Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety of a Single 2‐mg Intravenous Dose of Hydromorphone Versus Usual Care in the Management of Acute Pain

Objectives The objective was to test the efficacy and safety of 2 mg of intravenous (IV) hydromorphone (Dilaudid) against “usual care” in emergency department (ED) patients with acute severe pain. Methods This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients allocated to 2 mg of IV hydromorphone received t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2013-02, Vol.20 (2), p.185-192
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Andrew K., Bijur, Polly E., Lupow, Jason B., John Gallagher, E., Bird, Steven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 192
container_issue 2
container_start_page 185
container_title Academic emergency medicine
container_volume 20
creator Chang, Andrew K.
Bijur, Polly E.
Lupow, Jason B.
John Gallagher, E.
Bird, Steven
description Objectives The objective was to test the efficacy and safety of 2 mg of intravenous (IV) hydromorphone (Dilaudid) against “usual care” in emergency department (ED) patients with acute severe pain. Methods This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients allocated to 2 mg of IV hydromorphone received their medication in a single dose. Those randomized to usual care received any IV opioid, with type, dose, and frequency chosen by the ED attending. All patients received 2 L/min. nasal cannula oxygen. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of patients who achieved clinically satisfactory analgesia by 30 minutes. This was defined as the patient declining additional analgesia when asked the question, “Do you want more pain medicine?” A 10% absolute difference was chosen a priori as the minimum difference considered clinically significant. Results Of 175 subjects randomized to each group, 164 in the 2 mg hydromorphone group and 161 in the usual care group had sufficient data for analysis. Additional pain medication was declined by 77.4% of patients in the 2 mg hydromorphone group at 30 minutes, compared to 65.8% in the usual care group. This difference of 11.6% was statistically and clinically significant (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8% to 21.1%). Safety profiles were similar and no patient required naloxone. There was more pruritus in the hydromorphone group (18.3% vs. 8.7%; difference = 9.6%, 95% CI = 2.6% to 16.6%). Conclusions Using a simple dichotomous patient‐centered endpoint in which a difference of 10% in proportion obtaining adequate analgesia was considered clinically significant, 2 mg of hydromorphone in a single IV dose is clinically and statistically more efficacious when compared to usual care for acute pain management in the ED. Resumen Ensayo Clínico Aleatorizado de la Eficacia y la Seguridad de una Dosis Única de 2 mg de Hidromorfona Frente a la Atención Estándar en el Manejo del Dolor Agudo Objetivos Determinar la eficacia y la seguridad de 2 mg de hidromorfona (Dilaudid) intravenosa (IV) frente a la atención estándar en los pacientes con dolor agudo grave en el servicio de urgencias (SU). Metodología Se trata de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado. Los pacientes asignados a 2 mg de hidromorfona IV recibieron la medicación en una dosis única. Aquéllos asignados a la atención estándar recibieron cualquier opioide intravenoso, con tipo, dosis y frecuencia elegidos por el médico del SU. Todos los pacientes recibieron oxígeno en gaf
doi_str_mv 10.1111/acem.12071
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1288311473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1288311473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-e0acaea9e529e7e7a3854ec0eefc948d492b6e9c39240557cd6ba3cf87fe67a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c1u1DAQB_AIUdFSuPAAyBIXhJTijzhOjquw0EqtQLTlGs06462rxF7sBBROPAI33o8nqcMWDhzwwbbGP_9la7LsGaMnLI3XoHE4YZwq9iA7YlKKnCvGH6Y9Leu8lKU4zB7HeEsplapWj7JDLgpaUlUdZT8_guv8YL9hR5reOquhJ1fBptkbsjYmFfRMEiKXYHCclzKQS-u2PRL-6_uPYUvO3BjgCzo_RfLGR1zM6dwFP_iwu_EOyScMMR1exykFNxCQWEfGGyQX4GCLA7pxubTS04jkA1j3JDsw0Ed8er8eZ9dv11fNaX7-_t1ZszrPtagFy5GCBoQaJa9RoQJRyQI1RTS6LqquqPmmxDphXlAple7KDQhtKmWwVFCJ4-zlPncX_OcJ49gONmrse3CYvtMyXlWCsUKJRF_8Q2_9FFx63aJULZWiPKlXe6WDjzGgaXfBDhDmltF2aVe7tKv93a6En99HTpsBu7_0T38SYHvw1fY4_yeqXTXri33oHUOVoRI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1287957702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety of a Single 2‐mg Intravenous Dose of Hydromorphone Versus Usual Care in the Management of Acute Pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Chang, Andrew K. ; Bijur, Polly E. ; Lupow, Jason