilized approach.
Data collected
Perioperative bleeding, postoperative pain, time of recovery, components orientation, complications and functional results. Five-year follow-up.
Results
No differences were found in blood loss, postoperative pain, surgical time, components orientation, rate of complications or functional result. Minimally invasive lateral approach produced faster recovery with less hospital stay and earlier walking start.
Conclusion
Our results suggested that minimally invasive lateral approach has not provided significant benefits over conventional lateral approach for the implantation of a total hip arthroplasty.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23412407</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00590-011-0917-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1633-8065 |
| ispartof | European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology, 2013, Vol.23 (1), p.47-52 |
| issn | 1633-8065 1432-1068 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1288315084 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink |
| subjects | Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods Blood Loss, Surgical - statistics & numerical data Female Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods Operative Time Original Article Pain, Postoperative - etiology Prospective Studies Recovery of Function Surgical Orthopedics Traumatic Surgery Treatment Outcome |
| title | Minimally invasive hip surgery: the approach did not make the difference |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A45%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimally%20invasive%20hip%20surgery:%20the%20approach%20did%20not%20make%20the%20difference&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20&%20traumatology&rft.au=Varela-Egocheaga,%20J.%20R.&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=47-52&rft.issn=1633-8065&rft.eissn=1432-1068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00590-011-0917-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2837216217%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2837216217&rft_id=info:pmid/23412407&rfr_iscdi=true |