B. ; John Gallagher, E. ; Bird, Steven</creator><contributor>Bird, Steven</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chang, Andrew K. ; Bijur, Polly E. ; Lupow, Jason B. ; John Gallagher, E. ; Bird, Steven ; Bird, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The objective was to test the efficacy and safety of 2 mg of intravenous (IV) hydromorphone (Dilaudid) against “usual care” in emergency department (ED) patients with acute severe pain. Methods This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients allocated to 2 mg of IV hydromorphone received their medication in a single dose. Those randomized to usual care received any IV opioid, with type, dose, and frequency chosen by the ED attending. All patients received 2 L/min. nasal cannula oxygen. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of patients who achieved clinically satisfactory analgesia by 30 minutes. This was defined as the patient declining additional analgesia when asked the question, “Do you want more pain medicine?” A 10% absolute difference was chosen a priori as the minimum difference considered clinically significant. Results Of 175 subjects randomized to each group, 164 in the 2 mg hydromorphone group and 161 in the usual care group had sufficient data for analysis. Additional pain medication was declined by 77.4% of patients in the 2 mg hydromorphone group at 30 minutes, compared to 65.8% in the usual care group. This difference of 11.6% was statistically and clinically significant (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8% to 21.1%). Safety profiles were similar and no patient required naloxone. There was more pruritus in the hydromorphone group (18.3% vs. 8.7%; difference = 9.6%, 95% CI = 2.6% to 16.6%). Conclusions Using a simple dichotomous patient‐centered endpoint in which a difference of 10% in proportion obtaining adequate analgesia was considered clinically significant, 2 mg of hydromorphone in a single IV dose is clinically and statistically more efficacious when compared to usual care for acute pain management in the ED. Resumen Ensayo Clínico Aleatorizado de la Eficacia y la Seguridad de una Dosis Única de 2 mg de Hidromorfona Frente a la Atención Estándar en el Manejo del Dolor Agudo Objetivos Determinar la eficacia y la seguridad de 2 mg de hidromorfona (Dilaudid) intravenosa (IV) frente a la atención estándar en los pacientes con dolor agudo grave en el servicio de urgencias (SU). Metodología Se trata de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado. Los pacientes asignados a 2 mg de hidromorfona IV recibieron la medicación en una dosis única. Aquéllos asignados a la atención estándar recibieron cualquier opioide intravenoso, con tipo, dosis y frecuencia elegidos por el médico del SU. Todos los pacientes recibieron oxígeno en gafas nasales a 2 L/min. El resultado principal fue la diferencia en la proporción de pacientes que alcanzaron una analgesia satisfactoria a los 30 minutos. Ésta se definió como el paciente que declinó analgesia adicional cuando se le preguntó la cuestión: ¿quiere más medicación para el dolor? Una diferencia absoluta del 10% se eligió a priori como la diferencia mínima considerada clínicamente significativa. Resultados De los 175 sujetos asignados aleatoriamente a cada grupo, se obtuvieron suficientes datos para el análisis en 164 del grupo de hidromorfona 2 mg y en 161 del grupo de atención estándar. El 77,4% de los pacientes del grupo de hidromorfona 2 mg iv declinó medicación adicional para el dolor a los 30 minutos, en comparación con el 65,8% del grupo de atención estándar. Esta diferencia del 11,6% fue estadística y clínicamente significativa (IC 95% = 1,8% a 21,1%). Los perfiles de seguridad fueron similares y ningún paciente requirió naloxona. Hubo más prurito en el grupo hidromorfona (18,3% vs 8,7%; diferencia 9,6%, IC 95% = 2,6% a 16,6%). Conclusiones Cuando se usa un resultado simple dicotómico basado en el paciente y que considera clínicamente significativa una diferencia del 10% en la proporción de obtener una adecuada analgesia, 2 mg de hidromorfona en una dosis única IV es clínica y estadísticamente más eficaz cuando se compara con la atención estándar para el manejo del dolor agudo en el SU.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-6563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-2712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acem.12071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23406078</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Pain - drug therapy ; Adult ; Analgesics ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage ; Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects ; Clinical trials ; Drug dosages ; Effectiveness ; Female ; Humans ; Hydromorphone - administration &amp; dosage ; Hydromorphone - adverse effects ; Intravenous therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain management ; Pain Management - methods ; Pain Measurement ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Academic emergency medicine, 2013-02, Vol.20 (2), p.185-192</ispartof><rights>2013 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</rights><rights>2013 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.</rights><rights>Copyright Hanley &amp; Belfus, Inc. Feb 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-e0acaea9e529e7e7a3854ec0eefc948d492b6e9c39240557cd6ba3cf87fe67a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-e0acaea9e529e7e7a3854ec0eefc948d492b6e9c39240557cd6ba3cf87fe67a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Facem.12071$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Facem.12071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23406078$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Bird, Steven</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chang, Andrew K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bijur, Polly E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupow, Jason B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John Gallagher, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bird, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety of a Single 2‐mg Intravenous Dose of Hydromorphone Versus Usual Care in the Management of Acute Pain</title><title>Academic emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Acad Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Objectives The objective was to test the efficacy and safety of 2 mg of intravenous (IV) hydromorphone (Dilaudid) against “usual care” in emergency department (ED) patients with acute severe pain. Methods This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients allocated to 2 mg of IV hydromorphone received their medication in a single dose. Those randomized to usual care received any IV opioid, with type, dose, and frequency chosen by the ED attending. All patients received 2 L/min. nasal cannula oxygen. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of patients who achieved clinically satisfactory analgesia by 30 minutes. This was defined as the patient declining additional analgesia when asked the question, “Do you want more pain medicine?” A 10% absolute difference was chosen a priori as the minimum difference considered clinically significant. Results Of 175 subjects randomized to each group, 164 in the 2 mg hydromorphone group and 161 in the usual care group had sufficient data for analysis. Additional pain medication was declined by 77.4% of patients in the 2 mg hydromorphone group at 30 minutes, compared to 65.8% in the usual care group. This difference of 11.6% was statistically and clinically significant (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8% to 21.1%). Safety profiles were similar and no patient required naloxone. There was more pruritus in the hydromorphone group (18.3% vs. 8.7%; difference = 9.6%, 95% CI = 2.6% to 16.6%). Conclusions Using a simple dichotomous patient‐centered endpoint in which a difference of 10% in proportion obtaining adequate analgesia was considered clinically significant, 2 mg of hydromorphone in a single IV dose is clinically and statistically more efficacious when compared to usual care for acute pain management in the ED. Resumen Ensayo Clínico Aleatorizado de la Eficacia y la Seguridad de una Dosis Única de 2 mg de Hidromorfona Frente a la Atención Estándar en el Manejo del Dolor Agudo Objetivos Determinar la eficacia y la seguridad de 2 mg de hidromorfona (Dilaudid) intravenosa (IV) frente a la atención estándar en los pacientes con dolor agudo grave en el servicio de urgencias (SU). Metodología Se trata de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado. Los pacientes asignados a 2 mg de hidromorfona IV recibieron la medicación en una dosis única. Aquéllos asignados a la atención estándar recibieron cualquier opioide intravenoso, con tipo, dosis y frecuencia elegidos por el médico del SU. Todos los pacientes recibieron oxígeno en gafas nasales a 2 L/min. El resultado principal fue la diferencia en la proporción de pacientes que alcanzaron una analgesia satisfactoria a los 30 minutos. Ésta se definió como el paciente que declinó analgesia adicional cuando se le preguntó la cuestión: ¿quiere más medicación para el dolor? Una diferencia absoluta del 10% se eligió a priori como la diferencia mínima considerada clínicamente significativa. Resultados De los 175 sujetos asignados aleatoriamente a cada grupo, se obtuvieron suficientes datos para el análisis en 164 del grupo de hidromorfona 2 mg y en 161 del grupo de atención estándar. El 77,4% de los pacientes del grupo de hidromorfona 2 mg iv declinó medicación adicional para el dolor a los 30 minutos, en comparación con el 65,8% del grupo de atención estándar. Esta diferencia del 11,6% fue estadística y clínicamente significativa (IC 95% = 1,8% a 21,1%). Los perfiles de seguridad fueron similares y ningún paciente requirió naloxona. Hubo más prurito en el grupo hidromorfona (18,3% vs 8,7%; diferencia 9,6%, IC 95% = 2,6% a 16,6%). Conclusiones Cuando se usa un resultado simple dicotómico basado en el paciente y que considera clínicamente significativa una diferencia del 10% en la proporción de obtener una adecuada analgesia, 2 mg de hidromorfona en una dosis única IV es clínica y estadísticamente más eficaz cuando se compara con la atención estándar para el manejo del dolor agudo en el SU.</description><subject>Acute Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydromorphone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hydromorphone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Intravenous therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1069-6563</issn><issn>1553-2712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c1u1DAQB_AIUdFSuPAAyBIXhJTijzhOjquw0EqtQLTlGs06462rxF7sBBROPAI33o8nqcMWDhzwwbbGP_9la7LsGaMnLI3XoHE4YZwq9iA7YlKKnCvGH6Y9Leu8lKU4zB7HeEsplapWj7JDLgpaUlUdZT8_guv8YL9hR5reOquhJ1fBptkbsjYmFfRMEiKXYHCclzKQS-u2PRL-6_uPYUvO3BjgCzo_RfLGR1zM6dwFP_iwu_EOyScMMR1exykFNxCQWEfGGyQX4GCLA7pxubTS04jkA1j3JDsw0Ed8er8eZ9dv11fNaX7-_t1ZszrPtagFy5GCBoQaJa9RoQJRyQI1RTS6LqquqPmmxDphXlAple7KDQhtKmWwVFCJ4-zlPncX_OcJ49gONmrse3CYvtMyXlWCsUKJRF_8Q2_9FFx63aJULZWiPKlXe6WDjzGgaXfBDhDmltF2aVe7tKv93a6En99HTpsBu7_0T38SYHvw1fY4_yeqXTXri33oHUOVoRI</recordid><startdate>201302</startdate><enddate>201302</enddate><creator>Chang, Andrew K.</creator><creator>Bijur, Polly E.</creator><creator>Lupow, Jason B.</creator><creator>John Gallagher, E.</creator><creator>Bird, Steven</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201302</creationdate><title>Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety of a Single 2‐mg Intravenous Dose of Hydromorphone Versus Usual Care in the Management of Acute Pain</title><author>Chang, Andrew K. ; Bijur, Polly E. ; Lupow, Jason B. ; John Gallagher, E. ; Bird, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-e0acaea9e529e7e7a3854ec0eefc948d492b6e9c39240557cd6ba3cf87fe67a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acute Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydromorphone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hydromorphone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Intravenous therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, Andrew K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bijur, Polly E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupow, Jason B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John Gallagher, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bird, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, Andrew K.</au><au>Bijur, Polly E.</au><au>Lupow, Jason B.</au><au>John Gallagher, E.</au><au>Bird, Steven</au><au>Bird, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety of a Single 2‐mg Intravenous Dose of Hydromorphone Versus Usual Care in the Management of Acute Pain</atitle><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2013-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>185-192</pages><issn>1069-6563</issn><eissn>1553-2712</eissn><abstract>Objectives The objective was to test the efficacy and safety of 2 mg of intravenous (IV) hydromorphone (Dilaudid) against “usual care” in emergency department (ED) patients with acute severe pain. Methods This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients allocated to 2 mg of IV hydromorphone received their medication in a single dose. Those randomized to usual care received any IV opioid, with type, dose, and frequency chosen by the ED attending. All patients received 2 L/min. nasal cannula oxygen. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of patients who achieved clinically satisfactory analgesia by 30 minutes. This was defined as the patient declining additional analgesia when asked the question, “Do you want more pain medicine?” A 10% absolute difference was chosen a priori as the minimum difference considered clinically significant. Results Of 175 subjects randomized to each group, 164 in the 2 mg hydromorphone group and 161 in the usual care group had sufficient data for analysis. Additional pain medication was declined by 77.4% of patients in the 2 mg hydromorphone group at 30 minutes, compared to 65.8% in the usual care group. This difference of 11.6% was statistically and clinically significant (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8% to 21.1%). Safety profiles were similar and no patient required naloxone. There was more pruritus in the hydromorphone group (18.3% vs. 8.7%; difference = 9.6%, 95% CI = 2.6% to 16.6%). Conclusions Using a simple dichotomous patient‐centered endpoint in which a difference of 10% in proportion obtaining adequate analgesia was considered clinically significant, 2 mg of hydromorphone in a single IV dose is clinically and statistically more efficacious when compared to usual care for acute pain management in the ED. Resumen Ensayo Clínico Aleatorizado de la Eficacia y la Seguridad de una Dosis Única de 2 mg de Hidromorfona Frente a la Atención Estándar en el Manejo del Dolor Agudo Objetivos Determinar la eficacia y la seguridad de 2 mg de hidromorfona (Dilaudid) intravenosa (IV) frente a la atención estándar en los pacientes con dolor agudo grave en el servicio de urgencias (SU). Metodología Se trata de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado. Los pacientes asignados a 2 mg de hidromorfona IV recibieron la medicación en una dosis única. Aquéllos asignados a la atención estándar recibieron cualquier opioide intravenoso, con tipo, dosis y frecuencia elegidos por el médico del SU. Todos los pacientes recibieron oxígeno en gafas nasales a 2 L/min. El resultado principal fue la diferencia en la proporción de pacientes que alcanzaron una analgesia satisfactoria a los 30 minutos. Ésta se definió como el paciente que declinó analgesia adicional cuando se le preguntó la cuestión: ¿quiere más medicación para el dolor? Una diferencia absoluta del 10% se eligió a priori como la diferencia mínima considerada clínicamente significativa. Resultados De los 175 sujetos asignados aleatoriamente a cada grupo, se obtuvieron suficientes datos para el análisis en 164 del grupo de hidromorfona 2 mg y en 161 del grupo de atención estándar. El 77,4% de los pacientes del grupo de hidromorfona 2 mg iv declinó medicación adicional para el dolor a los 30 minutos, en comparación con el 65,8% del grupo de atención estándar. Esta diferencia del 11,6% fue estadística y clínicamente significativa (IC 95% = 1,8% a 21,1%). Los perfiles de seguridad fueron similares y ningún paciente requirió naloxona. Hubo más prurito en el grupo hidromorfona (18,3% vs 8,7%; diferencia 9,6%, IC 95% = 2,6% a 16,6%). Conclusiones Cuando se usa un resultado simple dicotómico basado en el paciente y que considera clínicamente significativa una diferencia del 10% en la proporción de obtener una adecuada analgesia, 2 mg de hidromorfona en una dosis única IV es clínica y estadísticamente más eficaz cuando se compara con la atención estándar para el manejo del dolor agudo en el SU.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>23406078</pmid><doi>10.1111/acem.12071</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-6563
ispartof Academic emergency medicine, 2013-02, Vol.20 (2), p.185-192
issn 1069-6563
1553-2712
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1288311473
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Acute Pain - drug therapy
Adult
Analgesics
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
Clinical trials
Drug dosages
Effectiveness
Female
Humans
Hydromorphone - administration & dosage
Hydromorphone - adverse effects
Intravenous therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Pain management
Pain Management - methods
Pain Measurement
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety of a Single 2‐mg Intravenous Dose of Hydromorphone Versus Usual Care in the Management of Acute Pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T00%3A16%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial%20of%20Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20of%20a%20Single%202%E2%80%90mg%20Intravenous%20Dose%20of%20Hydromorphone%20Versus%20Usual%20Care%20in%20the%20Management%20of%20Acute%20Pain&rft.jtitle=Academic%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Chang,%20Andrew%20K.&rft.date=2013-02&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=185-192&rft.issn=1069-6563&rft.eissn=1553-2712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acem.12071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1288311473%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1287957702&rft_id=info:pmid/23406078&rfr_iscdi=true